Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 8/2021

Open Access 01-07-2021 | Original Article

Deep learning-assisted ultra-fast/low-dose whole-body PET/CT imaging

Authors: Amirhossein Sanaat, Isaac Shiri, Hossein Arabi, Ismini Mainta, René Nkoulou, Habib Zaidi

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 8/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Tendency is to moderate the injected activity and/or reduce acquisition time in PET examinations to minimize potential radiation hazards and increase patient comfort. This work aims to assess the performance of regular full-dose (FD) synthesis from fast/low-dose (LD) whole-body (WB) PET images using deep learning techniques.

Methods

Instead of using synthetic LD scans, two separate clinical WB 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT studies of 100 patients were acquired: one regular FD (~ 27 min) and one fast or LD (~ 3 min) consisting of 1/8th of the standard acquisition time. A modified cycle-consistent generative adversarial network (CycleGAN) and residual neural network (ResNET) models, denoted as CGAN and RNET, respectively, were implemented to predict FD PET images. The quality of the predicted PET images was assessed by two nuclear medicine physicians. Moreover, the diagnostic quality of the predicted PET images was evaluated using a pass/fail scheme for lesion detectability task. Quantitative analysis using established metrics including standardized uptake value (SUV) bias was performed for the liver, left/right lung, brain, and 400 malignant lesions from the test and evaluation datasets.

Results

CGAN scored 4.92 and 3.88 (out of 5) (adequate to good) for brain and neck + trunk, respectively. The average SUV bias calculated over normal tissues was 3.39 ± 0.71% and − 3.83 ± 1.25% for CGAN and RNET, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis reported the lowest SUV bias (0.01%) and 95% confidence interval of − 0.36, + 0.47 for CGAN compared with the reference FD images for malignant lesions.

Conclusion

CycleGAN is able to synthesize clinical FD WB PET images from LD images with 1/8th of standard injected activity or acquisition time. The predicted FD images present almost similar performance in terms of lesion detectability, qualitative scores, and quantification bias and variance.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Boellaard R. Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:11S–20S.CrossRef Boellaard R. Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:11S–20S.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Zaidi H, Karakatsanis N. Towards enhanced PET quantification in clinical oncology. Br J Radiol. 2018;91:20170508.CrossRef Zaidi H, Karakatsanis N. Towards enhanced PET quantification in clinical oncology. Br J Radiol. 2018;91:20170508.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference NAS/NRC (National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council). Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII – Phase 2. BEIR VII phase. Washington DC: National Research Council; 2006. NAS/NRC (National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council). Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII – Phase 2. BEIR VII phase. Washington DC: National Research Council; 2006.
4.
go back to reference Liu X, Faes L, Kale AU, Wagner SK, Fu DJ, Bruynseels A, et al. A comparison of deep learning performance against health-care professionals in detecting diseases from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Digital Health. 2019;1:e271–97.CrossRef Liu X, Faes L, Kale AU, Wagner SK, Fu DJ, Bruynseels A, et al. A comparison of deep learning performance against health-care professionals in detecting diseases from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Digital Health. 2019;1:e271–97.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Litjens G, Kooi T, Bejnordi BE, Setio AAA, Ciompi F, Ghafoorian M, et al. A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med Image Anal. 2017;42:60–88.CrossRef Litjens G, Kooi T, Bejnordi BE, Setio AAA, Ciompi F, Ghafoorian M, et al. A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med Image Anal. 2017;42:60–88.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Arabi H, Zeng G, Zheng G, Zaidi H. Novel adversarial semantic structure deep learning for MRI-guided attenuation correction in brain PET/MRI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:2746–59.CrossRef Arabi H, Zeng G, Zheng G, Zaidi H. Novel adversarial semantic structure deep learning for MRI-guided attenuation correction in brain PET/MRI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:2746–59.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Shiri I, Arabi H, Geramifar P, Hajianfar G, Ghafarian P, Rahmim A, et al. Deep-JASC: joint attenuation and scatter correction in whole-body (18)F-FDG PET using a deep residual network. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:2533–48.CrossRef Shiri I, Arabi H, Geramifar P, Hajianfar G, Ghafarian P, Rahmim A, et al. Deep-JASC: joint attenuation and scatter correction in whole-body (18)F-FDG PET using a deep residual network. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:2533–48.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Akhavanallaf A, Shiri I, Arabi H, Zaidi H. Whole-body voxel-based internal dosimetry using deep learning. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020; in press. Akhavanallaf A, Shiri I, Arabi H, Zaidi H. Whole-body voxel-based internal dosimetry using deep learning. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020; in press.
9.
go back to reference Arabi H, Zaidi H. Applications of artificial intelligence and deep learning in molecular imaging and radiotherapy. Eur J Hybrid Imaging. 2020;4:17.CrossRef Arabi H, Zaidi H. Applications of artificial intelligence and deep learning in molecular imaging and radiotherapy. Eur J Hybrid Imaging. 2020;4:17.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Shiri I, AmirMozafari Sabet K, Arabi H, Pourkeshavarz M, Teimourian B, Ay MR, et al. Standard SPECT myocardial perfusion estimation from half-time acquisitions using deep convolutional residual neural networks. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020; in press. Shiri I, AmirMozafari Sabet K, Arabi H, Pourkeshavarz M, Teimourian B, Ay MR, et al. Standard SPECT myocardial perfusion estimation from half-time acquisitions using deep convolutional residual neural networks. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020; in press.
11.
go back to reference Chan C, Fulton R, Barnett R, Feng DD, Meikle S. Postreconstruction nonlocal means filtering of whole-body PET with an anatomical prior. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014;33:636–50.CrossRef Chan C, Fulton R, Barnett R, Feng DD, Meikle S. Postreconstruction nonlocal means filtering of whole-body PET with an anatomical prior. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014;33:636–50.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Arabi H, Zaidi H. Improvement of image quality in PET using post-reconstruction hybrid spatial-frequency domain filtering. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63:215010.CrossRef Arabi H, Zaidi H. Improvement of image quality in PET using post-reconstruction hybrid spatial-frequency domain filtering. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63:215010.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Arabi H, Zaidi H. Spatially guided nonlocal mean approach for denoising of PET images. Med Phys. 2020;47:1656–69.CrossRef Arabi H, Zaidi H. Spatially guided nonlocal mean approach for denoising of PET images. Med Phys. 2020;47:1656–69.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Xu Z, Gao M, Papadakis GZ, Luna B, Jain S, Mollura DJ, et al. Joint solution for PET image segmentation, denoising, and partial volume correction. Med Image Anal. 2018;46:229–43.CrossRef Xu Z, Gao M, Papadakis GZ, Luna B, Jain S, Mollura DJ, et al. Joint solution for PET image segmentation, denoising, and partial volume correction. Med Image Anal. 2018;46:229–43.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wang Y, Zhou L, Yu B, Wang L, Zu C, Lalush DS, et al. 3D auto-context-based locality adaptive multi-modality GANs for PET synthesis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018;38:1328–39.CrossRef Wang Y, Zhou L, Yu B, Wang L, Zu C, Lalush DS, et al. 3D auto-context-based locality adaptive multi-modality GANs for PET synthesis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018;38:1328–39.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chen KT, Gong E, de Carvalho Macruz FB, Xu J, Boumis A, Khalighi M, et al. Ultra–low-dose 18F-florbetaben amyloid PET imaging using deep learning with multi-contrast MRI inputs. Radiology. 2019;290:649–56.CrossRef Chen KT, Gong E, de Carvalho Macruz FB, Xu J, Boumis A, Khalighi M, et al. Ultra–low-dose 18F-florbetaben amyloid PET imaging using deep learning with multi-contrast MRI inputs. Radiology. 2019;290:649–56.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sanaat A, Arabi H, Mainta I, Garibotto V, Zaidi H. Projection-space implementation of deep learning-guided low-dose brain PET imaging improves performance over implementation in image-space. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:1388–96.CrossRef Sanaat A, Arabi H, Mainta I, Garibotto V, Zaidi H. Projection-space implementation of deep learning-guided low-dose brain PET imaging improves performance over implementation in image-space. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:1388–96.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lu W, Onofrey JA, Lu Y, Shi L, Ma T, Liu Y, et al. An investigation of quantitative accuracy for deep learning based denoising in oncological PET. Phys Med Biol. 2019;64:165019.CrossRef Lu W, Onofrey JA, Lu Y, Shi L, Ma T, Liu Y, et al. An investigation of quantitative accuracy for deep learning based denoising in oncological PET. Phys Med Biol. 2019;64:165019.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gong K, Guan J, Liu C-C, Qi J. PET image denoising using a deep neural network through fine tuning. IEEE Trans Rad Plasma Med Sci. 2018;3:153–61.CrossRef Gong K, Guan J, Liu C-C, Qi J. PET image denoising using a deep neural network through fine tuning. IEEE Trans Rad Plasma Med Sci. 2018;3:153–61.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kaplan S, Zhu Y-M. Full-dose PET image estimation from low-dose PET image using deep learning: a pilot study. J Digit Imaging. 2019;32:773–8.CrossRef Kaplan S, Zhu Y-M. Full-dose PET image estimation from low-dose PET image using deep learning: a pilot study. J Digit Imaging. 2019;32:773–8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Zhou L, Schaefferkoetter JD, Tham IW, Huang G, Yan J. Supervised learning with CycleGAN for low-dose FDG PET image denoising. Med Image Anal. 2020;101770. Zhou L, Schaefferkoetter JD, Tham IW, Huang G, Yan J. Supervised learning with CycleGAN for low-dose FDG PET image denoising. Med Image Anal. 2020;101770.
22.
go back to reference Cui J, Gong K, Guo N, Wu C, Meng X, Kim K, et al. PET image denoising using unsupervised deep learning. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:2780–9.CrossRef Cui J, Gong K, Guo N, Wu C, Meng X, Kim K, et al. PET image denoising using unsupervised deep learning. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:2780–9.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lei Y, Dong X, Wang T, Higgins K, Liu T, Curran WJ, et al. Whole-body PET estimation from low count statistics using cycle-consistent generative adversarial networks. Phys Med Biol. 2019;64:215017.CrossRef Lei Y, Dong X, Wang T, Higgins K, Liu T, Curran WJ, et al. Whole-body PET estimation from low count statistics using cycle-consistent generative adversarial networks. Phys Med Biol. 2019;64:215017.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lei Y, Wang T, Dong X, Higgins K, Liu T, Curran WJ, et al. Low dose PET imaging with CT-aided cycle-consistent adversarial networks. Medical Imaging 2020: Physics of Medical Imaging: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2020. p. 1131247. Lei Y, Wang T, Dong X, Higgins K, Liu T, Curran WJ, et al. Low dose PET imaging with CT-aided cycle-consistent adversarial networks. Medical Imaging 2020: Physics of Medical Imaging: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2020. p. 1131247.
25.
go back to reference Willemink MJ, Koszek WA, Hardell C, Wu J, Fleischmann D, Harvey H, et al. Preparing medical imaging data for machine learning. Radiology. 2020;295:4–15.CrossRef Willemink MJ, Koszek WA, Hardell C, Wu J, Fleischmann D, Harvey H, et al. Preparing medical imaging data for machine learning. Radiology. 2020;295:4–15.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Mongan J, Moy L, Kahn CEJ. Checklist for artificial intelligence in medical imaging (CLAIM): a guide for authors and reviewers. Radiol: Artif Intell. 2020;2:e200029. Mongan J, Moy L, Kahn CEJ. Checklist for artificial intelligence in medical imaging (CLAIM): a guide for authors and reviewers. Radiol: Artif Intell. 2020;2:e200029.
27.
go back to reference Loening AM, Gambhir SS. AMIDE: a free software tool for multimodality medical image analysis. Mol Imaging. 2003;2:131–7.CrossRef Loening AM, Gambhir SS. AMIDE: a free software tool for multimodality medical image analysis. Mol Imaging. 2003;2:131–7.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Schoonjans F, Zalata A, Depuydt C, Comhaire F. MedCalc: a new computer program for medical statistics. Comput Meth Progr Biomed. 1995;48:257–62.CrossRef Schoonjans F, Zalata A, Depuydt C, Comhaire F. MedCalc: a new computer program for medical statistics. Comput Meth Progr Biomed. 1995;48:257–62.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ouyang J, Chen KT, Gong E, Pauly J, Zaharchuk G. Ultra-low-dose PET reconstruction using generative adversarial network with feature matching and task-specific perceptual loss. Med Phys. 2019;46:3555–64.CrossRef Ouyang J, Chen KT, Gong E, Pauly J, Zaharchuk G. Ultra-low-dose PET reconstruction using generative adversarial network with feature matching and task-specific perceptual loss. Med Phys. 2019;46:3555–64.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Schaefferkoetter J, Nai YH, Reilhac A, Townsend DW, Eriksson L, Conti M. Low dose positron emission tomography emulation from decimated high statistics: a clinical validation study. Med Phys. 2019;46:2638–45.CrossRef Schaefferkoetter J, Nai YH, Reilhac A, Townsend DW, Eriksson L, Conti M. Low dose positron emission tomography emulation from decimated high statistics: a clinical validation study. Med Phys. 2019;46:2638–45.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Deep learning-assisted ultra-fast/low-dose whole-body PET/CT imaging
Authors
Amirhossein Sanaat
Isaac Shiri
Hossein Arabi
Ismini Mainta
René Nkoulou
Habib Zaidi
Publication date
01-07-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 8/2021
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05167-1

Other articles of this Issue 8/2021

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 8/2021 Go to the issue