Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2/2021

Open Access 01-02-2021 | Prostate Cancer | Original Article

68Ga-PSMA PET/CT targeted biopsy for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy: a prospective randomized single-centre study

Authors: Le-Le Zhang, Wen-Cheng Li, Zheng Xu, Nan Jiang, Shi-Ming Zang, Lu-Wei Xu, Wen-Bing Huang, Feng Wang, Hong-Bin Sun

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is valuable for detecting primary and recurrent prostatic lesions. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT as a triage tool for prostate biopsy (PSMA-TB) and compare with transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS-GB) for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).

Methods

This single-centre study randomly allocated 120 patients with elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (> 4 ng/ml) to PSMA-PET or TRUS group. Patients with PSMA-avid lesions (SUVmax ≥ 8.0) underwent PSMA-TB via a single-puncture percutaneous transgluteal approach (n = 25), whilst patients with negative PSMA-PET underwent systematic TRUS-GB (n = 35). All patients in the TRUS group underwent TRUS-GB directly (n = 60).

Results

PCa and csPCa were detected in 26/60 (43.3%) and 24/60 (40.0%) patients in the PSMA-PET group and 19/60 (31.6%) and 15/60 (25.0%) in the TRUS group, respectively. In the PSMA-PET group, the detection rate of PCa and csPCa were significantly higher in PSMA-PET-positive than negative patients (PCa, 23/25 (92.0%) vs 3/35 (8.6%), P < 0.01; csPCa, 22/25 (88.0%) vs 2/35 (5.7%), P < 0.01). PSMA-TB detected significantly more PCa and csPCa than TRUS-GB in the TRUS controls (PCa, 21/25 (84.0%) vs 19/60 (31.6%), P < 0.01; csPCa, 20/25 (80.0%) vs 15/60 (25.0%), P < 0.01). PSMA-PET detected significantly more cases of csPCa amongst patients with PSA 4.0–20.0 ng/ml than TRUS (27.02% vs 8.82%, P < 0.05). No haematuria, urinary retention or pelvic infection was observed after PSMA-TB compare with TRUS-GB.

Conclusions

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT is a feasible imaging technique that may serve as a triage tool for prostate biopsy, and may improve the detection rate of csPCa compared with TRUS-GB, especially in patients with serum PSA 4.0–20.0 ng/ml.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abraham NE, Mendhiratta N, Taneja SS. Patterns of repeat prostate biopsy in contemporary clinical practice. J Urol. 2015;193:1178–84.CrossRef Abraham NE, Mendhiratta N, Taneja SS. Patterns of repeat prostate biopsy in contemporary clinical practice. J Urol. 2015;193:1178–84.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ahmed HU, EI-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017;389:815–22.CrossRef Ahmed HU, EI-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017;389:815–22.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Barentsz JQ, Weinreb JC, Nerma S, et al. Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 guidelines for multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging and recommendation for use. Eur Urol. 2016;69:41–9.CrossRef Barentsz JQ, Weinreb JC, Nerma S, et al. Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 guidelines for multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging and recommendation for use. Eur Urol. 2016;69:41–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Turkbey B, et al. Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. JAMA. 2015;313:390–7.CrossRef Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Turkbey B, et al. Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. JAMA. 2015;313:390–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko M, Borghi V, et al. MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:589–99.CrossRef Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko M, Borghi V, et al. MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:589–99.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Panebianco V, Barchetti G, Simone G, et al. Negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: what’s next? Eur Urol. 2018;74:48–54.CrossRef Panebianco V, Barchetti G, Simone G, et al. Negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: what’s next? Eur Urol. 2018;74:48–54.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Paschalis A, Sheehan B, Riisnaes R, et al. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Heterogeneity and DNA Repair Defects in Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2019;76:469–78.CrossRef Paschalis A, Sheehan B, Riisnaes R, et al. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Heterogeneity and DNA Repair Defects in Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2019;76:469–78.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sheikhbahaei S, Afshar-Oromieh A, Eiber M, et al. Pearls and pitfalls in clinical interpretation of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:2117–36.CrossRef Sheikhbahaei S, Afshar-Oromieh A, Eiber M, et al. Pearls and pitfalls in clinical interpretation of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:2117–36.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cristain U, Marlon P, Michael SH, et al. 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in advanced prostate cancer: current state and future trends. Prostate Int. 2017;5:125–9.CrossRef Cristain U, Marlon P, Michael SH, et al. 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in advanced prostate cancer: current state and future trends. Prostate Int. 2017;5:125–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Perera M, Papa N, Roberts M, et al. Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in advanced prostate cancer-updated diagnostic utility, sensitivity, specificity, and distribution of prostate-specific membrane antigen-avid lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.01.049. Perera M, Papa N, Roberts M, et al. Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in advanced prostate cancer-updated diagnostic utility, sensitivity, specificity, and distribution of prostate-specific membrane antigen-avid lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2019. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2019.​01.​049.
11.
go back to reference Budäus L, Leyh-Bannurah SR, Salomon G, et al. Initial experience of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging in high-risk prostate cancer patients prior to radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2016;69:393–6.CrossRef Budäus L, Leyh-Bannurah SR, Salomon G, et al. Initial experience of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging in high-risk prostate cancer patients prior to radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2016;69:393–6.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Herlemann A, Wenter V, Kretschmer A, et al. 68Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography provides accurate staging of lymph node regions prior to lymph node dissection in patients with prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2016;70:553–7.CrossRef Herlemann A, Wenter V, Kretschmer A, et al. 68Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography provides accurate staging of lymph node regions prior to lymph node dissection in patients with prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2016;70:553–7.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Uprimny C, Kroiss AS, Decristoforo C, et al. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in primary staging of prostate cancer: PSA and Gleason score predict the intensity of tracer accumulation in the primary tumour. Eur J Nucl Mol Imaging. 2017;44:941–9.CrossRef Uprimny C, Kroiss AS, Decristoforo C, et al. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in primary staging of prostate cancer: PSA and Gleason score predict the intensity of tracer accumulation in the primary tumour. Eur J Nucl Mol Imaging. 2017;44:941–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fendler WP, Schmidt DF, Wenter V, et al. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT detects the location and extent of primary prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1720–5.CrossRef Fendler WP, Schmidt DF, Wenter V, et al. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT detects the location and extent of primary prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1720–5.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Eiber M, Weirich G, Holzapfel K, et al. Simultaneous (68)Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET/MRI improves the localization of primary prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2016;70:829–36.CrossRef Eiber M, Weirich G, Holzapfel K, et al. Simultaneous (68)Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET/MRI improves the localization of primary prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2016;70:829–36.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Zang S, Shao G, Cui C, et al. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for prostate cancer staging and risk stratification in Chinese patients. Oncotarget. 2017;8:12247–58.CrossRef Zang S, Shao G, Cui C, et al. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for prostate cancer staging and risk stratification in Chinese patients. Oncotarget. 2017;8:12247–58.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gao J, Zhang C, Zhang Q, et al. Diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for identification of aggressive cribriform morphology in prostate cancer with whole-mount sections. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:1531–41.CrossRef Gao J, Zhang C, Zhang Q, et al. Diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for identification of aggressive cribriform morphology in prostate cancer with whole-mount sections. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:1531–41.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Zhang Q, Zang SM, Zhang CE, et al. Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT with mpMRI for preoperative lymph node staging in patients with intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer. J Transl Med. 2017;15:230–8.CrossRef Zhang Q, Zang SM, Zhang CE, et al. Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT with mpMRI for preoperative lymph node staging in patients with intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer. J Transl Med. 2017;15:230–8.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sathekge M, Lengana T, Maes A, et al. (68) Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in primary staging of prostate carcinoma: preliminary results on differences between black and white South-Africans. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:226–34.CrossRef Sathekge M, Lengana T, Maes A, et al. (68) Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in primary staging of prostate carcinoma: preliminary results on differences between black and white South-Africans. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:226–34.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kisten B, Peter LC. Advances in prostate-specific membrane antigen PET of prostate cancer. Curr Opin Oncol. 2018;30:189–96.CrossRef Kisten B, Peter LC. Advances in prostate-specific membrane antigen PET of prostate cancer. Curr Opin Oncol. 2018;30:189–96.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bailey J, Piert M. Performance of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for prostate cancer management at initial staging and time of biochemical recurrence. Curr Urol Rep. 2017;18:84–90.CrossRef Bailey J, Piert M. Performance of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for prostate cancer management at initial staging and time of biochemical recurrence. Curr Urol Rep. 2017;18:84–90.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Eichler K, Hempel S, Wilby J, et al. Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review. J Urol. 2006;175:1605–12.CrossRef Eichler K, Hempel S, Wilby J, et al. Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review. J Urol. 2006;175:1605–12.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Djavan B, Ravery V, Zlotta A, et al. Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop? J Urol. 2001;166:1679–83.CrossRef Djavan B, Ravery V, Zlotta A, et al. Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop? J Urol. 2001;166:1679–83.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Baowei F, Perter TN, Viraj AM, et al. Molecular imaging and fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate. Clin Transl Imaging. 2017;5:29–43.CrossRef Baowei F, Perter TN, Viraj AM, et al. Molecular imaging and fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate. Clin Transl Imaging. 2017;5:29–43.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Simopoulos DN, Natarajan S, Jones TA, et al. Targeted prostate biopsy using 68Gallium PSMA-PET/CT for image guidance. Urol Case Rep. 2017;14:11–4.CrossRef Simopoulos DN, Natarajan S, Jones TA, et al. Targeted prostate biopsy using 68Gallium PSMA-PET/CT for image guidance. Urol Case Rep. 2017;14:11–4.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Fei B, Nieh PT, Schuster DM, Master VA. PET-directed 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Diagn Imaging Eur. 2013;29:12–5.PubMedPubMedCentral Fei B, Nieh PT, Schuster DM, Master VA. PET-directed 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Diagn Imaging Eur. 2013;29:12–5.PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Maurer T, Gschwend JE, Rauscher I, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of (68)gallium-PSMA positron emission tomography compared to conventional imaging for lymphnode staging of 130 consecutive patients with intermediate to high risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 2016;195:1436–43.CrossRef Maurer T, Gschwend JE, Rauscher I, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of (68)gallium-PSMA positron emission tomography compared to conventional imaging for lymphnode staging of 130 consecutive patients with intermediate to high risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 2016;195:1436–43.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Mannweiler S, Amersdorfer P, Trajanoski S, Terrett JA, King D, Mehes G. Heterogeneity of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression in prostate carcinoma in distant metastasis. Pathol Oncol Res. 2009;15:162–72. Mannweiler S, Amersdorfer P, Trajanoski S, Terrett JA, King D, Mehes G. Heterogeneity of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression in prostate carcinoma in distant metastasis. Pathol Oncol Res. 2009;15:162–72.
Metadata
Title
68Ga-PSMA PET/CT targeted biopsy for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy: a prospective randomized single-centre study
Authors
Le-Le Zhang
Wen-Cheng Li
Zheng Xu
Nan Jiang
Shi-Ming Zang
Lu-Wei Xu
Wen-Bing Huang
Feng Wang
Hong-Bin Sun
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04863-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2/2021 Go to the issue