Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 13/2016

01-12-2016 | Editorial

Effective and equivalent dose minimization for personnel in PET procedures: how far are we from the goal?

Authors: M. Lecchi, S. Malaspina, A. Del Sole

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 13/2016

Login to get access

Excerpt

Radiation dose limitation in patients undergoing nuclear medicine procedures is accomplished through adherence to the principles of justification and optimization, while radiation doses to operators are controlled mainly by reducing exposure times, using shielding, and increasing the distance from the source. In both cases, however, a key role in dose management can also be played by innovative technologies, making this an important issue not only for nuclear medicine specialists, medical physicists, and technologists, but also for biomedical engineers and for industry [13].1
Footnotes
1
The decay of positron emitters produces four times the amount of energy in photons than the decay of technetium-99 m does. The gamma ray constant of 511 keV annihilation photons is 1.81 μSv/h per MBq at 30 cm from an unshielded point source, while that of 140 keV photons is 0.26 μSv/h per MBq at 30 cm from an unshielded point source. Whereas the half-value layer (HVL) of 140 keV photons consists of approximately 0.03 cm of lead, 4.5 cm of water and 4000 cm of air, the HVL of 511 keV photons comprises approximately 0.6 cm of lead, 7.5 cm of water, and 6500 cm of air. For the sake of comparison, the dose rate due to a given technetium-99 m activity corresponds to 14 % of that delivered by the same amount of fluorine-18 activity.
 
Literature
4.
go back to reference Chiesa C, De Sanctis V, Crippa F, Schiavini M, Fraigola CE, Bogni A, et al. Radiation dose to technicians per nuclear medicine procedure: comparison between technetium-99m, gallium-67, and iodine-131 radiotracers and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose. Eur J Nucl Med. 1997;24(11):1380–9.CrossRefPubMed Chiesa C, De Sanctis V, Crippa F, Schiavini M, Fraigola CE, Bogni A, et al. Radiation dose to technicians per nuclear medicine procedure: comparison between technetium-99m, gallium-67, and iodine-131 radiotracers and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose. Eur J Nucl Med. 1997;24(11):1380–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Del Sole A, Lecchi M, Lucignani G. Variability of [18F]FDG administered activities among patients undergoing PET examinations: an international multicenter survey. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2016;168(3):337–42. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncv345. Del Sole A, Lecchi M, Lucignani G. Variability of [18F]FDG administered activities among patients undergoing PET examinations: an international multicenter survey. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2016;168(3):337–42. doi:10.​1093/​rpd/​ncv345.
7.
go back to reference Seierstad T, Stranden E, Bjering K, Evensen M, Holt A, Michalsen HM, et al. Doses to nuclear technicians in a dedicated PET/CT centre utilising 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). Radiat Prot Dosim. 2007;123(2):246–9.CrossRef Seierstad T, Stranden E, Bjering K, Evensen M, Holt A, Michalsen HM, et al. Doses to nuclear technicians in a dedicated PET/CT centre utilising 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). Radiat Prot Dosim. 2007;123(2):246–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kopec R, Budzanowski M, Budzynska A, Czepczynski R, Dziuk M, Sowinski J, et al. On the relationship between whole body, extremity and eye lens doses for medical staff in the preparation and application of radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear medicine. Radiat Meas. 2011;46(11):1295–8.CrossRef Kopec R, Budzanowski M, Budzynska A, Czepczynski R, Dziuk M, Sowinski J, et al. On the relationship between whole body, extremity and eye lens doses for medical staff in the preparation and application of radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear medicine. Radiat Meas. 2011;46(11):1295–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Summers EC, Brown JL, Bownes PJ, Anderson SE. Eye doses to staff in a nuclear medicine department. Nucl Med Commun. 2012;33(5):476–80.CrossRefPubMed Summers EC, Brown JL, Bownes PJ, Anderson SE. Eye doses to staff in a nuclear medicine department. Nucl Med Commun. 2012;33(5):476–80.CrossRefPubMed
12.
14.
go back to reference Pant GS, Sharma SK, Rath GK. Finger doses for staff handling radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med Technol. 2006;34:169–73.PubMed Pant GS, Sharma SK, Rath GK. Finger doses for staff handling radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med Technol. 2006;34:169–73.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Wrzesién M, Olszewski J, Jankowski J. Hand exposure to ionising radiation of nuclear medicine workers. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2008;130(3):325–30.CrossRef Wrzesién M, Olszewski J, Jankowski J. Hand exposure to ionising radiation of nuclear medicine workers. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2008;130(3):325–30.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chruscielewski W, Olszewski J, Jankowski J, Cygan M. Hand exposure in nuclear medicine workers. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2002;101(1–4):229–32.CrossRef Chruscielewski W, Olszewski J, Jankowski J, Cygan M. Hand exposure in nuclear medicine workers. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2002;101(1–4):229–32.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Carnicier A, Ginjaume M, Sans-Merce M, Donadille L, Barth I, Vanhavere F. Occupational exposure: with special reference to skin doses in hands and fingers. In: Mattsson S, Hoeschen C, editors. Radiation protection in nuclear medicine. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 2013. p. 93–108. Carnicier A, Ginjaume M, Sans-Merce M, Donadille L, Barth I, Vanhavere F. Occupational exposure: with special reference to skin doses in hands and fingers. In: Mattsson S, Hoeschen C, editors. Radiation protection in nuclear medicine. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 2013. p. 93–108.
18.
go back to reference Hudzietzová J, Fülöp M, Sabol J, Doležal J. Assessment of the local exposure of skin on hands of nuclear medicine workers handling 18F-labelled radiopharmaceuticals: preliminary Czech study. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2015;1–8. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncv441. Hudzietzová J, Fülöp M, Sabol J, Doležal J. Assessment of the local exposure of skin on hands of nuclear medicine workers handling 18F-labelled radiopharmaceuticals: preliminary Czech study. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2015;1–8. doi:10.​1093/​rpd/​ncv441.
19.
go back to reference Mattsson S, Andersson M, Söderberg M. Technological advances in hybrid imaging and impact on dose. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2015;165(1–4):410–5. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncv024. Erratum in: Radiat Prot Dosim. 2016;168(2):292. Mattsson S, Andersson M, Söderberg M. Technological advances in hybrid imaging and impact on dose. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2015;165(1–4):410–5. doi: 10.​1093/​rpd/​ncv024. Erratum in: Radiat Prot Dosim. 2016;168(2):292.
20.
go back to reference Berthold T, Weber B, Buck A. An Automatic 18F-FDG infusion system in clinical PET/CT. Radiological Society of North America 2009 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 29 - December 4, 2009, Chicago IL Berthold T, Weber B, Buck A. An Automatic 18F-FDG infusion system in clinical PET/CT. Radiological Society of North America 2009 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 29 - December 4, 2009, Chicago IL
21.
go back to reference Schleipman AR, Gerbaudo VH. Occupational radiation dosimetry assessment using an automated infusion device for positron-emitting radiotracers. J Nucl Med Technol. 2012;40(4):244–8.CrossRefPubMed Schleipman AR, Gerbaudo VH. Occupational radiation dosimetry assessment using an automated infusion device for positron-emitting radiotracers. J Nucl Med Technol. 2012;40(4):244–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Sánchez RM, Vano E, Fernández JM, Ginjaume M, Carreras JL. Evaluation of an automated FDG dose infuser to PET-CT patients. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2015;165(1–4):457–60. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncv077.CrossRef Sánchez RM, Vano E, Fernández JM, Ginjaume M, Carreras JL. Evaluation of an automated FDG dose infuser to PET-CT patients. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2015;165(1–4):457–60. doi:10.​1093/​rpd/​ncv077.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lecchi M, Lucignani G, Maioli C, Ignelzi G, Del Sole A. Validation of a new protocol for 18F-FDG infusion using an automatic combined dispenser and injector system. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39(11):1720–9. doi:10.1007/s00259-012-2174-0.CrossRefPubMed Lecchi M, Lucignani G, Maioli C, Ignelzi G, Del Sole A. Validation of a new protocol for 18F-FDG infusion using an automatic combined dispenser and injector system. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39(11):1720–9. doi:10.​1007/​s00259-012-2174-0.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Lucignani G, Del Sole A. Nuclear medicine: what kind of quality would we want if we were the patient? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37(11):2194–2198. Lucignani G, Del Sole A. Nuclear medicine: what kind of quality would we want if we were the patient? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37(11):2194–2198.
Metadata
Title
Effective and equivalent dose minimization for personnel in PET procedures: how far are we from the goal?
Authors
M. Lecchi
S. Malaspina
A. Del Sole
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 13/2016
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3513-3

Other articles of this Issue 13/2016

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 13/2016 Go to the issue