Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 9/2015

01-08-2015 | Original Article

Should PET/CT be implemented in the routine imaging work-up of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma? A prospective analysis

Authors: Jon Cacicedo, Iratxe Fernandez, Olga del Hoyo, Ainara Dolado, Javier Gómez-Suarez, Eduardo Hortelano, Aintzane Sancho, Jose I. Pijoan, Julio Alvarez, Jose M. Espinosa, Ayman Gaafar, Pedro Bilbao

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 9/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this study was to determine the incremental staging information provided by positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and its impact on management plans in patients with untreated stage III–IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

Methods

We prospectively studied, between September 2011 and February 2013, 84 consecutive patients [median age 63.5 years (39–84); 73 men] with histologically confirmed HNSCC. First, based on a conventional work-up (physical examination, CT imaging of the head, neck and chest), the multidisciplinary Head and Neck Tumour Board documented the TNM stage and a management plan for each patient, outlining the modalities to be used, including surgery, radiation therapy (RT), chemotherapy or a combination. After release of the PET/CT results, new TNM staging and management plans were agreed on by the multidisciplinary Tumour Board. Any changes in stage or intended management due to the PET/CT findings were then analysed. The impact on patient management was classified as: low (treatment modality, delivery and intent unchanged), moderate (change within the same treatment modality: type of surgery, radiation technique/dose) or high (change in treatment intent and/or treatment modality → curative to palliative, or surgery to chemoradiation or detection of unknown primary tumour or a synchronous second primary tumour). TNM stage was validated by histopathological analysis, additional imaging or follow-up. Accuracy of the conventional and PET/CT-based staging was compared using McNemar’s test.

Results

Conventional and PET/CT stages were discordant in 32/84 (38 %) cases: the T stage in 2/32 (6.2 %), the N stage in 21/32 (65.7 %) and the M stage 9/32 (28.1 %). Patient management was altered in 22/84 (26 %) patients, with a moderate impact in 8 (9.5 %) patients and high impact in 14 (16.6 %) patients. PET/CT TNM classification was significantly more accurate (92.5 vs 73.7 %) than conventional staging with a p value < 0.001 (McNemar’s test).

Conclusion

PET/CT should be implemented in the routine imaging work-up of stage III–IV HNSCC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rohde M, Dyrvig AK, Johansen J, Sørensen JA, Gerke O, Nielsen AL, et al. 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in diagnosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 2014;50(13):2271–9.PubMedCrossRef Rohde M, Dyrvig AK, Johansen J, Sørensen JA, Gerke O, Nielsen AL, et al. 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in diagnosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 2014;50(13):2271–9.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Carvalho AL, Nishimoto IN, Califano JA, Kowalsky LP. Trends in incidence and prognosis for head and neck cancer in the United States: a site-specific analysis of the SEER database. Int J Cancer 2005;114:806–16.PubMedCrossRef Carvalho AL, Nishimoto IN, Califano JA, Kowalsky LP. Trends in incidence and prognosis for head and neck cancer in the United States: a site-specific analysis of the SEER database. Int J Cancer 2005;114:806–16.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lonneux M, Hamoir M, Reychler H, Maingon P, Duvillard C, Calais G, et al. Positron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose improves staging and patient management in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter prospective study. J Clin Oncol 2010;28(7):1190–5.PubMedCrossRef Lonneux M, Hamoir M, Reychler H, Maingon P, Duvillard C, Calais G, et al. Positron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose improves staging and patient management in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter prospective study. J Clin Oncol 2010;28(7):1190–5.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kyzas PA, Evangelou E, Denaxa-Kyza D, Ioannidis JP. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to evaluate cervical node metastases in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100(10):712–20.PubMedCrossRef Kyzas PA, Evangelou E, Denaxa-Kyza D, Ioannidis JP. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to evaluate cervical node metastases in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100(10):712–20.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Senft A, de Bree R, Hoekstra OS, Kuik DJ, Golding RP, Oyen WJ, et al. Screening for distant metastases in head and neck cancer patients by chest CT or whole body FDG-PET: a prospective multicenter trial. Radiother Oncol 2008;87(2):221–9.PubMedCrossRef Senft A, de Bree R, Hoekstra OS, Kuik DJ, Golding RP, Oyen WJ, et al. Screening for distant metastases in head and neck cancer patients by chest CT or whole body FDG-PET: a prospective multicenter trial. Radiother Oncol 2008;87(2):221–9.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wong WL, Ross P, Corcoran M. Evidence-based guideline recommendations on the use of positron emission tomography imaging in head and neck cancer from Ontario and guidelines in general–some observations. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2013;25(4):242–5.CrossRef Wong WL, Ross P, Corcoran M. Evidence-based guideline recommendations on the use of positron emission tomography imaging in head and neck cancer from Ontario and guidelines in general–some observations. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2013;25(4):242–5.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yoo J, Henderson S, Walker-Dilks C. Evidence-based guideline recommendations on the use of positron emission tomography imaging in head and neck cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2013;25(4):e33–66.CrossRef Yoo J, Henderson S, Walker-Dilks C. Evidence-based guideline recommendations on the use of positron emission tomography imaging in head and neck cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2013;25(4):e33–66.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Johnson JT, Branstetter 4th BF. PET/CT in head and neck oncology: state-of-the-art 2013. Laryngoscope 2014;124(4):913–5.PubMedCrossRef Johnson JT, Branstetter 4th BF. PET/CT in head and neck oncology: state-of-the-art 2013. Laryngoscope 2014;124(4):913–5.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Scott AM, Gunawardana DH, Bartholomeusz D, Ramshaw JE, Lin P. PET changes management and improves prognostic stratification in patients with head and neck cancer: results of a multicenter prospective study. J Nucl Med 2008;49(10):1593–600.PubMedCrossRef Scott AM, Gunawardana DH, Bartholomeusz D, Ramshaw JE, Lin P. PET changes management and improves prognostic stratification in patients with head and neck cancer: results of a multicenter prospective study. J Nucl Med 2008;49(10):1593–600.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Connell CA, Corry J, Milner A, Hogg A, Hicks RJ, Rischin D, et al. Clinical impact of, and prognostic stratification by, F-18 FDG PET/CT in head and neck mucosal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2007;29:986–95.PubMedCrossRef Connell CA, Corry J, Milner A, Hogg A, Hicks RJ, Rischin D, et al. Clinical impact of, and prognostic stratification by, F-18 FDG PET/CT in head and neck mucosal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2007;29:986–95.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC. AJCC cancer staging handbook. 7th ed. Chap. 2: head and neck. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 39–123. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC. AJCC cancer staging handbook. 7th ed. Chap. 2: head and neck. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 39–123.
12.
go back to reference Robbins KT, Clayman G, Levine PA, Medina J, Sessions R, Shaha A, et al. Neck dissection classification update: revisions proposed by the American Head and Neck Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:751–8.PubMedCrossRef Robbins KT, Clayman G, Levine PA, Medina J, Sessions R, Shaha A, et al. Neck dissection classification update: revisions proposed by the American Head and Neck Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:751–8.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Schillaci O. Use of dual-point fluorodeoxyglucose imaging to enhance sensitivity and specificity. Semin Nucl Med 2012;42(4):267–80.PubMedCrossRef Schillaci O. Use of dual-point fluorodeoxyglucose imaging to enhance sensitivity and specificity. Semin Nucl Med 2012;42(4):267–80.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kim MR, Roh JL, Kim JS, Lee JH, Cho KJ, Choi SH, et al. Utility of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the preoperative staging of squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. Eur J Surg Oncol 2007;33(5):633–8.PubMedCrossRef Kim MR, Roh JL, Kim JS, Lee JH, Cho KJ, Choi SH, et al. Utility of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the preoperative staging of squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. Eur J Surg Oncol 2007;33(5):633–8.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dietl B, Marienhagen J, Kühnel T, Schreyer A, Kölbl O. The impact of FDG-PET/CT on the management of head and neck tumours: the radiotherapist’s perspective. Oral Oncol 2008;44(5):504–8.PubMedCrossRef Dietl B, Marienhagen J, Kühnel T, Schreyer A, Kölbl O. The impact of FDG-PET/CT on the management of head and neck tumours: the radiotherapist’s perspective. Oral Oncol 2008;44(5):504–8.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Brouwer J, Senft A, de Bree R, Comans EF, Golding RP, Castelijns JA, et al. Screening for distant metastases in patients with head and neck cancer: is there a role for (18)FDG-PET? Oral Oncol 2006;42:275–80.PubMedCrossRef Brouwer J, Senft A, de Bree R, Comans EF, Golding RP, Castelijns JA, et al. Screening for distant metastases in patients with head and neck cancer: is there a role for (18)FDG-PET? Oral Oncol 2006;42:275–80.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Haerle SK, Srobel K, Ahmad N, Hany TF, Stoeckli SJ. The value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of distant metastases in high-risk patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2011;47:653–9.PubMedCrossRef Haerle SK, Srobel K, Ahmad N, Hany TF, Stoeckli SJ. The value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of distant metastases in high-risk patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2011;47:653–9.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Fleming AJ, Smith SP, Paul CM, Hall NC, Daly BT, Agrawal A, et al. Impact of [18F]-2-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography on previously untreated head and neck cancer patients. Laryngoscope 2007;117:1173–9.PubMedCrossRef Fleming AJ, Smith SP, Paul CM, Hall NC, Daly BT, Agrawal A, et al. Impact of [18F]-2-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography on previously untreated head and neck cancer patients. Laryngoscope 2007;117:1173–9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Zanation AM, Sutton DK, Couch ME, Weissler MC, Shockley WW, Shores CG. Use, accuracy, and implications for patient management of [18F]-2-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission/computerized tomography for head and neck tumors. Laryngoscope 2005;115:1186–90.PubMedCrossRef Zanation AM, Sutton DK, Couch ME, Weissler MC, Shockley WW, Shores CG. Use, accuracy, and implications for patient management of [18F]-2-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission/computerized tomography for head and neck tumors. Laryngoscope 2005;115:1186–90.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Nguyen NP, Vock J, Vinh-Hung V, Almeida F, Ewell L, Betz M, et al. Effectiveness of prophylactic retropharyngeal lymph node irradiation in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. BMC Cancer 2012;12:253.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Nguyen NP, Vock J, Vinh-Hung V, Almeida F, Ewell L, Betz M, et al. Effectiveness of prophylactic retropharyngeal lymph node irradiation in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. BMC Cancer 2012;12:253.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Chu HR, Kim JH, Yoon DY, Hwang HS, Rho YS. Additional diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET-CT in detecting retropharyngeal nodal metastases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;141(5):633–8.PubMedCrossRef Chu HR, Kim JH, Yoon DY, Hwang HS, Rho YS. Additional diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET-CT in detecting retropharyngeal nodal metastases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;141(5):633–8.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hafidh MA, Lacy PD, Hughes JP, Duffy G, Timon CV. Evaluation of the impact of addition of PET to CT and MR scanning in the staging of patients with head and neck carcinomas. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2006;263(9):853–9.PubMedCrossRef Hafidh MA, Lacy PD, Hughes JP, Duffy G, Timon CV. Evaluation of the impact of addition of PET to CT and MR scanning in the staging of patients with head and neck carcinomas. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2006;263(9):853–9.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bar-Shalom R, Yefremov N, Guralnik L, Gaitini D, Frenkel A, Kuten A, et al. Clinical performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management. J Nucl Med 2003;44(8):1200–9.PubMed Bar-Shalom R, Yefremov N, Guralnik L, Gaitini D, Frenkel A, Kuten A, et al. Clinical performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management. J Nucl Med 2003;44(8):1200–9.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Branstetter BF, Blodgett TM, Zimmer LA, Snyderman CH, Johnson JT, Raman S, et al. Head and neck malignancy: is PET/CT more accurate than PET or CT alone? Radiology 2005;235(2):580–6.PubMedCrossRef Branstetter BF, Blodgett TM, Zimmer LA, Snyderman CH, Johnson JT, Raman S, et al. Head and neck malignancy: is PET/CT more accurate than PET or CT alone? Radiology 2005;235(2):580–6.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference VanderWalde NA, Salloum RG, Liu TL, Hornbrook MC, O’Keeffe Rosetti MC, Ritzwoller DP, et al. Positron emission tomography and stage migration in head and neck cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;140(7):654–61.PubMedCrossRef VanderWalde NA, Salloum RG, Liu TL, Hornbrook MC, O’Keeffe Rosetti MC, Ritzwoller DP, et al. Positron emission tomography and stage migration in head and neck cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;140(7):654–61.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Johansen J, Buus S, Loft A, Keiding S, Overgaard M, Hansen HS, et al. Prospective study of 18FDG-PET in the detection and management of patients with lymph node metastases to the neck from an unknown primary tumor. Results from the DAHANCA-13 study. Head Neck 2008;30:471–8.PubMedCrossRef Johansen J, Buus S, Loft A, Keiding S, Overgaard M, Hansen HS, et al. Prospective study of 18FDG-PET in the detection and management of patients with lymph node metastases to the neck from an unknown primary tumor. Results from the DAHANCA-13 study. Head Neck 2008;30:471–8.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Rusthoven KE, Koshy M, Paulino AC. The role of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in cervical lymph node metastases from an unknown primary tumor. Cancer 2004;101(11):2641–9.PubMedCrossRef Rusthoven KE, Koshy M, Paulino AC. The role of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in cervical lymph node metastases from an unknown primary tumor. Cancer 2004;101(11):2641–9.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Davis KS, Byrd JK, Mehta V, Chiosea SI, Kim S, Ferris RL, et al. Occult primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: utility of discovering primary lesions. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;151(2):272–8.PubMedCrossRef Davis KS, Byrd JK, Mehta V, Chiosea SI, Kim S, Ferris RL, et al. Occult primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: utility of discovering primary lesions. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;151(2):272–8.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Haerle SK, Strobel K, Hany TF, Sidler D, Stoeckli SJ. (18)F-FDG-PET/CT versus panendoscopy for the detection of synchronous second primary tumors in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2010;32:319–25.PubMed Haerle SK, Strobel K, Hany TF, Sidler D, Stoeckli SJ. (18)F-FDG-PET/CT versus panendoscopy for the detection of synchronous second primary tumors in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2010;32:319–25.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Grégoire V, Jeraj R, Lee JA, O’Sullivan B. Radiotherapy for head and neck tumours in 2012 and beyond: conformal, tailored, and adaptive? Lancet Oncol 2012;13(7):e292–300.PubMedCrossRef Grégoire V, Jeraj R, Lee JA, O’Sullivan B. Radiotherapy for head and neck tumours in 2012 and beyond: conformal, tailored, and adaptive? Lancet Oncol 2012;13(7):e292–300.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Brouwer J, de Bree R, Hoekstra OS, Golding RP, Langendijk JA, Castelijns JA, et al. Screening for distant metastases in patients with head and neck cancer: is chest computed tomography sufficient? Laryngoscope 2005;115:1813–7.PubMedCrossRef Brouwer J, de Bree R, Hoekstra OS, Golding RP, Langendijk JA, Castelijns JA, et al. Screening for distant metastases in patients with head and neck cancer: is chest computed tomography sufficient? Laryngoscope 2005;115:1813–7.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Uyl-de Groot CA, Senft A, de Bree R, Leemans CR, Hoekstra OS. Chest CT and whole-body 18F-FDG PET are cost-effective in screening for distant metastases in head and neck cancer patients. J Nucl Med 2010;51(2):176–82.PubMedCrossRef Uyl-de Groot CA, Senft A, de Bree R, Leemans CR, Hoekstra OS. Chest CT and whole-body 18F-FDG PET are cost-effective in screening for distant metastases in head and neck cancer patients. J Nucl Med 2010;51(2):176–82.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Abgral R, Le Roux PY, Rousset J, Querellou S, Valette G, Nowak E, et al. Prognostic value of dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET-CT imaging in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nucl Med Commun 2013;34(6):551–6.PubMedCrossRef Abgral R, Le Roux PY, Rousset J, Querellou S, Valette G, Nowak E, et al. Prognostic value of dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET-CT imaging in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nucl Med Commun 2013;34(6):551–6.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Should PET/CT be implemented in the routine imaging work-up of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma? A prospective analysis
Authors
Jon Cacicedo
Iratxe Fernandez
Olga del Hoyo
Ainara Dolado
Javier Gómez-Suarez
Eduardo Hortelano
Aintzane Sancho
Jose I. Pijoan
Julio Alvarez
Jose M. Espinosa
Ayman Gaafar
Pedro Bilbao
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 9/2015
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3071-0

Other articles of this Issue 9/2015

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 9/2015 Go to the issue