Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 12/2013

01-12-2013 | Original Article

Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry in healthy volunteers of a novel tumour-specific probe for PET/CT imaging: BAY 85-8050

Authors: Kamilla Smolarz, Bernd Joachim Krause, Frank Philipp Graner, Franziska Martina Wagner, Hans-Jürgen Wester, Tina Sell, Claudia Bacher-Stier, Lüder Fels, Ludger Dinkelborg, Markus Schwaiger

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 12/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Novel tracers for the diagnosis of malignant disease with PET and PET/CT are being developed as the most commonly used 18F deoxyglucose (FDG) tracer shows certain limitations. Employing radioactively labelled glutamate derivatives for specific imaging of the truncated citrate cycle potentially allows more specific tumour imaging. Radiation dosimetry of the novel tracer BAY 85-8050, a glutamate derivative, was calculated and the effective dose (ED) was compared with that of FDG.

Methods

Five healthy volunteers were included in the study. Attenuation-corrected whole-body PET/CT scans were performed from 0 to 90 min, at 120 and at 240 min after injection of 305.0 ± 17.6 MBq of BAY 85-8050. Organs with moderate to high uptake at any of the imaging time points were used as source organs. Total activity in each organ at each time point was measured. Time–activity curves (TAC) were determined for the whole body and all source organs. The resulting TACs were fitted to exponential equations and accumulated activities were determined. OLINDA/EXM software was used to calculate individual organ doses and the whole-body ED from the acquired data.

Results

Uptake of the tracer was highest in the kidneys due to renal excretion of the tracer, followed by the pancreas, heart wall and osteogenic cells. The mean organ doses were: kidneys 38.4 ± 11.2 μSv/MBq, pancreas 23.2 ± 3.8 μSv/MBq, heart wall 17.4 ± 4.1 μSv/MBq, and osteogenic cells 13.6 ± 3.5 μSv/MBq. The calculated ED was 8.9 ± 1.5 μSv/MBq.

Conclusion

Based on the distribution and dose estimates, the calculated radiation dose of BAY 85-8050 is 2.67 ± 0.45 mSv at a patient dose of 300 MBq, which compares favourably with the radiation dose of FDG (5.7 mSv).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, Siegel BA, Lowe VJ, Lyman GH, et al. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:480–508.PubMedCrossRef Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, Siegel BA, Lowe VJ, Lyman GH, et al. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:480–508.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Czernin J, Allen-Auerbach M, Schelbert HR. Improvements in cancer staging with PET/CT: literature-based evidence as of September 2006. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:78S–88S.PubMed Czernin J, Allen-Auerbach M, Schelbert HR. Improvements in cancer staging with PET/CT: literature-based evidence as of September 2006. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:78S–88S.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Bar-Shalom R, Yefremov N, Guralnik L, Gaitini D, Frenkel A, Kuten A, et al. Clinical performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1200–9.PubMed Bar-Shalom R, Yefremov N, Guralnik L, Gaitini D, Frenkel A, Kuten A, et al. Clinical performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1200–9.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Shreve PD, Anzai Y, Wahl RL. Pitfalls in oncologic diagnosis with FDG PET imaging: physiologic and benign variants. Radiographics. 1999;19:61–77.PubMedCrossRef Shreve PD, Anzai Y, Wahl RL. Pitfalls in oncologic diagnosis with FDG PET imaging: physiologic and benign variants. Radiographics. 1999;19:61–77.PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference Krasikova RN, Kuznetsova OF, Fedorova OS, Belokon YN, Maleev VI, Mu L, et al. 4-[(18)F]fluoroglutamic acid (BAY 85-8050), a new amino acid radiotracer for PET imaging of tumors: synthesis and in vitro characterization. J Med Chem. 2011;54:406–10.PubMedCrossRef Krasikova RN, Kuznetsova OF, Fedorova OS, Belokon YN, Maleev VI, Mu L, et al. 4-[(18)F]fluoroglutamic acid (BAY 85-8050), a new amino acid radiotracer for PET imaging of tumors: synthesis and in vitro characterization. J Med Chem. 2011;54:406–10.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Koglin N, Friebe M, Berndt M, Graham K, Krasikova R, Kuznetsova O, et al. [F-18]BAY 85-8050: a novel tumor specific probe for PET imaging – preclinical results. J Nucl Med. 2010;51 Suppl 2:1535. Koglin N, Friebe M, Berndt M, Graham K, Krasikova R, Kuznetsova O, et al. [F-18]BAY 85-8050: a novel tumor specific probe for PET imaging – preclinical results. J Nucl Med. 2010;51 Suppl 2:1535.
9.
go back to reference Stabin MG. Uncertainties in internal dose calculations for radiopharmaceuticals. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:853–60.PubMedCrossRef Stabin MG. Uncertainties in internal dose calculations for radiopharmaceuticals. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:853–60.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Loevinger R, Budinger TF, Watson EE. MIRD primer for absorbed dose calculations. New York: The Society of Nuclear Medicine; 1991. Loevinger R, Budinger TF, Watson EE. MIRD primer for absorbed dose calculations. New York: The Society of Nuclear Medicine; 1991.
11.
go back to reference Jakoby B, Long M, Carr C, Townsend D. Physical performance of a new combined PET/CT scanner. J Nucl Med. 2007;48 Suppl 2:46P. Jakoby B, Long M, Carr C, Townsend D. Physical performance of a new combined PET/CT scanner. J Nucl Med. 2007;48 Suppl 2:46P.
12.
go back to reference Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Wang Z, Ross R. Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18–88 yr. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89:81–8.PubMed Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Wang Z, Ross R. Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18–88 yr. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89:81–8.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Shen S, DeNardo GL, Sgouros G, O'Donnell RT, DeNardo SJ. Practical determination of patient-specific marrow dose using radioactivity concentration in blood and body. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:2102–6.PubMed Shen S, DeNardo GL, Sgouros G, O'Donnell RT, DeNardo SJ. Practical determination of patient-specific marrow dose using radioactivity concentration in blood and body. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:2102–6.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Stabin MG, Sparks RB, Crowe E. OLINDA/EXM: the second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1023–7.PubMed Stabin MG, Sparks RB, Crowe E. OLINDA/EXM: the second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1023–7.PubMed
15.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. Oxford: Pergamon; 1998. ICRP Publication 80: Addendum 2 to Publication 53. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. Oxford: Pergamon; 1998. ICRP Publication 80: Addendum 2 to Publication 53.
16.
go back to reference Vesselle H, Grierson J, Peterson LM, Muzi M, Mankoff DA, Krohn KA. 18F-Fluorothymidine radiation dosimetry in human PET imaging studies. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1482–8.PubMed Vesselle H, Grierson J, Peterson LM, Muzi M, Mankoff DA, Krohn KA. 18F-Fluorothymidine radiation dosimetry in human PET imaging studies. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1482–8.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Pauleit D, Floeth F, Herzog H, Hamacher K, Tellmann L, Müller HW, et al. Whole-body distribution and dosimetry of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30:519–24.PubMedCrossRef Pauleit D, Floeth F, Herzog H, Hamacher K, Tellmann L, Müller HW, et al. Whole-body distribution and dosimetry of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30:519–24.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry in healthy volunteers of a novel tumour-specific probe for PET/CT imaging: BAY 85-8050
Authors
Kamilla Smolarz
Bernd Joachim Krause
Frank Philipp Graner
Franziska Martina Wagner
Hans-Jürgen Wester
Tina Sell
Claudia Bacher-Stier
Lüder Fels
Ludger Dinkelborg
Markus Schwaiger
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 12/2013
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-013-2502-z

Other articles of this Issue 12/2013

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 12/2013 Go to the issue