Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 1/2010

Open Access 01-01-2010 | Original Article

Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy might be useful for detecting skeleton abnormalities in patients with multiple myeloma and plasmacytoma

Authors: Ali Agool, Riemer H. J. A. Slart, Rudi A. J. O. Dierckx, Philip M. Kluin, Lydia Visser, Pieter L. Jager, Edo Vellenga

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Somatostatin receptor expression has been demonstrated on a number of plasma cell lines. Therefore, we questioned whether somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) can be used to demonstrate in vivo multiple myeloma (MM) activity.

Methods

SRS was performed in newly diagnosed (n = 9) or relapsing (n = 18) MM patients or in patients with localized plasmacytoma (n = 2). The results were compared with radiographic findings.

Results

A positive SRS was demonstrated in 44% of the newly diagnosed patients, in 83% of the relapsed patients and in both patients with plasmacytoma. The SRS findings corresponded with radiographic abnormalities in 40% of the patients. However, in relapsed patients 60% demonstrated increased SRS uptake in areas without new radiographic abnormalities. The positive SRS corresponded with histologically proven disease activity and responded upon treatment. Moreover, immunohistochemical staining of MM material demonstrated concordant somatostatin receptor sst3 staining in five of six patients.

Conclusion

These results demonstrate that SRS is a valuable tool to detect disease activity, especially in relapsing MM patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Smith A, Wisloff F, Samson D, UK Myeloma Forum, Nordic Myeloma Study Group, British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma 2005. Br J Haematol 2006;132:410–51.CrossRefPubMed Smith A, Wisloff F, Samson D, UK Myeloma Forum, Nordic Myeloma Study Group, British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma 2005. Br J Haematol 2006;132:410–51.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Durie BG, Waxman AD, D’Agnolo A, Williams CM. Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET identifies high-risk myeloma. J Nucl Med 2002;43:1457–63.PubMed Durie BG, Waxman AD, D’Agnolo A, Williams CM. Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET identifies high-risk myeloma. J Nucl Med 2002;43:1457–63.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Bredella MA, Steinbach L, Caputo G, Segall G, Hawkins R. Value of FDG PET in the assessment of patients with multiple myeloma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1199–204.PubMed Bredella MA, Steinbach L, Caputo G, Segall G, Hawkins R. Value of FDG PET in the assessment of patients with multiple myeloma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1199–204.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Georgii-Hemming P, Strömberg T, Janson ET, Stridsberg M, Wiklund HJ, Nilsson K. The somatostatin analog octreotide inhibits growth of interleukin-6 (IL-6)-dependent and IL-6-independent human multiple myeloma cell lines. Blood 1999;93:1724–31.PubMed Georgii-Hemming P, Strömberg T, Janson ET, Stridsberg M, Wiklund HJ, Nilsson K. The somatostatin analog octreotide inhibits growth of interleukin-6 (IL-6)-dependent and IL-6-independent human multiple myeloma cell lines. Blood 1999;93:1724–31.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Krenning EP, Kwekkeboom DJ, Bakker WH, Breeman WA, Kooij PPM, Oei HY, et al. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy with [111In-DTPA-D-Phe1]- and [123Tyr3]-octreotide: the Rotterdam experience with more than 1000 patients. Eur J Nucl Med 1993;20:716–31.CrossRefPubMed Krenning EP, Kwekkeboom DJ, Bakker WH, Breeman WA, Kooij PPM, Oei HY, et al. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy with [111In-DTPA-D-Phe1]- and [123Tyr3]-octreotide: the Rotterdam experience with more than 1000 patients. Eur J Nucl Med 1993;20:716–31.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference de Jong M, Breeman WA, Bakker WH, Kooij PP, Bernard BF, Hofland LJ, et al. Comparison of (111)In-labeled somatostatin analogues for tumor scintigraphy and radionuclide therapy. Cancer Res 1998;58:437–41.PubMed de Jong M, Breeman WA, Bakker WH, Kooij PP, Bernard BF, Hofland LJ, et al. Comparison of (111)In-labeled somatostatin analogues for tumor scintigraphy and radionuclide therapy. Cancer Res 1998;58:437–41.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Sonneveld P, van der Holt B, Segeren CM, Vellenga E, Croockewit AJ, Verhoef GE, et al. Intermediate-dose melphalan compared with myeloablative treatment in multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up of the Dutch Cooperative Group HOVON 24 trial. Haematologica 2007;92:928–35.CrossRefPubMed Sonneveld P, van der Holt B, Segeren CM, Vellenga E, Croockewit AJ, Verhoef GE, et al. Intermediate-dose melphalan compared with myeloablative treatment in multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up of the Dutch Cooperative Group HOVON 24 trial. Haematologica 2007;92:928–35.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lokhorst HM, Schmidt-Wolf I, Sonneveld P, van der Holt B, Martin H, Barge R, et al. Thalidomide in induction treatment increases the very good partial response rate before and after high-dose therapy in previously untreated multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2008;93:124–27.CrossRefPubMed Lokhorst HM, Schmidt-Wolf I, Sonneveld P, van der Holt B, Martin H, Barge R, et al. Thalidomide in induction treatment increases the very good partial response rate before and after high-dose therapy in previously untreated multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2008;93:124–27.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hovenga S, Daenen SM, de Wolf JT, van Imhoff GW, Kluin-Nelemans HC, Sluiter WJ, et al. Combined thalidomide and cyclophosphamide treatment for refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma patients: a prospective phase II study. Ann Hematol 2005;84:311–16.CrossRefPubMed Hovenga S, Daenen SM, de Wolf JT, van Imhoff GW, Kluin-Nelemans HC, Sluiter WJ, et al. Combined thalidomide and cyclophosphamide treatment for refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma patients: a prospective phase II study. Ann Hematol 2005;84:311–16.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mele A, Offidani M, Visani G, Marconi M, Cambioli F, Nonni M, et al. Technetium-99m sestamibi scintigraphy is sensitive and specific for the staging and the follow-up of patients with multiple myeloma: a multicentre study on 397 scans. Br J Haematol 2007;136:729–35.CrossRefPubMed Mele A, Offidani M, Visani G, Marconi M, Cambioli F, Nonni M, et al. Technetium-99m sestamibi scintigraphy is sensitive and specific for the staging and the follow-up of patients with multiple myeloma: a multicentre study on 397 scans. Br J Haematol 2007;136:729–35.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Fallahi B, Saghari M, Fard Esfahani A, Eftekhari M, Iravani M, Beiki D, et al. The value of 99mTc-MIBI whole body scintigraphy in active and in remission multiple myeloma. Hell J Nucl Med 2005;8:165–8. Fallahi B, Saghari M, Fard Esfahani A, Eftekhari M, Iravani M, Beiki D, et al. The value of 99mTc-MIBI whole body scintigraphy in active and in remission multiple myeloma. Hell J Nucl Med 2005;8:165–8.
12.
go back to reference Fonti R, Salvatore B, Quarantelli M, Sirignano C, Segreto S, Petruzziello F, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT, 99mTc-MIBI, and MRI in evaluation of patients with multiple myeloma. J Nucl Med 2008;49:195–200.CrossRefPubMed Fonti R, Salvatore B, Quarantelli M, Sirignano C, Segreto S, Petruzziello F, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT, 99mTc-MIBI, and MRI in evaluation of patients with multiple myeloma. J Nucl Med 2008;49:195–200.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy might be useful for detecting skeleton abnormalities in patients with multiple myeloma and plasmacytoma
Authors
Ali Agool
Riemer H. J. A. Slart
Rudi A. J. O. Dierckx
Philip M. Kluin
Lydia Visser
Pieter L. Jager
Edo Vellenga
Publication date
01-01-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-009-1199-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 1/2010 Go to the issue