Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 8/2008

01-08-2008 | Original Article

Evaluation of a decision support system for interpretation of myocardial perfusion gated SPECT

Authors: Milan Lomsky, Peter Gjertsson, Lena Johansson, Jens Richter, Mattias Ohlsson, Deborah Tout, Andries van Aswegen, S. Richard Underwood, Lars Edenbrandt

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 8/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

We have recently presented a decision support system for interpreting myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS). In this study, we wanted to evaluate the system in a separate hospital from where it was trained and to compare it with a quantification software package.

Methods

A completely automated method based on neural networks was trained for the interpretation of MPS regarding myocardial ischaemia and infarction using 418 MPS from one hospital. Features from each examination describing rest and stress perfusion, regional and global function were used as inputs to different neural networks. After the training session, the system was evaluated using 532 MPS from another hospital. The test images were also processed with the quantification software package Emory Cardiac Toolbox (ECTb). The images were interpreted by experienced clinicians at both the training and the test hospital, regarding the presence or absence of myocardial ischaemia and/or infarction and these interpretations were used as gold standard.

Results

The neural network showed a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 85% for myocardial ischaemia. The specificity for the ECTb was 46% (p < 0.001), measured at the same sensitivity. The neural network sensitivity for myocardial infarction was 89% and the specificity 96%. The corresponding specificity for the ECTb was 54% (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

A decision support system based on neural networks presents interpretations more similar to experienced clinicians compared to a conventional automated quantification software package. This study shows the feasibility of disseminating the expertise of experienced clinicians to less experienced physicians by the use of neural networks.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Shaw LJ, Kiat H, Cohen I, Cabico JA, et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998;97:535–43. Erratum in: Circulation 1998;98:190.PubMed Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Shaw LJ, Kiat H, Cohen I, Cabico JA, et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998;97:535–43. Erratum in: Circulation 1998;98:190.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Kang X, Berman DS, Van Train KS, Amanullah AM, Areeda J, Friedman JD, et al. Clinical validation of automatic quantitative defect size in rest technetium-99m-sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:1441–6.PubMed Kang X, Berman DS, Van Train KS, Amanullah AM, Areeda J, Friedman JD, et al. Clinical validation of automatic quantitative defect size in rest technetium-99m-sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:1441–6.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Berman DS, Kang X, Van Train KF, Lewin HC, Cohen I, Areeda J, et al. Comparative prognostic value of automatic quantitative analysis versus semiquantitative visual analysis of exercise myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1987–95.PubMedCrossRef Berman DS, Kang X, Van Train KF, Lewin HC, Cohen I, Areeda J, et al. Comparative prognostic value of automatic quantitative analysis versus semiquantitative visual analysis of exercise myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1987–95.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lindahl D, Lanke J, Lundin A, Palmer J, Edenbrandt L. Improved classifications of myocardial bull’s-eye scintigrams with computer-based decision support system. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:96–101.PubMed Lindahl D, Lanke J, Lundin A, Palmer J, Edenbrandt L. Improved classifications of myocardial bull’s-eye scintigrams with computer-based decision support system. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:96–101.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Gjertsson P, Lomsky M, Richter J, Ohlsson M, Tout DA, Van Aswegen A, et al. The added value of ECG-gating for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction using myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and artificial neural networks. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2006;26(5):301–4. Sep.PubMedCrossRef Gjertsson P, Lomsky M, Richter J, Ohlsson M, Tout DA, Van Aswegen A, et al. The added value of ECG-gating for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction using myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and artificial neural networks. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2006;26(5):301–4. Sep.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Germano G, Kiat H, Kavanagh PB, Moriel M, Mazzanti M, Su HT, et al. Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:2138–47.PubMed Germano G, Kiat H, Kavanagh PB, Moriel M, Mazzanti M, Su HT, et al. Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:2138–47.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Sharir T, Germano G, Waechter P, Kavanagh PB, Areeda JS, Gerlach J, et al. A new algorithm for the quantitation of myocardial perfusion SPECT. I. Validation and diagnostic yield. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:720–7.PubMed Sharir T, Germano G, Waechter P, Kavanagh PB, Areeda JS, Gerlach J, et al. A new algorithm for the quantitation of myocardial perfusion SPECT. I. Validation and diagnostic yield. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:720–7.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Van Train KF, Areeda J, Garcia EV, Cooke CD, Maddahi J, Kiat H, et al. Quantitative same-day rest-stress technetium-99m-sestamibi SPECT: definition and validation of stress normal limits and criteria for abnormality. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:1494–502.PubMed Van Train KF, Areeda J, Garcia EV, Cooke CD, Maddahi J, Kiat H, et al. Quantitative same-day rest-stress technetium-99m-sestamibi SPECT: definition and validation of stress normal limits and criteria for abnormality. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:1494–502.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Lomsky M, Richter J, Johansson L, El-Ali H, Åström K, Ljungberg M, et al. A new automated method for analysis of gated-SPECT images based on a 3-dimensional heart shaped model. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2005;25:234–40.PubMedCrossRef Lomsky M, Richter J, Johansson L, El-Ali H, Åström K, Ljungberg M, et al. A new automated method for analysis of gated-SPECT images based on a 3-dimensional heart shaped model. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2005;25:234–40.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lomsky M, Richter J, Johansson L, Høilund-Carlsen PF, Edenbrandt L. Validation of a new automated method for analysis of gated-SPECT images. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2006;26:139–45.PubMedCrossRef Lomsky M, Richter J, Johansson L, Høilund-Carlsen PF, Edenbrandt L. Validation of a new automated method for analysis of gated-SPECT images. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2006;26:139–45.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL, eds. Parallel distributed processing, vols. 1 and 2. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1986. Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL, eds. Parallel distributed processing, vols. 1 and 2. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1986.
12.
go back to reference Rögnvaldsson T. On Langevin updating in multiplayer perceptrons. Neural Comput. 1994;6:916–26.CrossRef Rögnvaldsson T. On Langevin updating in multiplayer perceptrons. Neural Comput. 1994;6:916–26.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hanson SJ, Pratt LY. Comparing biases for minimal network construction with backpropagation. In: Touretzky DS, editor. Advances in neural information processing systems. San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann; 1998. p. 177–85. Hanson SJ, Pratt LY. Comparing biases for minimal network construction with backpropagation. In: Touretzky DS, editor. Advances in neural information processing systems. San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann; 1998. p. 177–85.
14.
go back to reference Van Train KF, Garcia EV, Maddahi J, Areeda J, Cooke CD, Kiat H, et al. Multicenter trial validation for quantitative analysis of same-day rest-stress technetium-99m-sestamibi myocardial tomograms. J Nucl Med. 1994;35:609–18.PubMed Van Train KF, Garcia EV, Maddahi J, Areeda J, Cooke CD, Kiat H, et al. Multicenter trial validation for quantitative analysis of same-day rest-stress technetium-99m-sestamibi myocardial tomograms. J Nucl Med. 1994;35:609–18.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Riffenburgh RH. Statistics in medicine. London: Academic; 1999. Riffenburgh RH. Statistics in medicine. London: Academic; 1999.
16.
go back to reference Lindahl D, Toft J, Hesse B, Palmer J, Ali S, Lundin A, et al. Scandinavian test of artificial neural network for classification of myocardial perfusion images. Clin Physiol. 2000;20:253–61.PubMedCrossRef Lindahl D, Toft J, Hesse B, Palmer J, Ali S, Lundin A, et al. Scandinavian test of artificial neural network for classification of myocardial perfusion images. Clin Physiol. 2000;20:253–61.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Heden B, Ohlin H, Rittner R, Edenbrandt L. Acute myocardial infarction detected in the 12-lead ECG by artificial neural networks. Circulation. 1997;96:1798–802.PubMed Heden B, Ohlin H, Rittner R, Edenbrandt L. Acute myocardial infarction detected in the 12-lead ECG by artificial neural networks. Circulation. 1997;96:1798–802.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of a decision support system for interpretation of myocardial perfusion gated SPECT
Authors
Milan Lomsky
Peter Gjertsson
Lena Johansson
Jens Richter
Mattias Ohlsson
Deborah Tout
Andries van Aswegen
S. Richard Underwood
Lars Edenbrandt
Publication date
01-08-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 8/2008
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-008-0746-9

Other articles of this Issue 8/2008

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 8/2008 Go to the issue