Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 3/2005

01-03-2005 | Controversies–For

Is whole-body FDG-PET valuable for health screening?

Authors: Michiru Ide, Yutaka Suzuki

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 3/2005

Login to get access

Excerpt

The survival of patients with various cancers, such as colorectal, breast and prostate carcinomas, has improved significantly since the 1970s [1], but unfortunately cancer remains the first or second most common cause of death among both men and women in developed countries. Present-day medical practice generally assumes that early detection of cancer offers the best chance of a good outcome. Finding a cancer in an asymptomatic person provides more treatment options, offers a better prognosis and cuts down on expenses compared with the cost incurred when cancers are detected at later stages. To detect cancers at an early stage, self-referral for mammography, routine or virtual colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, Pap smear screening, prostate-specific antigen testing and measurements of other tumour-specific markers have been actively recommended by consensual medical opinion, despite some continuing debate as to the value of these measures. With improvements in the standard of living and ready access to medical information via the internet and other mass media, more and more healthy lay persons are willing to undergo cancer screening. In Far Eastern countries (especially Japan), this tendency is strongly evident. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2000. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2000. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2000. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2000.
2.
go back to reference Obuchowski NA, Grham RJ, Baker ME, Powell KA. Ten criteria for effective screening for pulmonary and colon cancers. Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:1357–62. Obuchowski NA, Grham RJ, Baker ME, Powell KA. Ten criteria for effective screening for pulmonary and colon cancers. Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:1357–62.
3.
go back to reference Warburg O. The mechanism of tumors. New York, NY: Richard Smith; 1931. p.129–69. Warburg O. The mechanism of tumors. New York, NY: Richard Smith; 1931. p.129–69.
4.
go back to reference Wahl RL. Targeting glucose transporters for tumor imaging: “sweet” idea, “sour” result. J Nucl Med 1996;37:1038–41. Wahl RL. Targeting glucose transporters for tumor imaging: “sweet” idea, “sour” result. J Nucl Med 1996;37:1038–41.
5.
go back to reference Hustinx R, Benard F, Alavi A. Whole-body PET imaging in the management of patients with cancer. Semin Nucl Med 2002;32:35–46. Hustinx R, Benard F, Alavi A. Whole-body PET imaging in the management of patients with cancer. Semin Nucl Med 2002;32:35–46.
6.
go back to reference Rohren EM, Turkington TG, Coleman RE. Clinical application of PET in oncology. Radiology 2004;231:305–32. Rohren EM, Turkington TG, Coleman RE. Clinical application of PET in oncology. Radiology 2004;231:305–32.
7.
go back to reference Rades D, Kuhnel G, Wildfang A, Borner AR, Chmoll HJ, Knapp W. Localised disease in cancer of unknown primary (CUP): the value of positron emission tomography (PET) for individual therapeutic management. Ann Oncol 2001;12:1605–9.CrossRef Rades D, Kuhnel G, Wildfang A, Borner AR, Chmoll HJ, Knapp W. Localised disease in cancer of unknown primary (CUP): the value of positron emission tomography (PET) for individual therapeutic management. Ann Oncol 2001;12:1605–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Humm JL, Rozenfeld A, Del Guearra A. From PET detectos to PET scanners. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:1574–94.CrossRef Humm JL, Rozenfeld A, Del Guearra A. From PET detectos to PET scanners. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:1574–94.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yasuda S, Shohtsu A. Cancer screening with whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (letter). Lancet 1997;350:1819.CrossRef Yasuda S, Shohtsu A. Cancer screening with whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (letter). Lancet 1997;350:1819.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Yasuda S, Ide M, Fujii H, Nakahara T, Mochizuki Y, Takahashi W, et al. Application of positron emission tomography imaging to cancer screening. Br J Cancer 2000;83:1607–11.CrossRef Yasuda S, Ide M, Fujii H, Nakahara T, Mochizuki Y, Takahashi W, et al. Application of positron emission tomography imaging to cancer screening. Br J Cancer 2000;83:1607–11.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Shreve PD, Anzai Y, Wahl RL. Pitfalls in oncologic diagnosis with FDG PET imaging: physiologic and benign variants. RadioGraphics 1999;19:61–77.PubMed Shreve PD, Anzai Y, Wahl RL. Pitfalls in oncologic diagnosis with FDG PET imaging: physiologic and benign variants. RadioGraphics 1999;19:61–77.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Cook GJR, Wagner EA, Fogelman I. Pitfalls and artifacts in 18FDG PET and PET/CT oncologic imaging. Semin Nucl Med 2004;34:122–33.CrossRef Cook GJR, Wagner EA, Fogelman I. Pitfalls and artifacts in 18FDG PET and PET/CT oncologic imaging. Semin Nucl Med 2004;34:122–33.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kubota K, Itoh M, Ozaki K, Ono S, Tashiro M, Yamaguchi K, et al. Advantage of delayed whole-body FDG-PET imaging for tumour detection. Eur J Nucl Med 2001;28:696–703.CrossRefPubMed Kubota K, Itoh M, Ozaki K, Ono S, Tashiro M, Yamaguchi K, et al. Advantage of delayed whole-body FDG-PET imaging for tumour detection. Eur J Nucl Med 2001;28:696–703.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Matthies A, Hickeson M, Cuchiara A, Alavis A. Dual time point 18F-FDG for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. J Nucl Med 2002;43:871–5.PubMed Matthies A, Hickeson M, Cuchiara A, Alavis A. Dual time point 18F-FDG for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. J Nucl Med 2002;43:871–5.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Bar-Shalom R, Yefremov N, Guralnik L, Gaitini D, Frenkel A, Kuten A, et al. Clinical performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management. J Nucl Med 2003;44:1200–9.PubMed Bar-Shalom R, Yefremov N, Guralnik L, Gaitini D, Frenkel A, Kuten A, et al. Clinical performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management. J Nucl Med 2003;44:1200–9.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Ide M, Suzuki Y. Medical health club with clinical PET (a window on Japan). Eur J Nucl Med 1996;23:1677–9. Ide M, Suzuki Y. Medical health club with clinical PET (a window on Japan). Eur J Nucl Med 1996;23:1677–9.
17.
go back to reference Moran JK, Lee HB, Blaufox MD. Optimization of urinary FDG excretion during PET imaging. J. Nucl Med 1999;40:1352–7. Moran JK, Lee HB, Blaufox MD. Optimization of urinary FDG excretion during PET imaging. J. Nucl Med 1999;40:1352–7.
18.
go back to reference Higashi K, Matsunari I, Ueda Y, Ikeda R, Guo J, Oguchi M, et al. Value of whole-body FDG PET in management of lung cancer. Ann Nucl Med 2003;17:1–14. Higashi K, Matsunari I, Ueda Y, Ikeda R, Guo J, Oguchi M, et al. Value of whole-body FDG PET in management of lung cancer. Ann Nucl Med 2003;17:1–14.
19.
go back to reference Iwata Y, Shiomi S, Sasaki N, Jomura H, Nishiguchi S, Seki S, et al. Clinical usefulness of positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-deoxyglucose in the diagnosis of liver tumors. Ann Nucl Med 2003;14:121–6. Iwata Y, Shiomi S, Sasaki N, Jomura H, Nishiguchi S, Seki S, et al. Clinical usefulness of positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-deoxyglucose in the diagnosis of liver tumors. Ann Nucl Med 2003;14:121–6.
20.
go back to reference Deloar HM, Fujiwara T, Shidehara M, Nakamura T, Watabe H, Narita Y, et al. Estimation of absorbed dose for 2-[F-18-]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose using whole-body positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Nucl Med 1998;25:565–74.CrossRef Deloar HM, Fujiwara T, Shidehara M, Nakamura T, Watabe H, Narita Y, et al. Estimation of absorbed dose for 2-[F-18-]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose using whole-body positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Nucl Med 1998;25:565–74.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Guidelines for FDG-PET cancer screening (in Japanese). Kaku Igaku (Jpn J Nucl Med) 2004;41 (4):1–21. Guidelines for FDG-PET cancer screening (in Japanese). Kaku Igaku (Jpn J Nucl Med) 2004;41 (4):1–21.
Metadata
Title
Is whole-body FDG-PET valuable for health screening?
Authors
Michiru Ide
Yutaka Suzuki
Publication date
01-03-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 3/2005
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-005-1774-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2005

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 3/2005 Go to the issue