Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 12/2018

01-12-2018 | Scientific Article

Some new angles on the magic angle: what MSK radiologists know and don’t know about this phenomenon

Authors: Michael L. Richardson, Behrang Amini, Todd L. Richards

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 12/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Magic angle effects (MAE) are well-recognized in musculoskeletal (MSK) MRI. With short TE acquisitions, the signal intensity of tendons, ligaments, and menisci depend on their orientation relative to the main magnetic field (B0). An interactive resident physics teaching module simulating MR imaging of a tendon forced us to identify and correct several misconceptions we had about MAE. We suspected these misconceptions were shared by other MSK radiologists.

Materials and methods

We surveyed members of the Society of Academic Bone Radiologists (SABR) regarding which pulse sequences, acquisition parameters, tissues and angles relative to B0 were most likely to produce MAE.

Results

Survey respondents knew that MAE strongly depend on TE and commonly appear on T1W, FSE and PD sequences, but were less aware that MAE may also appear on T2W, STIR and DWI sequences. They knew of MAE effects in tendons, ligaments and cartilage, but were less aware of those in entheses, peripheral nerves and intervertebral discs. Respondents underestimated the wide angular range (full-width at half-maximum ≈ 40) over which significant MAE can be seen with short TE.

Conclusions

Collagen-containing tissues with parallel molecular alignment exhibit increased signal intensity when oriented at 55 relative to B0. Experienced MSK radiologists were found to underestimate the combinations of image parameters, pulse sequences, tissues and collagen orientations in which significant MAE may be seen. Our survey results highlight the need for ongoing MR physics education for practicing radiologists.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chappell KE, Robson MD, Stonebridge-Foster A, Glover A, Allsop JM, Williams AD, et al. Magic angle effects in MR neurography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25(3):431–40. Chappell KE, Robson MD, Stonebridge-Foster A, Glover A, Allsop JM, Williams AD, et al. Magic angle effects in MR neurography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25(3):431–40.
4.
go back to reference Li T, Mirowitz SA. Manifestation of magic angle phenomenon: comparative study on effects of varying echo time and tendon orientation among various MR sequences. Magn Reson Imaging 2003;21(7):741–4.CrossRef Li T, Mirowitz SA. Manifestation of magic angle phenomenon: comparative study on effects of varying echo time and tendon orientation among various MR sequences. Magn Reson Imaging 2003;21(7):741–4.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hayes CW, Parellada JA. The magic angle effect in musculoskeletal MR imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1996;8(1):51–6.PubMed Hayes CW, Parellada JA. The magic angle effect in musculoskeletal MR imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1996;8(1):51–6.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Marascuilo LA, Dagenais F. Planned and post hoc comparisons for tests of homogeneity where the dependent variable is categorical and ordered. Educ Psychol Meas 1982;42(3):777–81.CrossRef Marascuilo LA, Dagenais F. Planned and post hoc comparisons for tests of homogeneity where the dependent variable is categorical and ordered. Educ Psychol Meas 1982;42(3):777–81.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Berendsen HJC. Nuclear magnetic resonance study of collagen hydration. J Chem Phys 1962;36(12):3297–305.CrossRef Berendsen HJC. Nuclear magnetic resonance study of collagen hydration. J Chem Phys 1962;36(12):3297–305.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Boesch C, Kreis R. Dipolar coupling and ordering effects observed in magnetic resonance spectra of skeletal muscle. NMR Biomed 2001;14(2):140–8.CrossRef Boesch C, Kreis R. Dipolar coupling and ordering effects observed in magnetic resonance spectra of skeletal muscle. NMR Biomed 2001;14(2):140–8.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Elster AD, Burdette JH. Questions and Answers in MRI, 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2001. Elster AD, Burdette JH. Questions and Answers in MRI, 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2001.
22.
go back to reference Kluyver T, Ragan-Kelley B, Pérez F, Granger B, Bussonnier M, Frederic J, et al. Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas; chap. Jupyter Notebooks – a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2016, pp. 87–90. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-649-1-87. Kluyver T, Ragan-Kelley B, Pérez F, Granger B, Bussonnier M, Frederic J, et al. Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas; chap. Jupyter Notebooks – a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2016, pp. 87–90. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3233/​978-1-61499-649-1-87.
24.
go back to reference Oliphant TE. Python for scientific computing. Comput Sci Eng 2007;9(3):10–20.CrossRef Oliphant TE. Python for scientific computing. Comput Sci Eng 2007;9(3):10–20.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Li T, Mirowitz SA. Fast T2-weighted MR imaging: impact of variation in pulse sequence parameters on image quality and artifacts. Magn Reson Imaging 2003;21(7):745–53.CrossRef Li T, Mirowitz SA. Fast T2-weighted MR imaging: impact of variation in pulse sequence parameters on image quality and artifacts. Magn Reson Imaging 2003;21(7):745–53.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Some new angles on the magic angle: what MSK radiologists know and don’t know about this phenomenon
Authors
Michael L. Richardson
Behrang Amini
Todd L. Richards
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 12/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-018-3011-8

Other articles of this Issue 12/2018

Skeletal Radiology 12/2018 Go to the issue

Browser's Notes

Browser's notes