Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 3/2018

01-03-2018 | Scientific Article

Academic musculoskeletal radiology: influences for gender disparity

Authors: Sadia R. Qamar, Kiran Khurshid, Sabeena Jalal, Laura Bancroft, Peter L. Munk, Savvas Nicolaou, Faisal Khosa

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Research productivity is one of the few quintessential gauges that North American academic radiology departments implement to determine career progression. The rationale of this study is to quantify the relationship of gender, research productivity, and academic advancements in the musculoskeletal (MSK) radiology to account for emerging trends in workforce diversity.

Methods

Radiology residency programs enlisted in the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database (FREIDA), Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS) and International Skeletal Society (ISS) were searched for academic faculty to generate the database for gender and academic profiles of MSK radiologists. Bibliometric data was collected using Elsevier’s SCOPUS archives, and analyzed using Stata version 14.2.

Results

Among 274 MSK radiologists in North America, 190 (69.34%) were men and 84 (30.66%) were women, indicating a statistically significant difference (χ2 = 6.34; p value = 0.042). The available number of female assistant professors (n = 50) was more than half of the male assistant professors (n = 88), this ratio however, plummeted at higher academic ranks, with only one-fourth of women (n = 11) professors compared to men (n = 45). The male MSK radiologist had 1.31 times the odds of having a higher h-index, keeping all other variables constant.

Conclusions

The trend of gender disparity exists in MSK radiology with significant underrepresentation of women in top tiers of academic hierarchy. Even with comparable h-indices, at the lower academic ranks, a lesser number of women are promoted relative to their male colleagues. Further studies are needed to investigate the degree of influence research productivity has, in determining academic advancement of MSK radiologists.
Literature
6.
go back to reference Owen JB, Chan WC, Sunshine JH, Shaffer KA. The sex ratio of American radiologists: comparison and implications by age, subspecialty, and type of practice. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:1337–41.CrossRef Owen JB, Chan WC, Sunshine JH, Shaffer KA. The sex ratio of American radiologists: comparison and implications by age, subspecialty, and type of practice. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:1337–41.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Andriole DA, Jeffe DB. The road to an academic medicine career: a national cohort study of male and female U.S. medical graduates. Acad Med. 2012;87(12):1722–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Andriole DA, Jeffe DB. The road to an academic medicine career: a national cohort study of male and female U.S. medical graduates. Acad Med. 2012;87(12):1722–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Zener R, Lee SY, Visscher KL, Ricketts M, Speer S, Wiseman D. Women in radiology: exploring the gender disparity. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Mar;13(3):344–50.CrossRefPubMed Zener R, Lee SY, Visscher KL, Ricketts M, Speer S, Wiseman D. Women in radiology: exploring the gender disparity. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Mar;13(3):344–50.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Piper, Crystal Lynne. A 35-Year Analysis of Gender Trends in Radiology Authorship (2015). Yale Medicine Thesis Digital Library. Piper, Crystal Lynne. A 35-Year Analysis of Gender Trends in Radiology Authorship (2015). Yale Medicine Thesis Digital Library.
11.
go back to reference Nonnemaker L. Women physicians in academic medicine—new insights from cohort studies. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(6):399–405.CrossRefPubMed Nonnemaker L. Women physicians in academic medicine—new insights from cohort studies. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(6):399–405.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lewis RJ. Some thoughts regarding gender issues in the mentoring of future academicians. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10(1):59–60.CrossRefPubMed Lewis RJ. Some thoughts regarding gender issues in the mentoring of future academicians. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10(1):59–60.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Payton FC. Making STEM careers more accessible. Black issues in. High Educ. 2004;21(2):90. Payton FC. Making STEM careers more accessible. Black issues in. High Educ. 2004;21(2):90.
14.
go back to reference Denbeste-Barnett M. Publish or perish: the scientific publications of women physicians in late Imperial Russia. Dynamis. 1999;19(215-40). Denbeste-Barnett M. Publish or perish: the scientific publications of women physicians in late Imperial Russia. Dynamis. 1999;19(215-40).
15.
go back to reference Schermerhorn GR, Colliver JA, Verhulst SJ, Schmidt EL. Factors that influence career patterns of women physicians. J Am Med Women Assoc. 1986;41(3):74. Schermerhorn GR, Colliver JA, Verhulst SJ, Schmidt EL. Factors that influence career patterns of women physicians. J Am Med Women Assoc. 1986;41(3):74.
16.
go back to reference Oancia T, Bohm C, Carr T, Cujec B, Johnson D. The influence of gender and specialty on reporting of abusive and discriminatory behavior by medical students, residents, and physicians teachers. Med Educ. 2000;34:250–6.CrossRefPubMed Oancia T, Bohm C, Carr T, Cujec B, Johnson D. The influence of gender and specialty on reporting of abusive and discriminatory behavior by medical students, residents, and physicians teachers. Med Educ. 2000;34:250–6.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Potterton V, Ruan S, Sunshine J, Applegate K, et al. Why don’t female medical students choose diagnostic radiology? A review of current literature. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004;1:583–90.CrossRefPubMed Potterton V, Ruan S, Sunshine J, Applegate K, et al. Why don’t female medical students choose diagnostic radiology? A review of current literature. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004;1:583–90.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Applegate KE. E future workforce in academic radiology: gender, generational, and cultural influences. JACR. 2005;2:133–8.PubMed Applegate KE. E future workforce in academic radiology: gender, generational, and cultural influences. JACR. 2005;2:133–8.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Roubidoux MA, et al. Female medical students’ interest in a radiology career. JACR. 2009;6:246–53.PubMed Roubidoux MA, et al. Female medical students’ interest in a radiology career. JACR. 2009;6:246–53.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Illes J, Glover GH, Wexler L, Leung ANC, Glazer GM. A model for faculty mentoring in academic radiology. Acad Radiol. 2000;7(9):717–24.CrossRefPubMed Illes J, Glover GH, Wexler L, Leung ANC, Glazer GM. A model for faculty mentoring in academic radiology. Acad Radiol. 2000;7(9):717–24.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Fielding J, et al. Choosing a specialty in medicine: female medical students and radiology. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:897–900.CrossRef Fielding J, et al. Choosing a specialty in medicine: female medical students and radiology. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:897–900.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sunshine JH, et al. Update on the diagnostic radiology employment market: findings through 2007–2008. JACR. 2008;5:827–33.PubMed Sunshine JH, et al. Update on the diagnostic radiology employment market: findings through 2007–2008. JACR. 2008;5:827–33.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Kapoor N, Blumenthal DM, Smith SE, Ip IK, Khorasani R. Gender differences in academic rank of radiologists in U.S. medical schools. Radiology. 2017; Apr;283(1):140–7.CrossRefPubMed Kapoor N, Blumenthal DM, Smith SE, Ip IK, Khorasani R. Gender differences in academic rank of radiologists in U.S. medical schools. Radiology. 2017; Apr;283(1):140–7.CrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
go back to reference Carr PL, Friedman RH, Moskowitz MA, Kazis LE. Comparing the status of women and men in academic medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119(9):908–13.CrossRefPubMed Carr PL, Friedman RH, Moskowitz MA, Kazis LE. Comparing the status of women and men in academic medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119(9):908–13.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Forman HP, Larson DB, Kaye AD, et al. Masters of radiology panel discussion: women in radiology—how can we encourage more women to join the field and become leaders? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:145–9.CrossRefPubMed Forman HP, Larson DB, Kaye AD, et al. Masters of radiology panel discussion: women in radiology—how can we encourage more women to join the field and become leaders? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:145–9.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Anzai Y, Carolyn M, DeStigter K, Destounis S, et al. Entrepreneurial women in radiology: role models of success. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13:1378–82.CrossRefPubMed Anzai Y, Carolyn M, DeStigter K, Destounis S, et al. Entrepreneurial women in radiology: role models of success. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13:1378–82.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Moss-Racusin CA, Dovidio JF, Brescoll VL, Graham MJ, Handelsman J. Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(41):16474–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moss-Racusin CA, Dovidio JF, Brescoll VL, Graham MJ, Handelsman J. Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(41):16474–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Lee J, Kraus KL, Couldwell WT. Use of the h index in neurosurgery. Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2009;111(2):387–92.CrossRefPubMed Lee J, Kraus KL, Couldwell WT. Use of the h index in neurosurgery. Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2009;111(2):387–92.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Bartneck C, Kokkelmans S. Detecting h-index manipulation through self-citation analysis. Scientometrics. 2011;87:85–98.CrossRefPubMed Bartneck C, Kokkelmans S. Detecting h-index manipulation through self-citation analysis. Scientometrics. 2011;87:85–98.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Academic musculoskeletal radiology: influences for gender disparity
Authors
Sadia R. Qamar
Kiran Khurshid
Sabeena Jalal
Laura Bancroft
Peter L. Munk
Savvas Nicolaou
Faisal Khosa
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-017-2836-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Skeletal Radiology 3/2018 Go to the issue