Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 7/2016

01-07-2016 | Scientific Article

T2 map signal variation predicts symptomatic osteoarthritis progression: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

Authors: Haoti Zhong, David J. Miller, Kenneth L. Urish

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this work is to use quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify patients at risk for symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) progression. We hypothesized that classification of signal variation on T2 maps might predict symptomatic OA progression.

Methods

Patients were selected from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI), a prospective cohort. Two groups were identified: a symptomatic OA progression group and a control group. At baseline, both groups were asymptomatic (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis [WOMAC] pain score total <10) with no radiographic evidence of OA (Kellgren–Lawrence [KL] score ≤ 1). The OA progression group (n = 103) had a change in total WOMAC score greater than 10 by the 3-year follow-up. The control group (n = 79) remained asymptomatic, with a change in total WOMAC score less than 10 at the 3-year follow-up. A classifier was designed to predict OA progression in an independent population based on T2 map cartilage signal variation. The classifier was designed using a nearest neighbor classification based on a Gaussian Mixture Model log-likelihood fit of T2 map cartilage voxel intensities.

Results

The use of T2 map signal variation to predict symptomatic OA progression in asymptomatic individuals achieved a specificity of 89.3 %, a sensitivity of 77.2 %, and an overall accuracy rate of 84.2 %.

Conclusion

T2 map signal variation can predict symptomatic knee OA progression in asymptomatic individuals, serving as a possible early OA imaging biomarker.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brandt KD, Fife RS, Braunstein EM, Katz B. Radiographic grading of the severity of knee osteoarthritis: relation of the Kellgren and Lawrence grade to a grade based on joint space narrowing, and correlation with arthroscopic evidence of articular cartilage degeneration. Arthritis Rheum. 1991;34(11):1381–6.CrossRefPubMed Brandt KD, Fife RS, Braunstein EM, Katz B. Radiographic grading of the severity of knee osteoarthritis: relation of the Kellgren and Lawrence grade to a grade based on joint space narrowing, and correlation with arthroscopic evidence of articular cartilage degeneration. Arthritis Rheum. 1991;34(11):1381–6.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference David-Vaudey E, Ghosh S, Ries M, Majumdar S. T2 relaxation time measurements in osteoarthritis. Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;22(5):673–82.CrossRefPubMed David-Vaudey E, Ghosh S, Ries M, Majumdar S. T2 relaxation time measurements in osteoarthritis. Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;22(5):673–82.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Mosher TJ, Dardzinski BJ. Cartilage MRI T2 relaxation time mapping: overview and applications. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2004;8(4):355–68.CrossRefPubMed Mosher TJ, Dardzinski BJ. Cartilage MRI T2 relaxation time mapping: overview and applications. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2004;8(4):355–68.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Mosher TJ, Smith H, Dardzinski BJ, Schmithorst VJ, Smith MB. MR imaging and T2 mapping of femoral cartilage: in vivo determination of the magic angle effect. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177(3):665–9.CrossRefPubMed Mosher TJ, Smith H, Dardzinski BJ, Schmithorst VJ, Smith MB. MR imaging and T2 mapping of femoral cartilage: in vivo determination of the magic angle effect. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177(3):665–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Wheaton AJ, Casey FL, Gougoutas AJ, et al. Correlation of T1rho with fixed charge density in cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;20(3):519–25.CrossRefPubMed Wheaton AJ, Casey FL, Gougoutas AJ, et al. Correlation of T1rho with fixed charge density in cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;20(3):519–25.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Burstein D, Gray ML. Is MRI fulfilling its promise for molecular imaging of cartilage in arthritis? Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006;14(11):1087–90.CrossRefPubMed Burstein D, Gray ML. Is MRI fulfilling its promise for molecular imaging of cartilage in arthritis? Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006;14(11):1087–90.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Xia Y, Moody JB, Alhadlaq H. Orientational dependence of T2 relaxation in articular cartilage: a microscopic MRI (microMRI) study. Magn Reson Med. 2002;48(3):460–9.CrossRefPubMed Xia Y, Moody JB, Alhadlaq H. Orientational dependence of T2 relaxation in articular cartilage: a microscopic MRI (microMRI) study. Magn Reson Med. 2002;48(3):460–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Harrison MM, Cooke TD, Fisher SB, Griffin MP. Patterns of knee arthrosis and patellar subluxation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;309:56–63.PubMed Harrison MM, Cooke TD, Fisher SB, Griffin MP. Patterns of knee arthrosis and patellar subluxation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;309:56–63.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Yulish BS, Lieberman JM, Newman AJ, Bryan PJ, Mulopulos GP, Modic MT. Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: assessment with MR imaging. Radiology. 1987;165(1):149–52.CrossRefPubMed Yulish BS, Lieberman JM, Newman AJ, Bryan PJ, Mulopulos GP, Modic MT. Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: assessment with MR imaging. Radiology. 1987;165(1):149–52.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Urish KL, Keffalas MG, Durkin JR, Miller DJ, Chu CR, Mosher TJ.. T2 texture index of cartilage can predict early symptomatic OA progression: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21(10):1550–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Urish KL, Keffalas MG, Durkin JR, Miller DJ, Chu CR, Mosher TJ.. T2 texture index of cartilage can predict early symptomatic OA progression: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21(10):1550–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Blumenkrantz G, Stahl R, et al. The feasibility of characterizing the spatial distribution of cartilage T(2) using texture analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16(5):584–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Blumenkrantz G, Stahl R, et al. The feasibility of characterizing the spatial distribution of cartilage T(2) using texture analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16(5):584–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Carballido-Gamio J, Link TM, Majumdar S. New techniques for cartilage magnetic resonance imaging relaxation time analysis: texture analysis of flattened cartilage and localized intra- and inter-subject comparisons. Magn Reson Med. 2008;59(6):1472–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Carballido-Gamio J, Link TM, Majumdar S. New techniques for cartilage magnetic resonance imaging relaxation time analysis: texture analysis of flattened cartilage and localized intra- and inter-subject comparisons. Magn Reson Med. 2008;59(6):1472–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Peterfy CG, Schneider E, Nevitt M. The osteoarthritis initiative: report on the design rationale for the magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16(12):1433–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Peterfy CG, Schneider E, Nevitt M. The osteoarthritis initiative: report on the design rationale for the magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16(12):1433–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Eckstein F, Hudelmaier M, Wirth W, et al. Double echo steady state magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 tesla: a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(4):433–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eckstein F, Hudelmaier M, Wirth W, et al. Double echo steady state magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 tesla: a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(4):433–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Urish KL, Williams AA, Durkin JR, Chu CR; the OAI Investigators Group. Registration of magnetic resonance image series for knee articular cartilage analysis: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Cartilage. 2013;4(1):20–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Urish KL, Williams AA, Durkin JR, Chu CR; the OAI Investigators Group. Registration of magnetic resonance image series for knee articular cartilage analysis: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Cartilage. 2013;4(1):20–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Smith HE, Mosher TJ, et al. Spatial variation in cartilage T2 of the knee. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;14(1):50–5.CrossRefPubMed Smith HE, Mosher TJ, et al. Spatial variation in cartilage T2 of the knee. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;14(1):50–5.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Duda RO, PE Hart, Stork DG. Pattern classification; 2nd Ed. 2000; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience. Duda RO, PE Hart, Stork DG. Pattern classification; 2nd Ed. 2000; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
18.
go back to reference Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Statist. 1978; 6(2):461–464.CrossRef Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Statist. 1978; 6(2):461–464.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Joseph GB, Baum T, Carballido-Gamio J, et al. Texture analysis of cartilage T2 maps: individuals with risk factors for OA have higher and more heterogeneous knee cartilage MR T2 compared to normal controls—data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(5):R153.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Joseph GB, Baum T, Carballido-Gamio J, et al. Texture analysis of cartilage T2 maps: individuals with risk factors for OA have higher and more heterogeneous knee cartilage MR T2 compared to normal controls—data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(5):R153.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
T2 map signal variation predicts symptomatic osteoarthritis progression: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative
Authors
Haoti Zhong
David J. Miller
Kenneth L. Urish
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2360-4

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

Skeletal Radiology 7/2016 Go to the issue

Browser's Notes

Browser’s notes