Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 2/2016

01-02-2016 | Scientific Article

Navicular bone position determined by positional MRI: a reproducibility study

Authors: Philip Hansen, Finn E. Johannsen, Stine Hangaard, Sandra E. Stallknecht, Bjarke B. Hansen, Janus D. Nybing, Mikael Boesen

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To examine intraobserver, interobserver and between-day reproducibility of positional MRI for evaluation of navicular bone height (NVH) and medial navicular position (MNP).

Materials and methods

Positional MRI (pMRI) of the foot was performed on ten healthy participants (0.25 T G-scanner). Scanning was performed in supine and standing position, respectively. Two radiologists evaluated the images in a blinded manner. Reliability and agreement were assessed by calculation of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95 % limits of agreement as a percentage of the mean (LOA%).

Results

Intraobserver and interobserver reliability was “substantial” in both supine and standing position (ICC 0.86–0.98) and showed good agreement (LOA% 4.9–14.7 %). Between-day reliability of navicular height and medial navicular position in standing position remained substantial (ICC 0.85–0.92) with adequate agreement (LOA% 8.3–19.8 %). In supine position between-day reliability was “moderate” for NVH (ICC 0.72) and “slight” for MNP (ICC 0.39). Agreement remained adequate between-days for MNP in supine position (LOA% 17.7 %), but it was less than adequate for NVH in supine position (LOA% 24.2 %).

Conclusion

Navicular height and medial navicular position can be measured by pMRI in a very reproducible manner within and between observers. Increased measurement variation is observed between-days in supine position, which may be due to small positional differences or other unknown biomechanical factors.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Younger AS, Sawatzky B, Dryden P. Radiographic assessment of adult flatfoot. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:820–5.PubMed Younger AS, Sawatzky B, Dryden P. Radiographic assessment of adult flatfoot. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:820–5.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Neal BS, Griffiths IB, Dowling GJ, Murley GS, Munteanu SE, Franettovich Smith MM, et al. Foot posture as a risk factor for lower limb overuse injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res. 2014;7:55.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Neal BS, Griffiths IB, Dowling GJ, Murley GS, Munteanu SE, Franettovich Smith MM, et al. Foot posture as a risk factor for lower limb overuse injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res. 2014;7:55.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
3.
go back to reference Williams DS, Davis IM, Scholz JP, Hamill J, Buchanan TS. High-arched runners exhibit increased leg stiffness compared to low-arched runners. Gait Posture. 2004;19:263–9.CrossRefPubMed Williams DS, Davis IM, Scholz JP, Hamill J, Buchanan TS. High-arched runners exhibit increased leg stiffness compared to low-arched runners. Gait Posture. 2004;19:263–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Saltzman CL, Nawoczenski DA, Talbot KD. Measurement of the medial longitudinal arch. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:45–9.CrossRefPubMed Saltzman CL, Nawoczenski DA, Talbot KD. Measurement of the medial longitudinal arch. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:45–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Menz HB. Alternative techniques for the clinical assessment of foot pronation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1998;88:119–29.CrossRefPubMed Menz HB. Alternative techniques for the clinical assessment of foot pronation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1998;88:119–29.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Williams DS, McClay IS. Measurements used to characterize the foot and the medial longitudinal arch: reliability and validity. Phys Ther. 2000;80:864–71.PubMed Williams DS, McClay IS. Measurements used to characterize the foot and the medial longitudinal arch: reliability and validity. Phys Ther. 2000;80:864–71.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Metcalfe SA, Bowling FL, Baltzopoulos V, Maganaris C, Reeves ND. The reliability of measurements taken from radiographs in the assessment of paediatric flat foot deformity. Foot (Edinb). 2012;22:156–62.CrossRef Metcalfe SA, Bowling FL, Baltzopoulos V, Maganaris C, Reeves ND. The reliability of measurements taken from radiographs in the assessment of paediatric flat foot deformity. Foot (Edinb). 2012;22:156–62.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cavanagh PR, Boulton AJM. The relationship of static foot structure to dynamic foot function. J Biomech. 1997;30:243–50.CrossRefPubMed Cavanagh PR, Boulton AJM. The relationship of static foot structure to dynamic foot function. J Biomech. 1997;30:243–50.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference McCrory JL, Young MJ, Boulton AJM, Cavanagh PR. Arch index as a predictor of arch height. Foot. 1997;7:79–81.CrossRef McCrory JL, Young MJ, Boulton AJM, Cavanagh PR. Arch index as a predictor of arch height. Foot. 1997;7:79–81.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cornwall MW, McPoil TG. Relative movement of the navicular bone during normal walking. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20:507–12.CrossRefPubMed Cornwall MW, McPoil TG. Relative movement of the navicular bone during normal walking. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20:507–12.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Harris EJ, Vanore JV, Thomas JL, Kravitz SR, Mendelson SA, Mendicino RW, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of pediatric flatfoot. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004;43:341–73.CrossRefPubMed Harris EJ, Vanore JV, Thomas JL, Kravitz SR, Mendelson SA, Mendicino RW, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of pediatric flatfoot. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004;43:341–73.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hansen BB, Bouert R, Bliddal H, Christensen R, Bendix T, Christensen A, et al. External pneumatic compression device prevents fainting in standing weight-bearing MRI: a cohort study. Skelet Radiol. 2013; 1437–42. Hansen BB, Bouert R, Bliddal H, Christensen R, Bendix T, Christensen A, et al. External pneumatic compression device prevents fainting in standing weight-bearing MRI: a cohort study. Skelet Radiol. 2013; 1437–42.
13.
go back to reference De Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:1033–9.CrossRefPubMed De Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:1033–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Shrout PE. Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry. Stat Methods Med Res. 1998;7:301–17.CrossRefPubMed Shrout PE. Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry. Stat Methods Med Res. 1998;7:301–17.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Train. 2005;19:231–40. Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Train. 2005;19:231–40.
16.
go back to reference Henriksen M, Lund H, Moe-Nilssen R, Bliddal H, Danneskiod-Samsøe B. Test-retest reliability of trunk accelerometric gait analysis. Gait Posture. 2004;19:288–97.CrossRefPubMed Henriksen M, Lund H, Moe-Nilssen R, Bliddal H, Danneskiod-Samsøe B. Test-retest reliability of trunk accelerometric gait analysis. Gait Posture. 2004;19:288–97.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kottner J, Audigé L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hróbjartsson A, et al. Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:96–106.CrossRefPubMed Kottner J, Audigé L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hróbjartsson A, et al. Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:96–106.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Rathleff MS, Moelgaard C, Lykkegaard OJ. Intra- and interobserver reliability of quantitative ultrasound measurement of the plantar fascia. J Clin Ultrasound. 2010;39:128–34.CrossRef Rathleff MS, Moelgaard C, Lykkegaard OJ. Intra- and interobserver reliability of quantitative ultrasound measurement of the plantar fascia. J Clin Ultrasound. 2010;39:128–34.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Scharfbillig R, Evans AM, Pod D, Dev GC, Copper AW, Pod B, et al. Criterion validation of four criteria of the foot posture index. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2004;94:31–8.CrossRefPubMed Scharfbillig R, Evans AM, Pod D, Dev GC, Copper AW, Pod B, et al. Criterion validation of four criteria of the foot posture index. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2004;94:31–8.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Wolf P, Luechinger R, Boesiger P, Stuessi E, Stacoff A. A MR imaging procedure to measure tarsal bone rotations. J Biomech Eng. 2007;129:931–6.CrossRefPubMed Wolf P, Luechinger R, Boesiger P, Stuessi E, Stacoff A. A MR imaging procedure to measure tarsal bone rotations. J Biomech Eng. 2007;129:931–6.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Vinicombe A, Raspovic A, Menz HB. Reliability of navicular displacement measurement as a clinical indicator of foot posture. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2001;91:262–8.CrossRefPubMed Vinicombe A, Raspovic A, Menz HB. Reliability of navicular displacement measurement as a clinical indicator of foot posture. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2001;91:262–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Sutera R, Iovane A, Sorrentino F, Candela F, Mularo V, La TG, et al. Plantar fascia evaluation with a dedicated magnetic resonance scanner in weight-bearing position: our experience in patients with plantar fasciitis and in healthy volunteers. Radiol Med. 2010;115:246–60.CrossRefPubMed Sutera R, Iovane A, Sorrentino F, Candela F, Mularo V, La TG, et al. Plantar fascia evaluation with a dedicated magnetic resonance scanner in weight-bearing position: our experience in patients with plantar fasciitis and in healthy volunteers. Radiol Med. 2010;115:246–60.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Navicular bone position determined by positional MRI: a reproducibility study
Authors
Philip Hansen
Finn E. Johannsen
Stine Hangaard
Sandra E. Stallknecht
Bjarke B. Hansen
Janus D. Nybing
Mikael Boesen
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2272-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Skeletal Radiology 2/2016 Go to the issue