Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 1/2014

01-01-2014 | Scientific Article

An alternative injection technique for performing MR ankle arthrography: the lateral mortise approach

Authors: Philip R. Wright, Michael G. Fox, Bennett Alford, James T. Patrie, Mark W. Anderson

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

This study evaluates whether the recently described lateral mortise (LM) approach to therapeutic ankle injections can also be used to inject the ankle prior to magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) without impairing the evaluation of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL).

Materials and methods

An IRB-approved, retrospective review of ankle MRAs performed using the LM approach between April 2009 and April 2011 was conducted. The MRAs were independently evaluated by three musculoskeletal radiologists for: ATFL assessment (well assessed, limited or unable to assess), amount of fluid in the anterolateral soft tissues (none to large), and capsular distention (underdistended to overdistended). Patient age, gender, fluoroscopy time, injection location, degree of ankle arthritis, and ankle joint narrowing on radiographs were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using exact binomial confidence limits.

Results

Fifteen MRAs were successfully performed on 13 patients (mean age: 27 years, 11 male, 2 female). Mean fluoroscopic time was 39 s (range 9–108) and mean volume injected was 7 mL (range 5–9 mL). The ATFL was well assessed on all MRAs. A moderate to large amount of fluid was noted in the anterolateral soft tissues on 5 out of 15 MRAs. No ankle joints were underdistended, but 3 out of 15 were overdistended.

Conclusion

Since the ATFL is inferior to the location used for the LM injection, the interpretation of the ankle MRA, specifically ATFL evaluation, was not compromised in any patient. Therefore, the LM approach can be used as an alternative to the anteromedial approach for ankle MRA without sacrificing diagnostic quality.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Helgason JW, Chandnani VP. Magnetic resonance imaging arthrography of the ankle. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;9:286–94.PubMed Helgason JW, Chandnani VP. Magnetic resonance imaging arthrography of the ankle. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;9:286–94.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Haage H. Die Arthrographie des Sprunggelenkes. Radiologe. 1967;7(5):137–42.PubMed Haage H. Die Arthrographie des Sprunggelenkes. Radiologe. 1967;7(5):137–42.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Ala-Ketola L, Puranen J, Koivisto E, Puupera M. Arthrography in the diagnosis of ligament injuries and classification of ankle injuries. Radiology. 1977;125:63–8.PubMed Ala-Ketola L, Puranen J, Koivisto E, Puupera M. Arthrography in the diagnosis of ligament injuries and classification of ankle injuries. Radiology. 1977;125:63–8.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Chandnani VP, Harper MT, Ficke JR, et al. Chronic ankle instability: evaluation with MR arthrography, MR imaging, and stress radiography. Radiology. 1994;192:189–94.PubMed Chandnani VP, Harper MT, Ficke JR, et al. Chronic ankle instability: evaluation with MR arthrography, MR imaging, and stress radiography. Radiology. 1994;192:189–94.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Spiegel PK, Staples OS. Arthrography of the ankle joint: problems in diagnosis of acute lateral ligament injuries. Radiology. 1975;114:587–90.PubMed Spiegel PK, Staples OS. Arthrography of the ankle joint: problems in diagnosis of acute lateral ligament injuries. Radiology. 1975;114:587–90.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Steinbach LS, Palmer WE, Schweitzer ME. Special focus session: MR arthrography. Radiographics. 2002;22:1223–46.PubMedCrossRef Steinbach LS, Palmer WE, Schweitzer ME. Special focus session: MR arthrography. Radiographics. 2002;22:1223–46.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schmid MR, Pfirrmann CW, Hodler J, Vienne P, Zanetti M. Cartilage lesions in the ankle joint: comparison of MR arthrography and CT arthrography. Skeletal Radiol. 2003;32:259–65.PubMedCrossRef Schmid MR, Pfirrmann CW, Hodler J, Vienne P, Zanetti M. Cartilage lesions in the ankle joint: comparison of MR arthrography and CT arthrography. Skeletal Radiol. 2003;32:259–65.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fox MG, Wright PR, Alford B, Patrie JT, Anderson MW. The lateral mortise approach for therapeutic ankle injections: an alternative to the anteromedial approach. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(5):1096–100.PubMedCrossRef Fox MG, Wright PR, Alford B, Patrie JT, Anderson MW. The lateral mortise approach for therapeutic ankle injections: an alternative to the anteromedial approach. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(5):1096–100.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Moon J, Shim J, Suh J, Lee W. Radiographic predictability of cartilage damage in medial ankle osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2188–97.PubMedCrossRef Moon J, Shim J, Suh J, Lee W. Radiographic predictability of cartilage damage in medial ankle osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2188–97.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteoarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16:494–502.PubMedCrossRef Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteoarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16:494–502.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Koivikko MP, Koskinen SK. Is subcutaneous local anesthesia in shoulder magnetic resonance arthrography necessary? Acta Radiol. 2007;48(7):741–3.PubMedCrossRef Koivikko MP, Koskinen SK. Is subcutaneous local anesthesia in shoulder magnetic resonance arthrography necessary? Acta Radiol. 2007;48(7):741–3.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Shortt CP, Morrison WB, Roberts CC, Deely DM, Gopez AG, Zoga AC. Shoulder, hip, and knee arthrography needle placement using fluoroscopic guidance: practice patterns of musculoskeletal radiologists in North America. Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38:377–85.PubMedCrossRef Shortt CP, Morrison WB, Roberts CC, Deely DM, Gopez AG, Zoga AC. Shoulder, hip, and knee arthrography needle placement using fluoroscopic guidance: practice patterns of musculoskeletal radiologists in North America. Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38:377–85.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Depelteau H, Bureau N, Cardinal E, Aubin B, Brassard P. Arthrography of the shoulder: a simple fluoroscopically guided approach for targeting the rotator cuff interval. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:329–32.PubMedCrossRef Depelteau H, Bureau N, Cardinal E, Aubin B, Brassard P. Arthrography of the shoulder: a simple fluoroscopically guided approach for targeting the rotator cuff interval. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:329–32.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Catalano O, Manfredi R, Vanzulli A, Tomei E, Napolitano M, Esposito A, et al. MR arthrography of the glenohumeral joint: modified posterior approach without imaging guidance. Radiology. 2007;242:550–4.PubMedCrossRef Catalano O, Manfredi R, Vanzulli A, Tomei E, Napolitano M, Esposito A, et al. MR arthrography of the glenohumeral joint: modified posterior approach without imaging guidance. Radiology. 2007;242:550–4.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lohman M, Borrero C, Casagranda B, Rafiee B, Towers J. The posterior transtriceps approach for elbow arthrography: a forgotten technique? Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38:513–6.PubMedCrossRef Lohman M, Borrero C, Casagranda B, Rafiee B, Towers J. The posterior transtriceps approach for elbow arthrography: a forgotten technique? Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38:513–6.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
An alternative injection technique for performing MR ankle arthrography: the lateral mortise approach
Authors
Philip R. Wright
Michael G. Fox
Bennett Alford
James T. Patrie
Mark W. Anderson
Publication date
01-01-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1740-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Skeletal Radiology 1/2014 Go to the issue

Test Yourself: Answer

Painful left thigh mass