Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 7/2012

01-07-2012 | Scientific Article

MRI of double-bundle ACL reconstruction: evaluation of graft findings

Authors: Tommi Kiekara, Timo Järvelä, Heini Huhtala, Antti Paakkala

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 7/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To demonstrate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction grafts.

Materials and methods

Sixty-six patients with DB ACL reconstruction were evaluated with MRI 2 years postoperatively. Graft thickness was measured separately by two musculoskeletal radiologists. The MRI findings of graft disruption, signal intensity (SI) changes, cystic degeneration, arthrofibrosis, and impingement were analyzed. The statistical significance of the association between MRI findings was calculated.

Results

The mean anteromedial (AM) graft thickness was reduced 9% and the mean posterolateral (PL) graft thickness was reduced 18% from the original graft thickness. Disruption was seen in 3% of AM grafts and 6% of PL grafts and a partial tear in 8 and 23%, respectively. Both grafts were disrupted in 3% of patients. Increased SI was seen in 14% of intact AM grafts and in 60% of partially torn AM grafts (p = 0.032). In PL grafts the increased SI was seen in 51% of the intact grafts and in 93% of the partially torn grafts (p = 0.005). Cystic degeneration was seen in 8% of AM grafts and in 5% of PL grafts. Diffuse arthrofibrosis was seen in 5% of patients and a localized cyclops lesion in 3% of patients. Impingement of the AM graft was seen in 8% of patients.

Conclusion

Both grafts were disrupted in 3% of patients. Also, the frequencies of other complications were low. The use of orthogonal sequences in the evaluation of the PL graft SI seems to cause volume-averaging artefacts.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Colombet P, Robinson J, Christel P, et al. Morphology of anterior cruciate ligament attachments for anatomic reconstruction: a cadaveric dissection and radiographic study. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:984–92.PubMedCrossRef Colombet P, Robinson J, Christel P, et al. Morphology of anterior cruciate ligament attachments for anatomic reconstruction: a cadaveric dissection and radiographic study. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:984–92.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Petersen W, Zantop T. Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament with regard to its two bundles. Clin Orthoped Relat Res. 2007;454:35–47.CrossRef Petersen W, Zantop T. Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament with regard to its two bundles. Clin Orthoped Relat Res. 2007;454:35–47.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Duthon VB, Barea C, Abrassart S, Fasel JH, Fritschy D, Menetrey J. Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:204–13.PubMedCrossRef Duthon VB, Barea C, Abrassart S, Fasel JH, Fritschy D, Menetrey J. Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:204–13.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Fukuda A, Tsukada H, Toh S. Stability evaluation of single-bundle and double-bundle reconstruction during navigated ACL reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2008;16:77–83.PubMedCrossRef Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Fukuda A, Tsukada H, Toh S. Stability evaluation of single-bundle and double-bundle reconstruction during navigated ACL reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2008;16:77–83.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Yamamoto Y, Tsukada H, Toh S. Navigation evaluation of the pivot-shift phenomenon during double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is the posterolateral bundle more important? Arthroscopy. 2009;25:488–95.PubMedCrossRef Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Yamamoto Y, Tsukada H, Toh S. Navigation evaluation of the pivot-shift phenomenon during double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is the posterolateral bundle more important? Arthroscopy. 2009;25:488–95.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wu JL, Seon JK, Gadikota HR, et al. In situ forces in the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament under simulated functional loading conditions. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:558–63.PubMedCrossRef Wu JL, Seon JK, Gadikota HR, et al. In situ forces in the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament under simulated functional loading conditions. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:558–63.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Aglietti P, Giron F, Losco M, Cuomo P, Ciardullo A, Mondanelli N. Comparison between single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:25–34.PubMedCrossRef Aglietti P, Giron F, Losco M, Cuomo P, Ciardullo A, Mondanelli N. Comparison between single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:25–34.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hofbauer M, Valentin P, Kdolsky R, et al. Rotational and translational laxity after computer-navigated single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:1201–7.PubMedCrossRef Hofbauer M, Valentin P, Kdolsky R, et al. Rotational and translational laxity after computer-navigated single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:1201–7.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Järvelä T. Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:500–7.PubMedCrossRef Järvelä T. Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:500–7.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Järvelä T, Moisala AS, Sihvonen R, Järvelä S, Kannus P, Järvinen M. Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autografts and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation: prospective, randomized, clinical study with 2-year results. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:290–7.PubMedCrossRef Järvelä T, Moisala AS, Sihvonen R, Järvelä S, Kannus P, Järvinen M. Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autografts and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation: prospective, randomized, clinical study with 2-year results. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:290–7.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kim SJ, Jo SB, Kumar P, Oh K. Comparison of single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps tendon-bone autografts. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:70–7.PubMedCrossRef Kim SJ, Jo SB, Kumar P, Oh K. Comparison of single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps tendon-bone autografts. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:70–7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kondo E, Merican AM, Yasuda K, Amis AA. Biomechanical comparisons of knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between 2 clinically available transtibial procedures: anatomic double bundle versus single bundle. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1349–58.PubMedCrossRef Kondo E, Merican AM, Yasuda K, Amis AA. Biomechanical comparisons of knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between 2 clinically available transtibial procedures: anatomic double bundle versus single bundle. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1349–58.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kondo E, Yasuda K, Azuma H, Tanabe Y, Yagi T. Prospective clinical comparisons of anatomic double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in 328 consecutive patients. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1675–87.PubMedCrossRef Kondo E, Yasuda K, Azuma H, Tanabe Y, Yagi T. Prospective clinical comparisons of anatomic double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in 328 consecutive patients. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1675–87.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Muneta T, Koga H, Mochizuki T, et al. A prospective randomized study of 4-strand semitendinosus tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing single-bundle and double-bundle techniques. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:618–28.PubMedCrossRef Muneta T, Koga H, Mochizuki T, et al. A prospective randomized study of 4-strand semitendinosus tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing single-bundle and double-bundle techniques. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:618–28.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Seon JK, Park SJ, Lee KB, Yoon TR, Seo HY, Song EK. Stability comparison of anterior cruciate ligament between double- and single-bundle reconstructions. Int Orthop. 2009;33:425–9.PubMedCrossRef Seon JK, Park SJ, Lee KB, Yoon TR, Seo HY, Song EK. Stability comparison of anterior cruciate ligament between double- and single-bundle reconstructions. Int Orthop. 2009;33:425–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Siebold R, Dehler C, Ellert T. Prospective randomized comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:137–45.PubMedCrossRef Siebold R, Dehler C, Ellert T. Prospective randomized comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:137–45.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Suomalainen P, Moisala AS, Paakkala A, Kannus P, Järvelä T. Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: randomized clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study with 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:1615–22.PubMedCrossRef Suomalainen P, Moisala AS, Paakkala A, Kannus P, Järvelä T. Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: randomized clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study with 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:1615–22.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Recht MP, Kramer J. MR imaging of the postoperative knee: a pictorial essay. Radiographics. 2002;22:765–74.PubMed Recht MP, Kramer J. MR imaging of the postoperative knee: a pictorial essay. Radiographics. 2002;22:765–74.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Papakonstantinou O, Chung CB, Chanchairujira K, Resnick DL. Complications of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1106–17.PubMed Papakonstantinou O, Chung CB, Chanchairujira K, Resnick DL. Complications of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1106–17.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Vogl TJ, Schmitt J, Lumbrich J, et al. Reconstructed anterior cruciate ligaments using patellar tendon ligament grafts. Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced MRI in a 2-year follow-up regimen. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:1450–6.PubMedCrossRef Vogl TJ, Schmitt J, Lumbrich J, et al. Reconstructed anterior cruciate ligaments using patellar tendon ligament grafts. Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced MRI in a 2-year follow-up regimen. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:1450–6.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference White LM, Kramer J, Recht MP. MR imaging evaluation of the postoperative knee: ligaments, menisci, and articular cartilage. Skeletal Radiol. 2005;34:431–52.PubMedCrossRef White LM, Kramer J, Recht MP. MR imaging evaluation of the postoperative knee: ligaments, menisci, and articular cartilage. Skeletal Radiol. 2005;34:431–52.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Collins MS, Unruh KP, Bond JR, Mandrekar JN. Magnetic resonance imaging of surgically confirmed anterior cruciate ligament graft disruption. Skeletal Radiol. 2008;37:233–43.PubMedCrossRef Collins MS, Unruh KP, Bond JR, Mandrekar JN. Magnetic resonance imaging of surgically confirmed anterior cruciate ligament graft disruption. Skeletal Radiol. 2008;37:233–43.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Saupe N et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction grafts: MR imaging features at long-term follow-up—correlation with functional and clinical evaluation. Radiology. 2008;249:581–90.PubMedCrossRef Saupe N et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction grafts: MR imaging features at long-term follow-up—correlation with functional and clinical evaluation. Radiology. 2008;249:581–90.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bencardino JT, Beltran J, Feldman MI, Rose DJ. MR imaging of complications of anterior cruciate ligament graft reconstruction. Radiographics. 2009;29:2115–26.PubMedCrossRef Bencardino JT, Beltran J, Feldman MI, Rose DJ. MR imaging of complications of anterior cruciate ligament graft reconstruction. Radiographics. 2009;29:2115–26.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Casagranda BC, Maxwell NJ, Kavanagh EC, Towers JD, Shen W, Fu FF. Normal appearance and complications of double-bundle and selective-bundle anterior ligament reconstructions using optimal MRI techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:1407–15.PubMedCrossRef Casagranda BC, Maxwell NJ, Kavanagh EC, Towers JD, Shen W, Fu FF. Normal appearance and complications of double-bundle and selective-bundle anterior ligament reconstructions using optimal MRI techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:1407–15.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Poellinger A, Scheffler S, Hamm B, Asbach P. Magnetic resonance imaging of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38:308–15.CrossRef Poellinger A, Scheffler S, Hamm B, Asbach P. Magnetic resonance imaging of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38:308–15.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sonoda M, Morikawa T, Tsuchiya K, Moriya H. Correlation between knee laxity and graft appearance on magnetic reconance imaging after double-bundle hamstring graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:936–42.PubMedCrossRef Sonoda M, Morikawa T, Tsuchiya K, Moriya H. Correlation between knee laxity and graft appearance on magnetic reconance imaging after double-bundle hamstring graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:936–42.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Howell SM, Clark JA, Blasier RD. Serial magnetic resonance imaging of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament autografts during the first year of implantation. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19:42–7.PubMedCrossRef Howell SM, Clark JA, Blasier RD. Serial magnetic resonance imaging of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament autografts during the first year of implantation. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19:42–7.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Howell SM. Principles for placing the tibial tunnel and avoiding roof impingement during reconstruction of a torn anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998;6 suppl 1:S49–55.PubMedCrossRef Howell SM. Principles for placing the tibial tunnel and avoiding roof impingement during reconstruction of a torn anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998;6 suppl 1:S49–55.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet. 1986;8:307–10.CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet. 1986;8:307–10.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Fu FH, Shen W, Starman JS, Okeke N, Irrgang JJ. Primary anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a preliminary 2-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1263–74.PubMedCrossRef Fu FH, Shen W, Starman JS, Okeke N, Irrgang JJ. Primary anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a preliminary 2-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1263–74.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Järvelä T, Suomalainen P. ACL reconstruction with double-bundle technique: a review on clinical results. Phys Sportsmed. 2011;39:85–92.PubMedCrossRef Järvelä T, Suomalainen P. ACL reconstruction with double-bundle technique: a review on clinical results. Phys Sportsmed. 2011;39:85–92.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Meredick RB, Vance KJ, Appleby D, Lubowitz JH. Outcome of single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1414–21.PubMedCrossRef Meredick RB, Vance KJ, Appleby D, Lubowitz JH. Outcome of single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1414–21.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Giaconi JC, Allen CR, Steinbach LS. Anterior cruciate ligament graft reconstruction: clinical, technical, and imaging overview. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;20:129–50.PubMedCrossRef Giaconi JC, Allen CR, Steinbach LS. Anterior cruciate ligament graft reconstruction: clinical, technical, and imaging overview. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;20:129–50.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Cohen SB, VanBeek C, Starman JS, Armfield D, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH. MRI measurement of the 2 bundles of the normal anterior cruciate ligament. Orthopedics 2009;32:687. doi:10.3928/01477447-20090728-35. Cohen SB, VanBeek C, Starman JS, Armfield D, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH. MRI measurement of the 2 bundles of the normal anterior cruciate ligament. Orthopedics 2009;32:687. doi:10.​3928/​01477447-20090728-35.
36.
go back to reference van Eck CF, Kropf EJ, Romanowski JR, Lesniak BP, Tranovich MJ, van Dijk CN, et al. ACL graft re-rupture after double-bundle reconstruction: factors that influence the intra-articular pattern of injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19:340–6.PubMedCrossRef van Eck CF, Kropf EJ, Romanowski JR, Lesniak BP, Tranovich MJ, van Dijk CN, et al. ACL graft re-rupture after double-bundle reconstruction: factors that influence the intra-articular pattern of injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19:340–6.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Hodler J, Haghighi P, Trudell D, Resnick D. The cruciate ligaments of the knee: correlation between MR appearance and gross and histologic findings in cadaveric specimens. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;159:357–60.PubMed Hodler J, Haghighi P, Trudell D, Resnick D. The cruciate ligaments of the knee: correlation between MR appearance and gross and histologic findings in cadaveric specimens. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;159:357–60.PubMed
38.
go back to reference McIntyre J, Moelleken S, Tirman P. Mucoid degeneration of the anterior cruciate ligament mistaken for ligamentous tears. Skeletal Radiol. 2001;30:312–5.PubMedCrossRef McIntyre J, Moelleken S, Tirman P. Mucoid degeneration of the anterior cruciate ligament mistaken for ligamentous tears. Skeletal Radiol. 2001;30:312–5.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Bergin D, Morrison WB, Carrino JA, Nallamshetty SN, Bartolozzi AR. Anterior cruciate ligament ganglia and mucoid degeneration: coexistence and clinical correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:1283–7.PubMed Bergin D, Morrison WB, Carrino JA, Nallamshetty SN, Bartolozzi AR. Anterior cruciate ligament ganglia and mucoid degeneration: coexistence and clinical correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:1283–7.PubMed
40.
go back to reference Bining J, Andrews G, Forster BB. The ABCs of the anterior cruciate ligament: a primer for magnetic resonance imaging assessment of the normal, injured and surgically repaired anterior cruciate ligament. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43:856–62.PubMedCrossRef Bining J, Andrews G, Forster BB. The ABCs of the anterior cruciate ligament: a primer for magnetic resonance imaging assessment of the normal, injured and surgically repaired anterior cruciate ligament. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43:856–62.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Buck FM, Grehn H, Hilbe M, Pfirrmann CWA, Manzanell S, Hodler J. Magnetic resonance histologic correlation in rotator cuff tendons. J Magn Res Im. 2010;32:165–72.CrossRef Buck FM, Grehn H, Hilbe M, Pfirrmann CWA, Manzanell S, Hodler J. Magnetic resonance histologic correlation in rotator cuff tendons. J Magn Res Im. 2010;32:165–72.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Jansson KA et al. MRI of the anterior cruciate ligament repair with patellar and hamstring autografts. Skeletal Radiol. 2001;30:8–14.PubMedCrossRef Jansson KA et al. MRI of the anterior cruciate ligament repair with patellar and hamstring autografts. Skeletal Radiol. 2001;30:8–14.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
MRI of double-bundle ACL reconstruction: evaluation of graft findings
Authors
Tommi Kiekara
Timo Järvelä
Heini Huhtala
Antti Paakkala
Publication date
01-07-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 7/2012
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1285-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2012

Skeletal Radiology 7/2012 Go to the issue

Test Yourself: Question

Subpubic cyst

Test Yourself: Answer

Subpubic cyst