Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 11/2009

01-11-2009 | Scientific Article

Ultrasound of the hands and feet for rheumatological disorders: influence on clinical diagnostic confidence and patient management

Authors: Mark Matsos, Srinivasan Harish, Peter Zia, Yvonne Ho, Andrew Chow, George Ioannidis, Nader Khalidi

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 11/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to quantify the impact that ultrasound (US) of the hands and feet has on the rheumatologists' diagnostic confidence and on patient management.

Materials and methods

There were 62 consecutive referrals from two rheumatologists for US of the hands and/or feet for this prospective controlled observational study. Measurements of diagnostic confidence for both specific clinical findings as well as overall diagnosis using a Likert scale were made both before and after the US examination in each case. Proposed management was also recorded before US and then with the benefit of the US result. McNemar’s test was performed to determine differences in diagnostic certainty and proposed management before and after US.

Results

The physician certainty for specific clinical findings increased significantly following US for synovitis (9.7 vs 38.7%), tenosynovitis (9.7 vs 46.8%), erosions (1.6 vs 58.1%), enthesitis (50.0 vs 83.9%) and other (53.2 vs 77.4%). The physician certainty for overall diagnosis increased significantly for seronegative arthritis (46.8 vs 61.3%), inflammatory osteoarthritis (46.8 vs 87.1%), and primary osteoarthritis (46.8 vs 73.0%). A total of 88.7% of patients had disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs as a proposed management option before US vs 48.4% after US. Before US, 4.8% of patients had non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug as a proposed management option versus 45.2% after US.

Conclusion

Ultrasound of the hands and/or feet significantly influenced the rheumatologists' diagnostic confidence in specific clinical findings and management plans.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kane D, Grassi W, Sturrock R, Balint PV. Musculoskeletal ultrasound—a state of the art review in rheumatology. II. Clinical indications for musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;43:829–38.CrossRef Kane D, Grassi W, Sturrock R, Balint PV. Musculoskeletal ultrasound—a state of the art review in rheumatology. II. Clinical indications for musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;43:829–38.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wakefield RJ, Green MJ, Marzo-Ortega H, et al. Should oligoarthritis be reclassified? Ultrasound reveals a high prevalence of subclinical disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:382–385.CrossRef Wakefield RJ, Green MJ, Marzo-Ortega H, et al. Should oligoarthritis be reclassified? Ultrasound reveals a high prevalence of subclinical disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:382–385.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Szkudlarek M, Klarlund M, Narvestad E, et al. Ultrasonography of the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography and clinical examination. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006; 8:R52.CrossRef Szkudlarek M, Klarlund M, Narvestad E, et al. Ultrasonography of the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography and clinical examination. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006; 8:R52.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Szkudlarek M, Narvestad E, Klarlund M, Court-Payen M, Thomsen HS, Østergaard M. Ultrasonography of the metatarsophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography, and clinical examination. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:2103–12.CrossRef Szkudlarek M, Narvestad E, Klarlund M, Court-Payen M, Thomsen HS, Østergaard M. Ultrasonography of the metatarsophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography, and clinical examination. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:2103–12.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wiell C, Szkudlarek M, Hasselquist M, et al. Ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, radiography, and clinical assessment of inflammatory and destructive changes in fingers and toes of patients with psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007;9:R119.CrossRef Wiell C, Szkudlarek M, Hasselquist M, et al. Ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, radiography, and clinical assessment of inflammatory and destructive changes in fingers and toes of patients with psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007;9:R119.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Salaffi F, Filippucci E, Carotti M, et al. Inter-observer agreement of standard joint counts in early rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with grey scale ultrasonography—a preliminary study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008;47:54–8.CrossRef Salaffi F, Filippucci E, Carotti M, et al. Inter-observer agreement of standard joint counts in early rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with grey scale ultrasonography—a preliminary study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008;47:54–8.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference McNally EG. Ultrasound of the small joints of the hands and feet: current status. Skeletal Radiol. 2008;37:99–113.CrossRef McNally EG. Ultrasound of the small joints of the hands and feet: current status. Skeletal Radiol. 2008;37:99–113.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Karim Z, Wakefield RJ, Conaghan PG, et al. The impact of ultrasonography on diagnosis and management of patients with musculoskeletal conditions. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44:2932–3.CrossRef Karim Z, Wakefield RJ, Conaghan PG, et al. The impact of ultrasonography on diagnosis and management of patients with musculoskeletal conditions. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44:2932–3.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Agrawal S, Bhagat SS, Dasgupta B. Improvement in diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal conditions with one-stop clinic-based ultrasonography. Mod Rheumatol. 2009;19:53–6.CrossRef Agrawal S, Bhagat SS, Dasgupta B. Improvement in diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal conditions with one-stop clinic-based ultrasonography. Mod Rheumatol. 2009;19:53–6.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wakefield RJ, Balint PV, Szkudlarek M, et al. Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. J Rheumatol. 2005;32:2485–7. Wakefield RJ, Balint PV, Szkudlarek M, et al. Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. J Rheumatol. 2005;32:2485–7.
11.
go back to reference Albrecht K, Grob K, Lange U, Müller-Ladner U, Strunk J. Reliability of different Doppler ultrasound quantification methods and devices in the assessment of therapeutic response in arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008;47:1521–6.CrossRef Albrecht K, Grob K, Lange U, Müller-Ladner U, Strunk J. Reliability of different Doppler ultrasound quantification methods and devices in the assessment of therapeutic response in arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008;47:1521–6.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bearcroft PW, Guy S, Bradley M, Robinson F. MRI of the ankle: effect on diagnostic confidence and patient management. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:1327–31.CrossRef Bearcroft PW, Guy S, Bradley M, Robinson F. MRI of the ankle: effect on diagnostic confidence and patient management. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:1327–31.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hobby JL, Dixon AK, Bearcroft PW, et al. MR imaging of the wrist: effect on clinical diagnosis and patient care. Radiology. 2001;220:589–93.CrossRef Hobby JL, Dixon AK, Bearcroft PW, et al. MR imaging of the wrist: effect on clinical diagnosis and patient care. Radiology. 2001;220:589–93.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Grassi W. Clinical evaluation versus ultrasonography: who is the winner? J Rheumatol. 2003;30:908–9.PubMed Grassi W. Clinical evaluation versus ultrasonography: who is the winner? J Rheumatol. 2003;30:908–9.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Delle Sedie A, Riente L, Bombardieri S. Limits and perspectives of ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of rheumatic diseases. Mod Rheumatol. 2008;18:125–31.CrossRef Delle Sedie A, Riente L, Bombardieri S. Limits and perspectives of ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of rheumatic diseases. Mod Rheumatol. 2008;18:125–31.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ultrasound of the hands and feet for rheumatological disorders: influence on clinical diagnostic confidence and patient management
Authors
Mark Matsos
Srinivasan Harish
Peter Zia
Yvonne Ho
Andrew Chow
George Ioannidis
Nader Khalidi
Publication date
01-11-2009
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 11/2009
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0738-2

Other articles of this Issue 11/2009

Skeletal Radiology 11/2009 Go to the issue