Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 11/2009

01-11-2009 | Scientific Article

Supraspinatus tendon tears: comparison of 3D US and MR arthrography with surgical correlation

Authors: Chang Ho Kang, Sam Soo Kim, Jung Hyuk Kim, Kyoo Byung Chung, Yun Hwan Kim, Yu-Whan Oh, Woong-Kyo Jeong, Baek Hyun Kim

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 11/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The objective of the study was to compare the diagnostic reliability of 3D US with MR arthrography in diagnosing supraspinatus tendon tears, with arthroscopic findings used as the standard.

Materials and methods

In a prospective study 50 patients who later underwent arthroscopic surgery of the rotator cuff were examined pre-operatively by 3D US with MR arthrography. The presence or absence of a full- or partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tear and the tear size as demonstrated by each imaging and arthroscopy was recorded. The tear size was divided into three grades: small (<1 cm), medium (1-3 cm), and large (>3 cm).

Results

The arthroscopic diagnosis was a full-thickness tear in 40 patients, partial-thickness tears in 5, and intact supraspinatus tendon in 5. 3D US correctly diagnosed 35 out of 40 full-thickness tears and MR arthrography 39 out of 40 full-thickness tears. Regarding partial-thickness tears, 3D US underestimated 2 cases as no tear and overestimated 1 case as a full-thickness tear. MR arthrography underestimated 1 case as a partial-thickness tear and overestimated 2 cases as full-thickness and partial-thickness tears respectively. 3D US and MR arthrography yield a sensitivity for full-thickness tears of 87.5% and 97.5% with specificity of 90.0% and 90.0%. Based on the grading system, 3D US measurements correctly predicted the tear size of 23 (65.7%) of the 35 full-thickness tears and MR arthrography 30 (75.0%) of the 39 full-thickness tears.

Conclusion

Three-dimensional ultrasound seems to be a promising imaging modality comparable to MR arthrography for the assessment of the supraspinatus tendon tears.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bachmann GF, Melzer C, Heinrichs CM, Mohring B, Rominger MB. Diagnosis of rotator cuff lesions: comparison of US and MRI on 38 joint specimens. Eur Radiol. 1997;7:192–7.CrossRef Bachmann GF, Melzer C, Heinrichs CM, Mohring B, Rominger MB. Diagnosis of rotator cuff lesions: comparison of US and MRI on 38 joint specimens. Eur Radiol. 1997;7:192–7.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Seibold CJ, Mallisee TA, Erickson SJ, Boynton MD, Raasch WG, Timins ME. Rotator cuff: evaluation with US and MR imaging. Radiographics. 1999;19:685–705.CrossRef Seibold CJ, Mallisee TA, Erickson SJ, Boynton MD, Raasch WG, Timins ME. Rotator cuff: evaluation with US and MR imaging. Radiographics. 1999;19:685–705.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Teefey SA, Hasan SA, Middleton WD, Patel M, Wright RW, Yamaguchi K. Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff. A comparison of ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings in one hundred consecutive cases. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2000;82:498–504.CrossRef Teefey SA, Hasan SA, Middleton WD, Patel M, Wright RW, Yamaguchi K. Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff. A comparison of ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings in one hundred consecutive cases. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2000;82:498–504.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Takagishi K, Makino K, Takahira N, Ikeda T, Tsuruno K, Itoman M. Ultrasonography for diagnosis of rotator cuff tear. Skeletal Radiol. 1996;25:221–4.CrossRef Takagishi K, Makino K, Takahira N, Ikeda T, Tsuruno K, Itoman M. Ultrasonography for diagnosis of rotator cuff tear. Skeletal Radiol. 1996;25:221–4.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Uri DS. MR imaging of shoulder impingement and rotator cuff disease. Radiol Clin North Am. 1997;35:77–96.PubMed Uri DS. MR imaging of shoulder impingement and rotator cuff disease. Radiol Clin North Am. 1997;35:77–96.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Schiavone Panni A, Milano G, Lucania L, Fabbriciani C. Subacromial space disorders: clinical features and therapeutic indications. J Sports Traumatol Relat Res. 1995;17:143–68. Schiavone Panni A, Milano G, Lucania L, Fabbriciani C. Subacromial space disorders: clinical features and therapeutic indications. J Sports Traumatol Relat Res. 1995;17:143–68.
7.
go back to reference Guckel C, Nidecker A. Diagnosis of tears in rotator-cuff-injuries. Eur J Radiol. 1997;25:168–76.CrossRef Guckel C, Nidecker A. Diagnosis of tears in rotator-cuff-injuries. Eur J Radiol. 1997;25:168–76.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Downey DB, Fenster A, Williams JC. Clinical utility of three-dimensional US. Radiographics. 2000;20:559–71.CrossRef Downey DB, Fenster A, Williams JC. Clinical utility of three-dimensional US. Radiographics. 2000;20:559–71.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wallny TA, Theuerkauf I, Schild RL, Perlick L, Bertelsbeck DS. The three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of the rotator cuff—an experimental study. Eur J Ultrasound. 2000;11:135–41.CrossRef Wallny TA, Theuerkauf I, Schild RL, Perlick L, Bertelsbeck DS. The three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of the rotator cuff—an experimental study. Eur J Ultrasound. 2000;11:135–41.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Leotta DF, Martin RW. Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the rotator cuff: spatial compounding and tendon thickness measurement. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000;26:509–25.CrossRef Leotta DF, Martin RW. Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the rotator cuff: spatial compounding and tendon thickness measurement. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000;26:509–25.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Teefey SA, Rubin DA, Middleton WD, Hildebolt CF, Leibold RA, Yamaguchi K. Detection and quantification of rotator cuff tears. Comparison of ultrasonographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopic findings in seventy-one consecutive cases. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2004;86-A:708–16.CrossRef Teefey SA, Rubin DA, Middleton WD, Hildebolt CF, Leibold RA, Yamaguchi K. Detection and quantification of rotator cuff tears. Comparison of ultrasonographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopic findings in seventy-one consecutive cases. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2004;86-A:708–16.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Quinn SF, Sheley RC, Demlow TA, Szumowski J. Rotator cuff tendon tears: evaluation with fat-suppressed MR imaging with arthroscopic correlation in 100 patients. Radiology. 1995;195:497–500.CrossRef Quinn SF, Sheley RC, Demlow TA, Szumowski J. Rotator cuff tendon tears: evaluation with fat-suppressed MR imaging with arthroscopic correlation in 100 patients. Radiology. 1995;195:497–500.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Singson RD, Hoang T, Dan S, Friedman M. MR evaluation of rotator cuff pathology using T2-weighted fast spin-echo technique with and without fat suppression. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:1061–5.CrossRef Singson RD, Hoang T, Dan S, Friedman M. MR evaluation of rotator cuff pathology using T2-weighted fast spin-echo technique with and without fat suppression. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:1061–5.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Nelson MC, Leather GP, Nirschl RP, Pettrone FA, Freedman MT. Evaluation of the painful shoulder. A prospective comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, computerized tomographic arthrography, ultrasonography, and operative findings. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1991;73:707–16.CrossRef Nelson MC, Leather GP, Nirschl RP, Pettrone FA, Freedman MT. Evaluation of the painful shoulder. A prospective comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, computerized tomographic arthrography, ultrasonography, and operative findings. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1991;73:707–16.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rafii M, Firooznia H, Sherman O, et al. Rotator cuff lesions: signal patterns at MR imaging. Radiology. 1990;177:817–23.CrossRef Rafii M, Firooznia H, Sherman O, et al. Rotator cuff lesions: signal patterns at MR imaging. Radiology. 1990;177:817–23.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Balich SM, Sheley RC, Brown TR, Sauser DD, Quinn SF. MR imaging of the rotator cuff tendon: interobserver agreement and analysis of interpretive errors. Radiology. 1997;204:191–194.CrossRef Balich SM, Sheley RC, Brown TR, Sauser DD, Quinn SF. MR imaging of the rotator cuff tendon: interobserver agreement and analysis of interpretive errors. Radiology. 1997;204:191–194.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Iannotti JP, Zlatkin MB, Esterhai JL, Kressel HY, Dalinka MK, Spindler KP. Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1991;73:17–29.CrossRef Iannotti JP, Zlatkin MB, Esterhai JL, Kressel HY, Dalinka MK, Spindler KP. Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1991;73:17–29.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Reinus WR, Shady KL, Mirowitz SA, Totty WG. MR diagnosis of rotator cuff tears of the shoulder: value of using T2-weighted fat-saturated images. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:1451–5.CrossRef Reinus WR, Shady KL, Mirowitz SA, Totty WG. MR diagnosis of rotator cuff tears of the shoulder: value of using T2-weighted fat-saturated images. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:1451–5.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hodler J, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Snyder SJ, et al. Rotator cuff disease: assessment with MR arthrography versus standard MR imaging in 36 patients with arthroscopic confirmation. Radiology. 1992;182:431–6.CrossRef Hodler J, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Snyder SJ, et al. Rotator cuff disease: assessment with MR arthrography versus standard MR imaging in 36 patients with arthroscopic confirmation. Radiology. 1992;182:431–6.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ferrari FS, Governi S, Burresi F, Vigni F, Stefani P. Supraspinatus tendon tears: comparison of US and MR arthrography with surgical correlation. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1211–7.CrossRef Ferrari FS, Governi S, Burresi F, Vigni F, Stefani P. Supraspinatus tendon tears: comparison of US and MR arthrography with surgical correlation. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1211–7.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Waldt S, Bruegel M, Mueller D, et al. Rotator cuff tears: assessment with MR arthrography in 275 patients with arthroscopic correlation. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:491–8.CrossRef Waldt S, Bruegel M, Mueller D, et al. Rotator cuff tears: assessment with MR arthrography in 275 patients with arthroscopic correlation. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:491–8.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Middleton WD, Reinus WR, Totty WG, Melson CL, Murphy WA. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the rotator cuff and biceps tendon. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1986;68:440–50.CrossRef Middleton WD, Reinus WR, Totty WG, Melson CL, Murphy WA. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the rotator cuff and biceps tendon. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1986;68:440–50.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Milosavljevic J, Elvin A, Rahme H. Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff: a comparison with arthroscopy in one-hundred-and-ninety consecutive cases. Acta Radiol. 2005;46:858–65.CrossRef Milosavljevic J, Elvin A, Rahme H. Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff: a comparison with arthroscopy in one-hundred-and-ninety consecutive cases. Acta Radiol. 2005;46:858–65.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Iannotti JP, Ciccone J, Buss DD, et al. Accuracy of office-based ultrasonography of the shoulder for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2005;87:1305–11. Iannotti JP, Ciccone J, Buss DD, et al. Accuracy of office-based ultrasonography of the shoulder for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2005;87:1305–11.
25.
go back to reference Kenn W, Hufnagel P, Muller T, et al. Arthrography, ultrasound and MRI in rotator cuff lesions: a comparison of methods in partial lesions and small complete ruptures. Rofo. 2000;172:260–6.CrossRef Kenn W, Hufnagel P, Muller T, et al. Arthrography, ultrasound and MRI in rotator cuff lesions: a comparison of methods in partial lesions and small complete ruptures. Rofo. 2000;172:260–6.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Neviaser RJ, Neviaser TJ. Reconstruction of chronic tears of the rotator cuff. In: Bateman JE, Welsh RP, editors. Surgery of the shoulder. Philadelphia: Mosby; 1984. p. 172–9. Neviaser RJ, Neviaser TJ. Reconstruction of chronic tears of the rotator cuff. In: Bateman JE, Welsh RP, editors. Surgery of the shoulder. Philadelphia: Mosby; 1984. p. 172–9.
27.
go back to reference Zlatkin MB, Iannotti JP, Roberts MC, et al. Rotator cuff tears: diagnostic performance of MR imaging. Radiology. 1989;172:223–9.CrossRef Zlatkin MB, Iannotti JP, Roberts MC, et al. Rotator cuff tears: diagnostic performance of MR imaging. Radiology. 1989;172:223–9.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bryant L, Shnier R, Bryant C, Murrell GA. A comparison of clinical estimation, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopy in determining the size of rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:219–24.CrossRef Bryant L, Shnier R, Bryant C, Murrell GA. A comparison of clinical estimation, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopy in determining the size of rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:219–24.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Farin PU, Kaukanen E, Jaroma H, Vaatainen U, Miettinen H, Soimakallio S. Site and size of rotator-cuff tear. Findings at ultrasound, double-contrast arthrography, and computed tomography arthrography with surgical correlation. Invest Radiol. 1996;31:387–94.CrossRef Farin PU, Kaukanen E, Jaroma H, Vaatainen U, Miettinen H, Soimakallio S. Site and size of rotator-cuff tear. Findings at ultrasound, double-contrast arthrography, and computed tomography arthrography with surgical correlation. Invest Radiol. 1996;31:387–94.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Brenneke SL, Morgan CJ. Evaluation of ultrasonography as a diagnostic technique in the assessment of rotator cuff tendon tears. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20:287–9.CrossRef Brenneke SL, Morgan CJ. Evaluation of ultrasonography as a diagnostic technique in the assessment of rotator cuff tendon tears. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20:287–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Supraspinatus tendon tears: comparison of 3D US and MR arthrography with surgical correlation
Authors
Chang Ho Kang
Sam Soo Kim
Jung Hyuk Kim
Kyoo Byung Chung
Yun Hwan Kim
Yu-Whan Oh
Woong-Kyo Jeong
Baek Hyun Kim
Publication date
01-11-2009
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 11/2009
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0734-6

Other articles of this Issue 11/2009

Skeletal Radiology 11/2009 Go to the issue

Test Yourself: Question

Painless mass in leg