Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Skeletal Radiology
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 8/2007

01-08-2007 | Scientific Article

Radiographic measures of thoracic kyphosis in osteoporosis: Cobb and vertebral centroid angles

Authors: A. M. Briggs, T. V. Wrigley, E. A. Tully, P. E. Adams, A. M. Greig, K. L. Bennell

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 8/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Several measures can quantify thoracic kyphosis from radiographs, yet their suitability for people with osteoporosis remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of the vertebral centroid and Cobb angles in people with osteoporosis.

Design and patients

Lateral radiographs of the thoracic spine were captured in 31 elderly women with osteoporosis. Thoracic kyphosis was measured globally (T1–T12) and regionally (T4–T9) using Cobb and vertebral centroid angles. Multisegmental curvature was also measured by fitting polynomial functions to the thoracic curvature profile. Canonical and Pearson correlations were used to examine correspondence; agreement between measures was examined with linear regression.

Results

Moderate to high intra- and inter-rater reliability was achieved (SEM = 0.9–4.0°). Concurrent validity of the simple measures was established against multisegmental curvature (r = 0.88–0.98). Strong association was observed between the Cobb and centroid angles globally (r = 0.84) and regionally (r = 0.83). Correspondence between measures was moderate for the Cobb method r = 0.72), yet stronger for the centroid method (r = 0.80). The Cobb angle was 20% greater for regional measures due to the influence of endplate tilt.

Conclusions

Regional Cobb and centroid angles are valid and reliable measures of thoracic kyphosis in people with osteoporosis. However, the Cobb angle is biased by endplate tilt, suggesting that the centroid angle is more appropriate for this population.
Literature
1.
Kado DM, Christianson L, Palermo L, Smith-Bindman R, Cummings SR, Greendale GA. Comparing a supine radiologic versus standing clinical measurement of kyphosis in older women: the fracture intervention trial. Spine 2006; 31 4: 463–467.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Arnold CM, Beatty B, Harrison EL, Olszynski W. The reliability of five clinical postural alignment measures for women with osteoporosis. Physiother Can 2000; 52 4: 286–294.
3.
Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG. Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol 1990; 72 3: 328–333.
4.
Stotts AK, Smith JT, Santora SD, Roach JW, D’Astous JL. Measurement of spinal kyphosis: implications for the management of Scheuermann’s kyphosis. Spine 2002; 27 19: 2143–2146.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Harrison DE, Cailliet R, Harrison DD, Janik TJ, Holland B. Reliability of centroid, Cobb, and Harrison posterior tangent methods: which to choose for analysis of thoracic kyphosis. Spine 2001; 26 11: E227–E234.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, Holland B. Radiographic analysis of lumbar lordosis: centroid, Cobb, TRALL, and Harrison posterior tangent methods. Spine 2001; 26 11: E235–E242.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Chen Y. Vertebral centroid measurement of lumbar lordosis compared with the Cobb technique. Spine 1999; 24 17: 1786–1790.PubMedCrossRef
8.
McAlister WH, Shackelford GD. Measurement of spinal curvatures. Radiol Clin North Am 1975; 13 1: 113–121.PubMed
9.
Singer KP, Jones TJ, Breidahl PD. A comparison of radiographic and computer-assisted measurements of thoracic and thoracolumbar sagittal curvature. Skeletal Radiol 1990; 19 1: 21–26.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Bernhardt M, Bridwell KH. Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction. Spine 1989; 14: 717–721.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Singer KP, Edmondston SJ, Day RE, Breidahl WH. Computer-assisted curvature assessment and Cobb angle determination of the thoracic kyphosis. An in vivo and in vitro comparison. Spine 1994; 19 12: 1381–1384.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Goh S, Price RI, Leedman PJ, Singer KP. A comparison of three methods for measuring thoracic kyphosis: implications for clinical studies. Rheumatology 2000; 39 3: 310–315.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Goh S, Price RI, Leedman PJ, Singer KP. The relative influence of vertebral body and intervertebral disc shape on thoracic kyphosis. Clin Biomech 1999; 14 7: 439–448.CrossRef
14.
McCloskey EV, Spector TD, Eyres KS, et al. The assessment of vertebral deformity: a method for use in population studies and clinical trials. Osteoporos Int 1993; 3 3: 138–147.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Fon GT, Pitt MJ, Thies AC. Thoracic kyphosis: range in normal subjects. Am J Roentgenol 1980; 134: 979–983.
16.
Osman AAH, Bassiouni H, Koutri R, Nijs J, Geusens P, Dequeker J. Aging of the thoracic spine. Distinction between wedging in osteoarthritis and fracture in osteoporosis: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Bone 1994; 15 4: 437–442.CrossRef
17.
Pradhan B, Bae HW, Kropf MA, Patel VV, Delamarter RB. Kyphoplasty reduction of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: correction of local kyphosis versus overall sagittal alignment. Spine 2006; 31 4: 435–441.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Voutsinas SA, McEwan GD. Sagittal profiles of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; 210: 235–242.PubMed
19.
De Smet AA, Robinson RG, Johnson BE, Lukert BP. Spinal compression fractures in osteoporotic women: patterns and relationship to hyperkyphosis. Radiology 1988; 166: 497–500.PubMed
20.
Singer KP, Goh S. Anatomy of the thoracic spine. In: Giles LGF, Singer KP, editors. Clinical anatomy and management of thoracic spine pain. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2000, p. 17–33.
Metadata
Title
Radiographic measures of thoracic kyphosis in osteoporosis: Cobb and vertebral centroid angles
Authors
A. M. Briggs
T. V. Wrigley
E. A. Tully
P. E. Adams
A. M. Greig
K. L. Bennell
Publication date
01-08-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 8/2007
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-007-0284-8

Other articles of this Issue 8/2007

Skeletal Radiology 8/2007 Go to the issue

Case Report

Subungual keratoacanthoma: ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging findings

Review Article

MR imaging of the posterolateral corner of the knee

Browser's Notes

Browser’s Notes

Case Report

Anomalies of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon: clinical significance, MR arthrographic findings, and arthroscopic correlation in two patients

Scientific Article

Meniscofemoral ligaments: patterns of tears and pseudotears of the menisci using cadaveric and clinical material

Scientific Article

Imaging of pseudoneoplastic masses associated with allografts