Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 11/2021

01-10-2021 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | ESPR

Indications for magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal central nervous system: recommendations from the European Society of Paediatric Radiology Fetal Task Force

Authors: Georgia Papaioannou, Willemijn Klein, Marie Cassart, Catherine Garel

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 11/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Fetal central nervous system MRI is a well-established method to complement a high-quality fetal ultrasound and to clarify sonographically detected abnormalities in complex pregnancies. However, there is still worldwide heterogeneity and confusion regarding the indications of fetal central nervous system MRI, which has roots in differences among countries regarding the performance of ultrasound examinations and legislation on pregnancy termination. The purpose of this article is to clarify the indications for fetal central nervous system MRI by focusing on the ultrasound findings that guide further investigation with MRI and highlight the strengths and the weaknesses of each modality on imaging the fetal central nervous system.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Salomon LJ, Garel C (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging examination of the fetal brain. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:1019–1032CrossRef Salomon LJ, Garel C (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging examination of the fetal brain. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:1019–1032CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Garel C (2008) Imaging the fetus: when does MRI really help? Pediatr Radiol 38:S467–S470CrossRef Garel C (2008) Imaging the fetus: when does MRI really help? Pediatr Radiol 38:S467–S470CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Krishnamurthy U, Neelavalli J, Mody S et al (2015) MR imaging of the fetal brain at 1.5T and 3.0T field strengths: comparing specific absorption rate (SAR) and image quality. J Perinat Med 43:209–220CrossRef Krishnamurthy U, Neelavalli J, Mody S et al (2015) MR imaging of the fetal brain at 1.5T and 3.0T field strengths: comparing specific absorption rate (SAR) and image quality. J Perinat Med 43:209–220CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Garel C, Moutard M-L (2014) Main congenital cerebral anomalies: how prenatal imaging aids counceling. Fetal Diagn Ther 35:229–239CrossRef Garel C, Moutard M-L (2014) Main congenital cerebral anomalies: how prenatal imaging aids counceling. Fetal Diagn Ther 35:229–239CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cassart M, Garel C (2020) European overview of current practice of fetal imaging by pediatric radiologists: a new task force is launched. Pediatr Radiol 50:1794–1798CrossRef Cassart M, Garel C (2020) European overview of current practice of fetal imaging by pediatric radiologists: a new task force is launched. Pediatr Radiol 50:1794–1798CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rossi AC, Prefumo F (2014) Additional value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system anomalies: a systematic review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 44:388–393CrossRef Rossi AC, Prefumo F (2014) Additional value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system anomalies: a systematic review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 44:388–393CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Griffiths PD, Bradburn M, Campbell MJ et al (2019) MRI in the diagnosis of fetal developmental brain abnormalities: the MERIDIAN diagnostic accuracy study. Health Technol Assess 23:1–144CrossRef Griffiths PD, Bradburn M, Campbell MJ et al (2019) MRI in the diagnosis of fetal developmental brain abnormalities: the MERIDIAN diagnostic accuracy study. Health Technol Assess 23:1–144CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Griffiths PD, Mooney C, Bradburn M, Jarvis D (2018) Should we perform in utero MRI on a fetus at increased risk of a brain abnormality if ultrasonography is normal or shows non-specific findings? Clin Radiol 73:123–134CrossRef Griffiths PD, Mooney C, Bradburn M, Jarvis D (2018) Should we perform in utero MRI on a fetus at increased risk of a brain abnormality if ultrasonography is normal or shows non-specific findings? Clin Radiol 73:123–134CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Diogo MC, Glatter S, Binder J et al (2020) The MRI spectrum of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Prenat Diagn 40:110–124CrossRef Diogo MC, Glatter S, Binder J et al (2020) The MRI spectrum of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Prenat Diagn 40:110–124CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Atallah A, Lacalm A, Massoud M et al (2018) Prenatal diagnosis of pericallosal curvilinear lipoma: specific imaging pattern and diagnostic pitfalls. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 51:269–273CrossRef Atallah A, Lacalm A, Massoud M et al (2018) Prenatal diagnosis of pericallosal curvilinear lipoma: specific imaging pattern and diagnostic pitfalls. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 51:269–273CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Griffiths PD, Jarvis D (2016) In utero MR imaging of fetal holoprosencephaly: a structures approach to diagnosis and classification. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37:535–543CrossRef Griffiths PD, Jarvis D (2016) In utero MR imaging of fetal holoprosencephaly: a structures approach to diagnosis and classification. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37:535–543CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Cabet S, Karl K, Garel C et al (2020) Two different prenatal imaging cerebral patterns of tubulinopathies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 57:493–497CrossRef Cabet S, Karl K, Garel C et al (2020) Two different prenatal imaging cerebral patterns of tubulinopathies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 57:493–497CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Esteban H, Blondiaux E, Audureau E et al (2015) Prenatal features of isolated subependymal pseudocysts associated with adverse pregnancy outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 46:678–687CrossRef Esteban H, Blondiaux E, Audureau E et al (2015) Prenatal features of isolated subependymal pseudocysts associated with adverse pregnancy outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 46:678–687CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Putbrese B, Kennedy A (2017) Findings and differential diagnosis of fetal intracranial haemorrhage and fetal ischaemic brain injury: what is the role of fetal MRI? Br J Radiol 90:20160253CrossRef Putbrese B, Kennedy A (2017) Findings and differential diagnosis of fetal intracranial haemorrhage and fetal ischaemic brain injury: what is the role of fetal MRI? Br J Radiol 90:20160253CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Garel C, Delezoide A-L, Elmalech-Berges M et al (2004) Contribution of fetal MR imaging in the evaluation of cerebral ischemic lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25:1563–1568PubMedPubMedCentral Garel C, Delezoide A-L, Elmalech-Berges M et al (2004) Contribution of fetal MR imaging in the evaluation of cerebral ischemic lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25:1563–1568PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Garel C (2010) Posterior fossa malformations: main features and limits in prenatal diagnosis. Pediatr Radiol 40:1038–1045CrossRef Garel C (2010) Posterior fossa malformations: main features and limits in prenatal diagnosis. Pediatr Radiol 40:1038–1045CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Massoud M, Cagneaux M, Garel C et al (2014) Prenatal unilateral cerebellar hypoplasia in a series of 26 cases: significance and implication for prenatal diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 44:447–454CrossRef Massoud M, Cagneaux M, Garel C et al (2014) Prenatal unilateral cerebellar hypoplasia in a series of 26 cases: significance and implication for prenatal diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 44:447–454CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bulas D (2010) Fetal evaluation of spine dysraphism. Pediatr Radiol 40:1029–1037CrossRef Bulas D (2010) Fetal evaluation of spine dysraphism. Pediatr Radiol 40:1029–1037CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Indications for magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal central nervous system: recommendations from the European Society of Paediatric Radiology Fetal Task Force
Authors
Georgia Papaioannou
Willemijn Klein
Marie Cassart
Catherine Garel
Publication date
01-10-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 11/2021
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021-05104-w

Other articles of this Issue 11/2021

Pediatric Radiology 11/2021 Go to the issue