Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 7/2020

01-06-2020 | Ultrasound | Original Article

Feasibility and reproducibility of shear wave elastography in pediatric cranial ultrasound

Authors: Alexander M. El-Ali, Subramanian Subramanian, Lisa M. Krofchik, Morie C. Kephart, Judy H. Squires

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 7/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Head ultrasound (US) is commonly used to evaluate the neonatal brain but may be limited by its lack of sensitivity and specificity. Ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) might provide additional information to conventional gray-scale imaging.

Objective

To assess whether SWE of brain parenchyma can be (1) successfully performed at a large academic medical center where US technologists perform the majority of examinations and (2) used to detect intracranial pathology.

Materials and methods

Pediatric patients undergoing head ultrasound underwent simultaneous SWE examination. We included normal examinations (n=70) and those with intracranial pathology (n=8) for analysis. We analyzed inter-reader variability and examination success rates and assessed the stiffness of white matter and deep gray nuclei in normal and pathological states across multiple gestational age groups.

Results

Average gestational age of the term, pre-term and extreme pre-term groups were 38.4±1.2 weeks, 29.0±3.7 weeks and 28.3±3.1 weeks, respectively. Overall examination success rate was 79.5%. We observed a decrease in the SWE examination time from the first month (5.9±3.7 min) to the second month (4.1±1.7 min; P=0.01). Forty-one repeat examinations were performed on 14 children by different technologists, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.91. Mean stiffness in the periventricular white matter was lower than in the deep gray nuclei in all gestational age groups: term group (1.3 m/s vs. 1.5 m/s, P<0.001), pre-term (1.3 m/s vs. 1.4 m/s P=0.12), and extremely preterm group (1.2 m/s vs. 1.4 m/s, P=0.001). Mean stiffness for the deep gray nuclei differed between the term (1.5±0.3 m/s) and pre-term (1.4±0.2 m/s) groups (P<0.01). No significant differences in white matter stiffness were seen in relation to gestational age. Infants with large intraparenchymal hemorrhage had increased white matter stiffness (1.3±0.1 m/s) and deep gray nuclei stiffness (1.6±0.2 m/s) compared to full-term infants with normal head ultrasounds. These differences approached statistical significance with P=0.09 and P=0.06, respectively.

Conclusion

We demonstrated that SWE performed by pediatric sonography technologists is reproducible. We found differences in stiffness between deep gray nuclei and periventricular white matter across multiple age groups.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Steggerda SJ, Leijser LM, Walther FJ, van Wezel-Meijler G (2009) Neonatal cranial ultrasonography: how to optimize its performance. Early Hum Dev 85:93–99CrossRef Steggerda SJ, Leijser LM, Walther FJ, van Wezel-Meijler G (2009) Neonatal cranial ultrasonography: how to optimize its performance. Early Hum Dev 85:93–99CrossRef
2.
go back to reference deCampo D, Hwang M (2018) Characterizing the neonatal brain with ultrasound elastography. Pediatr Neurol 86:19–26CrossRef deCampo D, Hwang M (2018) Characterizing the neonatal brain with ultrasound elastography. Pediatr Neurol 86:19–26CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Davies G, Koenen M (2011) Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography in distinguishing hepatic haemangiomata from metastases: preliminary observations. Br J Radiol 84:939–943CrossRef Davies G, Koenen M (2011) Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography in distinguishing hepatic haemangiomata from metastases: preliminary observations. Br J Radiol 84:939–943CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cho SH, Lee JY, Han JK, Choi BI (2010) Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for the evaluation of focal solid hepatic lesions: preliminary findings. Ultrasound Med Biol 36:202–208CrossRef Cho SH, Lee JY, Han JK, Choi BI (2010) Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for the evaluation of focal solid hepatic lesions: preliminary findings. Ultrasound Med Biol 36:202–208CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Heide R, Strobel D, Bernatik T, Goertz RS (2010) Characterization of focal liver lesions (FLL) with acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastometry. Ultraschall Med 31:405–409CrossRef Heide R, Strobel D, Bernatik T, Goertz RS (2010) Characterization of focal liver lesions (FLL) with acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastometry. Ultraschall Med 31:405–409CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chauvet D, Imbault M, Capelle L et al (2016) In vivo measurement of brain tumor elasticity using intraoperative shear wave elastography. Ultraschall Med 37:584–590PubMed Chauvet D, Imbault M, Capelle L et al (2016) In vivo measurement of brain tumor elasticity using intraoperative shear wave elastography. Ultraschall Med 37:584–590PubMed
7.
go back to reference Barr RG, Ferraioli G, Palmeri ML et al (2016) Elastography assessment of liver fibrosis: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference statement. Ultrasound Q 32:94–107 Barr RG, Ferraioli G, Palmeri ML et al (2016) Elastography assessment of liver fibrosis: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference statement. Ultrasound Q 32:94–107
8.
go back to reference Thumar V, Squires JH, Spicer PJ et al (2018) Ultrasound elastography applications in pediatrics. Ultrasound Q 34:199–205CrossRef Thumar V, Squires JH, Spicer PJ et al (2018) Ultrasound elastography applications in pediatrics. Ultrasound Q 34:199–205CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kim HG, Park MS, Lee J-D, Park SY (2017) Ultrasound elastography of the neonatal brain: preliminary study. J Ultrasound Med 36:1313–1319CrossRef Kim HG, Park MS, Lee J-D, Park SY (2017) Ultrasound elastography of the neonatal brain: preliminary study. J Ultrasound Med 36:1313–1319CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Albayrak E, Kasap T (2018) Evaluation of neonatal brain parenchyma using 2-dimensional shear wave elastography. J Ultrasound Med 37:959–967CrossRef Albayrak E, Kasap T (2018) Evaluation of neonatal brain parenchyma using 2-dimensional shear wave elastography. J Ultrasound Med 37:959–967CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ferraioli G, Filice C, Castera L et al (2015) WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 3: liver. Ultrasound Med Biol 41:1161–1179 Ferraioli G, Filice C, Castera L et al (2015) WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 3: liver. Ultrasound Med Biol 41:1161–1179
12.
go back to reference McGraw KO, Wong SP (1996) Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods 1:30–46CrossRef McGraw KO, Wong SP (1996) Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods 1:30–46CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6:284CrossRef Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6:284CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hallgren KA (2012) Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol 8:23–34CrossRef Hallgren KA (2012) Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol 8:23–34CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Li C, Zhang C, Li J et al (2016) An experimental study of the potential biological effects associated with 2-D shear wave elastography on the neonatal brain. Ultrasound Med Biol 42:1551–1559CrossRef Li C, Zhang C, Li J et al (2016) An experimental study of the potential biological effects associated with 2-D shear wave elastography on the neonatal brain. Ultrasound Med Biol 42:1551–1559CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pong AC, Jugé L, Cheng S, Bilston LE (2016) Longitudinal measurements of postnatal rat brain mechanical properties in-vivo. J Biomech 49:1751–1756CrossRef Pong AC, Jugé L, Cheng S, Bilston LE (2016) Longitudinal measurements of postnatal rat brain mechanical properties in-vivo. J Biomech 49:1751–1756CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Plaisier A, Raets MMA, Ecury-Goossen GM et al (2015) Serial cranial ultrasonography or early MRI for detecting preterm brain injury? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 100:F293–F300CrossRef Plaisier A, Raets MMA, Ecury-Goossen GM et al (2015) Serial cranial ultrasonography or early MRI for detecting preterm brain injury? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 100:F293–F300CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hagberg H, Mallard C, Ferriero DM et al (2015) The role of inflammation in perinatal brain injury. Nat Rev Neurol 11:192–208CrossRef Hagberg H, Mallard C, Ferriero DM et al (2015) The role of inflammation in perinatal brain injury. Nat Rev Neurol 11:192–208CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Clouchoux C, du Plessis AJ, Bouyssi-Kobar M et al (2013) Delayed cortical development in fetuses with complex congenital heart disease. Cereb Cortex 23:2932–2943CrossRef Clouchoux C, du Plessis AJ, Bouyssi-Kobar M et al (2013) Delayed cortical development in fetuses with complex congenital heart disease. Cereb Cortex 23:2932–2943CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Khalil A, Suff N, Thilaganathan B et al (2014) Brain abnormalities and neurodevelopmental delay in congenital heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 43:14–24CrossRef Khalil A, Suff N, Thilaganathan B et al (2014) Brain abnormalities and neurodevelopmental delay in congenital heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 43:14–24CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Feasibility and reproducibility of shear wave elastography in pediatric cranial ultrasound
Authors
Alexander M. El-Ali
Subramanian Subramanian
Lisa M. Krofchik
Morie C. Kephart
Judy H. Squires
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04592-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2020

Pediatric Radiology 7/2020 Go to the issue