Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 2/2019

01-02-2019 | Original Article

Utility of Hounsfield unit and hematocrit values in the diagnosis of acute venous sinus thrombosis in unenhanced brain CTs in the pediatric population

Authors: Gabriela de la Vega Muns, Robert Quencer, Nisreen S. Ezuddin, Gaurav Saigal

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is a recognized cause of childhood and neonatal stroke with high morbidity and mortality and a challenging diagnosis in the pediatric population.

Objective

We hypothesize that measuring Hounsfield units (HU) of blood in venous sinuses is a more reliable method to diagnose CVST and that normalizing the measured HU in relation to the patient’s hematocrit levels may further improve detection of CVST in the pediatric population.

Materials and methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of 15 pediatric patients with acute CVST and 31 control patients. Regions of interest (ROIs) were plotted to measure HU values within the venous sinuses of each patient. Hounsfield unit to hematocrit (HU:Hct) ratios were also calculated. In patients with CVST, HU values were determined in thrombosed and non-thrombosed venous sinuses. Statistical analysis was performed to calculate the differences between patient and control groups and to determine optimal cutoff values for HU and HU:Hct measurements in diagnosing CVST on non-contrast brain computed tomography (CT).

Results

A statistically significant difference in sinus attenuation and HU:Hct ratio was found between thrombosed (66.2±5.3 HU, 1.96±0.4) and non-thrombosed sinuses (47.2±4.5 HU, 1.38±0.25) in the patient group (P<0.0001), with the average attenuation difference being 19 HU. A statistically significant difference was also found between thrombosed sinuses in the patient group and sinuses (48.9±3.13 HU, 1.3±0.12) in the control group (P<0.0001).

Conclusion

Optimal cutoff values of 58 HU and HU:Hct ratios of 1.4 lead to sensitivities of 100% in diagnosing CVST.
Literature
1.
go back to reference deVeber G, Andrew M, Adams C et al (2001) Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis in children. N Engl J Med 345:417–423CrossRefPubMed deVeber G, Andrew M, Adams C et al (2001) Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis in children. N Engl J Med 345:417–423CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hedlund GL (2013) Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis in pediatric practice. Pediatr Radiol 43:173–188CrossRefPubMed Hedlund GL (2013) Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis in pediatric practice. Pediatr Radiol 43:173–188CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Wagner MW, Bosemani T, Oshmyansky A et al (2015) Neuroimaging findings in pediatric cerebral sinovenous thrombosis. Childs Nerv Syst 31:705–712CrossRefPubMed Wagner MW, Bosemani T, Oshmyansky A et al (2015) Neuroimaging findings in pediatric cerebral sinovenous thrombosis. Childs Nerv Syst 31:705–712CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ferro JM, Canhao P, Stam J et al (2004) Prognosis of cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis: results of the international study on cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis (ISCVT). Stroke 35:664–670CrossRefPubMed Ferro JM, Canhao P, Stam J et al (2004) Prognosis of cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis: results of the international study on cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis (ISCVT). Stroke 35:664–670CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Canhao P, Ferro JM, Lindgren AG et al (2005) Causes and predictors of death in cerebral venous thrombosis. Stroke 36:1720–1725CrossRefPubMed Canhao P, Ferro JM, Lindgren AG et al (2005) Causes and predictors of death in cerebral venous thrombosis. Stroke 36:1720–1725CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Saposnik G, Barinagarrementeria F, Brown RD Jr et al (2011) Diagnosis and management of cerebral venous thrombosis: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 42:1158–1192CrossRefPubMed Saposnik G, Barinagarrementeria F, Brown RD Jr et al (2011) Diagnosis and management of cerebral venous thrombosis: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 42:1158–1192CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Linn J, Pfefferkorn T, Ivanicova K et al (2009) Noncontrast CT in deep cerebral venous thrombosis and sinus thrombosis: comparison of its diagnostic value for both entities. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:728–735CrossRefPubMed Linn J, Pfefferkorn T, Ivanicova K et al (2009) Noncontrast CT in deep cerebral venous thrombosis and sinus thrombosis: comparison of its diagnostic value for both entities. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:728–735CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Roland T, Jacobs J, Rappaport A et al (2010) Unenhanced brain CT is useful to decide on further imaging in suspected venous sinus thrombosis. Clin Radiol 65:34–39CrossRefPubMed Roland T, Jacobs J, Rappaport A et al (2010) Unenhanced brain CT is useful to decide on further imaging in suspected venous sinus thrombosis. Clin Radiol 65:34–39CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Buyck PJ, De Keyzer F, Vanneste D et al (2013) CT density measurement and H:H ratio are useful in diagnosing acute cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:1568–1572CrossRefPubMed Buyck PJ, De Keyzer F, Vanneste D et al (2013) CT density measurement and H:H ratio are useful in diagnosing acute cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:1568–1572CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Black DF, Rad AE, Gray LA et al (2011) Cerebral venous sinus density on noncontrast CT correlates with hematocrit. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:1354–1357CrossRefPubMed Black DF, Rad AE, Gray LA et al (2011) Cerebral venous sinus density on noncontrast CT correlates with hematocrit. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:1354–1357CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Coutinho J, de Bruijn SF, Deveber G et al (2011) Anticoagulation for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD002005 Coutinho J, de Bruijn SF, Deveber G et al (2011) Anticoagulation for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD002005
13.
go back to reference Virapongse C, Cazenave C, Quisling R et al (1987) The empty delta sign: frequency and significance in 76 cases of dural sinus thrombosis. Radiology 162:779–785CrossRefPubMed Virapongse C, Cazenave C, Quisling R et al (1987) The empty delta sign: frequency and significance in 76 cases of dural sinus thrombosis. Radiology 162:779–785CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bracken J, Barnacle A, Ditchfield M (2013) Potential pitfalls in imaging of paediatric cerebral sinovenous thrombosis. Pediatr Radiol 43:219–231CrossRefPubMed Bracken J, Barnacle A, Ditchfield M (2013) Potential pitfalls in imaging of paediatric cerebral sinovenous thrombosis. Pediatr Radiol 43:219–231CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Alsafi A, Lakhani A, Carlton Jones L et al (2015) Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, a nonenhanced CT diagnosis? Radiol Res Pract 2015:581437 Alsafi A, Lakhani A, Carlton Jones L et al (2015) Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, a nonenhanced CT diagnosis? Radiol Res Pract 2015:581437
Metadata
Title
Utility of Hounsfield unit and hematocrit values in the diagnosis of acute venous sinus thrombosis in unenhanced brain CTs in the pediatric population
Authors
Gabriela de la Vega Muns
Robert Quencer
Nisreen S. Ezuddin
Gaurav Saigal
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4273-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Pediatric Radiology 2/2019 Go to the issue