Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Pediatric Radiology
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 13/2018

01-12-2018 | Original Article

A survey of pediatric diagnostic radiologists in North America: current practices in fetal magnetic resonance imaging

Authors: Teresa Chapman, Adina L. Alazraki, Meryle J. Eklund

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 13/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an imaging examination in evolution. Rapid developments over recent decades have led to better image quality, an increased number of examinations and greater impact on patient care.

Objective

To gather data regarding current practices among established programs in North America and provide information to radiologists interested in implementing or growing a fetal MRI service.

Materials and methods

An electronic survey containing 15 questions relevant to the use of fetal MRI was submitted to pediatric radiologists and neuroradiologists. Items regarded scheduling and reporting logistics, magnet strength, patient positioning and patient preparation. Answers and comments were collected, and descriptive statistics were summarized.

Results

One hundred and six survey responses were evaluated. Of the survey responses, 62/106 (58.5%) allow fetal MR scheduling any time during the day and 72/105 (68.6%) exclusively use 1.5-T strength platforms for fetal MRI, while only 7/105 (6.7%) use exclusively 3 T. Patient positioning is variable: supine, 40/106 (37.8%); left lateral decubitus, 22/106 (20.8%), and, patient’s choice, 43/106 (40.6%). Of the centers responding, 51/104 (49.0%) require no particular fasting instructions, while 20/104 (19.2%) request the patient avoid caffeine before the scanning.

Conclusion

Logistical trends in performing fetal MRI may supplement the American College of Radiology’s published technical standards and offer guidance to radiologists new to the field.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2008) Update on overall prevalence of major birth defects–Atlanta, Georgia, 1978-2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 57:1–5
2.
Bulas D (2007) Fetal magnetic resonance imaging as a complement to fetal ultrasonography. Ultrasound Q 23:3–22CrossRef
3.
Levine D (2013) Timing of MRI in pregnancy, repeat exams, access, and physician qualifications. Semin Perinatol 37:340–344CrossRef
4.
Mailáth-Pokorny M, Worda C, Krampl-Bettelheim E et al (2010) What does magnetic resonance imaging add to the prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of facial clefts? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36:445–451CrossRef
5.
Vimercati A, Greco P, Vera L et al (1999) The diagnostic role of “in utero” magnetic resonance imaging. J Perinat Med 27:303–308CrossRef
6.
Bahado-Singh RO, Goncalves LF (2013) Techniques, terminology, and indications for MRI in pregnancy. Semin Perinatol 37:334–339CrossRef
7.
Smith F, MacLennan F, Abramovich D et al (1984) NMR imaging in human pregnancy: a preliminary study. Magn Reson Imaging 2:57–64CrossRef
8.
Thickman D, Mintz M, Mennuti M, Kressel H (1984) MR imaging of cerebral abnormalities in utero. J Comput Assist Tomogr 8:1058–1061CrossRef
9.
Johnson I, Symonds E, Kean D et al (1984) Imaging the pregnant human uterus with nuclear magnetic resonance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 148:1136–1139CrossRef
10.
Weinreb JC, Lowe TW, Santos-Ramos R et al (1985) Magnetic resonance imaging in obstetric diagnosis. Radiology 154:157–161CrossRef
11.
Horvath L, Seeds J (1989) Temporary arrest of fetal movement with pancuronium bromide to enable antenatal magnetic resonance imaging of holoprosencephaly. Am J Perinatol 6:418–420CrossRef
12.
Toma P, Lucigrai G, Dodero P, Lituania M (1990) Prenatal detection of an abdominal mass by MR imaging performed while the fetus is immobilized with pancuronium bromide. AJR Am J Roentgenol 154:1049–1050CrossRef
13.
Kitagawa H, Pringle K (2017) Fetal surgery: a critical review. Pediatr Surg Int 33:421–433CrossRef
14.
Ryan G, Somme S, Crombleholme TM (2016) Airway compromise in the fetus and neonate: prenatal assessment and perinatal management. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 21:230–239CrossRef
15.
Reddy UM, Abuhamad AZ, Levine D, Saade GR (2014) Fetal imaging: executive summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecolog. Am J Obstet Gynecol 210:387–397CrossRef
16.
17.
Edwards L, Hui L (2018) First and second trimester screening for fetal structural anomalies. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 23:102–111CrossRef
18.
Huisman TA, Wisser J, Martin E et al (2002) Fetal magnetic resonance imaging of the central nervous system: a pictorial essay. Eur Radiol 12:1952–1961CrossRef
19.
Huisman TA, Martin E, Kubik-Huch R, Marincek B (2002) Fetal magnetic resonance imaging of the brain: technical considerations and normal brain development. Eur Radiol 12:1941–1951CrossRef
20.
Manganaro L, Bernardo S, Antonelli A et al (2017) Fetal MRI of the central nervous system: state-of-the-art. Eur J Radiol 93:273–283CrossRef
21.
Limperopoulos C, Robertson RL, Khwaja OS et al (2008) How accurately does current fetal imaging identify posterior fossa anomalies? AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1637–1643CrossRef
22.
Santos X, Papanna R, Johnson A et al (2010) The use of combined ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of fetal anomalies. Prenat Diagn 30:402–407PubMed
23.
Ruano R, Lazar DA, Cass DL et al (2014) Fetal lung volume and quantification of liver herniation by magnetic resonance imaging in isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 43:662–669CrossRef
24.
Triebwasser JE, Treadwell MC (2017) Prenatal prediction of pulmonary hypoplasia. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 22:245–249CrossRef
25.
Chiang G, Levine D (2004) Imaging of adnexal masses in pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 23:805–819CrossRef
26.
Bernardo S, Vinci V, Saldari M et al (2015) Dandy-Walker malformation: is the “tail sign” the key sign? Prenat Diagn 35:1358–1364CrossRef
27.
Robinson AJ, Blaser S, Vladimirov A et al (2015) Foetal “black bone” MRI: utility in assessment of the foetal spine. Br J Radiol 88:1–6CrossRef
28.
Ferguson MR, Chapman T, Dighe M (2010) Fetal tumors: imaging features. Pediatr Radiol 40:1263–1273CrossRef
29.
Chapman T (2012) Fetal genitourinary imaging. Pediatr Radiol 42(Suppl 1):S115–S123CrossRef
30.
Krekora M, Zych-Krekora K, Blitek M et al (2016) Difficulties in prenatal diagnosis of tumour in the fetal sacrococcygeal area. Ultrasound 24:119–124CrossRef
31.
Brodsky JR, Irace AL, Didas A et al (2017) Teratoma of the neonatal head and neck: a 41-year experience. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 97:66–71CrossRef
32.
Saguintaah M, Couture A, Veyrac C et al (2002) MRI of the fetal gastrointestinal tract. Pediatr Radiol 32:395–404CrossRef
33.
Faure A, Panait N, Panuel M et al (2017) Predicting postnatal renal function of prenatally detected posterior urethral valves using fetal diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient determination. Prenat Diagn 37:666–672CrossRef
34.
Chen X, Shan R, Zhao L et al (2018) Invasive placenta previa: placental bulge with distorted uterine outline and uterine serosal hypervascularity at 1.5T MRI – useful features for differentiating placenta percreta from placenta accreta. Eur Radiol 28:708–717CrossRef
35.
Webb JA, Thomsen HS, Morcos SK, Members of Contrast Media Safety Committee of European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) (2005) The use of iodinated and gadolinium contrast media during pregnancy and lactation. Eur Radiol 15:1234–1240CrossRef
36.
Meng X, Xie L, Song W (2013) Comparing the diagnostic value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for placenta accreta: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 39:1958–1965CrossRef
37.
Millischer AE, Salomon LJ, Porcher R et al (2017) Magnetic resonance imaging for abnormally invasive placenta: the added value of intravenous gadolinium injection. BJOG 124:88–95CrossRef
38.
Bulas D, Egloff A (2013) Benefits and risks of MRI in pregnancy. Semin Perinatol 37:301–304CrossRef
39.
Ray JG, Vermeulen MJ, Bharatha A et al (2016) Association between MRI exposure during pregnancy and fetal and childhood outcomes. JAMA 316:952–961CrossRef
40.
Jaimes C, Delgado J, Hoffman C et al (2017) Does 3T fetal MRI induce adverse acoustic effects in the neonate? A preliminary study comparing postnatal auditory test performance of fetus scanned at 1.5 and 3T MRI. Pediatr Radiol 47:S147
41.
Prayer D, Malinger G, Brugger PC et al (2017) ISUOG practice guidelines: performance of fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 49:671–680CrossRef
42.
Plunk MR, Chapman T (2014) The fundamentals of fetal MR imaging: part 1. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 43:331–346CrossRef
43.
Victoria T, Jaramillo D, Roberts TP et al (2014) Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: jumping from 1.5 to 3 tesla (preliminary experience). Pediatr Radiol 44:376–386CrossRef
44.
Zizka J, Elias P, Hodik K et al (2006) Liver, meconium, haemorrhage: the value of T1-weighted images in fetal MRI. Pediatr Radiol 36:792–801CrossRef
45.
Inaoka T, Sugimori H, Sasaki Y et al (2007) VIBE MRI for evaluating the normal and abnormal gastrointestinal tract in fetuses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:W303–W308CrossRef
46.
47.
Dotson P (2013) CPT ® codes: what are they, why are they necessary, and how are they developed? Adv Wound Care 2:583–587CrossRef
48.
Howard B, Goodson J, Mengert W (1953) Supine hypotensive syndrome in late pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1:371–377PubMed
49.
Morong S, Hermsen B, De Vries N (2014) Sleep-disordered breathing in pregnancy: a review of the physiology and potential role for positional therapy. Sleep Breath 18:31–37CrossRef
50.
Kim DR, Wang E (2014) Prevention of supine hypotensive syndrome in pregnant women treated with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Psychiatry Res 218:247–248CrossRef
51.
52.
Victoria T, Johnson AM, Christopher Edgar J et al (2016) Comparison between 1.5-T and 3-T MRI for fetal imaging: is there an advantage to imaging with a higher field strength? AJR Am J Roentgenol 206:195–201CrossRef
53.
Cortes MS, Bargallo N, Arranz A et al (2017) Feasibility and success rate of a fetal MRI and MR spectroscopy research protocol performed at term using a 3.0-tesla scanner. Fetal Diagn Ther 41:127–135CrossRef
54.
Tocchio S, Kline-Fath B, Kanal E et al (2015) MRI evaluation and safety in the developing brain. Semin Perinatol 39:73–104CrossRef
55.
Krishnamurthy U, Neelavalli J, Mody S et al (2015) MR imaging of the fetal brain at 1.5T and 3.0T field strengths: comparing specific absorption rate (SAR) and image quality. J Perinat Med 43:209–220CrossRef
56.
Neelavalli J, Krishnamurthy U, Jella PK et al (2016) Magnetic resonance angiography of fetal vasculature at 3.0 T. Eur Radiol 26:4570–4576CrossRef
57.
Kim K, Habas P, Rajagopalan V et al (2010) Non-iterative relative bias correction for 3D reconstruction of in utero fetal brain MR imaging. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010:879–882PubMed
58.
Marami B, Mohseni Salehi SS, Afacan O et al (2017) Temporal slice registration and robust diffusion-tensor reconstruction for improved fetal brain structural connectivity analysis. Neuroimage 156:475–488CrossRef
59.
Seshamani S, Blazejewska AI, Mckown S et al (2016) Detecting default mode networks in utero by integrated 4D fMRI reconstruction and analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 37:4158–4178CrossRef
60.
Turk EA, Luo J, Gagoski B et al (2017) Spatiotemporal alignment of in utero BOLD-MRI series. J Magn Reson Imaging 46:403–412CrossRef
61.
Malamateniou C, Malik SJ, Counsell SJ et al (2013) Motion-compensation techniques in neonatal and fetal MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:1124–1136CrossRef
62.
Birkenfeld A, Laufer N, Sadovksky E (1980) Diurnal variation of fetal activity. Obstet Gynecol 55:417–419PubMed
63.
Minors D, Waterhouse J (1979) The effect of maternal posture, meals and time of day on fetal movements. Br J Obs Gynecol 86:717–723CrossRef
64.
Sorokin Y, Dierker LJ Jr (1982) Fetal movement. Clin Obstet Gynecol 25:719–734CrossRef
65.
Yen C, Mehollin-Ray A, Bernardo F et al (2016) Correlation between maternal breakfast and fetal motion during fetal MRI. Pediatr Radiol 46(Suppl 1):138
66.
Novak Z, Thurmond A, Ross P et al (1993) Gadolinium-DTPA transplacental transfer and distribution in fetal tissue in rabbits. Investig Radiol 28:828–830CrossRef
67.
Okazaki O, Murayama N, Masubuchi N et al (1996) Placental transfer and milk secretion of gadodiamide injection in rats. Arzneimittelfors Drug Res 46:83–86
68.
Rofsky N, Pizzarello D, Weinreb J et al (1994) Effect on fetal mouse development of exposure to MR imaging and gadopentetate dimeglumine. J Magn Reson Imaging 4:805–807CrossRef
69.
Rofsky N, Pizzarello D, Duhaney M et al (1995) Effect on magnetic resonance exposure combined with gadopentetate dimeglumine on chromosomes in animal specimens. Acad Radiol 2:492–496CrossRef
70.
Morisetti A, Bussi S, Tirone P, de Haen C (1999) Toxicological safety evaluation of gadobenate dimeglumine 0.5M solution for inection (MultiHance), a new magnetic resonance imaging contrast medium. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23(Suppl 1):S207–S217CrossRef
71.
Leyendecker JR, Gorengaut V, Brown JJ (2004) MR imaging of maternal diseases of the abdomen and pelvis during pregnancy and the immediate postpartum period. Radiographics 24:1301–1316CrossRef
72.
Birchard KR, Brown MA, Hyslop WB, Semelka RC (2005) MRI of acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnant patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:452–458CrossRef
73.
Sundgren PC, Leander P (2011) Is administration of gadolinium-based contrast media to pregnant women and small children justified? J Magn Reson Imaging 34:750–757CrossRef
74.
Patenaude Y, Pugash D, Lim K et al (2014) The use of magnetic resonance imaging in the obstetric patient. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 36:349–363CrossRef
75.
76.
Splendiani A, Perri M, Marsecano C et al (2018) Effects of serial macrocyclic-based contrast materials gadoterate meglumine and gadobutrol administrations on gadolinium-related dentate nuclei signal increases in unenhanced T1-weighted brain: a retrospective study in 158 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Radiol Med 123:125–134CrossRef
77.
Dekkers IA, Roos R, van der Molen AJ (2018) Gadolinium retention after administration of contrast agents based on linear chelators and the recommendations of the European medicines agency. Eur Radiol 28:1579–1584CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A survey of pediatric diagnostic radiologists in North America: current practices in fetal magnetic resonance imaging
Authors
Teresa Chapman
Adina L. Alazraki
Meryle J. Eklund
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 13/2018
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4236-3

Other articles of this Issue 13/2018

Pediatric Radiology 13/2018 Go to the issue

Original Article

Parasagittal vertex clots on head CT in infants with subdural hemorrhage as a predictor for abusive head trauma

Review

Current concepts and challenges in the radiologic assessment of brain tumors in children: part 2

Original Article

A comprehensive severity score for the morbidly adherent placenta: combining ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging

Original Article

Unfounded conclusions of equivalence in diagnostic accuracy studies: a pervasive fallacy of inference in pediatric radiology scientific abstracts

Pictorial Essay

Sonographic features of umbilical catheter-related complications

Acknowledgement to Referees

Active reviewers (from October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018)