Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 1/2018

01-01-2018 | Technical Innovation

Development of a tool to aid the radiologic technologist using augmented reality and computer vision

Authors: Robert D. MacDougall, Benoit Scherrer, Steven Don

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

This technical innovation describes the development of a novel device to aid technologists in reducing exposure variation and repeat imaging in computed and digital radiography. The device consists of a color video and depth camera in combination with proprietary software and user interface. A monitor in the x-ray control room displays the position of the patient in real time with respect to automatic exposure control chambers and image receptor area. The thickness of the body part of interest is automatically displayed along with a motion indicator for the examined body part. The aim is to provide an automatic measurement of patient thickness to set the x-ray technique and to assist the technologist in detecting errors in positioning and motion before the patient is exposed. The device has the potential to reduce the incidence of repeat imaging by addressing problems technologists encounter daily during the acquisition of radiographs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Foos DH, Sehnert WJ, Reiner B et al (2009) Digital radiography reject analysis: data collection methodology, results, and recommendations from an in-depth investigation at two hospitals. J Digit Imaging 22:89–98CrossRefPubMed Foos DH, Sehnert WJ, Reiner B et al (2009) Digital radiography reject analysis: data collection methodology, results, and recommendations from an in-depth investigation at two hospitals. J Digit Imaging 22:89–98CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Little KJ, Reiser I, Liu L et al (2017) Unified database for rejected image analysis across multiple vendors in radiography. J Am Coll Radiol 14:208–216CrossRefPubMed Little KJ, Reiser I, Liu L et al (2017) Unified database for rejected image analysis across multiple vendors in radiography. J Am Coll Radiol 14:208–216CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Jones AK, Heintz P, Geiser W et al (2015) Ongoing quality control in digital radiography: report of AAPM imaging physics committee task group 151. Med Phys 42:6658–6670CrossRefPubMed Jones AK, Heintz P, Geiser W et al (2015) Ongoing quality control in digital radiography: report of AAPM imaging physics committee task group 151. Med Phys 42:6658–6670CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Don S, Macdougall R, Strauss K et al (2013) Image gently campaign back to basics initiative: ten steps to help manage radiation dose in pediatric digital radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:W431–W436CrossRefPubMed Don S, Macdougall R, Strauss K et al (2013) Image gently campaign back to basics initiative: ten steps to help manage radiation dose in pediatric digital radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:W431–W436CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kleinman PL, Strauss KJ, Zurakowski D et al (2010) Patient size measured on CT images as a function of age at a tertiary care children’s hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1611–1619CrossRefPubMed Kleinman PL, Strauss KJ, Zurakowski D et al (2010) Patient size measured on CT images as a function of age at a tertiary care children’s hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1611–1619CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Development of a tool to aid the radiologic technologist using augmented reality and computer vision
Authors
Robert D. MacDougall
Benoit Scherrer
Steven Don
Publication date
01-01-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3968-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Pediatric Radiology 1/2018 Go to the issue

Hermes

Hermes

Minisymposium: Minimizing sedation in pediatric MRI

Pediatric neuro MRI: tricks to minimize sedation