Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 9/2016

01-08-2016 | Original Article

Simulated impact of pelvic MRI in treatment planning for pediatric adnexal masses

Authors: Alessandro Marro, Lisa M. Allen, Sari L. Kives, Rahim Moineddin, Govind B. Chavhan

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 9/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There are no studies on utility of MRI in management of pediatric adnexal masses.

Objective

To determine the diagnostic and therapeutic impact of pelvic MRI in adnexal masses in children and adolescents.

Materials and methods

We included 32 females age 18 years and younger who had adnexal masses and who underwent both pelvic ultrasound (US) and MRI. A radiologist retrospectively reviewed US and MR images and created a standard radiologic report for each patient. In a prospective theoretical fashion, two pediatric gynecologists reviewed the clinical data and US report for each patient and indicated conservative versus surgical management; in surgical cases the options were laparoscopy versus laparotomy, midline versus Pfannenstiel incision, and oophorectomy versus cystectomy. Subsequently, the gynecologists were presented the MRI report and were asked to indicate their treatment options again. A binomial test was conducted to determine the effect of adding MRI findings to the management plan.

Results

The addition of MRI significantly changed management in 10 of 32 patients (P=0.0322), with a change in surgical versus conservative treatment in 5, a change in laparotomy vs. laparoscopy in 2, and a change from oophorectomy to cystectomy along with change in incision in 3 cases. This was based on additional information provided by MRI regarding the nature of the mass in 8 cases and origin of the mass in 2 cases.

Conclusion

Preoperative pelvic MRI findings might change the surgical management of pediatric patients with adnexal masses, so it is a valuable addition to the conventional workup in the clinical management.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cartault A, Caula-Legriel S, Baunin C et al (2012) Ovarian masses in adolescent girls. Endocr Dev 22:194–207CrossRefPubMed Cartault A, Caula-Legriel S, Baunin C et al (2012) Ovarian masses in adolescent girls. Endocr Dev 22:194–207CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kirkham YA, Lacy JA, Kives S et al (2011) Characteristics and management of adnexal masses in a Canadian pediatric and adolescent populations. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 33:935–943CrossRefPubMed Kirkham YA, Lacy JA, Kives S et al (2011) Characteristics and management of adnexal masses in a Canadian pediatric and adolescent populations. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 33:935–943CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Skiadas VT, Koutoulidis V, Eleytheriades M et al (2004) Ovarian masses in young adolescents: imaging findings with surgical confirmation. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 25:201–206PubMed Skiadas VT, Koutoulidis V, Eleytheriades M et al (2004) Ovarian masses in young adolescents: imaging findings with surgical confirmation. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 25:201–206PubMed
4.
go back to reference Mitchell DG, Javitt MC, Glan P et al (2013) ACR appropriateness criteria and follow-up of ovarian cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 10:822–827CrossRefPubMed Mitchell DG, Javitt MC, Glan P et al (2013) ACR appropriateness criteria and follow-up of ovarian cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 10:822–827CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sala E, Rockall AG, Freeman SJ et al (2013) The added role of MR imaging in treatment stratification of patients with gynecologic malignancies: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiology 266:717–740CrossRefPubMed Sala E, Rockall AG, Freeman SJ et al (2013) The added role of MR imaging in treatment stratification of patients with gynecologic malignancies: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiology 266:717–740CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ratner ES, Staib LH, Cross SN et al (2015) The clinical impact of gynecologic MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:674–680CrossRefPubMed Ratner ES, Staib LH, Cross SN et al (2015) The clinical impact of gynecologic MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:674–680CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Chilla B, Hauser N, Singer G et al (2011) Indeterminate adnexal masses at ultrasound: effect of MRI imaging findings on diagnostic thinking and therapeutic decisions. Eur Radiol 21:1301–1310CrossRefPubMed Chilla B, Hauser N, Singer G et al (2011) Indeterminate adnexal masses at ultrasound: effect of MRI imaging findings on diagnostic thinking and therapeutic decisions. Eur Radiol 21:1301–1310CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hricak H, Chen M, Coakley FV et al (2000) Complex adnexal masses: detection and characterization with MR imaging — multivariate analysis 1. Radiology 214:39–46CrossRefPubMed Hricak H, Chen M, Coakley FV et al (2000) Complex adnexal masses: detection and characterization with MR imaging — multivariate analysis 1. Radiology 214:39–46CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ruwe PA, Wright J, Randall RL et al (1992) Can MR imaging effectively replace diagnostic arthroscopy? Radiology 183:335–339CrossRefPubMed Ruwe PA, Wright J, Randall RL et al (1992) Can MR imaging effectively replace diagnostic arthroscopy? Radiology 183:335–339CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Schwartz LB, Panageas E, Lange R et al (1994) Female pelvis: impact of MR imaging on treatment decisions and net cost analysis. Radiology 192:55–60CrossRefPubMed Schwartz LB, Panageas E, Lange R et al (1994) Female pelvis: impact of MR imaging on treatment decisions and net cost analysis. Radiology 192:55–60CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hricak H, Powell CB, Yu KK et al (1996) Invasive cervical carcinoma: role of MR imaging in pretreatment work-up — cost minimization and diagnostic efficacy analysis. Radiology 198:403–409CrossRefPubMed Hricak H, Powell CB, Yu KK et al (1996) Invasive cervical carcinoma: role of MR imaging in pretreatment work-up — cost minimization and diagnostic efficacy analysis. Radiology 198:403–409CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Van Winter JT, Simmons PS, Podratz KC (1994) Surgically treated adnexal masses in infancy, childhood, and adolescence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:1780–1786CrossRefPubMed Van Winter JT, Simmons PS, Podratz KC (1994) Surgically treated adnexal masses in infancy, childhood, and adolescence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:1780–1786CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Oltmann SC, Garcia N, Barber R et al (2010) Can we preoperatively risk stratify ovarian masses for malignancy? J Pediatr Surg 45:130–134CrossRefPubMed Oltmann SC, Garcia N, Barber R et al (2010) Can we preoperatively risk stratify ovarian masses for malignancy? J Pediatr Surg 45:130–134CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Adusumilli S, Hussain HK, Caolli EM et al (2006) MRI of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:732–740CrossRefPubMed Adusumilli S, Hussain HK, Caolli EM et al (2006) MRI of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:732–740CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Sohaib SA, Mills TD, Sahdev A et al (2005) The role of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in patients with adnexal masses. Clin Radiol 60:340–348CrossRefPubMed Sohaib SA, Mills TD, Sahdev A et al (2005) The role of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in patients with adnexal masses. Clin Radiol 60:340–348CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Luijendijk RW, Jeekel J, Storm RK et al (1997) The low transverse Pfannenstiel incision and the prevalence of incisional hernia and nerve entrapment. Ann Surg 225:365–369CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Luijendijk RW, Jeekel J, Storm RK et al (1997) The low transverse Pfannenstiel incision and the prevalence of incisional hernia and nerve entrapment. Ann Surg 225:365–369CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Biswas KK (1973) Why not Pfannenstiel’s incision? Obstet Gynecol 41:303–307PubMed Biswas KK (1973) Why not Pfannenstiel’s incision? Obstet Gynecol 41:303–307PubMed
18.
go back to reference El-Boghdadly SA, Abel K (1984) Pfannenstiel incision for appendicectomy in females. Br J Clin Pract 38:17–19PubMed El-Boghdadly SA, Abel K (1984) Pfannenstiel incision for appendicectomy in females. Br J Clin Pract 38:17–19PubMed
Metadata
Title
Simulated impact of pelvic MRI in treatment planning for pediatric adnexal masses
Authors
Alessandro Marro
Lisa M. Allen
Sari L. Kives
Rahim Moineddin
Govind B. Chavhan
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 9/2016
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3606-y

Other articles of this Issue 9/2016

Pediatric Radiology 9/2016 Go to the issue