Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 8/2015

01-08-2015 | Original Article

Reference values of MRI measurements of the common bile duct and pancreatic duct in children

Authors: Kriti Gwal, Maria A. Bedoya, Neal Patel, Siri J. Rambhatla, Kassa Darge, Ram R. Sreedharan, Sudha A. Anupindi

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 8/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Magnetic resonance imaging/cholangiopancreatography (MRI/MRCP) is now an essential imaging modality for the evaluation of biliary and pancreatic pathology in children, but there are no data depicting the normal diameters of the common bile duct (CBD) and pancreatic duct. Recognition of abnormal duct size is important and the increasing use of MRCP necessitates normal MRI measurements.

Objective

To present normal MRI measurements for the common bile duct and pancreatic duct in children.

Materials and methods

In this retrospective study we searched all children ages birth to 10 years in our MR urography (MRU) database from 2006 until 2013. We excluded children with a history of hepatobiliary or pancreatic surgery. We stratified 204 children into five age groups and retrospectively measured the CBD and the pancreatic duct on 2-D axial and 3-D coronal T2-weighted sequences. We performed statistical analysis, using logistic and linear regressions to detect the age association of the visibility and size of the duct measurements. We used non-parametric tests to detect gender and imaging plane differences.

Results

Our study included 204 children, 106 (52%) boys and 98 (48%) girls, with a median age of 33 months (range 0–119 months). The children were distributed into five age groups. The common bile duct was visible in all children in all age groups. The pancreatic duct was significantly less visible in the youngest children, group 1 (54/67, 80.5%; P = 0.003) than in the oldest children, group 5 (22/22, 100%). In group 2 the pancreatic duct was seen in 19/21 (90.4%), in group 3 52/55 (94.5%), and in group 4 39/39 (100%). All duct measurements increased with age (P < 0.001; r-value > 0.423), and the incremental differences between ages were significant. The measurement variations between the axial and coronal planes were statistically significant (P < 0.001); however these differences were fractions of millimeters. For example, in group 1 the mean coronal measurement of the CBD was 2.1 mm and the axial measurement was 2.0 mm; the mean coronal measurement of the pancreatic duct was 0.9 mm and the axial measurement was 0.8 mm.

Conclusion

Our study provides normative measurements for the common bile duct and pancreatic duct for children up to age 10 years. The upper limits of the CBD and pancreatic duct increase with age, and the values range 1.1–4.0 mm for the CBD and 0.6–1.9 mm for the pancreatic duct.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Darge K, Anupindi S (2009) Pancreatitis and the role of US, MRCP and ERCP. Pediatr Radiol 39:S153–157CrossRefPubMed Darge K, Anupindi S (2009) Pancreatitis and the role of US, MRCP and ERCP. Pediatr Radiol 39:S153–157CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Darge K, Anupindi SA, Jaramillo D (2011) MR imaging of the abdomen and pelvis in infants, children, and adolescents. Radiology 261:12–29CrossRefPubMed Darge K, Anupindi SA, Jaramillo D (2011) MR imaging of the abdomen and pelvis in infants, children, and adolescents. Radiology 261:12–29CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Anupindi SA, Victoria T (2008) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: techniques and applications. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 16:453–466CrossRefPubMed Anupindi SA, Victoria T (2008) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: techniques and applications. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 16:453–466CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Egbert ND, Bloom DA, Dillman JR (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging of the pediatric pancreaticobiliary system. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 21:681–696CrossRefPubMed Egbert ND, Bloom DA, Dillman JR (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging of the pediatric pancreaticobiliary system. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 21:681–696CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J et al (2008) The Image Gently campaign: working together to change practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:273–274 Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J et al (2008) The Image Gently campaign: working together to change practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:273–274
7.
go back to reference Konus OL, Ozdemir A, Akkaya A et al (1998) Normal liver, spleen, and kidney dimensions in neonates, infants, and children: evaluation with sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:1693–1698CrossRefPubMed Konus OL, Ozdemir A, Akkaya A et al (1998) Normal liver, spleen, and kidney dimensions in neonates, infants, and children: evaluation with sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:1693–1698CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kahramaner Z, Erdemir A, Cicek E et al (2013) Reference ranges for sonographic dimensions of the liver and spleen in preterm infants. Pediatr Radiol 43:1464–1474CrossRefPubMed Kahramaner Z, Erdemir A, Cicek E et al (2013) Reference ranges for sonographic dimensions of the liver and spleen in preterm infants. Pediatr Radiol 43:1464–1474CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Erdemir A, Kahramaner Z, Cicek E et al (2013) Reference ranges for sonographic renal dimensions in preterm infants. Pediatr Radiol 43:1475–1484CrossRefPubMed Erdemir A, Kahramaner Z, Cicek E et al (2013) Reference ranges for sonographic renal dimensions in preterm infants. Pediatr Radiol 43:1475–1484CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hernanz-Schulman M, Ambrosino MM, Freeman PC et al (1995) Common bile duct in children: sonographic dimensions. Radiology 195:193–195CrossRefPubMed Hernanz-Schulman M, Ambrosino MM, Freeman PC et al (1995) Common bile duct in children: sonographic dimensions. Radiology 195:193–195CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Siegel MJ, Martin KW, Worthington JL (1987) Normal and abnormal pancreas in children: US studies. Radiology 165:15–18CrossRefPubMed Siegel MJ, Martin KW, Worthington JL (1987) Normal and abnormal pancreas in children: US studies. Radiology 165:15–18CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Chao HC, Lin SJ, Kong MS et al (2000) Sonographic evaluation of the pancreatic duct in normal children and children with pancreatitis. J Ultrasound Med 19:757–763PubMed Chao HC, Lin SJ, Kong MS et al (2000) Sonographic evaluation of the pancreatic duct in normal children and children with pancreatitis. J Ultrasound Med 19:757–763PubMed
13.
go back to reference Mortele KJ, Rocha TC, Streeter JL et al (2006) Multimodality imaging of pancreatic and biliary congenital anomalies. Radiographics 26:715–731CrossRefPubMed Mortele KJ, Rocha TC, Streeter JL et al (2006) Multimodality imaging of pancreatic and biliary congenital anomalies. Radiographics 26:715–731CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Delaney L, Applegate KE, Karmazyn B et al (2008) MR cholangiopancreatography in children: feasibility, safety, and initial experience. Pediatr Radiol 38:64–75CrossRefPubMed Delaney L, Applegate KE, Karmazyn B et al (2008) MR cholangiopancreatography in children: feasibility, safety, and initial experience. Pediatr Radiol 38:64–75CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Arcement CM, Meza MP, Arumanla S et al (2001) MRCP in the evaluation of pancreaticobiliary disease in children. Pediatr Radiol 31:92–97CrossRefPubMed Arcement CM, Meza MP, Arumanla S et al (2001) MRCP in the evaluation of pancreaticobiliary disease in children. Pediatr Radiol 31:92–97CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Almehdar A, Chavhan GB (2013) MR cholangiopancreatography at 3.0 T in children: diagnostic quality and ability in assessment of common paediatric pancreatobiliary pathology. Br J Radiol 86:20130036PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Almehdar A, Chavhan GB (2013) MR cholangiopancreatography at 3.0 T in children: diagnostic quality and ability in assessment of common paediatric pancreatobiliary pathology. Br J Radiol 86:20130036PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Chavhan GB, Almehdar A, Moineddin R et al (2013) Comparison of respiratory-triggered 3-D fast spin-echo and single-shot fast spin-echo radial slab MR cholangiopancreatography images in children. Pediatr Radiol 43:1086–1092CrossRefPubMed Chavhan GB, Almehdar A, Moineddin R et al (2013) Comparison of respiratory-triggered 3-D fast spin-echo and single-shot fast spin-echo radial slab MR cholangiopancreatography images in children. Pediatr Radiol 43:1086–1092CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Edelman RR (2007) MR imaging of the pancreas: 1.5 T versus 3 T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 15:349–353CrossRefPubMed Edelman RR (2007) MR imaging of the pancreas: 1.5 T versus 3 T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 15:349–353CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Trout AT, Podberesky DJ, Serai SD et al (2013) Does secretin add value in pediatric magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography? Pediatr Radiol 43:479–486CrossRefPubMed Trout AT, Podberesky DJ, Serai SD et al (2013) Does secretin add value in pediatric magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography? Pediatr Radiol 43:479–486CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Sandrasegaran K, Cote GA, Tahir B et al (2014) The utility of secretin-enhanced MRCP in diagnosing congenital anomalies. Abdom Imaging 39:979–987CrossRefPubMed Sandrasegaran K, Cote GA, Tahir B et al (2014) The utility of secretin-enhanced MRCP in diagnosing congenital anomalies. Abdom Imaging 39:979–987CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Reference values of MRI measurements of the common bile duct and pancreatic duct in children
Authors
Kriti Gwal
Maria A. Bedoya
Neal Patel
Siri J. Rambhatla
Kassa Darge
Ram R. Sreedharan
Sudha A. Anupindi
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 8/2015
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3296-x

Other articles of this Issue 8/2015

Pediatric Radiology 8/2015 Go to the issue