Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 2/2015

01-02-2015 | Original Article

Implementation of a competency check-off in diagnostic fluoroscopy for radiology trainees: impact on reducing radiation for three common fluoroscopic exams in children

Authors: Sweta Shah, Stephane L. Desouches, Lisa H. Lowe, Nima Kasraie, Brenton Reading

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Fluoroscopy is an important tool for diagnosis in the pediatric population, but it carries the risk of radiation exposure. Because radiology resident education and experience in the use of fluoroscopy equipment in children vary, we implemented an intervention to standardize fluoroscopy training.

Objective

The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of implementing a fluoroscopy competency check-off for radiology resident trainees aimed at decreasing radiation exposure in three common pediatric fluoroscopic studies.

Materials and methods

A fluoroscopy competency check-off form was developed for radiology resident trainees performing pediatric procedures. Techniques used to limit radiation exposure for common pediatric radiologic studies were reviewed as part of the check-off process. Pediatric radiologists supervised each trainee until they demonstrated competence to independently perform three specified procedures. Radiation dose was recorded for the three procedures, upper GI (UGI), voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) and oropharyngeal (OPM) exams, over 6 months preceding and 6 months following implementation of the competency check-off. The mean cumulative dose for each procedure was compared before and after implementation of competency check-off using a Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results

During the 12-month study period doses from 909 fluoroscopic procedures were recorded. In the 6 months preceding competency check-off implementation, procedures were performed by 24 radiology resident trainees including 171 UGI, 176 VCUG and 171 OPM exams. In the 6 months following competency check-off, 23 trainees performed 114 UGI, 145 VCUG and 132 OPM exams. After competency check-off implementation, a statistically significant reduction in average radiation dose was found for all three studies (P < 0.001). Median cumulative doses (mGy) were decreased by 33%, 36% and 13% for UGIs, VCUGs and OPMs, respectively.

Conclusion

Implementation of a competency check-off for radiology resident trainees can reduce average radiation doses in pediatric patients undergoing three common fluoroscopic studies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sheyn DD, Racadio JM, Ying J et al (2008) Efficacy of a radiation safety education initiative in reducing radiation exposure in the pediatric IR suite. Pediatr Radiol 38:669–674PubMedCrossRef Sheyn DD, Racadio JM, Ying J et al (2008) Efficacy of a radiation safety education initiative in reducing radiation exposure in the pediatric IR suite. Pediatr Radiol 38:669–674PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Xu BJ, Duszak R Jr, McGinnis RS et al (2013) Increased fluoroscopy time for central venous catheter placement by radiology residents versus staff radiologists. J Am Coll Radiol 10:518–522PubMedCrossRef Xu BJ, Duszak R Jr, McGinnis RS et al (2013) Increased fluoroscopy time for central venous catheter placement by radiology residents versus staff radiologists. J Am Coll Radiol 10:518–522PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Haaga JR (2001) Radiation dose management: weighing risk versus benefit. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:289–291PubMedCrossRef Haaga JR (2001) Radiation dose management: weighing risk versus benefit. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:289–291PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296PubMedCrossRef Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J et al (2008) The Image Gently campaign: working together to change practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:273–274PubMedCrossRef Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J et al (2008) The Image Gently campaign: working together to change practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:273–274PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Donnelly LF (2005) Reducing radiation dose associated with pediatric CT by decreasing unnecessary examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:655–657PubMedCrossRef Donnelly LF (2005) Reducing radiation dose associated with pediatric CT by decreasing unnecessary examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:655–657PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Strauss KJ, Kaste SC (2006) The ALARA concept in pediatric interventional and fluoroscopic imaging: striving to keep radiation doses as low as possible during fluoroscopy of pediatric patients–a white paper executive summary. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:818–819PubMedCrossRef Strauss KJ, Kaste SC (2006) The ALARA concept in pediatric interventional and fluoroscopic imaging: striving to keep radiation doses as low as possible during fluoroscopy of pediatric patients–a white paper executive summary. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:818–819PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Strauss KJ, Kaste SC (2006) The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric interventional and fluoroscopic imaging: striving to keep radiation doses as low as possible during fluoroscopy of pediatric patients–a white paper executive summary. Radiology 240:621–622PubMedCrossRef Strauss KJ, Kaste SC (2006) The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric interventional and fluoroscopic imaging: striving to keep radiation doses as low as possible during fluoroscopy of pediatric patients–a white paper executive summary. Radiology 240:621–622PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference American College of Radiology, RSNA, American Society of Radiologic Technologists, American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2010) Image Wisely. American College of Radiology, Reston American College of Radiology, RSNA, American Society of Radiologic Technologists, American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2010) Image Wisely. American College of Radiology, Reston
12.
go back to reference Brink JA, Amis ES Jr (2010) Image Wisely: a campaign to increase awareness about adult radiation protection. Radiology 257:601–602PubMedCrossRef Brink JA, Amis ES Jr (2010) Image Wisely: a campaign to increase awareness about adult radiation protection. Radiology 257:601–602PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J et al (2008) The ‘Image Gently’ campaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program. Pediatr Radiol 38:265–269PubMedCrossRef Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J et al (2008) The ‘Image Gently’ campaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program. Pediatr Radiol 38:265–269PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Jafari ME, Daus AM (2013) Applying Image Gently SM and Image Wisely SM in nuclear medicine. Health Phys 104:S31–36PubMedCrossRef Jafari ME, Daus AM (2013) Applying Image Gently SM and Image Wisely SM in nuclear medicine. Health Phys 104:S31–36PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gaca AM, Frush DP, Hohenhaus SM et al (2007) Enhancing pediatric safety: using simulation to assess radiology resident preparedness for anaphylaxis from intravenous contrast media. Radiology 245:236–244PubMedCrossRef Gaca AM, Frush DP, Hohenhaus SM et al (2007) Enhancing pediatric safety: using simulation to assess radiology resident preparedness for anaphylaxis from intravenous contrast media. Radiology 245:236–244PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hoskins PR, Williams JR (1992) Influence of radiologist grade on fluoroscopic patient dose. Br J Radiol 65:1119–1123PubMedCrossRef Hoskins PR, Williams JR (1992) Influence of radiologist grade on fluoroscopic patient dose. Br J Radiol 65:1119–1123PubMedCrossRef
17.
18.
go back to reference Nasca TJ, Philibert I, Brigham T et al (2012) The next GME accreditation system–rationale and benefits. N Eng J Med 366:1051–1056CrossRef Nasca TJ, Philibert I, Brigham T et al (2012) The next GME accreditation system–rationale and benefits. N Eng J Med 366:1051–1056CrossRef
19.
20.
go back to reference Warm EJ, Mathis BR, Held JD et al (2014) Entrustment and mapping of observable practice activities for resident assessment. J Gen Intern Med [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1007/s11606-014-2801-5 Warm EJ, Mathis BR, Held JD et al (2014) Entrustment and mapping of observable practice activities for resident assessment. J Gen Intern Med [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.​1007/​s11606-014-2801-5
21.
go back to reference Archer BR, Wagner LK (2000) Protecting patients by training physicians in fluoroscopic radiation management. J Appl Clin Med Phys 1:32–37PubMedCrossRef Archer BR, Wagner LK (2000) Protecting patients by training physicians in fluoroscopic radiation management. J Appl Clin Med Phys 1:32–37PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Administration USFaD (2002) 21CFR1020.32, Part 1020 - Performance standards for ionizing radiation emitting products. Code of Federal Regulations. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Silver Springs, MD Administration USFaD (2002) 21CFR1020.32, Part 1020 - Performance standards for ionizing radiation emitting products. Code of Federal Regulations. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Silver Springs, MD
23.
go back to reference Jones AK, Pasciak AS (2011) Calculating the peak skin dose resulting from fluoroscopically guided interventions. Part I: Methods. J Appl Clin Med Phys 12:3670PubMed Jones AK, Pasciak AS (2011) Calculating the peak skin dose resulting from fluoroscopically guided interventions. Part I: Methods. J Appl Clin Med Phys 12:3670PubMed
24.
go back to reference Vehmas T (2003) Do radiologists’ radiation-related opinions predict their fluoroscopy doses? Br J Radiol 76:653–655PubMedCrossRef Vehmas T (2003) Do radiologists’ radiation-related opinions predict their fluoroscopy doses? Br J Radiol 76:653–655PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Brateman L (1999) Radiation safety considerations for diagnostic radiology personnel. Radiographics 19:1037–1055PubMedCrossRef Brateman L (1999) Radiation safety considerations for diagnostic radiology personnel. Radiographics 19:1037–1055PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Agrawalla S, Pearce R, Goodman TR (2004) How to perform the perfect voiding cystourethrogram. Pediatr Radiol 34:114–119PubMedCrossRef Agrawalla S, Pearce R, Goodman TR (2004) How to perform the perfect voiding cystourethrogram. Pediatr Radiol 34:114–119PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lim R, Khawaja RD, Nimkin K et al (2013) Relationship between radiologist training level and fluoroscopy time for voiding cystourethrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:645–651PubMedCrossRef Lim R, Khawaja RD, Nimkin K et al (2013) Relationship between radiologist training level and fluoroscopy time for voiding cystourethrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:645–651PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Oztas E, Parlak E, Kucukay F et al (2012) The impact of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography education on radiation exposure to experienced endoscopist: ‘trainee effect’. Dig Dis Sci 57:1134–1143PubMedCrossRef Oztas E, Parlak E, Kucukay F et al (2012) The impact of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography education on radiation exposure to experienced endoscopist: ‘trainee effect’. Dig Dis Sci 57:1134–1143PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Uradomo LT, Lustberg ME, Darwin PE (2006) Effect of physician training on fluoroscopy time during ERCP. Dig Dis Sci 51:909–914PubMedCrossRef Uradomo LT, Lustberg ME, Darwin PE (2006) Effect of physician training on fluoroscopy time during ERCP. Dig Dis Sci 51:909–914PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Zhou Y, Singh N, Abdi S et al (2005) Fluoroscopy radiation safety for spine interventional pain procedures in university teaching hospitals. Pain Physician 8:49–53PubMed Zhou Y, Singh N, Abdi S et al (2005) Fluoroscopy radiation safety for spine interventional pain procedures in university teaching hospitals. Pain Physician 8:49–53PubMed
Metadata
Title
Implementation of a competency check-off in diagnostic fluoroscopy for radiology trainees: impact on reducing radiation for three common fluoroscopic exams in children
Authors
Sweta Shah
Stephane L. Desouches
Lisa H. Lowe
Nima Kasraie
Brenton Reading
Publication date
01-02-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3108-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Pediatric Radiology 2/2015 Go to the issue