Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 8/2014

01-08-2014 | Original Article

MR imaging of capitellar ossification: a study in children of different ages

Authors: Lauren M. Fader, Tal Laor, Emily A. Eismann, Roger Cornwall, Kevin J. Little

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 8/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The capitellar ossification center is used routinely to evaluate elbow alignment on radiography. However, whether capitellar ossification is central and concentric to support this practice is unknown.

Objective

To define the pattern of capitellar ossification at different ages of childhood.

Materials and methods

This HIPAA-compliant study was IRB approved. MR imaging examinations from 81 children (ages 1–13 years, at least 3 boys and 3 girls in each age group) were included. We determined the center points of the ossified capitellum and the cartilaginous capitellum on the sagittal and coronal sequences that best showed differentiation between cartilage and bone. Percentage offset of the center of the ossified capitellum from the center of the cartilaginous capitellum was calculated in anterior–posterior, proximal–distal and medial–lateral dimensions, and compared across age groups and between genders. Linear regressions were used to ascertain the effect of age on percentage offset for all patients and for each gender.

Results

Capitellar ossification begins eccentrically with sagittal anterior proximal offset and coronal medial offset. With age, ossification proceeds posteriorly, distally and laterally. Percentage offset gradually diminishes with age. The ossified capitellum centralizes in the sagittal plane by 12–13 years. In the coronal plane, the capitellum ossifies medially beyond the proximal radioulnar joint and remains eccentric at 12–13 years. Centralization in boys lags in the anterior–posterior dimension.

Conclusion

Capitellar ossification is an eccentric process, with lag in anterior–posterior centralization in boys. Medial offset persists at 12–13 years. Recognition of this eccentric ossification may allow for more accurate assessment of elbow alignment on radiographs, especially in younger children.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cheng JC, Wing-Man K, Shen WY et al (1998) A new look at the sequential development of elbow-ossification centers in children. J Pediatr Orthop 18:161–167PubMed Cheng JC, Wing-Man K, Shen WY et al (1998) A new look at the sequential development of elbow-ossification centers in children. J Pediatr Orthop 18:161–167PubMed
2.
go back to reference McCarthy SM, Ogden JA (1982) Radiology of postnatal skeletal development. V. Distal humerus. Skelet Radiol 7:239–249CrossRef McCarthy SM, Ogden JA (1982) Radiology of postnatal skeletal development. V. Distal humerus. Skelet Radiol 7:239–249CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Keats TE, Anderson MW (2013) Atlas of normal roentgen variants that may simulate disease. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia Keats TE, Anderson MW (2013) Atlas of normal roentgen variants that may simulate disease. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia
4.
go back to reference Patel B, Reed M, Patel S (2009) Gender-specific pattern differences of the ossification centers in the pediatric elbow. Pediatr Radiol 39:226–231PubMedCrossRef Patel B, Reed M, Patel S (2009) Gender-specific pattern differences of the ossification centers in the pediatric elbow. Pediatr Radiol 39:226–231PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Silberstein MJ, Brodeur AE, Graviss ER (1979) Some vagaries of the capitellum. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:244–247PubMed Silberstein MJ, Brodeur AE, Graviss ER (1979) Some vagaries of the capitellum. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:244–247PubMed
6.
go back to reference Iyer RS, Thapa MM, Khanna PC et al (2012) Pediatric bone imaging: imaging elbow trauma in children—a review of acute and chronic injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:1053–1068PubMedCrossRef Iyer RS, Thapa MM, Khanna PC et al (2012) Pediatric bone imaging: imaging elbow trauma in children—a review of acute and chronic injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:1053–1068PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rogers LF, Rockwood CA Jr (1973) Separation of the entire distal humeral epiphysis. Radiology 106:393–400PubMedCrossRef Rogers LF, Rockwood CA Jr (1973) Separation of the entire distal humeral epiphysis. Radiology 106:393–400PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kunkel S, Cornwall R, Little K et al (2011) Limitations of the radiocapitellar line for assessment of pediatric elbow radiographs. J Pediatr Orthop 31:628–632PubMedCrossRef Kunkel S, Cornwall R, Little K et al (2011) Limitations of the radiocapitellar line for assessment of pediatric elbow radiographs. J Pediatr Orthop 31:628–632PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Herman MJ, Boardman MJ, Hoover JR et al (2009) Relationship of the anterior humeral line to the capitellar ossific nucleus: variability with age. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:2188–2193PubMedCrossRef Herman MJ, Boardman MJ, Hoover JR et al (2009) Relationship of the anterior humeral line to the capitellar ossific nucleus: variability with age. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:2188–2193PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kaawach W, Ecklund K, Di Canzio J et al (2001) Normal ranges of scapholunate distance in children 6 to 14 years old. J Pediatr Orthop 21:464–467PubMed Kaawach W, Ecklund K, Di Canzio J et al (2001) Normal ranges of scapholunate distance in children 6 to 14 years old. J Pediatr Orthop 21:464–467PubMed
12.
go back to reference Hubbard AM, Meyer JS, Davidson RS et al (1993) Relationship between the ossification center and cartilaginous anlage in the normal hindfoot in children: study with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 161:849–853PubMedCrossRef Hubbard AM, Meyer JS, Davidson RS et al (1993) Relationship between the ossification center and cartilaginous anlage in the normal hindfoot in children: study with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 161:849–853PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Grayson DE (2005) The elbow: radiographic imaging pearls and pitfalls. Semin Roentgenol 40:223–247PubMedCrossRef Grayson DE (2005) The elbow: radiographic imaging pearls and pitfalls. Semin Roentgenol 40:223–247PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Vallejo JM, Jaramillo D (2001) Normal MR imaging anatomy of the ankle and foot in the pediatric population. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 9:435–446, ixPubMed Vallejo JM, Jaramillo D (2001) Normal MR imaging anatomy of the ankle and foot in the pediatric population. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 9:435–446, ixPubMed
15.
go back to reference Laor T, Jaramillo D (2009) MR imaging insights into skeletal maturation: what is normal? Radiology 250:28–38PubMedCrossRef Laor T, Jaramillo D (2009) MR imaging insights into skeletal maturation: what is normal? Radiology 250:28–38PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Scheuer L, Black S (2000) The upper limb. Developmental juvenile osteology. Elsevier, Oxford, p 283 Scheuer L, Black S (2000) The upper limb. Developmental juvenile osteology. Elsevier, Oxford, p 283
17.
go back to reference Rivas R, Shapiro F (2002) Structural stages in the development of the long bones and epiphyses: a study in the New Zealand white rabbit. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:85–100PubMed Rivas R, Shapiro F (2002) Structural stages in the development of the long bones and epiphyses: a study in the New Zealand white rabbit. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:85–100PubMed
Metadata
Title
MR imaging of capitellar ossification: a study in children of different ages
Authors
Lauren M. Fader
Tal Laor
Emily A. Eismann
Roger Cornwall
Kevin J. Little
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 8/2014
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-2921-4

Other articles of this Issue 8/2014

Pediatric Radiology 8/2014 Go to the issue