Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 8/2014

01-08-2014 | Original Article

Characterization of acoustic noise in a neonatal intensive care unit MRI system

Authors: Jean A. Tkach, Yu Li, Ronald G. Pratt, Kelly A. Baroch, Wolfgang Loew, Barret R. Daniels, Randy O. Giaquinto, Stephanie L. Merhar, Beth M. Kline-Fath, Charles L. Dumoulin

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 8/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To eliminate the medical risks and logistical challenges of transporting infants from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to the radiology department for magnetic resonance imaging, a small-footprint 1.5-T MRI scanner has been developed for neonatal imaging within the NICU. MRI is known to be noisy, and exposure to excessive acoustic noise has the potential to elicit physiological distress and impact development in the term and preterm infant.

Objective

To measure and compare the acoustic noise properties of the NICU MRI system against those of a conventional 1.5-T MRI system.

Materials and methods

We performed sound pressure level measurements in the NICU MRI scanner and in a conventional adult-size whole-body 1.5-T MRI system. Sound pressure level measurements were made for six standard clinical MR imaging protocols.

Results

The average sound pressure level value, reported in unweighted (dB) and A-weighted (dBA) decibels for all six imaging pulse sequences, was 73.8 dB and 88 dBA for the NICU scanner, and 87 dB and 98.4 dBA for the conventional MRI scanner. The sound pressure level values measured on the NICU scanner for each of the six MR imaging pulse sequences were consistently and significantly (P = 0.03) lower, with an average difference of 14.2 dB (range 10–21 dB) and 11 dBA (range 5–18 dBA). The sound pressure level frequency response of the two MR systems showed a similar harmonic structure above 200 Hz for all imaging sequences. The amplitude, however, was appreciably lower for the NICU scanner, by as much as 30 dB, for frequencies below 200 Hz.

Conclusion

The NICU MRI system is quieter than conventional MRI scanners, improving safety for the neonate and facilitating siting of the unit within the NICU.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Morris BH, Philbin MK, Bose C (2000) Physiological effects of sound on the newborn. J Perinatol 20:S55–S60PubMedCrossRef Morris BH, Philbin MK, Bose C (2000) Physiological effects of sound on the newborn. J Perinatol 20:S55–S60PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Watts C, Trim E, Metherall J et al (2008) Neonatal transport—the comfort zone. Neonatal Transp 4:4 Watts C, Trim E, Metherall J et al (2008) Neonatal transport—the comfort zone. Neonatal Transp 4:4
5.
go back to reference Nordell A, Lundh M, Horsch S et al (2009) The acoustic hood: a patient-independent device improving acoustic noise protection during neonatal magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Paediatr 98:1278–1283PubMedCrossRef Nordell A, Lundh M, Horsch S et al (2009) The acoustic hood: a patient-independent device improving acoustic noise protection during neonatal magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Paediatr 98:1278–1283PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Amaro E Jr, Williams SC, Shergill SS et al (2002) Acoustic noise and functional magnetic resonance imaging: current strategies and future prospects. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:497–510PubMedCrossRef Amaro E Jr, Williams SC, Shergill SS et al (2002) Acoustic noise and functional magnetic resonance imaging: current strategies and future prospects. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:497–510PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Philbin MK, Taber KH, Hayman LA (1996) Preliminary report: changes in vital signs of term newborns during MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17:1033–1036PubMed Philbin MK, Taber KH, Hayman LA (1996) Preliminary report: changes in vital signs of term newborns during MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17:1033–1036PubMed
8.
go back to reference Lasky RE, Williams AL (2005) The development of the auditory system from conception to term. NeoReviews 6:141–152CrossRef Lasky RE, Williams AL (2005) The development of the auditory system from conception to term. NeoReviews 6:141–152CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Graven SN, Browne JV (2008) Auditory development in the fetus and infant. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev 8:187–193CrossRef Graven SN, Browne JV (2008) Auditory development in the fetus and infant. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev 8:187–193CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Graven SN, Browne JV (2008) Sensory development in the fetus, neonate and infant. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev 8:169–172CrossRef Graven SN, Browne JV (2008) Sensory development in the fetus, neonate and infant. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev 8:169–172CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Graven SN, Browne JV (2008) Sleep and brain development, neonate and infant. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev 8:173–179CrossRef Graven SN, Browne JV (2008) Sleep and brain development, neonate and infant. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev 8:173–179CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Macnab A, Chen Y, Gagnon F et al (1995) Vibration and noise in pediatric emergency transport vehicles: a potential cause of morbidity? Aviat Space Environ Med 66:212–219PubMed Macnab A, Chen Y, Gagnon F et al (1995) Vibration and noise in pediatric emergency transport vehicles: a potential cause of morbidity? Aviat Space Environ Med 66:212–219PubMed
14.
go back to reference Berger EH (1984) Attenuation of earplugs worn in combination with earmuffs. Occup Health Saf May:72–73 Berger EH (1984) Attenuation of earplugs worn in combination with earmuffs. Occup Health Saf May:72–73
16.
go back to reference Small SA, Stapells DR (2006) Multiple auditory steady-state response thresholds to bone-conduction stimuli in young infants with normal hearing. Ear Hear 27:219–228PubMedCrossRef Small SA, Stapells DR (2006) Multiple auditory steady-state response thresholds to bone-conduction stimuli in young infants with normal hearing. Ear Hear 27:219–228PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tkach JA, Hillman NH, Jobe AH et al (2012) An MRI system for imaging neonates in the NICU: initial feasibility study. Pediatr Radiol 42:1347–1356PubMedCrossRef Tkach JA, Hillman NH, Jobe AH et al (2012) An MRI system for imaging neonates in the NICU: initial feasibility study. Pediatr Radiol 42:1347–1356PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Tkach JA, Merhar SL, Kline-Fath BM et al (2014) MR imaging in the neonatal intensive care unit: initial experience using a small footprint 1.5 T system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:W95–W105PubMedCrossRef Tkach JA, Merhar SL, Kline-Fath BM et al (2014) MR imaging in the neonatal intensive care unit: initial experience using a small footprint 1.5 T system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:W95–W105PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Windram J, Grosse-Wortmann L, Shariat M (2012) Cardiovascular MRI without sedation or general anesthesia using a feed-and-sleep technique in neonates and infants. Pediatr Radiol 42:183–187PubMedCrossRef Windram J, Grosse-Wortmann L, Shariat M (2012) Cardiovascular MRI without sedation or general anesthesia using a feed-and-sleep technique in neonates and infants. Pediatr Radiol 42:183–187PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Mathur AM, Neil JJ, McKinstry RC et al (2008) Transport, monitoring, and successful brain MR imaging in unsedated neonates. Pediatr Radiol 38:260–264PubMedCrossRef Mathur AM, Neil JJ, McKinstry RC et al (2008) Transport, monitoring, and successful brain MR imaging in unsedated neonates. Pediatr Radiol 38:260–264PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hurwitz R, Lane SR, Bell RA et al (1989) Acoustic analysis of gradient-coil noise in MR imaging. Radiology 173:545–548PubMedCrossRef Hurwitz R, Lane SR, Bell RA et al (1989) Acoustic analysis of gradient-coil noise in MR imaging. Radiology 173:545–548PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference McJury MJ (1995) Acoustic noise levels generated during high field MR imaging. Clin Radiol 50:331–334PubMedCrossRef McJury MJ (1995) Acoustic noise levels generated during high field MR imaging. Clin Radiol 50:331–334PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Price DL, De Wilde JP, Papadaki AM et al (2001) Investigation of acoustic noise on 15 MRI scanners from 0.2 T to 3 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:288–293PubMedCrossRef Price DL, De Wilde JP, Papadaki AM et al (2001) Investigation of acoustic noise on 15 MRI scanners from 0.2 T to 3 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:288–293PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Gerhardt KJ, Abrams RM (2000) Fetal exposures to sound and vibroacoustic stimulation. J Perinatol 20:S21–S30PubMedCrossRef Gerhardt KJ, Abrams RM (2000) Fetal exposures to sound and vibroacoustic stimulation. J Perinatol 20:S21–S30PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Boothroyd A (1986) Speech acoustics and speech perception. (Pro-ed studies in communication disorders), PRO-ED, Austin, TX Boothroyd A (1986) Speech acoustics and speech perception. (Pro-ed studies in communication disorders), PRO-ED, Austin, TX
27.
go back to reference Boothroyd A (2004) Room acoustics and speech perception. Semin Hear 25:155–166CrossRef Boothroyd A (2004) Room acoustics and speech perception. Semin Hear 25:155–166CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Berglund B, Hassmen P, Job RF (1996) Sources and effects of low-frequency noise. J Acoust Soc Am 99:2985–3002PubMedCrossRef Berglund B, Hassmen P, Job RF (1996) Sources and effects of low-frequency noise. J Acoust Soc Am 99:2985–3002PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Jevtovic-Todorovic V, Hartman RE, Izumi Y et al (2003) Early exposure to common anesthetic agents causes widespread neurodegeneration in the developing rat brain and persistent learning deficits. J Neurosci 23:876–882PubMed Jevtovic-Todorovic V, Hartman RE, Izumi Y et al (2003) Early exposure to common anesthetic agents causes widespread neurodegeneration in the developing rat brain and persistent learning deficits. J Neurosci 23:876–882PubMed
30.
go back to reference Beauve B, Dearlove O (2008) Sedation of children under 4 weeks of age for MRI examination. Paediatr Anaesth 18:892–893PubMedCrossRef Beauve B, Dearlove O (2008) Sedation of children under 4 weeks of age for MRI examination. Paediatr Anaesth 18:892–893PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Allegaert K, Naulaers G (2008) Procedural sedation of neonates with chloral hydrate: a sedation procedure does not end at the end of the acquisition of the images. Paediatr Anaesth 18:1270–1271PubMedCrossRef Allegaert K, Naulaers G (2008) Procedural sedation of neonates with chloral hydrate: a sedation procedure does not end at the end of the acquisition of the images. Paediatr Anaesth 18:1270–1271PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Cote CJ (2010) Safety after chloral hydrate sedation of former preterm and term infants for magnetic resonance imaging: are the data clear? Anesth Analg 110:671–673PubMedCrossRef Cote CJ (2010) Safety after chloral hydrate sedation of former preterm and term infants for magnetic resonance imaging: are the data clear? Anesth Analg 110:671–673PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Etzel-Hardman D, Kapsin K, Jones S et al (2009) Sedation reduction in a pediatric radiology department. J Healthc Qual 31:34–39PubMedCrossRef Etzel-Hardman D, Kapsin K, Jones S et al (2009) Sedation reduction in a pediatric radiology department. J Healthc Qual 31:34–39PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Characterization of acoustic noise in a neonatal intensive care unit MRI system
Authors
Jean A. Tkach
Yu Li
Ronald G. Pratt
Kelly A. Baroch
Wolfgang Loew
Barret R. Daniels
Randy O. Giaquinto
Stephanie L. Merhar
Beth M. Kline-Fath
Charles L. Dumoulin
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 8/2014
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-2909-0

Other articles of this Issue 8/2014

Pediatric Radiology 8/2014 Go to the issue