Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 12/2013

01-12-2013 | Original Article

Multiplanar CT assessment of femoral head displacement in slipped capital femoral epiphysis

Authors: Shafagh Monazzam, Jerry R. Dwek, Harish S. Hosalkar

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 12/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

With recent changing approaches to the management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), the accurate radiographic assessment of maximum extent of displacement is crucial for planning surgical treatment.

Objective

To determine what plane best represents the maximum SCFE displacement as quantified by the head-neck angle difference (HNAD), whether HNAD can quantitatively differentiate the SCFE cohort from the normal cohort, based on CT, and how Southwick slip angle (SSA) compares to HNAD.

Materials and methods

We reviewed 19 children with SCFE (23 affected hips) with preoperative CT scans and 27 age- and sex-matched children undergoing abdominal CT for non-orthopedic problems. Head-neck angle (HNA), the angle between the femoral epiphysis and the neck axis, was measured in three planes on each hip and the HNAD (affected − unaffected hip) was determined. SSA was measured on radiographs.

Results

The coronal HNAD (mean 8.7°) was less than both the axial-oblique (mean 30.7°) and sagittal (mean 37.4°) HNADs, which were also greater than the HNADs of the normal cohort. Grouping HNAD measurements by SSA severity classification did not consistently distinguish between SCFE severity levels.

Conclusion

Axial-oblique and sagittal planes best represent the maximum SCFE displacement while biplanar radiograph may underestimate the extent of the displacement, thereby potentially altering the management between in situ pinning and capital realignment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Paré A (1572) Fractures of the neck of the femur. Cinq Livres de Chirurgie Paré A (1572) Fractures of the neck of the femur. Cinq Livres de Chirurgie
2.
go back to reference Ziebarth K, Zilkens C, Spencer S et al (2009) Capital realignment for moderate and severe SCFE using a modified Dunn procedure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:704–716PubMedCrossRef Ziebarth K, Zilkens C, Spencer S et al (2009) Capital realignment for moderate and severe SCFE using a modified Dunn procedure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:704–716PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Loder RT (2006) Controversies in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Orthop Clin North Am 37:211–221, viiPubMedCrossRef Loder RT (2006) Controversies in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Orthop Clin North Am 37:211–221, viiPubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hosalkar HS, Pandya NK, Bomar JD et al (2012) Hip impingement in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a changing perspective. J Child Orthop 6:161–172PubMedCrossRef Hosalkar HS, Pandya NK, Bomar JD et al (2012) Hip impingement in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a changing perspective. J Child Orthop 6:161–172PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fishkin Z, Armstrong DG, Shah H et al (2006) Proximal femoral physis shear in slipped capital femoral epiphysis – a finite element study. J Pediatr Orthop 26:291–294PubMedCrossRef Fishkin Z, Armstrong DG, Shah H et al (2006) Proximal femoral physis shear in slipped capital femoral epiphysis – a finite element study. J Pediatr Orthop 26:291–294PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sankar WN, Brighton BK, Kim YJ et al (2011) Acetabular morphology in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 31:254–258PubMedCrossRef Sankar WN, Brighton BK, Kim YJ et al (2011) Acetabular morphology in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 31:254–258PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Loder RT, Richards BS, Shapiro PS et al (1993) Acute slipped capital femoral epiphysis: the importance of physeal stability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:1134–1140PubMed Loder RT, Richards BS, Shapiro PS et al (1993) Acute slipped capital femoral epiphysis: the importance of physeal stability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:1134–1140PubMed
8.
go back to reference Aronsson DD, Loder RT, Breur GJ et al (2006) Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14:666–679PubMed Aronsson DD, Loder RT, Breur GJ et al (2006) Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14:666–679PubMed
9.
go back to reference Dodds MK, McCormack D, Mulhall KJ (2009) Femoroacetabular impingement after slipped capital femoral epiphysis: does slip severity predict clinical symptoms? J Pediatr Orthop 29:535–539PubMedCrossRef Dodds MK, McCormack D, Mulhall KJ (2009) Femoroacetabular impingement after slipped capital femoral epiphysis: does slip severity predict clinical symptoms? J Pediatr Orthop 29:535–539PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fraitzl CR, Kafer W, Nelitz M et al (2007) Radiological evidence of femoroacetabular impingement in mild slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a mean follow-up of 14.4 years after pinning in situ. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:1592–1596PubMed Fraitzl CR, Kafer W, Nelitz M et al (2007) Radiological evidence of femoroacetabular impingement in mild slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a mean follow-up of 14.4 years after pinning in situ. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:1592–1596PubMed
11.
go back to reference Tjoumakaris FP, Wallach DM, Davidson RS (2007) Subtrochanteric osteotomy effectively treats femoroacetabular impingement after slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:230–237PubMed Tjoumakaris FP, Wallach DM, Davidson RS (2007) Subtrochanteric osteotomy effectively treats femoroacetabular impingement after slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:230–237PubMed
12.
go back to reference Masse A, Aprato A, Grappiolo G et al (2012) Surgical hip dislocation for anatomic reorientation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: preliminary results. Hip Int 22:137–144PubMedCrossRef Masse A, Aprato A, Grappiolo G et al (2012) Surgical hip dislocation for anatomic reorientation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: preliminary results. Hip Int 22:137–144PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Richolt JA, Hata N, Kikinis R et al (2008) Quantitative evaluation of angular measurements on plain radiographs in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a 3-dimensional analysis of computed tomography-based computer models of 46 femora. J Pediatr Orthop 28:291–296PubMedCrossRef Richolt JA, Hata N, Kikinis R et al (2008) Quantitative evaluation of angular measurements on plain radiographs in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a 3-dimensional analysis of computed tomography-based computer models of 46 femora. J Pediatr Orthop 28:291–296PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fahey JJ, O’Brien ET (1965) Acute slipped capital femoral epiphysis: review of the literature and report of ten cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 47:1105–1127PubMed Fahey JJ, O’Brien ET (1965) Acute slipped capital femoral epiphysis: review of the literature and report of ten cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 47:1105–1127PubMed
15.
go back to reference Aronsson DD, Loder RT (1996) Treatment of the unstable (acute) slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res (322):99–110 Aronsson DD, Loder RT (1996) Treatment of the unstable (acute) slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res (322):99–110
16.
go back to reference Southwick WO (1973) Compression fixation after biplane intertrochanteric osteotomy for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. A technical improvement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:1218–1224PubMed Southwick WO (1973) Compression fixation after biplane intertrochanteric osteotomy for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. A technical improvement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:1218–1224PubMed
17.
go back to reference Ziebarth K, Domayer S, Slongo T et al (2012) Clinical stability of slipped capital femoral epiphysis does not correlate with intraoperative stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:2274–2279PubMedCrossRef Ziebarth K, Domayer S, Slongo T et al (2012) Clinical stability of slipped capital femoral epiphysis does not correlate with intraoperative stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:2274–2279PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kordelle J, Millis M, Jolesz FA et al (2001) Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal femur in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis based on computed tomography. J Pediatr Orthop 21:179–182PubMed Kordelle J, Millis M, Jolesz FA et al (2001) Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal femur in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis based on computed tomography. J Pediatr Orthop 21:179–182PubMed
19.
go back to reference Loder RT (2001) Effect of femur position on the angular measurement of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 21:488–494PubMed Loder RT (2001) Effect of femur position on the angular measurement of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 21:488–494PubMed
20.
go back to reference Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Trousdale R et al (2009) Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:666–675PubMedCrossRef Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Trousdale R et al (2009) Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:666–675PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cohen MS, Gelberman RH, Griffin PP et al (1986) Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: assessment of epiphyseal displacement and angulation. J Pediatr Orthop 6:259–264PubMedCrossRef Cohen MS, Gelberman RH, Griffin PP et al (1986) Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: assessment of epiphyseal displacement and angulation. J Pediatr Orthop 6:259–264PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Umans H, Liebling MS, Moy L et al (1998) Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a physeal lesion diagnosed by MRI, with radiographic and CT correlation. Skeletal Radiol 27:139–144PubMedCrossRef Umans H, Liebling MS, Moy L et al (1998) Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a physeal lesion diagnosed by MRI, with radiographic and CT correlation. Skeletal Radiol 27:139–144PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Weiner DS, Cook AJ, Hoyt WA Jr et al (1978) Computed tomography in the measurement of femoral anteversion. Orthopedics 1:299–306PubMed Weiner DS, Cook AJ, Hoyt WA Jr et al (1978) Computed tomography in the measurement of femoral anteversion. Orthopedics 1:299–306PubMed
24.
go back to reference Chen L, Boonthathip M, Cardoso F et al (2009) Acetabulum protrusio and center edge angle: new MR-imaging measurement criteria – a correlative study with measurement derived from conventional radiography. Skeletal Radiol 38:123–129PubMedCrossRef Chen L, Boonthathip M, Cardoso F et al (2009) Acetabulum protrusio and center edge angle: new MR-imaging measurement criteria – a correlative study with measurement derived from conventional radiography. Skeletal Radiol 38:123–129PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Notzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH et al (2002) The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:556–560PubMedCrossRef Notzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH et al (2002) The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:556–560PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Southwick WO (1967) Osteotomy through the lesser trochanter for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 49:807–835PubMed Southwick WO (1967) Osteotomy through the lesser trochanter for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 49:807–835PubMed
27.
go back to reference Leunig M, Horowitz K, Manner H et al (2010) In situ pinning with arthroscopic osteoplasty for mild SCFE: a preliminary technical report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:3160–3167PubMedCrossRef Leunig M, Horowitz K, Manner H et al (2010) In situ pinning with arthroscopic osteoplasty for mild SCFE: a preliminary technical report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:3160–3167PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Multiplanar CT assessment of femoral head displacement in slipped capital femoral epiphysis
Authors
Shafagh Monazzam
Jerry R. Dwek
Harish S. Hosalkar
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 12/2013
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-013-2733-y

Other articles of this Issue 12/2013

Pediatric Radiology 12/2013 Go to the issue