Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 2/2011

01-09-2011 | ALARA-CT

Sedation and anesthesia issues in pediatric imaging

Author: Thomas L. Slovis

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Special Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Sedation and anesthesia for pediatric imaging departments has changed dramatically for the following reasons: (1) radiologists have stopped sedating patients; (2) the majority of sedations are not for CT (because of the speed of the procedure) but for MR, which lasts 45 min or greater; (3) a cadre of services—pediatricians, emergency medicine physicians, hospitalists and intensivists, as well as anesthesiologists—can provide the services. These changes have significantly influenced the type of agents utilized for sedation and anesthesia and, most important, have created operational issues for MR departments. Nevertheless, it is important for each imaging department to create a uniform approach to sedation, taking into account patient expectations, efficiency of through-put, facilities and personnel available, and institutional costs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Townsend BA, Callahan MJ, Zurakowski D et al (2010) Has pediatric CT at children’s hospitals reached its peak? AJR 194:1194–1196PubMedCrossRef Townsend BA, Callahan MJ, Zurakowski D et al (2010) Has pediatric CT at children’s hospitals reached its peak? AJR 194:1194–1196PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hansen-Flaschen J, Cowen J, Polomano RC (1994) Beyond the Ramsay scale: need for a validated measure of sedating drug efficacy in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 22:732–733PubMedCrossRef Hansen-Flaschen J, Cowen J, Polomano RC (1994) Beyond the Ramsay scale: need for a validated measure of sedating drug efficacy in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 22:732–733PubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
go back to reference Khan JJ, Donnelly LF, Koch BL et al (2007) A program to decrease the need for pediatric sedation for CT and MRI. Appl Radiol 4:30–33 Khan JJ, Donnelly LF, Koch BL et al (2007) A program to decrease the need for pediatric sedation for CT and MRI. Appl Radiol 4:30–33
7.
go back to reference Mason KP, Michna E, DiNardo JA et al (2002) Evolution of a protocol for ketamine-induced sedation as an alternative to general anesthesia for interventional radiologic procedures in pediatric patients. Radiology 225:457–465PubMedCrossRef Mason KP, Michna E, DiNardo JA et al (2002) Evolution of a protocol for ketamine-induced sedation as an alternative to general anesthesia for interventional radiologic procedures in pediatric patients. Radiology 225:457–465PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mason KP, Zgleszewski SE, Prescilla R et al (2008) Hemodynamic effects of dexmedetomidine sedation for CT imaging studies. Pediatric Anesth 18:393–402CrossRef Mason KP, Zgleszewski SE, Prescilla R et al (2008) Hemodynamic effects of dexmedetomidine sedation for CT imaging studies. Pediatric Anesth 18:393–402CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mason KP, Zurakowski D, Zgleszewski SE et al (2008) High dose dexmedetomidine as the sole sedative for pediatric MRI. Pediatric Anesth 18:403–411CrossRef Mason KP, Zurakowski D, Zgleszewski SE et al (2008) High dose dexmedetomidine as the sole sedative for pediatric MRI. Pediatric Anesth 18:403–411CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Siddappa R, Riggins J, Kariyanna S et al (2011) High-dose dexmedetomidine sedation for pediatric MRI. Pediatric Anesth 21:153–158CrossRef Siddappa R, Riggins J, Kariyanna S et al (2011) High-dose dexmedetomidine sedation for pediatric MRI. Pediatric Anesth 21:153–158CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Koroglu A, Teksan H, Sagir O et al (2006) A comparison of the sedative, hemodynamic, and respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. Anesth Analg 103:63–67PubMedCrossRef Koroglu A, Teksan H, Sagir O et al (2006) A comparison of the sedative, hemodynamic, and respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. Anesth Analg 103:63–67PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Zgleszewski SE, Zurakowski D, Fontaine PJ et al (2008) Is propofol a safe alternative to pentobarbital for sedation during pediatric diagnostic CT? Radiology 247:528–534PubMedCrossRef Zgleszewski SE, Zurakowski D, Fontaine PJ et al (2008) Is propofol a safe alternative to pentobarbital for sedation during pediatric diagnostic CT? Radiology 247:528–534PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Vanderby SA, Babyn PS, Carter MW et al (2010) Effect of anesthesia and sedation on pediatric MR imaging patient flow. Radiology 256:229–237PubMedCrossRef Vanderby SA, Babyn PS, Carter MW et al (2010) Effect of anesthesia and sedation on pediatric MR imaging patient flow. Radiology 256:229–237PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Sedation and anesthesia issues in pediatric imaging
Author
Thomas L. Slovis
Publication date
01-09-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue Special Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2115-2

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2011

Pediatric Radiology 2/2011 Go to the issue