Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 11/2011

01-11-2011 | Original Article

Caliceal diverticulum in pediatric patients: the spectrum of imaging findings

Authors: Boaz Karmazyn, Martin Kaefer, S. Gregory Jennings, Ranjini Nirmala, Molly E. Raske

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 11/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Caliceal diverticulum (CD) is uncommon in children. As compared to adults, most children with CD are symptomatic. Common complications include stone formation and infection. Correct diagnosis of CD is important for guiding management.

Objective

To identify imaging findings at diagnosis and follow-up in pediatric patients with CD.

Materials and methods

We identified all patients from 2003 to 2010 with a diagnosis of CD. We reviewed presenting symptoms, underlying diseases, complications, management, and all pertinent radiological examinations.

Results

Twenty-four patients (2.6 to 18.5 years old, 11 females) had CD. Urinary tract infection was the most common (n = 8) presentation. Diagnosis of CD was based on delayed post-contrast CT in 79% of patients with only one false-negative CT. Most patients (n = 20) had a single CD; others had either 2 CDs (n = 2) or multiple CDs (n = 2). CD diameter ranged from 1.0 to 18.3 cm and grew in five of nine patients who had follow-up studies. Seven patients developed stone in the CD. Fifteen patients (63%) underwent a surgical procedure.

Conclusions

CD is commonly solitary, often grows with time and may mimic other diagnoses, including simple cyst, complex cyst and polycystic kidney disease. Delayed postcontrast CT is highly sensitive in diagnosing CD.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kavukcu S, Cakmakci H, Babayigit A (2003) Diagnosis of caliceal diverticulum in two pediatric patients: a comparison of sonography, CT, and urography. J Clin Ultrasound 31:218–221PubMedCrossRef Kavukcu S, Cakmakci H, Babayigit A (2003) Diagnosis of caliceal diverticulum in two pediatric patients: a comparison of sonography, CT, and urography. J Clin Ultrasound 31:218–221PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Casale P, Grady RW, Feng WC et al (2004) The pediatric caliceal diverticulum: diagnosis and laparoscopic management. J Endourol 18:668–671PubMedCrossRef Casale P, Grady RW, Feng WC et al (2004) The pediatric caliceal diverticulum: diagnosis and laparoscopic management. J Endourol 18:668–671PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Siegel MJ, McAlister WH (1979) Calyceal diverticula in children: unusual features and complications. Radiology 131:79–82PubMed Siegel MJ, McAlister WH (1979) Calyceal diverticula in children: unusual features and complications. Radiology 131:79–82PubMed
4.
go back to reference Estrada CR, Datta S, Schneck FX et al (2009) Caliceal diverticula in children: natural history and management. J Urol 181:1306–1311PubMedCrossRef Estrada CR, Datta S, Schneck FX et al (2009) Caliceal diverticula in children: natural history and management. J Urol 181:1306–1311PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sejiny M, Al-Qahtani S, Elhaous A et al (2010) Efficacy of flexible ureterorenoscopy with holmium laser in the management of stone-bearing caliceal diverticula. J Endourol 24:961–967PubMedCrossRef Sejiny M, Al-Qahtani S, Elhaous A et al (2010) Efficacy of flexible ureterorenoscopy with holmium laser in the management of stone-bearing caliceal diverticula. J Endourol 24:961–967PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Smith RC, Rosenfield AT, Choe KA et al (1995) Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography. Radiology 194:789–794PubMed Smith RC, Rosenfield AT, Choe KA et al (1995) Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography. Radiology 194:789–794PubMed
7.
go back to reference Surendrababu NR, Govil S (2005) Diagnostic dilemma: calyceal diverticulum vs. complicated cyst. Indian J Med Sci 59:403–405PubMedCrossRef Surendrababu NR, Govil S (2005) Diagnostic dilemma: calyceal diverticulum vs. complicated cyst. Indian J Med Sci 59:403–405PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Stunell H, McNeill G, Brown RF et al (2010) The imaging appearances of calyceal diverticula complicated by uroliathasis. Br J Radiol 83:888–894PubMedCrossRef Stunell H, McNeill G, Brown RF et al (2010) The imaging appearances of calyceal diverticula complicated by uroliathasis. Br J Radiol 83:888–894PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Matlaga BR, Miller NL, Terry C et al (2007) The pathogenesis of calyceal diverticular calculi. Urol Res 35:35–40PubMedCrossRef Matlaga BR, Miller NL, Terry C et al (2007) The pathogenesis of calyceal diverticular calculi. Urol Res 35:35–40PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Auge BK, Maloney ME, Mathias BJ et al (2006) Metabolic abnormalities associated with calyceal diverticular stones. BJU Int 97:1053–1056PubMedCrossRef Auge BK, Maloney ME, Mathias BJ et al (2006) Metabolic abnormalities associated with calyceal diverticular stones. BJU Int 97:1053–1056PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wogan JM (2002) Pyelocalyceal diverticulum: an unusual cause of acute renal colic. J Emerg Med 23:19–21PubMedCrossRef Wogan JM (2002) Pyelocalyceal diverticulum: an unusual cause of acute renal colic. J Emerg Med 23:19–21PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Zuckerman JM, Passman C, Assimos DG (2010) Transitional cell carcinoma within a calyceal diverticulum associated with stone disease. Rev Urol 12:52–55PubMed Zuckerman JM, Passman C, Assimos DG (2010) Transitional cell carcinoma within a calyceal diverticulum associated with stone disease. Rev Urol 12:52–55PubMed
Metadata
Title
Caliceal diverticulum in pediatric patients: the spectrum of imaging findings
Authors
Boaz Karmazyn
Martin Kaefer
S. Gregory Jennings
Ranjini Nirmala
Molly E. Raske
Publication date
01-11-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 11/2011
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2113-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2011

Pediatric Radiology 11/2011 Go to the issue

Hermes

Hermes