Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 5/2011

01-05-2011 | Minisymposium

Quality assurance: using the exposure index and the deviation index to monitor radiation exposure for portable chest radiographs in neonates

Authors: Mervyn D. Cohen, Matt L. Cooper, Kelly Piersall, Bruce K. Apgar

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Many methods are used to track patient exposure during acquisition of plain film radiographs. A uniform international standard would aid this process.

Objective

To evaluate and describe a new, simple quality-assurance method for monitoring patient exposure. This method uses the “exposure index” and the “deviation index,” recently developed by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). The deviation index measures variation from an ideal target exposure index value. Our objective was to determine whether the exposure index and the deviation index can be used to monitor and control exposure drift over time.

Materials and methods

Our Agfa workstation automatically keeps a record of the exposure index for every patient. The exposure index and deviation index were calculated on 1,884 consecutive neonatal chest images. Exposure of a neonatal chest phantom was performed as a control.

Results

Acquisition of the exposure index and calculation of the deviation index was easily achieved. The weekly mean exposure index of the phantom and the patients was stable and showed <10% change during the study, indicating no exposure drift during the study period.

Conclusion

The exposure index is an excellent tool to monitor the consistency of patient exposures. It does not indicate the exposure value used, but is an index to track compliance with a pre-determined target exposure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J et al (2008) The image gently campaign: working together to change practice. AJR 190:273–274PubMedCrossRef Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J et al (2008) The image gently campaign: working together to change practice. AJR 190:273–274PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Don S (2004) Radiosensitivity of children: potential for overexposure in CR and DR and magnitude of doses in ordinary radiographic examinations. Pediatr Radiol 34(Suppl 3):S167–S172, discussion S234–241PubMedCrossRef Don S (2004) Radiosensitivity of children: potential for overexposure in CR and DR and magnitude of doses in ordinary radiographic examinations. Pediatr Radiol 34(Suppl 3):S167–S172, discussion S234–241PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Uffmann M, Schaefer-Prokop C (2009) Digital radiography: the balance between image quality and required radiation dose. Eur J Radiol 72:202–208PubMedCrossRef Uffmann M, Schaefer-Prokop C (2009) Digital radiography: the balance between image quality and required radiation dose. Eur J Radiol 72:202–208PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Vaño E, Fernández JM, Ten JI et al (2007) Transition from screen-film to digital radiography: evolution of patient radiation doses at projection radiography. Radiology 243:461–466PubMedCrossRef Vaño E, Fernández JM, Ten JI et al (2007) Transition from screen-film to digital radiography: evolution of patient radiation doses at projection radiography. Radiology 243:461–466PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference International commission on radiological protection (2004) Managing patient dose in digital radiology: a report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 34:1–73 International commission on radiological protection (2004) Managing patient dose in digital radiology: a report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 34:1–73
6.
go back to reference Schaetzing R (2004) Management of pediatric radiation dose using Agfa computed radiography. Pediatr Radiol 34(Suppl 3):S207–S214PubMedCrossRef Schaetzing R (2004) Management of pediatric radiation dose using Agfa computed radiography. Pediatr Radiol 34(Suppl 3):S207–S214PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Shepard SJ, Wang J, Flynn M et al (2009) An exposure indicator for digital radiography: AAPM Task Group 116 (executive summary). Med Phys 36:2898–2914, Erratum in: Med Phys (2010) 37:405PubMedCrossRef Shepard SJ, Wang J, Flynn M et al (2009) An exposure indicator for digital radiography: AAPM Task Group 116 (executive summary). Med Phys 36:2898–2914, Erratum in: Med Phys (2010) 37:405PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference (2008) Medical electrical equipment—exposure index of digital X-ray imaging systems. Part 1: definitions and requirements for general radiography, International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), international standard IEC 62494-1:2008-08 Geneva, Switzerland (2008) Medical electrical equipment—exposure index of digital X-ray imaging systems. Part 1: definitions and requirements for general radiography, International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), international standard IEC 62494-1:2008-08 Geneva, Switzerland
9.
go back to reference Willis CE, Leckie RG, Carter JR et al (1995) Objective measures of quality assurance in a computed radiography-based radiology department. SPIE 2432:12CrossRef Willis CE, Leckie RG, Carter JR et al (1995) Objective measures of quality assurance in a computed radiography-based radiology department. SPIE 2432:12CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Quality assurance: using the exposure index and the deviation index to monitor radiation exposure for portable chest radiographs in neonates
Authors
Mervyn D. Cohen
Matt L. Cooper
Kelly Piersall
Bruce K. Apgar
Publication date
01-05-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 5/2011
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1951-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

Pediatric Radiology 5/2011 Go to the issue