Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 5/2010

Open Access 01-05-2010 | Original Article

Estimated cumulative radiation dose from PET/CT in children with malignancies: a 5-year retrospective review

Authors: Soni C. Chawla, Noah Federman, Di Zhang, Kristen Nagata, Soujanya Nuthakki, Michael McNitt-Gray, M. Ines Boechat

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 5/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The increasing use of serial PET/CT scans in the management of pediatric malignancies raises the important consideration of radiation exposure in children.

Objective

To estimate the cumulative radiation dose from PET/CT studies to children with malignancy and to compare with the data in literature.

Materials and methods

Two hundred forty-eight clinical PET/CT studies performed on 78 patients (50 boys/28 girls, 1.3 to 18 years old from December 2002 to October 2007) were retrospectively reviewed under IRB approval. The whole-body effective dose (ED) estimates for each child were obtained by estimating the effective dose from each PET/CT exam performed using the ImPACT Patient Dosimetry Calculator for CT and OLINDA for PET.

Results

The average number of PET/CT studies was 3.2 per child (range: 1 to 14 studies). The average ED of an individual CT study was 20.3 mSv (range: 2.7 to 54.2), of PET study was 4.6 mSv (range: 0.4 to 7.7) and of PET/CT study was 24.8 mSv (range: 6.2 to 60.7). The average cumulative radiation dose per patient from CT studies was 64.4 mSv (range: 2.7 to 326), from PET studies was 14.5 mSv (range: 2.8 to 73) and from PET/CT studies was 78.9 mSv (range: 6.2 to 399).

Conclusion

The radiation exposure from serial PET/CT studies performed in pediatric malignancies was considerable; however, lower doses can be used for both PET and CT studies. The ALARA principle must be applied without sacrificing diagnostic information.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Czernin J, Allen-Auerbach M, Schelbert HR (2007) Improvements in cancer staging with PET/CT: literature-based evidence as of September 2006. J Nucl Med 48:78S–88SPubMed Czernin J, Allen-Auerbach M, Schelbert HR (2007) Improvements in cancer staging with PET/CT: literature-based evidence as of September 2006. J Nucl Med 48:78S–88SPubMed
2.
go back to reference Czernin J, Schelbert HR (2004) PET/CT imaging: facts, opinions, hopes, and questions. J Nucl Med 45:1S–3S Czernin J, Schelbert HR (2004) PET/CT imaging: facts, opinions, hopes, and questions. J Nucl Med 45:1S–3S
3.
go back to reference Federman N, Feig SA (2007) PET/CT in the evaluating pediatric malignancies: a clinician’s perspective. J Nucl Med 48:1920–1922CrossRefPubMed Federman N, Feig SA (2007) PET/CT in the evaluating pediatric malignancies: a clinician’s perspective. J Nucl Med 48:1920–1922CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Tatsumi M, Miller JH, Wahl RL (2007) FDG PET/CT in evaluating pediatric malignancies. J Nucl Med 48:1923–1931CrossRefPubMed Tatsumi M, Miller JH, Wahl RL (2007) FDG PET/CT in evaluating pediatric malignancies. J Nucl Med 48:1923–1931CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rhodes MM, Delbeke D, Whitlock JA et al (2006) Utility of FDG-PET/CT in follow-up of children treated for Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 28:300–306CrossRefPubMed Rhodes MM, Delbeke D, Whitlock JA et al (2006) Utility of FDG-PET/CT in follow-up of children treated for Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 28:300–306CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Miller E, Meltser U, Avrahami G et al (2006) Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in staging and follow-up of lymphoma in pediatric and young adult patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:689–694CrossRefPubMed Miller E, Meltser U, Avrahami G et al (2006) Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in staging and follow-up of lymphoma in pediatric and young adult patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:689–694CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hudson MM, Donaldson SS (1999) Treatment of pediatric Hodkin’s lymphoma. Semin Hematol 36:313–323PubMed Hudson MM, Donaldson SS (1999) Treatment of pediatric Hodkin’s lymphoma. Semin Hematol 36:313–323PubMed
8.
go back to reference McCarville MB, Christie R, Daw NC (2005) PET/CT in the evaluation of childhood sarcomas. AJR 184:1293–1304PubMed McCarville MB, Christie R, Daw NC (2005) PET/CT in the evaluation of childhood sarcomas. AJR 184:1293–1304PubMed
9.
go back to reference Jones DG, Wall BF (1985) Organ doses from medical x-ray examinations calculated using Monte Carlo techniques. National Radiological Protection Board Report NRPB-R186 Jones DG, Wall BF (1985) Organ doses from medical x-ray examinations calculated using Monte Carlo techniques. National Radiological Protection Board Report NRPB-R186
10.
go back to reference Jones DG, Shrimpton PC (1991) Survey of CT practice in the UK part 3: normalized organ doses calculated using Monte Carlo techniques. National Radiological Protection Board Report NRPB-R250 Jones DG, Shrimpton PC (1991) Survey of CT practice in the UK part 3: normalized organ doses calculated using Monte Carlo techniques. National Radiological Protection Board Report NRPB-R250
11.
go back to reference Khursheed A, Hillier MC, Shrimpton PC et al (2002) Influence of patient age on normalized effective doses calculated for CT examinations. Br J Radiol 75:819–830PubMed Khursheed A, Hillier MC, Shrimpton PC et al (2002) Influence of patient age on normalized effective doses calculated for CT examinations. Br J Radiol 75:819–830PubMed
12.
go back to reference Stabin MG, Siegel JA (2003) Physical models and dose factors for use in internal dose assessment. Health Phys 85:294–310CrossRefPubMed Stabin MG, Siegel JA (2003) Physical models and dose factors for use in internal dose assessment. Health Phys 85:294–310CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hays MT, Watson EE, Thomas SR et al (2002) MIRD dose estimate report No. 19: radiation absorbed dose estimates from 18F-FDG. J Nucl Med 43:210–214PubMed Hays MT, Watson EE, Thomas SR et al (2002) MIRD dose estimate report No. 19: radiation absorbed dose estimates from 18F-FDG. J Nucl Med 43:210–214PubMed
14.
go back to reference Otsuka H, Graham MM, Kubo A et al (2005) FDG-PET/CT findings of sarcomatous transformation in neurofibromatosis: a case report. Ann Nucl Med 19:55–58CrossRefPubMed Otsuka H, Graham MM, Kubo A et al (2005) FDG-PET/CT findings of sarcomatous transformation in neurofibromatosis: a case report. Ann Nucl Med 19:55–58CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Pierce DA, Shimizu Y, Preston DL et al (1996) Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, part 1. Cancer: 1950–1990. Radiat Res 146:1–27CrossRefPubMed Pierce DA, Shimizu Y, Preston DL et al (1996) Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, part 1. Cancer: 1950–1990. Radiat Res 146:1–27CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284CrossRefPubMed Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ et al (2002) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR 176:289–296 Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ et al (2002) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR 176:289–296
18.
go back to reference Kleinerman RA (2006) Cancer risks following diagnostic and therapeutic radiation exposure in children. Pediatr Radiol 36(Suppl 2):121–125CrossRefPubMed Kleinerman RA (2006) Cancer risks following diagnostic and therapeutic radiation exposure in children. Pediatr Radiol 36(Suppl 2):121–125CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Estimated cumulative radiation dose from PET/CT in children with malignancies: a 5-year retrospective review
Authors
Soni C. Chawla
Noah Federman
Di Zhang
Kristen Nagata
Soujanya Nuthakki
Michael McNitt-Gray
M. Ines Boechat
Publication date
01-05-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 5/2010
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-009-1434-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2010

Pediatric Radiology 5/2010 Go to the issue