Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 11/2008

01-11-2008 | Original Article

Entrance skin dose measured with MOSFETs in children undergoing interventional radiology procedures

Authors: Diana Glennie, Bairbre L. Connolly, Christopher Gordon

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 11/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Interventional procedures frequently employ fluoroscopy or digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Few studies have documented radiation doses received by children during these procedures.

Objective

To measure skin entrance dose received during common pediatric interventional procedures.

Materials and methods

MOSFET dosimeters were placed to record skin doses in 143 children undergoing any of five procedures: 30 PICC insertions, 34 CVL/port insertions, 30 G/GJ tube insertions, 25 sclerotherapy/vascular anomaly procedures, 24 cerebral angiography procedures. The highest recorded dose (HRD) from the five MOSFET probes was assumed to be the peak skin dose per child. HRD values were averaged for children within each group and correlated with patient weight, fluoroscopy time and number of DSA frames.

Results

Average HRD was 1.8 mGy for PICC insertions, 1.4 mGy for CVL/port insertions, 3.9 mGy for G/GJ tube insertions, 39.1 mGy for sclerotherapy/vascular anomaly procedures, and 149.9 and 101.6 mGy for frontal and lateral portions of cerebral angiography procedures. These entrance doses corresponded to effective dose estimates in the range 0.4–3 mSv. There were only modest correlations between peak skin dose and fluoroscopy time, patient weight and DSA frames (r 2<0.4, P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Pediatric interventional procedures are associated with a wide range of doses; those at the higher end require careful monitoring.
Literature
1.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection (2001) Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures, CRP publication 85. Elsevier, Philadelphia International Commission on Radiological Protection (2001) Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures, CRP publication 85. Elsevier, Philadelphia
2.
go back to reference Suleiman O (2004) Radiation doses in pediatric radiology: influence of regulations and standards. Pediatr Radiol 34:242–246CrossRef Suleiman O (2004) Radiation doses in pediatric radiology: influence of regulations and standards. Pediatr Radiol 34:242–246CrossRef
3.
go back to reference US Food and Drug Administration (1995) Clarification: recording information in the medical patient’s record that identifies the potential for serious X-ray induced skin injuries. Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Rockville, MD US Food and Drug Administration (1995) Clarification: recording information in the medical patient’s record that identifies the potential for serious X-ray induced skin injuries. Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Rockville, MD
4.
go back to reference Geise RA, Eubig C, Franz S et al (1998) AAPM report no. 58. Managing the use of fluoroscopy in medical institutions. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI Geise RA, Eubig C, Franz S et al (1998) AAPM report no. 58. Managing the use of fluoroscopy in medical institutions. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI
5.
go back to reference Geise R, O’Dea T (1999) Radiation dose in interventional fluoroscopic procedures. Appl Radiat Isot 50:173–184PubMedCrossRef Geise R, O’Dea T (1999) Radiation dose in interventional fluoroscopic procedures. Appl Radiat Isot 50:173–184PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Vano E, Gonzalez L, Ten J et al (2001) Skin dose and dose-area product values for interventional cardiology procedures. Br J Radiol 74:48–55PubMed Vano E, Gonzalez L, Ten J et al (2001) Skin dose and dose-area product values for interventional cardiology procedures. Br J Radiol 74:48–55PubMed
7.
go back to reference Gkanatsios N, Huda W, Peters K (2001) Adult patient doses in interventional neuroradiology. Med Phys 29:717–723CrossRef Gkanatsios N, Huda W, Peters K (2001) Adult patient doses in interventional neuroradiology. Med Phys 29:717–723CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kemerink G, Frantzen M, Oei K et al (2002) Patient and occupational dose in neurointerventional procedures. Neuroradiology 44:522–528PubMedCrossRef Kemerink G, Frantzen M, Oei K et al (2002) Patient and occupational dose in neurointerventional procedures. Neuroradiology 44:522–528PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Miller D, Balter S, Cole P et al (2003) Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:711–727PubMedCrossRef Miller D, Balter S, Cole P et al (2003) Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:711–727PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR 176:289–296PubMed Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR 176:289–296PubMed
11.
go back to reference Frush D, Donnelly L, Rosen N (2003) Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics 112:951–957PubMedCrossRef Frush D, Donnelly L, Rosen N (2003) Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics 112:951–957PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Balter S, Fletcher D, Kuan H et al (2002) Techniques to estimate radiation dose to skin during fluoroscopically guided procedures. AAPM, Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI Balter S, Fletcher D, Kuan H et al (2002) Techniques to estimate radiation dose to skin during fluoroscopically guided procedures. AAPM, Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI
13.
go back to reference Swoboda N, Armstrong D, Charkot E et al (2005) Pediatric patient surface doses in neuroangiography. Pediatr Radiol 35:859–866PubMedCrossRef Swoboda N, Armstrong D, Charkot E et al (2005) Pediatric patient surface doses in neuroangiography. Pediatr Radiol 35:859–866PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Best Medical Canada (2008) Thomson Nielsen mobile MOSFET operator’s manual. Best Medical Canada, Ottawa, Canada Best Medical Canada (2008) Thomson Nielsen mobile MOSFET operator’s manual. Best Medical Canada, Ottawa, Canada
15.
go back to reference Yoshizumi TT, Goodman PC, Frush DP et al (2007) Validation of metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for organ dose assessment during CT: comparison with thermoluminescent dosimetry. AJR 188:1332–1336PubMedCrossRef Yoshizumi TT, Goodman PC, Frush DP et al (2007) Validation of metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for organ dose assessment during CT: comparison with thermoluminescent dosimetry. AJR 188:1332–1336PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Yoshizumi T, Sarder M, Goodman P et al (2003) Application of MOSFET technology in CT organ assessment (abstract). Proceedings AAPM Annual Meeting. Med Physics 30:1422 Yoshizumi T, Sarder M, Goodman P et al (2003) Application of MOSFET technology in CT organ assessment (abstract). Proceedings AAPM Annual Meeting. Med Physics 30:1422
17.
go back to reference McClave J, Dietrich F (1988) Statistics, 4th edn. Dellen, San Francisco McClave J, Dietrich F (1988) Statistics, 4th edn. Dellen, San Francisco
18.
go back to reference Hart D, Jones DG, Wall BF (1996) Estimation of effective doses for pediatric X-ray examinations. NRPB-R279. National Radiation Protection Board, Chilton Hart D, Jones DG, Wall BF (1996) Estimation of effective doses for pediatric X-ray examinations. NRPB-R279. National Radiation Protection Board, Chilton
19.
go back to reference National Research Council (1990) Health effects of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. BEIR V. National Academy Press, Washington DC National Research Council (1990) Health effects of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. BEIR V. National Academy Press, Washington DC
20.
go back to reference Hall EJ (2002) Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Pediatr Radiol 32:700–706PubMedCrossRef Hall EJ (2002) Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Pediatr Radiol 32:700–706PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference van de Putte S, Verhaegen F, Taeymans Y et al (2000) Correlation of patient skin doses in cardiac interventional radiology with dose-area product. Br J Radiol 73:504–513PubMed van de Putte S, Verhaegen F, Taeymans Y et al (2000) Correlation of patient skin doses in cardiac interventional radiology with dose-area product. Br J Radiol 73:504–513PubMed
22.
go back to reference Chu RY, Thomas G, Maqbool F (2006) Skin entrance radiation dose in an interventional radiology procedure. Health Phys 91:41–46PubMedCrossRef Chu RY, Thomas G, Maqbool F (2006) Skin entrance radiation dose in an interventional radiology procedure. Health Phys 91:41–46PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Roshau J, Hintenlang D (2003) Characterization of the angular response of an isotropic MOSFET dosimeter. Health Phys 84:376–379PubMedCrossRef Roshau J, Hintenlang D (2003) Characterization of the angular response of an isotropic MOSFET dosimeter. Health Phys 84:376–379PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Entrance skin dose measured with MOSFETs in children undergoing interventional radiology procedures
Authors
Diana Glennie
Bairbre L. Connolly
Christopher Gordon
Publication date
01-11-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 11/2008
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-0966-y

Other articles of this Issue 11/2008

Pediatric Radiology 11/2008 Go to the issue

Hermes

Hermes