Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 1/2006

01-01-2006 | Original Article

The Leech method for diagnosing constipation: intra- and interobserver variability and accuracy

Authors: Fleur de Lorijn, Rick R. van Rijn, Jarom Heijmans, Johannes B. Reitsma, Wieger P. Voskuijl, Onno D. F. Henneman, Jan A. Taminiau, Marc A. Benninga

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 1/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The data concerning the value of a plain abdominal radiograph in childhood constipation are inconsistent. Recently, positive results have been reported of a new radiographic scoring system, "the Leech method", for assessing faecal loading.

Objective

To assess intra- and interobserver variability and determine diagnostic accuracy of the Leech method in identifying children with functional constipation (FC).

Materials and methods

A total of 89 children (median age 9.8 years) with functional gastrointestinal disorders were included in the study. Based on clinical parameters, 52 fulfilled the criteria for FC, six fulfilled the criteria for functional abdominal pain (FAP), and 31 for functional non-retentive faecal incontinence (FNRFI); the latter two groups provided the controls. To assess intra- and interobserver variability of the Leech method three scorers scored the same abdominal radiograph twice. A Leech score of 9 or more was considered as suggestive of constipation. ROC analysis was used to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the Leech method in separating patients with FC from control patients.

Results

Significant intraobserver variability was found between two scorers (P=0.005 and P<0.0001), whereas there was no systematic difference between the two scores of the other scorer (P=0.89). The scores between scorers differed systematically and displayed large variability. The area under the ROC curve was 0.68 (95% CI 0.58–0.80), indicating poor diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusions

The Leech scoring method for assessing faecal loading on a plain abdominal radiograph is of limited value in the diagnosis of FC in children.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Barr RG, Levine MD, Wilkinson RH, et al (1979) Chronic and occult stool retention: a clinical tool for its evaluation in school-aged children. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 18:674–679CrossRef Barr RG, Levine MD, Wilkinson RH, et al (1979) Chronic and occult stool retention: a clinical tool for its evaluation in school-aged children. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 18:674–679CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Blethyn AJ, Verrier JK, Newcombe R, et al (1995) Radiological assessment of constipation. Arch Dis Child 73:532–533PubMed Blethyn AJ, Verrier JK, Newcombe R, et al (1995) Radiological assessment of constipation. Arch Dis Child 73:532–533PubMed
3.
go back to reference Benninga MA, Buller HA, Staalman CR, et al (1995) Defaecation disorders in children, colonic transit time versus the Barr-score. Eur J Pediatr 154:277–284PubMedCrossRef Benninga MA, Buller HA, Staalman CR, et al (1995) Defaecation disorders in children, colonic transit time versus the Barr-score. Eur J Pediatr 154:277–284PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Tudor GR, Finlay D, Taub N (1997) An assessment of inter-observer agreement and accuracy when reporting plain radiographs. Clin Radiol 52:235–238CrossRefPubMed Tudor GR, Finlay D, Taub N (1997) An assessment of inter-observer agreement and accuracy when reporting plain radiographs. Clin Radiol 52:235–238CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Zaslavsky C, da Silveira TR, Maguilnik I (1998) Total and segmental colonic transit time with radio-opaque markers in adolescents with functional constipation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 27:138–142CrossRefPubMed Zaslavsky C, da Silveira TR, Maguilnik I (1998) Total and segmental colonic transit time with radio-opaque markers in adolescents with functional constipation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 27:138–142CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Gutierrez C, Marco A, Nogales A, et al (2002) Total and segmental colonic transit time and anorectal manometry in children with chronic idiopathic constipation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 35:31–38CrossRefPubMed Gutierrez C, Marco A, Nogales A, et al (2002) Total and segmental colonic transit time and anorectal manometry in children with chronic idiopathic constipation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 35:31–38CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference de Lorijn F, van Wijk MP, Reitsma JB, et al (2004) Prognosis of constipation: clinical factors and colonic transit time. Arch Dis Child 89:723–727PubMedCrossRef de Lorijn F, van Wijk MP, Reitsma JB, et al (2004) Prognosis of constipation: clinical factors and colonic transit time. Arch Dis Child 89:723–727PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Park ES, Park CI, Cho SR, et al (2004) Colonic transit time and constipation in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:453–456CrossRefPubMed Park ES, Park CI, Cho SR, et al (2004) Colonic transit time and constipation in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:453–456CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Leech SC, McHugh K, Sullivan PB (1999) Evaluation of a method of assessing faecal loading on plain abdominal radiographs in children. Pediatr Radiol 29:255–258PubMedCrossRef Leech SC, McHugh K, Sullivan PB (1999) Evaluation of a method of assessing faecal loading on plain abdominal radiographs in children. Pediatr Radiol 29:255–258PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Loening-Baucke V (1990) Biofeedback therapy for faecal incontinence. Dig Dis 8:112–124PubMed Loening-Baucke V (1990) Biofeedback therapy for faecal incontinence. Dig Dis 8:112–124PubMed
11.
go back to reference Rasquin-Weber A, Hyman PE, Cucchiara S, et al (1999) Childhood functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gut 45(Suppl 2):II60–II68PubMedCrossRef Rasquin-Weber A, Hyman PE, Cucchiara S, et al (1999) Childhood functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gut 45(Suppl 2):II60–II68PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Benninga M, Candy DC, Catto-Smith AG, et al (2005) The Paris Consensus on Childhood Constipation Terminology (PACCT) Group. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 40:273–275CrossRefPubMed Benninga M, Candy DC, Catto-Smith AG, et al (2005) The Paris Consensus on Childhood Constipation Terminology (PACCT) Group. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 40:273–275CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference van der Plas RN, Benninga MA, Redekop WK, et al (1996) Randomised trial of biofeedback training for encopresis. Arch Dis Child 75:367–374PubMed van der Plas RN, Benninga MA, Redekop WK, et al (1996) Randomised trial of biofeedback training for encopresis. Arch Dis Child 75:367–374PubMed
14.
go back to reference Bouchoucha M, Devroede G, Arhan P, et al (1992) What is the meaning of colorectal transit time measurement? Dis Colon Rectum 35:773–782CrossRefPubMed Bouchoucha M, Devroede G, Arhan P, et al (1992) What is the meaning of colorectal transit time measurement? Dis Colon Rectum 35:773–782CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Metcalf AM, Phillips SF, Zinsmeister AR, et al (1987) Simplified assessment of segmental colonic transit. Gastroenterology 92:40–47PubMed Metcalf AM, Phillips SF, Zinsmeister AR, et al (1987) Simplified assessment of segmental colonic transit. Gastroenterology 92:40–47PubMed
16.
go back to reference Arhan P, Devroede G, Jehannin B, et al (1981) Segmental colonic transit time. Dis Colon Rectum 24:625–629PubMedCrossRef Arhan P, Devroede G, Jehannin B, et al (1981) Segmental colonic transit time. Dis Colon Rectum 24:625–629PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310PubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310PubMed
18.
go back to reference DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845PubMedCrossRef DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Afzal N, Murch S, Thirrupathy K, et al (2003) Constipation with acquired megarectum in children with autism. Pediatrics 112:939–942CrossRefPubMed Afzal N, Murch S, Thirrupathy K, et al (2003) Constipation with acquired megarectum in children with autism. Pediatrics 112:939–942CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Quinn MF (1989) Relation of observer agreement to accuracy according to a two-receiver signal detection model of diagnosis. Med Decis Making 9:196–206PubMedCrossRef Quinn MF (1989) Relation of observer agreement to accuracy according to a two-receiver signal detection model of diagnosis. Med Decis Making 9:196–206PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Wolfson C, Moskowitz M, et al (1982) Observer variation in the interpretation of xeromammograms. J Natl Cancer Inst 68:357–363PubMed Boyd NF, Wolfson C, Moskowitz M, et al (1982) Observer variation in the interpretation of xeromammograms. J Natl Cancer Inst 68:357–363PubMed
23.
go back to reference Wald A (1986) Colonic transit and anorectal manometry in chronic idiopathic constipation. Arch Intern Med 146:1713–1716CrossRefPubMed Wald A (1986) Colonic transit and anorectal manometry in chronic idiopathic constipation. Arch Intern Med 146:1713–1716CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Papadopoulou A, Clayden GS, Booth IW (1994) The clinical value of solid marker transit studies in childhood constipation and soiling. Eur J Pediatr 153:560–564PubMedCrossRef Papadopoulou A, Clayden GS, Booth IW (1994) The clinical value of solid marker transit studies in childhood constipation and soiling. Eur J Pediatr 153:560–564PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Reuchlin-Vroklage LM, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Benninga MA, et al (2005) Diagnostic value of abdominal radiography in constipated children: a systematic review. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 159:671–678CrossRefPubMed Reuchlin-Vroklage LM, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Benninga MA, et al (2005) Diagnostic value of abdominal radiography in constipated children: a systematic review. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 159:671–678CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference van der Plas RN, Benninga MA, Redekop WK, et al (1997) How accurate is the recall of bowel habits in children with defaecation disorders? Eur J Pediatr 156:178–181CrossRefPubMed van der Plas RN, Benninga MA, Redekop WK, et al (1997) How accurate is the recall of bowel habits in children with defaecation disorders? Eur J Pediatr 156:178–181CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Benninga MA, Buller HA, Heymans HS, et al (1994) Is encopresis always the result of constipation? Arch Dis Child 71:186–193PubMedCrossRef Benninga MA, Buller HA, Heymans HS, et al (1994) Is encopresis always the result of constipation? Arch Dis Child 71:186–193PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Voskuijl WP, Heijmans J, Heijmans HS, et al (2004) Use of Rome II criteria in childhood defecation disorders: applicability in clinical and research practice. J Pediatr 145:213–217CrossRefPubMed Voskuijl WP, Heijmans J, Heijmans HS, et al (2004) Use of Rome II criteria in childhood defecation disorders: applicability in clinical and research practice. J Pediatr 145:213–217CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Leech method for diagnosing constipation: intra- and interobserver variability and accuracy
Authors
Fleur de Lorijn
Rick R. van Rijn
Jarom Heijmans
Johannes B. Reitsma
Wieger P. Voskuijl
Onno D. F. Henneman
Jan A. Taminiau
Marc A. Benninga
Publication date
01-01-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 1/2006
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-005-0031-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2006

Pediatric Radiology 1/2006 Go to the issue