Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Urolithiasis | Research

What is the appropriate gravel size during ureteroscopy lithotripsy? An in vitro evaluation

Authors: Baiyang Song, Dan Jin, Yue Cheng, Zhengyi Wang, Fengqi Wang, Li Fang

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

To propose the suitable diameter of calculus debris produced during flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy (fURL). A glass tube was used to simulate the stone excretion process during Furl. Different stone diameters (0.50–1.00 mm, 0.25–0.50 mm, and 0.10–0.25 mm) with three sizes of flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) (7.5Fr, 8.7Fr, and 9.9Fr) and ureteral access sheath (UAS) (12/14Fr) with or without negative pressure suction were employed in the experiment. The intraoperative calculi excretion (ICE) was recorded according to the stones discharged from the gap between fURS and UAS. The ICE raised significantly in thinner fURS and UAS due to the smaller Ratio of Endoscope-Sheath Diameter (RESD). The gravel size ≤ 0.25 mm was conducive to drainage with traditional UAS, while using fURS with negative-pressure UAS could significantly improve ICE. The gravel size ≤ 0.5 mm was conducive to expulsion. We clarify that ICE during ureteroscopy relates to RESD and negative pressure suction. The proper size of the stone fragment is critical in ensuring the expulsion during fURL, ≤ 0.25 mm in traditional UAS and ≤ 0.50 mm in negative-pressure UAS, respectively.
Literature
Metadata
Title
What is the appropriate gravel size during ureteroscopy lithotripsy? An in vitro evaluation
Authors
Baiyang Song
Dan Jin
Yue Cheng
Zhengyi Wang
Fengqi Wang
Li Fang
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword
Urolithiasis
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-023-01430-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Urolithiasis 1/2023 Go to the issue