Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 5/2011

01-10-2011 | Original Paper

An alternative treatment for high-burden ureteral stones: percutaneous antegrade ureteroscopy

Authors: Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu, Mehmet Resit Goren, Tufan Cicek, Bulent Ozturk, Hakan Ozkardes

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

The treatment of large proximal ureteral stones continues to be controversial. We evaluated the antegrade percutaneous approaches for the proximal ureteral stones in our clinic. In this study, 73 percutaneous antegrade ureteroscopy (PAU) operations applied to proximal ureteral stones between February 2005 and December 2009 were included. The stones were located between ureteropelvic junction and 4th lumbar vertebra. PAUs were applied through appropriate calyx with the patients in prone position. During operations, amplatz dilatators were used for dilatation, and pneumatic lithotripter was used for stone fragmentation. Patients were evaluated according to their success rate, complications, hospitalization period, and preference of drainage tube etc. Patients’ mean age was 52.21 years, the mean stone diameter was 19.47 mm (range 15–25), the mean stone burden was 283.76 ± 49.12 mm2 (mean ± SD) (range 188.5–392.7) and the mean hospitalization time 1.69 days. Single access done in 68 patients and two accesses were needed in 5 patients. Sixty-eight patients (93.1%) became stone-free. Nephrostomy tubes were placed in 12 patients after operation, while tubeless approach was preferred in 61 patients. Complications were seen in five patients. There were not any complications reported during the follow-up period. PAU is an effective and safe treatment modality if appropriate calyx access was performed. The possibility of renal stone treatment in the same session is an important advantage of this modality.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kijvikai K, Haleblian GE, Preminger GM, de la Rosette J (2007) Shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi: an old discussion revisited. J Urol 178:1157–1163PubMedCrossRef Kijvikai K, Haleblian GE, Preminger GM, de la Rosette J (2007) Shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi: an old discussion revisited. J Urol 178:1157–1163PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wolf JS Jr (2007) Treatment selection and outcomes: ureteral calculi. Urol Clin North Am 34:421–430PubMedCrossRef Wolf JS Jr (2007) Treatment selection and outcomes: ureteral calculi. Urol Clin North Am 34:421–430PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wignall GR, Canales BK, Denstedt JD, Monga M (2008) Minimally invasive approaches to upper urinary tract urolithiasis. Urol Clin North Am 35:441–454, viiiPubMedCrossRef Wignall GR, Canales BK, Denstedt JD, Monga M (2008) Minimally invasive approaches to upper urinary tract urolithiasis. Urol Clin North Am 35:441–454, viiiPubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Maheshwari PN, Oswal AT, Andankar M, Nanjappa KM, Bansal M (1999) Is antegrade ureteroscopy better than retrograde ureteroscopy for impacted large upper ureteral calculi? J Endourol 13:441–444PubMedCrossRef Maheshwari PN, Oswal AT, Andankar M, Nanjappa KM, Bansal M (1999) Is antegrade ureteroscopy better than retrograde ureteroscopy for impacted large upper ureteral calculi? J Endourol 13:441–444PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Pedro RN, Netto NR Jr (2008) Proximal ureteral calculi: shock wave or ureterolithotripsy? Urol Int 81:198–201PubMedCrossRef Pedro RN, Netto NR Jr (2008) Proximal ureteral calculi: shock wave or ureterolithotripsy? Urol Int 81:198–201PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Goel R, Aron M, Kesarwani PK, Dogra PN, Hemal AK, Gupta NP (2005) Percutaneous antegrade removal of impacted upper-ureteral calculi: still the treatment of choice in developing countries. J Endourol 19:54–57PubMedCrossRef Goel R, Aron M, Kesarwani PK, Dogra PN, Hemal AK, Gupta NP (2005) Percutaneous antegrade removal of impacted upper-ureteral calculi: still the treatment of choice in developing countries. J Endourol 19:54–57PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kumar V, Ahlawat R, Banjeree GK, Bhaduria RP, Elhence A, Bhandari M (1996) Percutaneous ureterolitholapaxy: the best bet to clear large bulk impacted upper ureteral calculi. Arch Esp Urol 49:86–91PubMed Kumar V, Ahlawat R, Banjeree GK, Bhaduria RP, Elhence A, Bhandari M (1996) Percutaneous ureterolitholapaxy: the best bet to clear large bulk impacted upper ureteral calculi. Arch Esp Urol 49:86–91PubMed
8.
go back to reference Toth CS, Varga A, Flasko T, Tallai B, Salah MA, Kocsis I (2001) Percutaneous ureterolithotomy: direct method for removal of impacted ureteral stones. J Endourol 15:285–290PubMedCrossRef Toth CS, Varga A, Flasko T, Tallai B, Salah MA, Kocsis I (2001) Percutaneous ureterolithotomy: direct method for removal of impacted ureteral stones. J Endourol 15:285–290PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Srivastava A, Ahlawat R, Kumar A, Kapoor R, Bhandari M (1992) Management of impacted upper ureteric calculi: results of lithotripsy and percutaneous litholapaxy. Br J Urol 70:252–257PubMed Srivastava A, Ahlawat R, Kumar A, Kapoor R, Bhandari M (1992) Management of impacted upper ureteric calculi: results of lithotripsy and percutaneous litholapaxy. Br J Urol 70:252–257PubMed
10.
go back to reference Tiselius HG, Alken P, Buck C, Gallucci M, Knoll T, Sarica K, Türk C (2008) Guidelines on Urolithiasis. European Association of Urology Tiselius HG, Alken P, Buck C, Gallucci M, Knoll T, Sarica K, Türk C (2008) Guidelines on Urolithiasis. European Association of Urology
11.
go back to reference Juan YS, Shen JT, Li CC, Wang CJ, Chuang SM, Huang CH, Wu WJ (2008) Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted, large, proximal ureteral stones. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 24:204–209PubMedCrossRef Juan YS, Shen JT, Li CC, Wang CJ, Chuang SM, Huang CH, Wu WJ (2008) Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted, large, proximal ureteral stones. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 24:204–209PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Istanbulluoglu MO, Cicek T, Ozturk B, Ozkardes H (2010) A good alternative for treatment of large upper ureter stones: percutaneous nephroureterolithotomy Turkish J Urol 36: Epub ahead of print Istanbulluoglu MO, Cicek T, Ozturk B, Ozkardes H (2010) A good alternative for treatment of large upper ureter stones: percutaneous nephroureterolithotomy Turkish J Urol 36: Epub ahead of print
13.
go back to reference Istanbulluoglu MO, Ozturk B, Gonen M, Cicek T, Ozkardes H (2009) Effectiveness of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol 41:541–545PubMedCrossRef Istanbulluoglu MO, Ozturk B, Gonen M, Cicek T, Ozkardes H (2009) Effectiveness of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol 41:541–545PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Istanbulluoglu MO, Ozturk B, Cicek T, Gonen M, Ozkardes H (2008) Case report: bilateral simultaneous tubeless and stentless nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 22:25–28PubMedCrossRef Istanbulluoglu MO, Ozturk B, Cicek T, Gonen M, Ozkardes H (2008) Case report: bilateral simultaneous tubeless and stentless nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 22:25–28PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Muslumanoglu AY, Karadag MA, Tefekli AH, Altunrende F, Tok A, Berberoglu Y (2006) When is open ureterolithotomy indicated for the treatment of ureteral stones? Int J Urol 13:1385–1388PubMedCrossRef Muslumanoglu AY, Karadag MA, Tefekli AH, Altunrende F, Tok A, Berberoglu Y (2006) When is open ureterolithotomy indicated for the treatment of ureteral stones? Int J Urol 13:1385–1388PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Basiri A, Simforoosh N, Ziaee A, Shayaninasab H, Moghaddam SM, Zare S (2008) Retrograde, antegrade, and laparoscopic approaches for the management of large, proximal ureteral stones: a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol 22:2677–2680PubMedCrossRef Basiri A, Simforoosh N, Ziaee A, Shayaninasab H, Moghaddam SM, Zare S (2008) Retrograde, antegrade, and laparoscopic approaches for the management of large, proximal ureteral stones: a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol 22:2677–2680PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
An alternative treatment for high-burden ureteral stones: percutaneous antegrade ureteroscopy
Authors
Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu
Mehmet Resit Goren
Tufan Cicek
Bulent Ozturk
Hakan Ozkardes
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 5/2011
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-010-0351-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

Urolithiasis 5/2011 Go to the issue