Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 6/2009

01-12-2009 | Symposium Paper

Investigations for recognizing urinary stone

Authors: Gayathri Varma, Nandu Nair, Abiya Salim, Y. M. Fazil Marickar

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 6/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

This study was done to identify the value of the commonly performed investigations available for identifying urinary stone disease, namely X-ray of the kidney, ureter and bladder (KUB) regions and ultrasound scan (USS) to recognize stones in patients suspected to have the disease. Two hundred patients who attended the stone clinic with symptoms suggestive of urinary stone disease and had either stone retrieved or have been followed up for minimum of 6 months were interviewed. The final opinion on stone disease was made after follow-up to assess the efficacy of the initial opinion based on the plain X-ray KUB or USS. The patients were classified as proved stone patients only after retrieval of stones. The efficacy of the initial screening investigation was assessed to calculate the specificity and sensitivity of the two modalities of investigation. Of the 200 patients studied, all had plain X-ray KUB. Only 166 patients had USS for recognizing stones in the urinary tract; 74 patients showed positive evidence of stones either by X-ray or USS. The findings of the two modalities of investigation are given below. Number of X-rays done, 200; number positive, 24; proved positive, 24 (stone retrieved); proved negative, 0; number negative, 176; proved positive, 32 (stone retrieved); proved negative, 144; number of USS done, 166; number positive, 120; proved positive, 50 (stone retrieved); proved negative, 70; number negative, 46; proved positive, 14 (stone retrieved); proved negative, 32. USS showed back presence effects in 62 patients. Of these, 12% showed stones in the ureter, whereas the rest did not show evidence of stones. Those selected as positive stones finally had either passed stones or had PCNL, URS, cystolithotripsy or open surgery or were put on high-dose chemotherapy. Forty-six patients who had no ROS in KUB and no stones in USS passed stones subsequently. It is concluded that the plain both X-ray KUB and USS should be performed in patients with suspected stone disease for identifying stone disease and also to exclude other pathology which may produce similar urinary symptoms.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Levine JA, Neitlich J, Verga M, Dalrymple N, Smith RC (1997) Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT. Radiology. 204:27–31PubMed Levine JA, Neitlich J, Verga M, Dalrymple N, Smith RC (1997) Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT. Radiology. 204:27–31PubMed
2.
go back to reference Chu G, Rosenfield AT, Anderson K, Scout L, Smith RC (1999) Sensitivity and value of digital CT scout radiography for detecting ureteral stones in patients with ureterolithiasis diagnosed on unenhanced CT. Am J Roentgenol 173:417–423 Chu G, Rosenfield AT, Anderson K, Scout L, Smith RC (1999) Sensitivity and value of digital CT scout radiography for detecting ureteral stones in patients with ureterolithiasis diagnosed on unenhanced CT. Am J Roentgenol 173:417–423
3.
go back to reference Elbahnasy AM, Clayman RV, Shalhav AL, Hoenig DM, Chandhoke P, Lingeman JE, Denstedt JD, Kahn R, Assimos DG, Nakada SY (1998) Lower-pole calyceal clearance after shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy: impact of radiographic spatial anatomy. J Endourol 12:113–119CrossRefPubMed Elbahnasy AM, Clayman RV, Shalhav AL, Hoenig DM, Chandhoke P, Lingeman JE, Denstedt JD, Kahn R, Assimos DG, Nakada SY (1998) Lower-pole calyceal clearance after shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy: impact of radiographic spatial anatomy. J Endourol 12:113–119CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Yilmaz S, Sindel T, Arslan G, Ozkaynak C, Karaali K, Kabaalioglu A, Luleci E (1998) Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi. Eur Radiol 8:212–217CrossRefPubMed Yilmaz S, Sindel T, Arslan G, Ozkaynak C, Karaali K, Kabaalioglu A, Luleci E (1998) Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi. Eur Radiol 8:212–217CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Wang LJ, Ng CJ, Chen JC, Chin TF, Wong YC (2004) Diagnosis of acute flank pain caused by ureteral stones: value of combined direct and indirect signs on IVU and unenhanced helical CT. Eur Radiol 14:1634–1640PubMed Wang LJ, Ng CJ, Chen JC, Chin TF, Wong YC (2004) Diagnosis of acute flank pain caused by ureteral stones: value of combined direct and indirect signs on IVU and unenhanced helical CT. Eur Radiol 14:1634–1640PubMed
6.
go back to reference Pepe P, Motta L, Pennisi M, Aragona F (2005) Functional evaluation of the urinary tract by color-Doppler ultrasonography (CDU) in 100 patients with renal colic. Eur J Radiol 53:131–135CrossRefPubMed Pepe P, Motta L, Pennisi M, Aragona F (2005) Functional evaluation of the urinary tract by color-Doppler ultrasonography (CDU) in 100 patients with renal colic. Eur J Radiol 53:131–135CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kartal M, Eray O, Erdogru T, Yilmaz S (2006) Prospective validation of a current algorithm including bedside US performed by emergency physicians for patients with acute flank pain suspected for renal colic. Emerg Med J 23:341–344CrossRefPubMed Kartal M, Eray O, Erdogru T, Yilmaz S (2006) Prospective validation of a current algorithm including bedside US performed by emergency physicians for patients with acute flank pain suspected for renal colic. Emerg Med J 23:341–344CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Mitterberger M, Pinggera GM, Maier E, Neuwirt H, Neururer R, Pallwein L, Gradl J, Bartsch G, Strasser H, Frauscher F (2007) Value of 3-dimensional transrectal/transvaginal sonography in diagnosis of distal ureteral calculi. J Ultrasound Med 26:19–27PubMed Mitterberger M, Pinggera GM, Maier E, Neuwirt H, Neururer R, Pallwein L, Gradl J, Bartsch G, Strasser H, Frauscher F (2007) Value of 3-dimensional transrectal/transvaginal sonography in diagnosis of distal ureteral calculi. J Ultrasound Med 26:19–27PubMed
9.
go back to reference Yoon DY, Bae SH, Choi CS (2000) Transrectal ultrasonography of distal ureteral calculi: comparison with intravenous urography. J Ultrasound Med 19:271–275PubMed Yoon DY, Bae SH, Choi CS (2000) Transrectal ultrasonography of distal ureteral calculi: comparison with intravenous urography. J Ultrasound Med 19:271–275PubMed
10.
go back to reference Yang JM, Yang SH, Huang WC (2005) Transvaginal sonography in the assessment of distal ureteral calculi. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26:658–662CrossRefPubMed Yang JM, Yang SH, Huang WC (2005) Transvaginal sonography in the assessment of distal ureteral calculi. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26:658–662CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Investigations for recognizing urinary stone
Authors
Gayathri Varma
Nandu Nair
Abiya Salim
Y. M. Fazil Marickar
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 6/2009
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-009-0219-z

Other articles of this Issue 6/2009

Urolithiasis 6/2009 Go to the issue