Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 4/2005

01-08-2005 | Original Paper

Pelvi-calyceal height, a predictor of success when treating lower pole stones with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy

Authors: A. Symes, G. Shaw, D. Corry, S. Choong

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 4/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Extra corporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) is the treatment of choice for the majority of renal stones, however, it has the lowest success rate in complete clearance of stones located in the lower pole. We assess whether pelvi-calyceal height is a useful measurement in predicting successful stone clearance from the lower pole. A total of 105 patients with a solitary lower pole calculus of less than 20 mm treated with ESWL were reviewed. Stone size, location and pelvi-calyceal height were measured by intravenous urogram. Success was defined as complete stone clearance. Fifty-four patients (51.4%) had successful treatments, with the remaining 51 (48.6%) having incomplete stone clearance (including two patients in whom treatment had no effect). There was a statistically significant difference (P<0.0001) in pelvi-calyceal height between the two groups. Mean pelvi-calyceal height in patients with complete stone clearance was 15.1 mm (SD=3.9) compared with 22.9 mm (SD=5.2) for those with incomplete clearance. Pelvi-calyceal height is a useful predictor of success when treating lower pole renal stones with ESWL.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Graff J, Diederichs W, Schulze H (1998) Long-term follow up in 1,003 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy patients. J Urol 140: 479 Graff J, Diederichs W, Schulze H (1998) Long-term follow up in 1,003 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy patients. J Urol 140: 479
2.
go back to reference Lingeman JE, Siegel YI, Steele B (1994) Management of lower pole nephrolithiasis: a critical analysis. J Urol 151: 663PubMed Lingeman JE, Siegel YI, Steele B (1994) Management of lower pole nephrolithiasis: a critical analysis. J Urol 151: 663PubMed
3.
go back to reference Elbahnasy AM, Clayman RV, Shalhav AL, Hoenig DM, Chandhoke P, Lingeman JE, Denstedt JD, Kahn R, Assimos DG, Nakada SY (1998) Lower calyceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy. J Urol 159: 676CrossRefPubMed Elbahnasy AM, Clayman RV, Shalhav AL, Hoenig DM, Chandhoke P, Lingeman JE, Denstedt JD, Kahn R, Assimos DG, Nakada SY (1998) Lower calyceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy. J Urol 159: 676CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sampaio FJB, Aragao AHM (1992) Inferior pole collecting system anatomy: its probable role in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 147: 322PubMed Sampaio FJB, Aragao AHM (1992) Inferior pole collecting system anatomy: its probable role in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 147: 322PubMed
5.
go back to reference Knoll T, Musial A, Trojan L, Ptashnyk T, Michel MS, Alken P, Kohrmann KU (2003) Measurement of renal anatomy for prediction of lower-pole caliceal stone clearance: reproducibility of different parameters. J Endourol 17: 447CrossRefPubMed Knoll T, Musial A, Trojan L, Ptashnyk T, Michel MS, Alken P, Kohrmann KU (2003) Measurement of renal anatomy for prediction of lower-pole caliceal stone clearance: reproducibility of different parameters. J Endourol 17: 447CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Tuckey J, Devasia A, Murthy L, Ramsden P, Thomas D (2000) Is there a simpler method for predicting lower pole stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy than measuring infundibulopelvic angle? J Endourol 14: 475PubMed Tuckey J, Devasia A, Murthy L, Ramsden P, Thomas D (2000) Is there a simpler method for predicting lower pole stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy than measuring infundibulopelvic angle? J Endourol 14: 475PubMed
7.
go back to reference Keeley FXJr, Moussa SA, Smith G, Tolley DA (1999) Clearance of lower-pole stones following shock wave lithotripsy: effect of the infundibulopelvic angle. Eur Urol 36: 371CrossRefPubMed Keeley FXJr, Moussa SA, Smith G, Tolley DA (1999) Clearance of lower-pole stones following shock wave lithotripsy: effect of the infundibulopelvic angle. Eur Urol 36: 371CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Madbouly K, Sheir KZ, Elsobky E (2001) Impact of lower pole renal anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy: fact or fiction? J Urol 165: 1415CrossRefPubMed Madbouly K, Sheir KZ, Elsobky E (2001) Impact of lower pole renal anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy: fact or fiction? J Urol 165: 1415CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Sorenson CM, Chandhoke PS (2002) Is lower pole calyceal anatomy predictive of initial treatment or re-treatment success for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of primary lower pole kidney stones? J Urol 167 [Suppl]: 380 Sorenson CM, Chandhoke PS (2002) Is lower pole calyceal anatomy predictive of initial treatment or re-treatment success for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of primary lower pole kidney stones? J Urol 167 [Suppl]: 380
10.
go back to reference Onal B, Demirkesen O, Tansu N, Kalkan M, Altintas R, Yalcin V (2004) The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric lower pole stones. J Urol 172: 1082CrossRefPubMed Onal B, Demirkesen O, Tansu N, Kalkan M, Altintas R, Yalcin V (2004) The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric lower pole stones. J Urol 172: 1082CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Brownlee N, Foster M, Griffith DP, Carlton CEJr (1990) Controlled inversion therapy: an adjunct to the elimination of gravity-dependent fragments following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 143: 1096PubMed Brownlee N, Foster M, Griffith DP, Carlton CEJr (1990) Controlled inversion therapy: an adjunct to the elimination of gravity-dependent fragments following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 143: 1096PubMed
12.
go back to reference Pace KT, Tariq N, Dyer SJ, Weir MJ, D’A Honey RJ (2001) Mechanical percussion, inversion, and diuresis for residual lower pole fragments after shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial. J Urol 166: 2065CrossRefPubMed Pace KT, Tariq N, Dyer SJ, Weir MJ, D’A Honey RJ (2001) Mechanical percussion, inversion, and diuresis for residual lower pole fragments after shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial. J Urol 166: 2065CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Pelvi-calyceal height, a predictor of success when treating lower pole stones with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy
Authors
A. Symes
G. Shaw
D. Corry
S. Choong
Publication date
01-08-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 4/2005
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-005-0476-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2005

Urolithiasis 4/2005 Go to the issue