Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 3/2023

25-11-2022 | Breast Augmentation | Original Paper

Primary—but not secondary—adjuvant fat transfer is associated with good patient satisfaction in mammoplasty: a single centre retrospective case series

Authors: Giovanni Zoccali, Barbara Pompei, Jian Farhadi

Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Issue 3/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Due to its unpredictable retention rate, using autologous fat alone for the enhancement of breast volume is often unsatisfactory. To overcome this limitation, fat transfer has been proposed as an immediate adjuvant procedure to aesthetic breast surgery, creating the concept of hybrid mammoplasty.
Fat transfer has already been shown to correct minor defects with good clinical outcome, but the amount of fat that can be safely transferred has not yet been identified. Our hypothesis is that contour improvement with small-volume fat transfer as a primary adjuvant treatment can lead to a better patient outcome.

Methods

A retrospective single-centre uncontrolled case series study was conducted on 70 patients who underwent hybrid mammoplasties for aesthetic purposes only. Primary and secondary cases were included and divided into corresponding groups. An ad-hoc outcome scale based on clinical parameters was created to standardise results; results were analysed after a follow-up period of at least 12 months.

Results

The overall results were reported as good in 48.7% of cases, moderate in 32.8%, and sufficient in 18.5%. Primary cases with small deformities showed a better outcome on our scale compared to revisional ones (57.4% good compared to 29%; p = 0.038). A transferred volume of fat up to 100 ml was associated with a higher retention rate (OR = 2.3; p = 0.032).

Conclusions

Small breast contour deformities or prosthesis coverage can be easily corrected with fat transfer. Based on our score system, this technique is indicated for volume enhancement up to 100 ml; beyond that the outcome quality decreases, and further corrections would be needed.
Level of evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hoon SY, Cui CX, Cao J, Hong ZR (2020) Better clinical outcome for autologous fat transplant combined with silicone gel prosthesis for breast augmentation: evidence from meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 43(1):166–180CrossRefPubMed Hoon SY, Cui CX, Cao J, Hong ZR (2020) Better clinical outcome for autologous fat transplant combined with silicone gel prosthesis for breast augmentation: evidence from meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 43(1):166–180CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bravo FG (2015) Parasternal infiltration composite breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(4):1010–1018CrossRefPubMed Bravo FG (2015) Parasternal infiltration composite breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(4):1010–1018CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Auclair E, Blondeel P, Del Vecchio DA (2013) Composite breast augmentation: soft-tissue planning using implants and fat. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(3):558–568CrossRefPubMed Auclair E, Blondeel P, Del Vecchio DA (2013) Composite breast augmentation: soft-tissue planning using implants and fat. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(3):558–568CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Graf RM, Closs Ono MC, Pace D, Balbinot P, Pazio ALB, de Paula DR (2019) Breast auto-augmentation (mastopexy and lipofilling): an option for quitting breast implants. Aesthetic Plast Surg 43(5):1133–1141CrossRefPubMed Graf RM, Closs Ono MC, Pace D, Balbinot P, Pazio ALB, de Paula DR (2019) Breast auto-augmentation (mastopexy and lipofilling): an option for quitting breast implants. Aesthetic Plast Surg 43(5):1133–1141CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Coleman SR, Saboeiro AP (2015) Primary breast augmentation with fat grafting. Clin Plast Surg 42(3):301–306CrossRefPubMed Coleman SR, Saboeiro AP (2015) Primary breast augmentation with fat grafting. Clin Plast Surg 42(3):301–306CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Krastev TK, Alshaikh GAH, Hommes J, Piatkowski A, van der Hulst RRWJ (2018) Efficacy of autologous fat transfer for the correction of contour deformities in the breast: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 71(10):1392–1409CrossRefPubMed Krastev TK, Alshaikh GAH, Hommes J, Piatkowski A, van der Hulst RRWJ (2018) Efficacy of autologous fat transfer for the correction of contour deformities in the breast: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 71(10):1392–1409CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Del Vecchio DA, Bucky LP (2011) Breast augmentation using preexpansion and autologous fat transplantation: a clinical radiographic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(6):2441–2450CrossRefPubMed Del Vecchio DA, Bucky LP (2011) Breast augmentation using preexpansion and autologous fat transplantation: a clinical radiographic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(6):2441–2450CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kerfant N, Marchac A, Auclair E (2019) Fat grafting in composite breast augmentation with round implants: a new concept for breastreshaping. Aesthetic Plast Surg 43(2):550–551CrossRefPubMed Kerfant N, Marchac A, Auclair E (2019) Fat grafting in composite breast augmentation with round implants: a new concept for breastreshaping. Aesthetic Plast Surg 43(2):550–551CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Serra-Mestre JM, Fernandez Peñuela R, Foti V, D’Andrea F, Serra-Renom JM (2017) Breast cleavage remodeling with fat grafting: a safe way to optimize symmetry and to reduce intermammary distance. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(5):665e–672eCrossRefPubMed Serra-Mestre JM, Fernandez Peñuela R, Foti V, D’Andrea F, Serra-Renom JM (2017) Breast cleavage remodeling with fat grafting: a safe way to optimize symmetry and to reduce intermammary distance. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(5):665e–672eCrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Tepper OM, Unger JG, Small KH, Feldman D, Kumar N, Choi M, Karp NS (2010) Mammometrics: the standardization of aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:393–400CrossRefPubMed Tepper OM, Unger JG, Small KH, Feldman D, Kumar N, Choi M, Karp NS (2010) Mammometrics: the standardization of aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:393–400CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hall-Findlay EJ (2010) The three breast dimensions: analysis and effecting change. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1632–1642CrossRefPubMed Hall-Findlay EJ (2010) The three breast dimensions: analysis and effecting change. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1632–1642CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mallucci P, Branford OA (2014) Population analysis of the perfect breast: a morphometric analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:436–447CrossRefPubMed Mallucci P, Branford OA (2014) Population analysis of the perfect breast: a morphometric analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:436–447CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Mallucci P, Branford OA (2015) Shapes, proportions, and variations in breast aesthetic ideals: the definition of breast beauty, analysis, and surgical practice. Clin Plast Surg 42:451–464CrossRefPubMed Mallucci P, Branford OA (2015) Shapes, proportions, and variations in breast aesthetic ideals: the definition of breast beauty, analysis, and surgical practice. Clin Plast Surg 42:451–464CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Murillo WL (2004) Buttock augmentation: case studies of fat injection monitored by magnetic resonance imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(6):1606–1614CrossRefPubMed Murillo WL (2004) Buttock augmentation: case studies of fat injection monitored by magnetic resonance imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(6):1606–1614CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference C.rdenas-Camarena L, Arenas-Quintana R, Robles-Cervantes JA (2011) Buttocks fat grafting: 14 years of evolution and experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(2):545–555CrossRef C.rdenas-Camarena L, Arenas-Quintana R, Robles-Cervantes JA (2011) Buttocks fat grafting: 14 years of evolution and experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(2):545–555CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Auclair E, Anavekar N (2015) Combined use of implant and fat grafting for breast augmentation. Clin Plast Surg 42(3):307–314CrossRefPubMed Auclair E, Anavekar N (2015) Combined use of implant and fat grafting for breast augmentation. Clin Plast Surg 42(3):307–314CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Yoshimura K, Sato K, Aoi N, Kurita M, Hirohi T, Harii K (2008) Cell-assisted lipotransfer for cosmetic breast augmentation: supportive use of adipose-derived stem/stromal cells. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32(1):48–55CrossRefPubMed Yoshimura K, Sato K, Aoi N, Kurita M, Hirohi T, Harii K (2008) Cell-assisted lipotransfer for cosmetic breast augmentation: supportive use of adipose-derived stem/stromal cells. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32(1):48–55CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Munhoz AM, de Azevedo Marques Neto A, Maximiliano J (2021) Subfascial ergonomic axillary hybrid (SEAH) breast augmentation: a surgical approach combining the advantages of incision, pocket, silicone gel, and fat grafting in primary and revision breast augmentation surgery. Aesthet Surg J 41(6):NP364–NP384CrossRefPubMed Munhoz AM, de Azevedo Marques Neto A, Maximiliano J (2021) Subfascial ergonomic axillary hybrid (SEAH) breast augmentation: a surgical approach combining the advantages of incision, pocket, silicone gel, and fat grafting in primary and revision breast augmentation surgery. Aesthet Surg J 41(6):NP364–NP384CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Munhoz AM, de Azevedo Marques Neto A, Maximiliano J (2022) Optimizing surgical outcomes with small-volume silicone implants associated with autogenous fat grafting in primary and revision breast augmentationsurgery: soft weight hybrid (SWEH) concept. Aesthetic Plast Surg 46(3):1087–1103 Munhoz AM, de Azevedo Marques Neto A, Maximiliano J (2022) Optimizing surgical outcomes with small-volume silicone implants associated with autogenous fat grafting in primary and revision breast augmentationsurgery: soft weight hybrid (SWEH) concept. Aesthetic Plast Surg 46(3):1087–1103
20.
go back to reference Maximiliano J, Munhoz AM, Pedron M, de Oliveira ACP, Duarte DW, Neto R, Portinho CP, Collares MVM (2020) Hybrid breast augmentation: a reliable formula for preoperative assessment of fat graft volume based on implant volume and projection. Aesthet Surg J 40(8):NP438–NP452CrossRefPubMed Maximiliano J, Munhoz AM, Pedron M, de Oliveira ACP, Duarte DW, Neto R, Portinho CP, Collares MVM (2020) Hybrid breast augmentation: a reliable formula for preoperative assessment of fat graft volume based on implant volume and projection. Aesthet Surg J 40(8):NP438–NP452CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Largo RD, Tchang LA, Mele V, Scherberich A, Harder Y, Wettstein R, Schaefer DJ (2014) Efficacy, safety and complications of autologous fat grafting to healthy breast tissue: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67:437–448CrossRefPubMed Largo RD, Tchang LA, Mele V, Scherberich A, Harder Y, Wettstein R, Schaefer DJ (2014) Efficacy, safety and complications of autologous fat grafting to healthy breast tissue: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67:437–448CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Guo X, Jin X (2019) Management of fat necrosis after autologous fat transplantation for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 144(4):700e–701eCrossRefPubMed Guo X, Jin X (2019) Management of fat necrosis after autologous fat transplantation for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 144(4):700e–701eCrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Primary—but not secondary—adjuvant fat transfer is associated with good patient satisfaction in mammoplasty: a single centre retrospective case series
Authors
Giovanni Zoccali
Barbara Pompei
Jian Farhadi
Publication date
25-11-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Issue 3/2023
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-022-02011-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2023

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 3/2023 Go to the issue