Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 2/2021

01-04-2021 | Rhinoplasty | Ideas and Innovations

Primary presentation of a novel cartilage tweezer for simplification of alar cartilage cephalic resection—preliminary results

Authors: Dirk Hellekes, Albert Niepel, Benjamin Loader, Lara Steinkellner

Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Aesthetic rhinoplasty can be quite challenging with the possibility of cartilage damage during manipulation, while there is a relevant risk of injury to the surgeon. To minimize both risks to the patient and surgeon, this paper presents a new cartilage tweezer, which also allows more precise handling during cartilage resection. At its distal end, the developed tweezer consists of a bent section, which forms a narrow scalpel guide for cartilage dissection with a partly overlapping branch design to improve accuracy during resection. At the apex of the tweezers’ cartilage guide, a ruler ensures meticulous measurement, which facilitates precise excision without the risk of over resection, which results in the preservation of cartilage stability. Additionally, the design includes an adjustable radius of the curvature of the two gripping jaws, allowing a variable resection size of lower lateral cartilage, without causing any crushing or bruising of the non-resected cartilage. The tweezer was tested during 21 functional-aesthetic nose surgeries at the department for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology of the Klinik Landstraße Hospital in Vienna. The presented instrument simplifies cartilage incision and the removal of excess cartilage during rhinoplasty, especially during cephalic trimming of the lower lateral cartilages.
Level of evidence: Level V, therapeutic study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tanna N et al (2018) Evidence-based medicine: current practices in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 141(1):137e–151eCrossRef Tanna N et al (2018) Evidence-based medicine: current practices in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 141(1):137e–151eCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Guyuron B, Pinsky B (2005) Calibrated lateral crus stabilizer. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(6):1776–1779CrossRef Guyuron B, Pinsky B (2005) Calibrated lateral crus stabilizer. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(6):1776–1779CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ishida LC, Ishida J, Ishida LH, Passos AP, Ferreira MC (2006) Power instrumentation for shaping the nasal cartilages. Ann Plast Surg 56(4):375–379CrossRef Ishida LC, Ishida J, Ishida LH, Passos AP, Ferreira MC (2006) Power instrumentation for shaping the nasal cartilages. Ann Plast Surg 56(4):375–379CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Peck GC (1983) The onlay graft for nasal tip projection. Plast Reconstr Surg 71(1):27–37CrossRef Peck GC (1983) The onlay graft for nasal tip projection. Plast Reconstr Surg 71(1):27–37CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Alexander AJ, Shah AR, Constantinides MS (2013) Alar retraction: etiology, treatment, and prevention. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 15(4):268–274CrossRef Alexander AJ, Shah AR, Constantinides MS (2013) Alar retraction: etiology, treatment, and prevention. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 15(4):268–274CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sheen JH (1993) Tip graft: a 20-year retrospective. Plast Reconstr Surg 91(1):48–63CrossRef Sheen JH (1993) Tip graft: a 20-year retrospective. Plast Reconstr Surg 91(1):48–63CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sheen JH (1978) Aesthetic Rhinoplasty. Mosby, St. Louis Sheen JH (1978) Aesthetic Rhinoplasty. Mosby, St. Louis
8.
go back to reference Gruber RP, Zhang AY, Mohebali K (2010) Preventing alar retraction by preservation of the lateral crus. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(2):581–588CrossRef Gruber RP, Zhang AY, Mohebali K (2010) Preventing alar retraction by preservation of the lateral crus. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(2):581–588CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Schlosser RJ, Park SS (1999) Functional nasal surgery. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 32(1):37–51CrossRef Schlosser RJ, Park SS (1999) Functional nasal surgery. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 32(1):37–51CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Foda HM (2003) Management of the droopy tip: a comparison of three alar cartilage–modifying techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 112(5):1408–1417CrossRef Foda HM (2003) Management of the droopy tip: a comparison of three alar cartilage–modifying techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 112(5):1408–1417CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hatzis GP, Sherry SD, Hogan GM, Finn RA (2004) Observations of the marginal incision and lateral crura alar cartilage asymmetry in rhinoplasty: a fixed cadaver study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 97(4):432–437CrossRef Hatzis GP, Sherry SD, Hogan GM, Finn RA (2004) Observations of the marginal incision and lateral crura alar cartilage asymmetry in rhinoplasty: a fixed cadaver study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 97(4):432–437CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Berghaus A (2006) New instruments for rhinoplasty: operating mirror and alar guiding set. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(7):2224–2225CrossRef Berghaus A (2006) New instruments for rhinoplasty: operating mirror and alar guiding set. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(7):2224–2225CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Primary presentation of a novel cartilage tweezer for simplification of alar cartilage cephalic resection—preliminary results
Authors
Dirk Hellekes
Albert Niepel
Benjamin Loader
Lara Steinkellner
Publication date
01-04-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-020-01760-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 2/2021 Go to the issue