Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 4/2019

01-08-2019 | Abdominoplasty | Original Paper

Anatomical position of umbilicus in Latin-American patients

Authors: Ricardo Cavalcanti Ribeiro, Renato Saltz, Carlos Ramirez, Luis Fernandez de Cordova

Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The umbiIicus is a natural scar, and the periumbilical area is characterized by a round or ellipsoid shape with a slight depression of 2.5–3.0 cm in diameter. It represents an essential feature in the overall body contour, and consequently exists as one of the most esthetically recognized landmarks on the abdominal wall. The umbilicus lies along the midline at the level of the intervertebral discs between the third and fourth lumbar vertebrae and is considered the only admissible scar on the human body. Given that the umbilicus aids in defining the median abdominal sulcus, it is considered the greatest esthetic component of the abdomen. Thus, the effect of the umbilicus on the esthetic appearance of the abdomen remains key—its position on the abdominal wall and its shape and depth represent important factors influencing conceptions of beauty and psychological well-being.

Methods

The aim of this study was to establish a quantitative index by evaluating skeletal landmarks surrounding the anterior wall of abdomen to determine the normal anatomical position of the umbilicus in a sample of Latin-American young women. In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 100 nulliparous Latin-American women, aged 21 to 32 years, were enrolled and examined in the supine position. The mathematical relationship of the umbilicus to various nearby anatomical structures (xiphoid process, pubic symphysis, vulvar commissure, and iliac crests) was determined in order to define its ideal localization.

Results

In the majority of patients, we observed a slight lateral deviation of the umbilicus, an average distance measuring 14.55 cm between the xiphoid process and the umbilicus, and an average distance measuring 13.14 cm between the umbilicus and the pubic symphysis, with a ratio of 1.10:1. In patients on whom the umbilicus was located medially, the relationship of the distance between the umbilicus and the anterior superior iliac crest, and the distance between both iliac crests, had a ratio of 0.53:1.

Conclusions

Although numerous studies have examined what constitutes the esthetically ideal umbilicus, no publication, up until now, reports mathematical values.
Level of Evidence: Level III, risk / prognostic study.
Literature
2.
3.
go back to reference Grant B (1965) Grant’s method of anatomy. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore Grant B (1965) Grant’s method of anatomy. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
5.
go back to reference Craig SB, Faller MS, Puckett CL (2000) In search of the ideal female umbilicus. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:389–392CrossRefPubMed Craig SB, Faller MS, Puckett CL (2000) In search of the ideal female umbilicus. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:389–392CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Moore K. El abdomen. In: Anatomia con orientacion clinica 3. ed. Ed. Panamericana, p 135–151 Moore K. El abdomen. In: Anatomia con orientacion clinica 3. ed. Ed. Panamericana, p 135–151
8.
go back to reference Catteau JF (1876) De l’ombilic et de ses modifications dans les cas de distention de l’abdomen. Méd.--Paris, p 6–28 Catteau JF (1876) De l’ombilic et de ses modifications dans les cas de distention de l’abdomen. Méd.--Paris, p 6–28
9.
go back to reference Gal Dini e Lydia Ferreira (2007) Putting the Umbilicus in the Midline. A simple technique to correct umbilicus vertical malposition. Plast Reconstr Surg 119(6):1973–1974 Gal Dini e Lydia Ferreira (2007) Putting the Umbilicus in the Midline. A simple technique to correct umbilicus vertical malposition. Plast Reconstr Surg 119(6):1973–1974
10.
go back to reference Dubou R, Ousterhout D (1978) Placement of the umbilicus in an abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 61:291–293CrossRefPubMed Dubou R, Ousterhout D (1978) Placement of the umbilicus in an abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 61:291–293CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Suhas V, Abhyankar MC, Rajguru AG (2006) Anatomical localization of the umbilicus: an Indian study. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:1153CrossRef Suhas V, Abhyankar MC, Rajguru AG (2006) Anatomical localization of the umbilicus: an Indian study. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:1153CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Rohrich RJ, Sorokin ES, Brown SA, Diane L (2003) Is the umbilicus truly midline? Clinical and medicolegal implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:259–265CrossRefPubMed Rohrich RJ, Sorokin ES, Brown SA, Diane L (2003) Is the umbilicus truly midline? Clinical and medicolegal implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:259–265CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Dick ET (1970) Umbilicoplasty as a treatment for persistent umbilical infection. Aust N Z J Surg 39:380–383CrossRefPubMed Dick ET (1970) Umbilicoplasty as a treatment for persistent umbilical infection. Aust N Z J Surg 39:380–383CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Tanner JM (1981) A History of the study of Human Growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 478 Tanner JM (1981) A History of the study of Human Growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 478
15.
go back to reference Ronald Golcman e Benjamin Golcman (2003) Abdominoplastias com cicatrizes reduzidas. In: Melega. Cirurgia plastica fundamentos e arte III (chapter 43). Editora Guanabara Koogan Ronald Golcman e Benjamin Golcman (2003) Abdominoplastias com cicatrizes reduzidas. In: Melega. Cirurgia plastica fundamentos e arte III (chapter 43). Editora Guanabara Koogan
16.
go back to reference Thorpe SKS, Holder RL, Crompton RH (2007) Origin of human bipedalism as an adaptation for locomotion on flexible branches. Science 316:1328–1331CrossRefPubMed Thorpe SKS, Holder RL, Crompton RH (2007) Origin of human bipedalism as an adaptation for locomotion on flexible branches. Science 316:1328–1331CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Hodgkinson DJ (1983) Umbilicoplasty: conversion of “outie” to “innie”. Aesthet Plast Surg 7:221–222CrossRef Hodgkinson DJ (1983) Umbilicoplasty: conversion of “outie” to “innie”. Aesthet Plast Surg 7:221–222CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Skandalakis JE et al (2006) Skandalakis’ Surgical anatomy. Chapter 4. Abdominal Wall and Hernias. The McGraw-Hill, p 109–208 Skandalakis JE et al (2006) Skandalakis’ Surgical anatomy. Chapter 4. Abdominal Wall and Hernias. The McGraw-Hill, p 109–208
19.
go back to reference Rosique Marina, et al (2009) Estudo comparativo entre tecnicas de Onfaloplastia. Rev Bras Cir Plast 24(1):47–51 Rosique Marina, et al (2009) Estudo comparativo entre tecnicas de Onfaloplastia. Rev Bras Cir Plast 24(1):47–51
20.
go back to reference Williams AM, Platt AJ (June 2006) Relocating the umbilicus in abdominal surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:2528 Williams AM, Platt AJ (June 2006) Relocating the umbilicus in abdominal surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:2528
21.
go back to reference Cormenzana P (2010) Revision abdominoplasty and proper umbil-ical positioning. Clin Plast Surg 37:541–546 Cormenzana P (2010) Revision abdominoplasty and proper umbil-ical positioning. Clin Plast Surg 37:541–546
Metadata
Title
Anatomical position of umbilicus in Latin-American patients
Authors
Ricardo Cavalcanti Ribeiro
Renato Saltz
Carlos Ramirez
Luis Fernandez de Cordova
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-018-1486-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 4/2019 Go to the issue