Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 5/2018

01-10-2018 | Master Class in Plastic Surgery

How to avoid common errors in writing scientific manuscripts

Authors: Franco A. Maiorana, Horacio F. Mayer

Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

When writing scientific manuscripts, many important details are left a side which many times causes the rejection of the manuscript from high impact journals. Scientific writing is a combination of a comprehensive literature search and study, collection of statistical data, and a clear and concise structured writing, while avoiding common and known errors. The knowledge and implementation of basic rules of style, structure, and presentation when writing a scientific paper increase the chances of success and ultimately publication. This article aims to contribute with the existing information on how to recognize and avoid common errors for a successful scientific writing and consequently being published.
Level of Evidence: Not ratable.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schein M, Farndon JR, Fingerhut A (2000) Why should a surgeon publish? Br J Surg 87:3–5CrossRef Schein M, Farndon JR, Fingerhut A (2000) Why should a surgeon publish? Br J Surg 87:3–5CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Uzuner S (2008) Multilingual scholars’ participation in core/global academic communities: a literature review. J Engl Acad Purp 7(4):250–263CrossRef Uzuner S (2008) Multilingual scholars’ participation in core/global academic communities: a literature review. J Engl Acad Purp 7(4):250–263CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Broaddus VC, Feigal DW Jr (1994) Starting an academic career: a survey of junior academic pulmonary physicians. Chest 105:1858–1863CrossRef Broaddus VC, Feigal DW Jr (1994) Starting an academic career: a survey of junior academic pulmonary physicians. Chest 105:1858–1863CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Shi L (2012) Rewriting and paraphrasing source texts in second language writing. J Second Lang Writ 21(2):134–148CrossRef Shi L (2012) Rewriting and paraphrasing source texts in second language writing. J Second Lang Writ 21(2):134–148CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bordage G (2001) Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: the strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports. Acad Med 76:889–896CrossRef Bordage G (2001) Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: the strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports. Acad Med 76:889–896CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pierson DJ (2004) The top 10 reasons why manuscripts are not accepted for publication. Respir Care 49:1246–12512PubMed Pierson DJ (2004) The top 10 reasons why manuscripts are not accepted for publication. Respir Care 49:1246–12512PubMed
7.
go back to reference DeBakey L, DeBakey S (1984) The case report: II. Style and form. Int J Cardiol 6:247–254CrossRef DeBakey L, DeBakey S (1984) The case report: II. Style and form. Int J Cardiol 6:247–254CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Derish P, Eastwood S (2008) A clarity clinic for surgical writing. J Surg Res 147:50–58CrossRef Derish P, Eastwood S (2008) A clarity clinic for surgical writing. J Surg Res 147:50–58CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sandra V. Kotsis, M.P.H. Kevin C. Chung, M.D. A guide for writing in the scientific forum. Plast. Reconstr. Surg 126: 1770, 2010 Sandra V. Kotsis, M.P.H. Kevin C. Chung, M.D. A guide for writing in the scientific forum. Plast. Reconstr. Surg 126: 1770, 2010
11.
go back to reference Paiva CE, Lima JP, Paiva BS (1996) Articles with short titles describing the results are cited more often. J Athl Train 31(3):201–206 Paiva CE, Lima JP, Paiva BS (1996) Articles with short titles describing the results are cited more often. J Athl Train 31(3):201–206
12.
go back to reference Knight K, Ingersoll CD (1996) Structure of a scholarly manuscript: 66 tips for what goes where. J Athl Train 31(3):201–206PubMedPubMedCentral Knight K, Ingersoll CD (1996) Structure of a scholarly manuscript: 66 tips for what goes where. J Athl Train 31(3):201–206PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Moreira A, Haahtela T (2011) How to write a scientific paper-and win the game scientists play! Pneumologia 17(3):146–149 Moreira A, Haahtela T (2011) How to write a scientific paper-and win the game scientists play! Pneumologia 17(3):146–149
14.
go back to reference Pollock A, Evans M, Wiggin M, Balch C (1991) Writing your first scientific paper. In: Troidl H (ed) Principles and practice of research. Strategies for surgical investigators. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 391–403 Pollock A, Evans M, Wiggin M, Balch C (1991) Writing your first scientific paper. In: Troidl H (ed) Principles and practice of research. Strategies for surgical investigators. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 391–403
15.
go back to reference Pakes GE (2001) Writing manuscripts describing clinical trials: a guide for pharmacotherapeutic researchers. Ann Pharmacother 35:770–779CrossRef Pakes GE (2001) Writing manuscripts describing clinical trials: a guide for pharmacotherapeutic researchers. Ann Pharmacother 35:770–779CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Branson RD (2004) Anatomy of a research paper. Respir Care 49:1222–1228PubMed Branson RD (2004) Anatomy of a research paper. Respir Care 49:1222–1228PubMed
17.
go back to reference Cook C, Brismee JM, Courtney C, Hancock M, May S (2009) Publishing a scientific manuscript on manual therapy. J Man Manip Ther 17(3):141–147CrossRef Cook C, Brismee JM, Courtney C, Hancock M, May S (2009) Publishing a scientific manuscript on manual therapy. J Man Manip Ther 17(3):141–147CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Agha RA, Devesa M, Whitehurst K, Fowler AJ, Coe R, Wellstead G, Orgill DP, McCulloch P (2016) Levels of evidence in plastic surgery—bibliometric trends and comparison with five other surgical specialties. Eur J Plast Surg 39(5):365–370CrossRef Agha RA, Devesa M, Whitehurst K, Fowler AJ, Coe R, Wellstead G, Orgill DP, McCulloch P (2016) Levels of evidence in plastic surgery—bibliometric trends and comparison with five other surgical specialties. Eur J Plast Surg 39(5):365–370CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312:71–72CrossRef Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312:71–72CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Chang EY, Pannucci CJ, Wilkins EG (2009) Quality of clinical studies in aesthetic surgery journals: a 10-year review. Aesthet Surg J 29:144–147 discussion 147–149CrossRef Chang EY, Pannucci CJ, Wilkins EG (2009) Quality of clinical studies in aesthetic surgery journals: a 10-year review. Aesthet Surg J 29:144–147 discussion 147–149CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Burns PB, Rohrich RJ, Chung KC (2011) The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:305–310CrossRef Burns PB, Rohrich RJ, Chung KC (2011) The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:305–310CrossRef
24.
26.
go back to reference Kallet RH (2004) How to write the methods section of a research paper. Respir Care 49:1229–1232PubMed Kallet RH (2004) How to write the methods section of a research paper. Respir Care 49:1229–1232PubMed
27.
go back to reference Eriksson P, Altermann W, Editorial CO (2005) Some general advice for writing a scientific paper. J African Earth Sci 41:285–288CrossRef Eriksson P, Altermann W, Editorial CO (2005) Some general advice for writing a scientific paper. J African Earth Sci 41:285–288CrossRef
Metadata
Title
How to avoid common errors in writing scientific manuscripts
Authors
Franco A. Maiorana
Horacio F. Mayer
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-018-1418-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 5/2018 Go to the issue