Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 4/2018

01-08-2018 | Original Paper

Complete resorption of Veritas® in acellular dermal matrix (ADM)-assisted implant-based breast reconstructions—is there a need for tighter regulation of new products developed for use in breast reconstruction?

Authors: Fayyaz A. K. Mazari, Kristjan S. Asgeirsson, Lisa Whisker, Eleanor Gutteridge, Tuabin Rasheed, R. Douglas Macmillan

Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Veritas® collagen matrix is derived from bovine pericardium and is currently used in soft tissue and breast reconstruction. This study reports the experience of implant-based breast reconstruction using Veritas® collagen matrix in a specialist breast unit.

Methods

This case series included all consecutive patients undergoing mastectomy and implant-based reconstruction using Veritas® over an 18-month period. Demographics, risk factors, operative parameters and postoperative outcomes were recorded prospectively.

Results

Nineteen patients underwent a total of 30 breast reconstruction procedures over the study period. Of these, 57.9% (N = 11) had bilateral procedures. Breast cancer was the commonest indication. Forty percent (N = 12) had concomitant axillary surgery. Forty percent (N = 12) had two-stage reconstruction. Prophylactic antibiotics and drains were used in all cases. Median mastectomy weight was 308 g (interquartile range (IQR) 205–363 g). Median implant volume was 350 ml (IQR 275–400 ml). Twenty percent (N = 6) had minor complications within 3 months. Forty-two percent (N = 8) of patients had complete resorption of Veritas® (50%, N = 15 reconstructions) with “bottoming out” of implants requiring revision surgery. Ten percent (N = 3) developed capsular contracture following radiotherapy and 3.3% (N = 1) had implant loss due to pain following postoperative infection. Product outcomes were reported to the manufacturers.

Conclusions

Veritas® collagen matrix has a comparable immediate postoperative complication rate when compared to other acellular dermal matrix. However, the long-term resorption rate in this series is high resulting in frequent correctional surgery.
Level of Evidence: Level III, risk/prognostic study.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Badylak SF, Freytes DO, Gilbert TW (2009) Extracellular matrix as a biological scaffold material: structure and function. Acta Biomater 5(1):1–13CrossRefPubMed Badylak SF, Freytes DO, Gilbert TW (2009) Extracellular matrix as a biological scaffold material: structure and function. Acta Biomater 5(1):1–13CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Reing JE, Zhang L, Myers-Irvin J, Cordero KE, Freytes DO, Heber-Katz E, Bedelbaeva K, McIntosh D, Dewilde A, Braunhut SJ, Badylak SF (2009) Degradation products of extracellular matrix affect cell migration and proliferation. Tissue Eng Part A 15(3):605–614CrossRefPubMed Reing JE, Zhang L, Myers-Irvin J, Cordero KE, Freytes DO, Heber-Katz E, Bedelbaeva K, McIntosh D, Dewilde A, Braunhut SJ, Badylak SF (2009) Degradation products of extracellular matrix affect cell migration and proliferation. Tissue Eng Part A 15(3):605–614CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Mennie JC, Mohanna PN, O'Donoghue JM, Rainsbury R, Cromwell DA (2017) National trends in immediate and delayed post-mastectomy reconstruction procedures in England: a seven-year population-based cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol 43(1):52–61CrossRefPubMed Mennie JC, Mohanna PN, O'Donoghue JM, Rainsbury R, Cromwell DA (2017) National trends in immediate and delayed post-mastectomy reconstruction procedures in England: a seven-year population-based cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol 43(1):52–61CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference (ASPS), A. S. o. P. S (2016) Plastic surgery statistics report. In A. N. C. o. P. S. P. Statistics ed. USA: American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 2016 (ASPS), A. S. o. P. S (2016) Plastic surgery statistics report. In A. N. C. o. P. S. P. Statistics ed. USA: American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 2016
6.
go back to reference Limpert JN, Desai AR, Kumpf AL, Fallucco MA, Aridge DL (2009) Repair of abdominal wall defects with bovine pericardium. Am J Surg 198(5):e60–e65CrossRefPubMed Limpert JN, Desai AR, Kumpf AL, Fallucco MA, Aridge DL (2009) Repair of abdominal wall defects with bovine pericardium. Am J Surg 198(5):e60–e65CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Deeken CR, Melman L, Jenkins ED, Greco SC, Frisella MM, Matthews BD (2011) Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic meshes in a porcine model of ventral incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 212(5):880–888CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Deeken CR, Melman L, Jenkins ED, Greco SC, Frisella MM, Matthews BD (2011) Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic meshes in a porcine model of ventral incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 212(5):880–888CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Sclafani AP, Romo T 3rd, Jacono AA, McCormick S, Cocker R, Parker A (2000) Evaluation of acellular dermal graft in sheet (AlloDerm) and injectable (micronized AlloDerm) forms for soft tissue augmentation. Clinical observations and histological analysis. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2(2):130–136CrossRefPubMed Sclafani AP, Romo T 3rd, Jacono AA, McCormick S, Cocker R, Parker A (2000) Evaluation of acellular dermal graft in sheet (AlloDerm) and injectable (micronized AlloDerm) forms for soft tissue augmentation. Clinical observations and histological analysis. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2(2):130–136CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Wainwright DJ (1995) Use of an acellular allograft dermal matrix (AlloDerm) in the management of full-thickness burns. Burns 21(4):243–248CrossRefPubMed Wainwright DJ (1995) Use of an acellular allograft dermal matrix (AlloDerm) in the management of full-thickness burns. Burns 21(4):243–248CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Baxter RA (2003) Intracapsular allogenic dermal grafts for breast implant-related problems. Plast Reconstr Surg 112(6):1692–1696; discussion 1697-1698CrossRefPubMed Baxter RA (2003) Intracapsular allogenic dermal grafts for breast implant-related problems. Plast Reconstr Surg 112(6):1692–1696; discussion 1697-1698CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Duncan DI (2001) Correction of implant rippling using allograft dermis. Aesthet Surg J 21(1):81–84CrossRefPubMed Duncan DI (2001) Correction of implant rippling using allograft dermis. Aesthet Surg J 21(1):81–84CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Breuing KH, Warren SM (2005) Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg 55(3):232–239CrossRefPubMed Breuing KH, Warren SM (2005) Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg 55(3):232–239CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bindingnavele V, Gaon M, Ota KS, Kulber DA, Lee DJ (2007) Use of acellular cadaveric dermis and tissue expansion in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 60(11):1214–1218CrossRefPubMed Bindingnavele V, Gaon M, Ota KS, Kulber DA, Lee DJ (2007) Use of acellular cadaveric dermis and tissue expansion in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 60(11):1214–1218CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Potter S, Chambers A, Govindajulu S, Sahu A, Warr R, Cawthorn S (2015) Early complications and implant loss in implant-based breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix (Tecnoss Protexa(R)): a comparative study. Eur J Surg Oncol 41(1):113–119CrossRefPubMed Potter S, Chambers A, Govindajulu S, Sahu A, Warr R, Cawthorn S (2015) Early complications and implant loss in implant-based breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix (Tecnoss Protexa(R)): a comparative study. Eur J Surg Oncol 41(1):113–119CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Salzberg CA, Dunavant C, Nocera N (2013) Immediate breast reconstruction using porcine acellular dermal matrix (Strattice): long-term outcomes and complications. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66(3):323–328CrossRefPubMed Salzberg CA, Dunavant C, Nocera N (2013) Immediate breast reconstruction using porcine acellular dermal matrix (Strattice): long-term outcomes and complications. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66(3):323–328CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Salzberg CA (2012) Focus on technique: one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(5 Suppl 2):95S–103SCrossRefPubMed Salzberg CA (2012) Focus on technique: one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(5 Suppl 2):95S–103SCrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Sbitany H, Serletti JM (2011) Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systematic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(6):1162–1169CrossRefPubMed Sbitany H, Serletti JM (2011) Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systematic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(6):1162–1169CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Sbitany H, Sandeen SN, Amalfi AN, Davenport MS, Langstein HN (2009) Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(6):1735–1740CrossRefPubMed Sbitany H, Sandeen SN, Amalfi AN, Davenport MS, Langstein HN (2009) Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(6):1735–1740CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Losken A (2009) Early results using sterilized acellular human dermis (Neoform) in post-mastectomy tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 123(6):1654–1658CrossRefPubMed Losken A (2009) Early results using sterilized acellular human dermis (Neoform) in post-mastectomy tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 123(6):1654–1658CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Spear SL, Parikh PM, Reisin E, Menon NG (2008) Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32(3):418–425CrossRefPubMed Spear SL, Parikh PM, Reisin E, Menon NG (2008) Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32(3):418–425CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Preminger BA, McCarthy CM, Hu QY, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ (2008) The influence of AlloDerm on expander dynamics and complications in the setting of immediate tissue expander/implant reconstruction: a matched-cohort study. Ann Plast Surg 60(5):510–513CrossRefPubMed Preminger BA, McCarthy CM, Hu QY, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ (2008) The influence of AlloDerm on expander dynamics and complications in the setting of immediate tissue expander/implant reconstruction: a matched-cohort study. Ann Plast Surg 60(5):510–513CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Vu MM, Kim JY (2015) Current opinions on indications and algorithms for acellular dermal matrix use in primary prosthetic breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 4(3):195–203PubMedPubMedCentral Vu MM, Kim JY (2015) Current opinions on indications and algorithms for acellular dermal matrix use in primary prosthetic breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 4(3):195–203PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Banyard DA, Bourgeois JM, Widgerow AD, Evans GR (2015) Regenerative biomaterials: a review. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(6):1740–1748CrossRefPubMed Banyard DA, Bourgeois JM, Widgerow AD, Evans GR (2015) Regenerative biomaterials: a review. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(6):1740–1748CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Dikmans RE, El Morabit F, Ottenhof MJ et al (2016) Single-stage breast reconstruction using Strattice: a retrospective study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69(2):227–233CrossRefPubMed Dikmans RE, El Morabit F, Ottenhof MJ et al (2016) Single-stage breast reconstruction using Strattice: a retrospective study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69(2):227–233CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Potter S, Browning D, Savovic J, Holcombe C, Blazeby JM (2015) Systematic review and critical appraisal of the impact of acellular dermal matrix use on the outcomes of implant-based breast reconstruction. Br J Surg 102(9):1010–1025CrossRefPubMed Potter S, Browning D, Savovic J, Holcombe C, Blazeby JM (2015) Systematic review and critical appraisal of the impact of acellular dermal matrix use on the outcomes of implant-based breast reconstruction. Br J Surg 102(9):1010–1025CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference McCarthy CM, Lee CN, Halvorson EG, Riedel E, Pusic AL, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ (2012) The use of acellular dermal matrices in two-stage expander/implant reconstruction: a multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(5 Suppl 2):57S–66SCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McCarthy CM, Lee CN, Halvorson EG, Riedel E, Pusic AL, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ (2012) The use of acellular dermal matrices in two-stage expander/implant reconstruction: a multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(5 Suppl 2):57S–66SCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Vardanian AJ, Clayton JL, Roostaeian J et al (2011) Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:403e–410eCrossRefPubMed Vardanian AJ, Clayton JL, Roostaeian J et al (2011) Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:403e–410eCrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Hoppe IC, Yueh JH, Wei CH, Ahuja NK, Patel PP, Datiashvili RO (2011) Complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction utilizing acellular dermal matrix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eplasty 11:e40PubMedPubMedCentral Hoppe IC, Yueh JH, Wei CH, Ahuja NK, Patel PP, Datiashvili RO (2011) Complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction utilizing acellular dermal matrix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eplasty 11:e40PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Lanier ST, Wang ED, Chen JJ, Arora BP, Katz SM, Gelfand MA, Khan SU, Dagum AB, Bui DT (2010) The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 64(5):674–678PubMed Lanier ST, Wang ED, Chen JJ, Arora BP, Katz SM, Gelfand MA, Khan SU, Dagum AB, Bui DT (2010) The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 64(5):674–678PubMed
30.
go back to reference Davila AA, Seth AK, Wang E, Hanwright P, Bilimoria K, Fine N, Kim JYS (2013) Human acellular dermis versus submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of short-term complications. Arch Plast Surg 40(1):19–27CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Davila AA, Seth AK, Wang E, Hanwright P, Bilimoria K, Fine N, Kim JYS (2013) Human acellular dermis versus submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of short-term complications. Arch Plast Surg 40(1):19–27CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, Lipsitz S, Morris D, Kenney P, Eriksson E (2010) Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(2):429–436CrossRefPubMed Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, Lipsitz S, Morris D, Kenney P, Eriksson E (2010) Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(2):429–436CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Kim JY, Davila AA, Persing S et al (2012) A meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(1):28–41CrossRefPubMed Kim JY, Davila AA, Persing S et al (2012) A meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(1):28–41CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Barber MD, Williams L, Anderson ED et al (2015) Outcome of the use of acellular-dermal matrix to assist implant-based breast reconstruction in a single centre. Eur J Surg Oncol 41(1):100–105CrossRefPubMed Barber MD, Williams L, Anderson ED et al (2015) Outcome of the use of acellular-dermal matrix to assist implant-based breast reconstruction in a single centre. Eur J Surg Oncol 41(1):100–105CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Jordan SW, Khavanin N, Fine NA, Kim JY (2014) An algorithmic approach for selective acellular dermal matrix use in immediate two-stage breast reconstruction: indications and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(2):178–188CrossRefPubMed Jordan SW, Khavanin N, Fine NA, Kim JY (2014) An algorithmic approach for selective acellular dermal matrix use in immediate two-stage breast reconstruction: indications and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(2):178–188CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Alderman A, Gutowski K, Ahuja A, Gray D (2014) ASPS clinical practice guideline summary on breast reconstruction with expanders and implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:648e–655eCrossRefPubMed Alderman A, Gutowski K, Ahuja A, Gray D (2014) ASPS clinical practice guideline summary on breast reconstruction with expanders and implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:648e–655eCrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Martin L, O'Donoghue JM, Horgan K, Thrush S, Johnson R, Gandhi A (2013) Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) assisted breast reconstruction procedures: joint guidelines from the Association of Breast Surgery and the British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Eur J Surg Oncol 39(5):425–429CrossRefPubMed Martin L, O'Donoghue JM, Horgan K, Thrush S, Johnson R, Gandhi A (2013) Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) assisted breast reconstruction procedures: joint guidelines from the Association of Breast Surgery and the British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Eur J Surg Oncol 39(5):425–429CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Hille-Betz U, Kniebusch N, Wojcinski S, Henseler H, Heyl V, Ohlinger R, Paepke S, Klapdor R, Krause-Bergmann B (2015) Breast reconstruction and revision surgery for implant-associated breast deformities using porcine acellular dermal matrix: a multicenter study of 156 cases. Ann Surg Oncol 22(4):1146–1152CrossRefPubMed Hille-Betz U, Kniebusch N, Wojcinski S, Henseler H, Heyl V, Ohlinger R, Paepke S, Klapdor R, Krause-Bergmann B (2015) Breast reconstruction and revision surgery for implant-associated breast deformities using porcine acellular dermal matrix: a multicenter study of 156 cases. Ann Surg Oncol 22(4):1146–1152CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Spear SL, Sher SR, Al-Attar A, Pittman T (2014) Applications of acellular dermal matrix in revision breast reconstruction surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(1):1–10CrossRefPubMed Spear SL, Sher SR, Al-Attar A, Pittman T (2014) Applications of acellular dermal matrix in revision breast reconstruction surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(1):1–10CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Maxwell GP, Gabriel A (2014) Non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix in revision breast surgery: long-term outcomes and safety with neopectoral pockets. Aesthet Surg J 34(4):551–559CrossRefPubMed Maxwell GP, Gabriel A (2014) Non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix in revision breast surgery: long-term outcomes and safety with neopectoral pockets. Aesthet Surg J 34(4):551–559CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Ortiz JA (2014) Poland’s breast reconstruction with decellularized human dermal allograft. Mil Med 179(2):e249–e252CrossRefPubMed Ortiz JA (2014) Poland’s breast reconstruction with decellularized human dermal allograft. Mil Med 179(2):e249–e252CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Spear SL, Sinkin JC, Al-Attar A (2013) Porcine acellular dermal matrix (strattice) in primary and revision cosmetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(5):1140–1148CrossRefPubMed Spear SL, Sinkin JC, Al-Attar A (2013) Porcine acellular dermal matrix (strattice) in primary and revision cosmetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(5):1140–1148CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Mofid MM (2011) Acellular dermal matrix in cosmetic breast procedures and capsular contracture. Aesthet Surg J 31(7 Supplement):77S–84SCrossRefPubMed Mofid MM (2011) Acellular dermal matrix in cosmetic breast procedures and capsular contracture. Aesthet Surg J 31(7 Supplement):77S–84SCrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Shestak KC (2011) Acellular dermal matrix inlays to correct significant implant malposition in patients with compromised local tissues. Aesthet Surg J 31(7 Supplement):85S–94SCrossRefPubMed Shestak KC (2011) Acellular dermal matrix inlays to correct significant implant malposition in patients with compromised local tissues. Aesthet Surg J 31(7 Supplement):85S–94SCrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Huston TL, Taback B, Rohde CH (2011) Chest wall reconstruction with porcine acellular dermal matrix (strattice) and a latissimus myocutaneous flap. Am Surg 77(6):e115–e116PubMed Huston TL, Taback B, Rohde CH (2011) Chest wall reconstruction with porcine acellular dermal matrix (strattice) and a latissimus myocutaneous flap. Am Surg 77(6):e115–e116PubMed
45.
go back to reference Craft RO, May JW Jr (2011) Staged nipple reconstruction with vascularized SurgiMend acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:148e–149eCrossRefPubMed Craft RO, May JW Jr (2011) Staged nipple reconstruction with vascularized SurgiMend acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:148e–149eCrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Grabov-Nardini G, Haik J, Regev E, Winkler E (2009) AlloDerm sling for correction of Synmastia after immediate, tissue expander, Breast Reconstruction in Thin Women. Eplasty 9:e54PubMedPubMedCentral Grabov-Nardini G, Haik J, Regev E, Winkler E (2009) AlloDerm sling for correction of Synmastia after immediate, tissue expander, Breast Reconstruction in Thin Women. Eplasty 9:e54PubMedPubMedCentral
47.
go back to reference Sandor M, Xu H, Connor J, Lombardi J, Harper JR, Silverman RP, McQuillan DJ (2008) Host response to implanted porcine-derived biologic materials in a primate model of abdominal wall repair. Tissue Eng Part A 14(12):2021–2031CrossRefPubMed Sandor M, Xu H, Connor J, Lombardi J, Harper JR, Silverman RP, McQuillan DJ (2008) Host response to implanted porcine-derived biologic materials in a primate model of abdominal wall repair. Tissue Eng Part A 14(12):2021–2031CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Xu H, Wan H, Sandor M, Qi S, Ervin F, Harper JR, Silverman RP, McQuillan DJ (2008) Host response to human acellular dermal matrix transplantation in a primate model of abdominal wall repair. Tissue Eng Part A 14(12):2009–2019CrossRefPubMed Xu H, Wan H, Sandor M, Qi S, Ervin F, Harper JR, Silverman RP, McQuillan DJ (2008) Host response to human acellular dermal matrix transplantation in a primate model of abdominal wall repair. Tissue Eng Part A 14(12):2009–2019CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Sun WQ, Xu H, Sandor M, Lombardi J (2013) Process-induced extracellular matrix alterations affect the mechanisms of soft tissue repair and regeneration. J Tissue Eng 4:2041731413505305CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sun WQ, Xu H, Sandor M, Lombardi J (2013) Process-induced extracellular matrix alterations affect the mechanisms of soft tissue repair and regeneration. J Tissue Eng 4:2041731413505305CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
go back to reference Annor AH, Tang ME, Pui CL, Ebersole GC, Frisella MM, Matthews BD, Deeken CR (2012) Effect of enzymatic degradation on the mechanical properties of biological scaffold materials. Surg Endosc 26(10):2767–2778CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Annor AH, Tang ME, Pui CL, Ebersole GC, Frisella MM, Matthews BD, Deeken CR (2012) Effect of enzymatic degradation on the mechanical properties of biological scaffold materials. Surg Endosc 26(10):2767–2778CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
go back to reference Pui CL, Tang ME, Annor AH, Ebersole GC, Frisella MM, Matthews BD, Deeken CR (2012) Effect of repetitive loading on the mechanical properties of biological scaffold materials. J Am Coll Surg 215(2):216–228CrossRefPubMed Pui CL, Tang ME, Annor AH, Ebersole GC, Frisella MM, Matthews BD, Deeken CR (2012) Effect of repetitive loading on the mechanical properties of biological scaffold materials. J Am Coll Surg 215(2):216–228CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Mofid MM, Meininger MS, Lacey MS (2012) Veritas(R) bovine pericardium for immediate breast reconstruction: a xenograft alternative to acellular dermal matrix products. Eur J Plast Surg 35(10):717–722CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mofid MM, Meininger MS, Lacey MS (2012) Veritas(R) bovine pericardium for immediate breast reconstruction: a xenograft alternative to acellular dermal matrix products. Eur J Plast Surg 35(10):717–722CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
53.
go back to reference Borgognone A, Anniboletti T, De Vita F (2011) Does Veritas(R) play a role in breast reconstruction? A case report. Breast Cancer 3:175–177 Borgognone A, Anniboletti T, De Vita F (2011) Does Veritas(R) play a role in breast reconstruction? A case report. Breast Cancer 3:175–177
54.
go back to reference Potter S, Conroy EJ, Williamson PR et al (2016) The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study: protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing new techniques of implant-based breast reconstruction. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2:41CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Potter S, Conroy EJ, Williamson PR et al (2016) The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study: protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing new techniques of implant-based breast reconstruction. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2:41CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Complete resorption of Veritas® in acellular dermal matrix (ADM)-assisted implant-based breast reconstructions—is there a need for tighter regulation of new products developed for use in breast reconstruction?
Authors
Fayyaz A. K. Mazari
Kristjan S. Asgeirsson
Lisa Whisker
Eleanor Gutteridge
Tuabin Rasheed
R. Douglas Macmillan
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-017-1389-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 4/2018 Go to the issue