Published in:
01-06-2018 | Original Paper
Anatomy of superficial inferior epigastric vessels: revival of superficial inferior epigastric (SIEA) flap
Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Issue 3/2018
Login to get accessAbstract
Background
Development of perforator flaps evolves the perspective of reconstructive surgery to another level due to many of their advantages over the pedicled flaps, particularly lower donor-site morbidity and versatility in flap design. Superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap offers this significant advantage over other lower abdominal flaps, as dissection of the rectus abdominis muscle is not required. However, both vascular agenesis and inappropriate vessel size for anastomosis are the major limitations. This study was therefore aimed to investigate these aspects of this flap.
Methods
Twenty cadavers were dissected bilaterally to demonstrate vascular anatomy of these vessels. The SIEA of each cadaver was dissected and traced from the origin (femoral arteries) to their presence in the subcutaneous layer. Originating patterns of these vessels, whether sharing a common trunk with other vessels such as superficial circumflex iliac (SCI) or superficial external pudendal (SEP) arteries, was determined and their diameters measured.
Results
SIEA agenesis rate was found to be 7.5% (3/40). The diameters greater than 1 and 1.5 mm were found in 86% (32/37) and 30% (11/37), respectively. The distance between its origin and point of entering Scarpa’s fascia varies from 10.29 to 62.62 mm (mean 37.48 mm). As opposed to the artery, the superficial inferior epigastric vein was found to be present in all dissections with a diameter ranging from 2.12 to 5 mm (mean 3.09 mm) and the distance, as measured in SIEA, ranging from 20.1 to 74.28 mm (mean 41.24 mm). SIEA usually crosses the inguinal ligament within area between mid-inguinal point and 3 cm medially. Correlations were found (1) between SIEA diameter and pedicle length and (2) between bilateral pedicle lengths of both artery and vein.
Conclusions
The high prevalence of both SIEA presence and appropriate diameter for anastomosis, and thus flap success, makes the SIEA perforator flap an appropriate option for reconstructive treatment.
Level of Evidence: not ratable.