Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Journal of Plastic Surgery
Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 11/2013

01-11-2013 | Original Paper

Surgical management of cubital tunnel syndrome: a comparative analysis of outcome using four different techniques

Authors: Michel Saint-Cyr, Chrisovalantis Lakhiani, Tsu-Min Tsai

Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Issue 11/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Various options exist for the surgical management of cubital tunnel syndrome. The goals of this study were to compare the outcome of four different surgical techniques: (1) simple decompression, (2) endoscopic decompression, (3) anterior subcutaneous transposition, and (4) anterior sub-muscular transposition for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome.

Methods

One hundred ten patients (117 cases) with cubital tunnel syndrome were reviewed from 1986 to 2000. Parameters measured included signs and symptoms, medical comorbidity, other nerve compressions, and anatomical pathology. Severity was evaluated using the Dellon classification and the symptom severity score (SSS). SSS included evaluation of pain, clawing, the Froment sign, and the Wartenberg sign. Bishop's rating was measured at final follow-up. Statistical analysis included ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis tests, and Spearman's Rho for correlation.

Results

Correlation between severity of nerve compression and symptom duration was not statistically significant. A significant weak positive correlation existed between Dellon score and SSS. Bishop's rating was 46.5 % excellent, 39.5 % good, 7.9 % fair, and 6.1 % poor overall. A significant weak negative correlation existed between the Dellon score and Bishop's rating. The average Bishop score was 1.74 ± 0.85, and no significant difference existed when comparing each surgical technique to one another. No significant association was found between the severity of compression (Dellon) and the surgery type performed. A weak negative correlation existed between severity of ulnar nerve compression and clinical outcome. No significant differences were found between the type of surgeries performed in regard to outcome and Dellon score.

Conclusions

We found patients with the most severe compressive symptoms benefited the least from operative intervention regardless of surgical technique used. However, for mild to moderate disease, performing any of the purposed surgical techniques in accordance with the physician’s experience and comfort level is adequate in treating ulnar nerve compression at the elbow joint.
Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic study
Literature
1.
Bartels RH (2001) History of the surgical treatment of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow. Neurosurgery 49(2):391–399, discussion 399–400PubMed
2.
Lowe JB 3rd, Novak CB, Mackinnon SE (2001) Current approach to cubital tunnel syndrome. Neurosurg Clin N Am 12(2):267–284PubMed
3.
Dellon AL (1989) Review of treatment results for ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow. J Hand Surg Am 14(4):688–700PubMedCrossRef
4.
Adelaar RS, Foster WC, McDowell C (1984) The treatment of the cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 9A(1):90–95PubMedCrossRef
5.
Baek GH, Kwon BC, Chung MS (2006) Comparative study between minimal medial epicondylectomy and anterior subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15(5):609–613PubMedCrossRef
6.
Foster RJ, Edshage S (1981) Factors related to the outcome of surgically managed compressive ulnar neuropathy at the elbow level. J Hand Surg Am 6(2):181–192PubMedCrossRef
7.
Geutjens GG, Langstaff RJ, Smith NJ, Jefferson D, Howell CJ, Barton NJ (1996) Medial epicondylectomy or ulnar-nerve transposition for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow? J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(5):777–779PubMed
8.
Stuffer M, Jungwirth W, Hussl H, Schmutzhardt E (1992) Subcutaneous or submuscular anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve? J Hand Surg Br 17(3):248–250PubMedCrossRef
9.
Dellon AL, Chang E, Coert JH, Campbell KR (1994) Intraneural ulnar nerve pressure changes related to operative techniques for cubital tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg Am 19(6):923–930PubMedCrossRef
10.
Nouhan R, Kleinert JM (1997) Ulnar nerve decompression by transposing the nerve and Z-lengthening the flexor–pronator mass: clinical outcome. J Hand Surg Am 22(1):127–131PubMedCrossRef
11.
Thomsen PB (1977) Compression neuritis of the ulnar nerve treated with simple decompression. Acta Orthop Scand 48(2):164–167PubMedCrossRef
12.
Osborne G (1957) The surgical treatment of tardy ulnar neuritis. J Bone Joint Surg 39(B):782
13.
Amako M, Nemoto K, Kawaguchi M, Kato N, Arino H, Fujikawa K (2000) Comparison between partial and minimal medial epicondylectomy combined with decompression for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 25(6):1043–1050PubMedCrossRef
14.
Gervasio O, Gambardella G, Zaccone C, Branca D (2005) Simple decompression versus anterior submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve in severe cubital tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized study. Neurosurgery 56(1):108–117, discussion 117PubMed
15.
Jackson LC, Hotchkiss RN (1996) Cubital tunnel surgery. Complications and treatment of failures. Hand Clin 12(2):449–456PubMed
16.
Taniguchi Y, Takami M, Takami T, Yoshida M (2002) Simple decompression with small skin incision for cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br 27(6):559–562PubMedCrossRef
17.
Nathan PA, Keniston RC, Meadows KD (1995) Outcome study of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow treated with simple decompression and an early programme of physical therapy. J Hand Surg Br 20(5):628–637PubMedCrossRef
18.
LeRoux PD, Ensign TD, Burchiel KJ (1990) Surgical decompression without transposition for ulnar neuropathy: factors determining outcome. Neurosurgery 27(5):709–714, discussion 714PubMedCrossRef
19.
Gellman H, Campion DS (1996) Modified in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. Hand Clin 12(2):405–410PubMed
20.
Mowlavi A, Andrews K, Lille S, Verhulst S, Zook EG, Milner S (2000) The management of cubital tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of clinical studies. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(2):327–334PubMedCrossRef
21.
Tsai TM, Chen IC, Majd ME, Lim BH (1999) Cubital tunnel release with endoscopic assistance: results of a new technique. J Hand Surg Am 24(1):21–29PubMedCrossRef
22.
Palmer DH, Paulson JC, Lane-Larsen CL, Peulen VK, Olson JD (1993) Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a comparison of two techniques with open release. Arthroscopy 9(5):498–508PubMedCrossRef
23.
Dellon AL, Coert JH (2004) Results of the musculofascial lengthening technique for submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(Suppl 1(Pt 2)):169–179PubMed
24.
Siegel DB (1996) Submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve. Hand Clin 12(2):445–448PubMed
25.
Asami A, Morisawa K, Tsuruta T (1998) Functional outcome of anterior transposition of the vascularized ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg (Br) 23(5):613–616CrossRef
26.
Kleinman WB (1998) Cubital tunnel syndrome: anterior transposition as a logical approach to complete nerve decompression. J Hand Surg Br 23(5):613–616CrossRef
27.
Pribyl CR, Robinson B (1998) Use of the medial intermuscular septum as a fascial sling during anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve. J Hand Surg Am 23(3):500–504PubMedCrossRef
28.
Black BT, Barron OA, Townsend PF, Glickel SZ, Eaton RG (2000) Stabilized subcutaneous ulnar nerve transposition with immediate range of motion. Long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A(11):1544–1551PubMed
29.
Caputo AE, Watson HK (2000) Subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for failed decompression of cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 25(3):544–551PubMedCrossRef
30.
Chan RC, Paine KW, Varughese G (1980) Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: comparison of simple decompression and anterior transposition. Neurosurgery 7(6):545–550PubMedCrossRef
31.
Eaton RG, Crowe JF, Parkes JC 3rd (1980) Anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve using a non-compressing fasciodermal sling. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62(5):820–825PubMed
32.
Greenwald D, Blum LC 3rd, Adams D, Mercantonio C, Moffit M, Cooper B (2006) Effective surgical treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome based on provocative clinical testing without electrodiagnostics. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(5):87e–91ePubMedCrossRef
33.
Kuschner SH (1996) Cubital tunnel syndrome. Treatment by medial epicondylectomy. Hand Clin 12(2):411–419PubMed
34.
Nathan PA, Istvan JA, Meadows KD (2005) Intermediate and long-term outcomes following simple decompression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. Chir Main 24(1):29–34PubMedCrossRef
35.
Novak CB, Mackinnon SE, Stuebe AM (2002) Patient self-reported outcome after ulnar nerve transposition. Ann Plast Surg 48(3):274–280PubMedCrossRef
36.
Plancher KD, McGillicuddy JO, Kleinman WB (1996) Anterior intramuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve. Hand Clin 12(2):435–444PubMed
37.
Teoh LC, Yong FC, Tan SH, Andrew Chin YH (2003) Anterior subfascial transposition of the ulnar nerve. J Hand Surg Br 28(1):73–76PubMedCrossRef
38.
Dellon AL (2001) Clinical grading of peripheral nerve problems. Neurosurg Clin N Am 12(2):229–240PubMed
39.
Kleinman WB, Bishop AT (1989) Anterior intramuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve. J Hand Surg Am 14(6):972–979PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Surgical management of cubital tunnel syndrome: a comparative analysis of outcome using four different techniques
Authors
Michel Saint-Cyr
Chrisovalantis Lakhiani
Tsu-Min Tsai
Publication date
01-11-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Issue 11/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-013-0870-z

Other articles of this Issue 11/2013

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 11/2013 Go to the issue

Original Paper

Reconstruction of soft tissue defects in the Achilles tendon region with perforator-based fasciocutaneous flaps

Letter to the Editor

Weight versus volume of mastectomy specimens

Case Report

An unusual case of nasal sarcoidosis

Ideas and Innovations

A conservative treatment of ingrown toenails: splinting technique with cyanoacrylate

Original Paper

DIEAP flap selection for unilateral breast reconstruction: a comparison of flap side harvest

Original Paper

Triple-V flap: nipple reconstruction using a modified C-V flap technique for long-lasting improvement of projection