Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 1/2009

01-02-2009 | Original Paper

The effect of superior pedicle breast reductions on breast sensation

Authors: Konstantina Belouli, Gratiela Iscru, Nathalie Krügel, Sonja Meier, Sandra Baldi, Gertrude M. Beer

Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess nipple, areola and breast skin sensation after breast reductions with two different superior pedicle techniques: a short, vertical scar technique compared to a long, inverted-T scar technique. Thirty-six women with a vertical technique (group I) and ten women with an inverted-T technique (group II) with a resection weight of ≤500 g per breast completed their 1-year follow-up. The four modalities used to evaluate sensation were pressure with Semmes–Weinstein filaments, vibration with a vibrometer, and temperature and pain perception on a qualitative basis. The evaluation revealed that 1-year after breast reduction, the sensation was either reduced, unaltered, or improved in both groups. In the nipple, the mean sensation was markedly reduced throughout all qualities in both groups with the exception of pain, which was enhanced. In the areola, the mean sensation was also reduced in all qualities in both groups. In the quadrants of the skin, mean sensation was improved in terms of pressure and vibration in group I (8.3% normal pressure values preoperatively vs. 70% normal pressure values postoperatively) but reduced in the lower quadrant of the skin in group II with the inverted-T scar. This reduction of pressure was also significant (p = 0.04) in comparison with group I. Apart from this difference between the two groups, this study showed that in breast reductions with a superior pedicle technique, the long-scar technique did not lead to a greater reduction of sensation in the nipple and areola than the short-scar technique.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Klassen A, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C et al (1996) Should breast reduction surgery be rationed? A comparison of the health status of patients before and after treatment: postal questionnaire survey. BMJ 313(7055):454–457PubMed Klassen A, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C et al (1996) Should breast reduction surgery be rationed? A comparison of the health status of patients before and after treatment: postal questionnaire survey. BMJ 313(7055):454–457PubMed
2.
go back to reference Georgiade NG, Serafin D, Riefkohl R et al (1979) Is there a reduction mammaplasty for “all seasons?”. Plast Reconstr Surg 63(6):765–773PubMedCrossRef Georgiade NG, Serafin D, Riefkohl R et al (1979) Is there a reduction mammaplasty for “all seasons?”. Plast Reconstr Surg 63(6):765–773PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cooper A (1840) On the anatomy of the breast. Longmann, Orme, Green, Brown and Longmanns, London Cooper A (1840) On the anatomy of the breast. Longmann, Orme, Green, Brown and Longmanns, London
10.
go back to reference Pitanguy I (1976) Surgical treatment of breast hypertrophy. Br J Plast Surg 20(1):78–85 Pitanguy I (1976) Surgical treatment of breast hypertrophy. Br J Plast Surg 20(1):78–85
12.
go back to reference Regnault P (1976) Breast ptosis. Definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 3(2):193–203PubMed Regnault P (1976) Breast ptosis. Definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 3(2):193–203PubMed
14.
go back to reference Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM (1976) Breast sensation before and after plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 58(1):1–13PubMedCrossRef Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM (1976) Breast sensation before and after plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 58(1):1–13PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Levin S, Pearsall G, Ruderman RJ (1978) Von Frey’s method of measuring pressure sensation in the hand: an engineering analysis of the Weinstein-Semmes pressure aesthesiometer. J Hand Surg 3(3):211–216 Levin S, Pearsall G, Ruderman RJ (1978) Von Frey’s method of measuring pressure sensation in the hand: an engineering analysis of the Weinstein-Semmes pressure aesthesiometer. J Hand Surg 3(3):211–216
18.
go back to reference Gonzalez F, Brown FE, Gold ME et al (1993) Preoperative and postoperative nipple-areola sensation in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 92(5):809–814 discussion 815–818PubMedCrossRef Gonzalez F, Brown FE, Gold ME et al (1993) Preoperative and postoperative nipple-areola sensation in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 92(5):809–814 discussion 815–818PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference DelVecchyo C, Caloca J Jr, Caloca J et al (2004) Evaluation of breast sensation using dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials. Plast Reconstr Surg 113(7):1975–1983PubMed DelVecchyo C, Caloca J Jr, Caloca J et al (2004) Evaluation of breast sensation using dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials. Plast Reconstr Surg 113(7):1975–1983PubMed
22.
go back to reference Wechselberger G, Stoss S, Schoeller T et al (2001) An analysis of breast sensation following inferior pedicle mammaplasty and the effect of the volume of resected tissue. Aesthetic Plast Surg 25(6):443–446. doi:10.1007/s002660010156 PubMedCrossRef Wechselberger G, Stoss S, Schoeller T et al (2001) An analysis of breast sensation following inferior pedicle mammaplasty and the effect of the volume of resected tissue. Aesthetic Plast Surg 25(6):443–446. doi:10.​1007/​s002660010156 PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The effect of superior pedicle breast reductions on breast sensation
Authors
Konstantina Belouli
Gratiela Iscru
Nathalie Krügel
Sonja Meier
Sandra Baldi
Gertrude M. Beer
Publication date
01-02-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-008-0298-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 1/2009 Go to the issue