Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neuroradiology 5/2018

01-05-2018 | Diagnostic Neuroradiology

Roles of the apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor volume in predicting tumor grade in patients with choroid plexus tumors

Authors: Tomoaki Sasaki, John Kim, Toshio Moritani, Aristides A. Capizzano, Shawn P. Sato, Yutaka Sato, Patricia Kirby, Shunta Ishitoya, Akiko Oya, Masahiro Toda, Sayaka Yuzawa, Koji Takahashi

Published in: Neuroradiology | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To explore the utility of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and tumor volume to predict histological grade and prognosis in patients with choroid plexus tumors.

Methods

ADC and tumor volumes were retrospectively evaluated in 25 patients with choroid plexus papilloma (CPP; WHO grade 1 [n = 13]), atypical CPP (aCPP; grade 2 [n = 8]), or choroid plexus carcinoma (grade 3 [n = 4]) The prognostic roles of ADC and tumor volume were assessed.

Results

There were significant differences in mean and minimum ADC values, and tumor volume among the WHO grades (p = 0.033, p = 0.044, and p = 0.014, respectively). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis revealed a mean cutoff ADC value ≤ 1.397 × 10−3 mm2/s for aCPP (sensitivity = 0.667, specificity = 0.923). Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that both mean ADC (β = − 0.455, p = 0.005) and tumor volume (β = 0.513, p = 0.002) were correlated with WHO grade (adjusted R2 = 0.520, p = 0.005). Kaplan-Meier curve analysis identified poorer survival in patients with WHO grade 2 and 3 tumors than in those with WHO grade 1 disease (p = 0.049 and p = 0.012, respectively). A mean ADC ≤ 1.397 × 10−3 mm2/s (p = 0.001) and tumor volume 21.05 ml (p = 0.031) predicted significantly poorer survival.

Conclusion

Mean ADC and tumor volume were correlated with WHO grade of choroid plexus tumors. A lower ADC value and a larger tumor volume predicted a poorer prognosis.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cavenee WK, Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2016) WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. World Health Organization classification of tumours, Revised 4th edn. International Agency For Research On Cancer, Lyon Cavenee WK, Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2016) WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. World Health Organization classification of tumours, Revised 4th edn. International Agency For Research On Cancer, Lyon
6.
go back to reference Lober RM, Cho Y-J, Tang Y, Barnes PD, Edwards MS, Vogel H, Fisher PG, Monje M, Yeom KW (2014) Diffusion-weighted MRI derived apparent diffusion coefficient identifies prognostically distinct subgroups of pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. J Neuro-Oncol 117(1):175–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-014-1375-8 CrossRef Lober RM, Cho Y-J, Tang Y, Barnes PD, Edwards MS, Vogel H, Fisher PG, Monje M, Yeom KW (2014) Diffusion-weighted MRI derived apparent diffusion coefficient identifies prognostically distinct subgroups of pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. J Neuro-Oncol 117(1):175–182. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11060-014-1375-8 CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lim C, Flood TA, Hakim SW, Shabana WM, Quon JS, El-Khodary M, Thornhill RE, El Hallani S, Schieda N (2016) Evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and MR volumetry as independent associative factors for extra-prostatic extension (EPE) in prostatic carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 43(3):726–736. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25033 CrossRefPubMed Lim C, Flood TA, Hakim SW, Shabana WM, Quon JS, El-Khodary M, Thornhill RE, El Hallani S, Schieda N (2016) Evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and MR volumetry as independent associative factors for extra-prostatic extension (EPE) in prostatic carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 43(3):726–736. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​jmri.​25033 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ludbrook J (2002) Statistical techniques for comparing measurers and methods of measurement: a critical review. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 29(7):527–536CrossRefPubMed Ludbrook J (2002) Statistical techniques for comparing measurers and methods of measurement: a critical review. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 29(7):527–536CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Han X, Suo S, Sun Y, Zu J, Qu J, Zhou Y, Chen Z, Xu J (2016) Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement in glioma: influence of region-of-interest determination methods on apparent diffusion coefficient values, interobserver variability, time efficiency, and diagnostic ability. J Magn Reson Imaging 45:722–730. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25405 CrossRefPubMed Han X, Suo S, Sun Y, Zu J, Qu J, Zhou Y, Chen Z, Xu J (2016) Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement in glioma: influence of region-of-interest determination methods on apparent diffusion coefficient values, interobserver variability, time efficiency, and diagnostic ability. J Magn Reson Imaging 45:722–730. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​jmri.​25405 CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Priola AM, Priola SM, Parlatano D, Gned D, Giraudo MT, Giardino R, Ferrero B, Ardissone F, Veltri A (2017) Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the anterior mediastinum: inter-observer reproducibility of five different methods of region-of-interest positioning. Eur Radiol 27(4):1386–1394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4527-8 CrossRefPubMed Priola AM, Priola SM, Parlatano D, Gned D, Giraudo MT, Giardino R, Ferrero B, Ardissone F, Veltri A (2017) Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the anterior mediastinum: inter-observer reproducibility of five different methods of region-of-interest positioning. Eur Radiol 27(4):1386–1394. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00330-016-4527-8 CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Thomas C, Sill M, Ruland V, Witten A, Hartung S, Kordes U, Jeibmann A, Beschorner R, Keyvani K, Bergmann M, Mittelbronn M, Pietsch T, Felsberg J, Monoranu CM, Varlet P, Hauser P, Olar A, Grundy RG, Wolff JE, Korshunov A, Jones DT, Bewerunge-Hudler M, Hovestadt V, von Deimling A, Pfister SM, Paulus W, Capper D, Hasselblatt M (2016) Methylation profiling of choroid plexus tumors reveals 3 clinically distinct subgroups. Neuro-Oncology 18(6):790–796. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nov322 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thomas C, Sill M, Ruland V, Witten A, Hartung S, Kordes U, Jeibmann A, Beschorner R, Keyvani K, Bergmann M, Mittelbronn M, Pietsch T, Felsberg J, Monoranu CM, Varlet P, Hauser P, Olar A, Grundy RG, Wolff JE, Korshunov A, Jones DT, Bewerunge-Hudler M, Hovestadt V, von Deimling A, Pfister SM, Paulus W, Capper D, Hasselblatt M (2016) Methylation profiling of choroid plexus tumors reveals 3 clinically distinct subgroups. Neuro-Oncology 18(6):790–796. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​neuonc/​nov322 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Roles of the apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor volume in predicting tumor grade in patients with choroid plexus tumors
Authors
Tomoaki Sasaki
John Kim
Toshio Moritani
Aristides A. Capizzano
Shawn P. Sato
Yutaka Sato
Patricia Kirby
Shunta Ishitoya
Akiko Oya
Masahiro Toda
Sayaka Yuzawa
Koji Takahashi
Publication date
01-05-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Neuroradiology / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0028-3940
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1920
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-018-2008-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Neuroradiology 5/2018 Go to the issue