Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Experimental Brain Research 3-4/2010

Open Access 01-01-2010 | Research Article

Action observation can prime visual object recognition

Authors: Hannah Barbara Helbig, Jasmin Steinwender, Markus Graf, Markus Kiefer

Published in: Experimental Brain Research | Issue 3-4/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Observing an action activates action representations in the motor system. Moreover, the representations of manipulable objects are closely linked to the motor systems at a functional and neuroanatomical level. Here, we investigated whether action observation can facilitate object recognition using an action priming paradigm. As prime stimuli we presented short video movies showing hands performing an action in interaction with an object (where the object itself was always removed from the video). The prime movie was followed by a (briefly presented) target object affording motor interactions that are either similar (congruent condition) or dissimilar (incongruent condition) to the prime action. Participants had to decide whether an object name shown after the target picture corresponds with the picture or not (picture–word matching task). We found superior accuracy for prime–target pairs with congruent as compared to incongruent actions across two experiments. Thus, action observation can facilitate recognition of a manipulable object typically involving a similar action. This action priming effect supports the notion that action representations play a functional role in object recognition.
Footnotes
1
Picture–word matching tasks are more constrained than naming tasks (as used in the previous study, Helbig et al. 2006), and are less susceptible to potential priming effects related to word labels (which may result from subjects’ attempts to imagine the names of objects with which the actions were performed). Moreover, they are considered to be better suited to study object recognition (see Jolicoeur and Humphrey 1998).
 
Literature
go back to reference Boronat CB, Buxbaum LJ, Coslett HB, Tang K, Saffran EM, Kimberg DY, Detre JA (2005) Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cogn Brain Res 23:361–373CrossRef Boronat CB, Buxbaum LJ, Coslett HB, Tang K, Saffran EM, Kimberg DY, Detre JA (2005) Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cogn Brain Res 23:361–373CrossRef
go back to reference Chao LL, Martin A (2000) Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage 12:478–484CrossRefPubMed Chao LL, Martin A (2000) Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage 12:478–484CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Chao LL, Haxby JV, Martin A (1999) Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nat Neurosci 2:913–919CrossRefPubMed Chao LL, Haxby JV, Martin A (1999) Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nat Neurosci 2:913–919CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cochin S, Barthelemy C, Roux S, Martineau J (1999) Observation and execution of movement: similarities demonstrated by quantified electroencephalography. Eur J Neurosci 11:1839–1842CrossRefPubMed Cochin S, Barthelemy C, Roux S, Martineau J (1999) Observation and execution of movement: similarities demonstrated by quantified electroencephalography. Eur J Neurosci 11:1839–1842CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Craighero L, Bonetti F, Massarenti L, Canto R, Fabbri Destro M, Fadigo L (2008) Temporal prediction of touch instant during observation of human and robot grasping. Brain Res Bull 75:770–774CrossRefPubMed Craighero L, Bonetti F, Massarenti L, Canto R, Fabbri Destro M, Fadigo L (2008) Temporal prediction of touch instant during observation of human and robot grasping. Brain Res Bull 75:770–774CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Decety J, Perani D, Jeannerod M, Bettinardi V, Tadary B, Woods R, Mazziotta JC, Fazio F (1994) Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography. Nature 371:600–602CrossRefPubMed Decety J, Perani D, Jeannerod M, Bettinardi V, Tadary B, Woods R, Mazziotta JC, Fazio F (1994) Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography. Nature 371:600–602CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Decety J, Grèzes J, Costes N, Perani D, Jeannerod M, Procyk E, Grassi F, Fazio F (1997) Brain activity during observation of actions influence of action content and subject’s strategy. Brain 120:1763–1777CrossRefPubMed Decety J, Grèzes J, Costes N, Perani D, Jeannerod M, Procyk E, Grassi F, Fazio F (1997) Brain activity during observation of actions influence of action content and subject’s strategy. Brain 120:1763–1777CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Pavesi G, Rizzolatti G (1995) Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. J Neurophysiol 73:2608–2611PubMed Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Pavesi G, Rizzolatti G (1995) Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. J Neurophysiol 73:2608–2611PubMed
go back to reference Farah MJ, McClelland JL (1991) A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity. J Exp Psychol Gen 120:339–357CrossRefPubMed Farah MJ, McClelland JL (1991) A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity. J Exp Psychol Gen 120:339–357CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gerlach C, Law I, Gade A, Paulson OB (2002) The role of action knowledge in the comprehension of artefacts—a PET study. Neuroimage 15:143–152CrossRefPubMed Gerlach C, Law I, Gade A, Paulson OB (2002) The role of action knowledge in the comprehension of artefacts—a PET study. Neuroimage 15:143–152CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Glover S, Rosenbaum DA, Graham J, Dixon P (2004) Grasping the meaning of words. Exp Brain Res 154:103–108CrossRefPubMed Glover S, Rosenbaum DA, Graham J, Dixon P (2004) Grasping the meaning of words. Exp Brain Res 154:103–108CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Graf M, Schütz-Bosbach S, Prinz W (2009) Motor involvement in action and object perception: similarity and complementarity. In: Semin G, Echterhoff G (eds) Grounding sociality: neurons, minds, and culture. Psychology Press, New York Graf M, Schütz-Bosbach S, Prinz W (2009) Motor involvement in action and object perception: similarity and complementarity. In: Semin G, Echterhoff G (eds) Grounding sociality: neurons, minds, and culture. Psychology Press, New York
go back to reference Grafton ST, Fadiga L, Arbib MA, Rizzolatti G (1997) Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuroimage 6:231–236CrossRefPubMed Grafton ST, Fadiga L, Arbib MA, Rizzolatti G (1997) Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuroimage 6:231–236CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Grèzes J, Decety J (2002) Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia 40:212–222CrossRefPubMed Grèzes J, Decety J (2002) Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia 40:212–222CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Grèzes J, Costes N, Decety J (1998) Top down effect of strategy on the perception of human biological motion: a PET investigation. Cogn Neuropsychol 15:553–582CrossRef Grèzes J, Costes N, Decety J (1998) Top down effect of strategy on the perception of human biological motion: a PET investigation. Cogn Neuropsychol 15:553–582CrossRef
go back to reference Grill-Spector K, Kanwisher N (2005) Visual recognition: as soon as you see it, you know what it is. Psychol Sci 16:152–160CrossRefPubMed Grill-Spector K, Kanwisher N (2005) Visual recognition: as soon as you see it, you know what it is. Psychol Sci 16:152–160CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Handy TC, Grafton ST, Shroff NM, Ketay S, Gazzaniga MS (2003) Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized. Nat Neurosci 6:421–427CrossRefPubMed Handy TC, Grafton ST, Shroff NM, Ketay S, Gazzaniga MS (2003) Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized. Nat Neurosci 6:421–427CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hari R, Forss N, Avikainen S, Kirveskari E, Salenius S, Rizzolatti G (1998) Activation of human primary motor cortex during action observation: a neuromagnetic study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:15061–15065CrossRefPubMed Hari R, Forss N, Avikainen S, Kirveskari E, Salenius S, Rizzolatti G (1998) Activation of human primary motor cortex during action observation: a neuromagnetic study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:15061–15065CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Helbig HB, Graf M, Kiefer M (2006) The role of action representations in visual object recognition. Exp Brain Res 174:221–228CrossRefPubMed Helbig HB, Graf M, Kiefer M (2006) The role of action representations in visual object recognition. Exp Brain Res 174:221–228CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hoenig K, Sim E-J, Bochev V, Herrnberger B, Kiefer M (2008) Conceptual flexibility in the human brain: dynamic recruitment of semantic maps from visual, motion and motor-related areas. J Cogn Neurosci 20:1799–1814CrossRefPubMed Hoenig K, Sim E-J, Bochev V, Herrnberger B, Kiefer M (2008) Conceptual flexibility in the human brain: dynamic recruitment of semantic maps from visual, motion and motor-related areas. J Cogn Neurosci 20:1799–1814CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Humphreys GW, Riddoch MJ, Quinlan PT (1988) Cascade processes in picture identification. Cogn Neuropsychol 5:67–103CrossRef Humphreys GW, Riddoch MJ, Quinlan PT (1988) Cascade processes in picture identification. Cogn Neuropsychol 5:67–103CrossRef
go back to reference Jeannerod M (2001) Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage 14:S103–S109CrossRefPubMed Jeannerod M (2001) Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage 14:S103–S109CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Jolicoeur P, Humphrey GK (1998) Perception of rotated two-dimensional and three-dimensional objects and visual shapes. In: Walsh V, Kulikowski J (eds) Perceptual constancy. Why things look as they do. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 69–123 Jolicoeur P, Humphrey GK (1998) Perception of rotated two-dimensional and three-dimensional objects and visual shapes. In: Walsh V, Kulikowski J (eds) Perceptual constancy. Why things look as they do. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 69–123
go back to reference Kiefer M (2001) Perceptual and semantic sources of category-specific effects: event-related potentials during picture and word categorization. Mem Cogn 29:100–116 Kiefer M (2001) Perceptual and semantic sources of category-specific effects: event-related potentials during picture and word categorization. Mem Cogn 29:100–116
go back to reference Kiefer M (2005) Repetition priming modulates category-related effects on event-related potentials: further evidence for multiple cortical semantic systems. J Cogn Neurosci 17:199–211CrossRefPubMed Kiefer M (2005) Repetition priming modulates category-related effects on event-related potentials: further evidence for multiple cortical semantic systems. J Cogn Neurosci 17:199–211CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kiefer M, Spitzer M (2001) The limits of a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends Cogn Sci 5:469–471CrossRefPubMed Kiefer M, Spitzer M (2001) The limits of a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends Cogn Sci 5:469–471CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kiefer M, Sim E-J, Liebich S, Hauk O, Tanaka JW (2007) Experience-dependent plasticity of conceptual representations in human sensory-motor areas. J Cogn Neurosci 19:525–542CrossRefPubMed Kiefer M, Sim E-J, Liebich S, Hauk O, Tanaka JW (2007) Experience-dependent plasticity of conceptual representations in human sensory-motor areas. J Cogn Neurosci 19:525–542CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kiefer M, Sim E-J, Herrnberger B, Grothe J, Hoenig K (2008) The sound of concepts: four markers for a link between auditory and conceptual brain systems. J Neurosci 28:12224–12230CrossRefPubMed Kiefer M, Sim E-J, Herrnberger B, Grothe J, Hoenig K (2008) The sound of concepts: four markers for a link between auditory and conceptual brain systems. J Neurosci 28:12224–12230CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kleiner M, Wallraven C, Bülthoff HH (2004) The MPI videolab—a system for high quality synchronous recording of video and audio from multiple viewpoints. Technical Report, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics 123:1–19 Kleiner M, Wallraven C, Bülthoff HH (2004) The MPI videolab—a system for high quality synchronous recording of video and audio from multiple viewpoints. Technical Report, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics 123:1–19
go back to reference Martin A, Haxby JV, Lalonde FM, Wiggs CL, Ungerleider LG (1995) Discrete cortical regions associated with knowledge of color and knowledge of action. Science 270:102–105CrossRefPubMed Martin A, Haxby JV, Lalonde FM, Wiggs CL, Ungerleider LG (1995) Discrete cortical regions associated with knowledge of color and knowledge of action. Science 270:102–105CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Martin A, Wiggs CL, Ungerleider LG, Haxby JV (1996) Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature 379:649–652CrossRefPubMed Martin A, Wiggs CL, Ungerleider LG, Haxby JV (1996) Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature 379:649–652CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Martin A, Ungerleider LG, Haxby JV (2000) Category specificity and the brain: the sensory/motor model of semantic representations of objects. In: Gazzaniga MS (ed) The Cognitive Neurosciences. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 1023–1036 Martin A, Ungerleider LG, Haxby JV (2000) Category specificity and the brain: the sensory/motor model of semantic representations of objects. In: Gazzaniga MS (ed) The Cognitive Neurosciences. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 1023–1036
go back to reference Prinz W (1990) A common coding approach to perception and action. In: Neumann O, Prinz W (eds) Relationships between perception and action: current approaches. Springer, Berlin, pp 167–201 Prinz W (1990) A common coding approach to perception and action. In: Neumann O, Prinz W (eds) Relationships between perception and action: current approaches. Springer, Berlin, pp 167–201
go back to reference Rizzolatti G, Sinigalia C (2007) Mirrors in the brain: how our minds share actions, emotions, and experience. Oxford University Press, New York Rizzolatti G, Sinigalia C (2007) Mirrors in the brain: how our minds share actions, emotions, and experience. Oxford University Press, New York
go back to reference Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Gallese V, Fogassi L (1996a) Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cogn Brain Res 3:131–141CrossRef Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Gallese V, Fogassi L (1996a) Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cogn Brain Res 3:131–141CrossRef
go back to reference Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Matelli M, Bettinardi V, Paulesu E, Perani D, Fazio F (1996b) Localization of grasp representations in humans by pet: 1 observation versus execution. Exp Brain Res 111:246–252CrossRefPubMed Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Matelli M, Bettinardi V, Paulesu E, Perani D, Fazio F (1996b) Localization of grasp representations in humans by pet: 1 observation versus execution. Exp Brain Res 111:246–252CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rosch E, Mervis CB, Gray WD, Johnson DM, Boyes-Braem P (1976) Basic objects in natural categories. Cogn Psychol 8:382–439CrossRef Rosch E, Mervis CB, Gray WD, Johnson DM, Boyes-Braem P (1976) Basic objects in natural categories. Cogn Psychol 8:382–439CrossRef
go back to reference Sacchett C, Humphreys GW (1992) Calling a squirrel a squirrel but a canoe a wigwam: a category-specific deficit for artefactual objects and body parts. Cogn Neuropsychol 9:73–86CrossRef Sacchett C, Humphreys GW (1992) Calling a squirrel a squirrel but a canoe a wigwam: a category-specific deficit for artefactual objects and body parts. Cogn Neuropsychol 9:73–86CrossRef
go back to reference Tucker M, Ellis R (1998) On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:830–846CrossRefPubMed Tucker M, Ellis R (1998) On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:830–846CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Tucker M, Ellis R (2001) The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Vis Cogn 8:769–800CrossRef Tucker M, Ellis R (2001) The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Vis Cogn 8:769–800CrossRef
go back to reference Tucker M, Ellis R (2004) Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychol 116:185–203CrossRef Tucker M, Ellis R (2004) Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychol 116:185–203CrossRef
go back to reference Warrington EK, McCarthy RA (1987) Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain 110:1273–1296CrossRefPubMed Warrington EK, McCarthy RA (1987) Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain 110:1273–1296CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Weisberg J, van Turennout M, Martin A (2007) A neural system for learning about object function. Cereb Cortex 17:513–521CrossRefPubMed Weisberg J, van Turennout M, Martin A (2007) A neural system for learning about object function. Cereb Cortex 17:513–521CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Action observation can prime visual object recognition
Authors
Hannah Barbara Helbig
Jasmin Steinwender
Markus Graf
Markus Kiefer
Publication date
01-01-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Experimental Brain Research / Issue 3-4/2010
Print ISSN: 0014-4819
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1106
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1953-8

Other articles of this Issue 3-4/2010

Experimental Brain Research 3-4/2010 Go to the issue