Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Experimental Brain Research 4/2006

01-03-2006 | Research Note

Affective state and decision-making in the Ultimatum Game

Authors: Mascha van ’t Wout, René S. Kahn, Alan G. Sanfey, André Aleman

Published in: Experimental Brain Research | Issue 4/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

The emerging field of neuroeconomics has provided evidence that emotional as well as cognitive processes may contribute to economic decision-making. Indeed, activation of the anterior insula, a brain area involved in emotional processing, has been shown to predict decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. However, as the insula has also been implicated in other brain functions, converging evidence on the role of emotion in the Ultimatum Game is needed. In the present study, 30 healthy undergraduate students played the Ultimatum Game while their skin conductance responses were measured as an autonomic index of affective state. The results revealed that skin conductance activity was higher for unfair offers and was associated with the rejection of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game. Interestingly, this pattern was only observed for offers proposed by human conspecifics, but not for offers generated by computers. This provides direct support for economic models that acknowledge the role of emotional brain systems in everyday decision-making.
Literature
go back to reference Bechara A, Damasio AR (2005) The somatic marker hypothesis: a neural theory of economic decision. Games Econ Behav 52:336–372CrossRef Bechara A, Damasio AR (2005) The somatic marker hypothesis: a neural theory of economic decision. Games Econ Behav 52:336–372CrossRef
go back to reference Bechara A, Damasio H, Tranel D, Damasio AR (1997) Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science 275:1293–1295PubMedCrossRef Bechara A, Damasio H, Tranel D, Damasio AR (1997) Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science 275:1293–1295PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bechara A, Damasio H, Damasio AR, Lee GP (1999) Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making. J Neurosci 19:5473–5481PubMed Bechara A, Damasio H, Damasio AR, Lee GP (1999) Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making. J Neurosci 19:5473–5481PubMed
go back to reference Bechara A, Damasio H, Tranel D, Damasio AR (2005) The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: some questions and answers. Trends Cogn Sci 9:159–162PubMedCrossRef Bechara A, Damasio H, Tranel D, Damasio AR (2005) The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: some questions and answers. Trends Cogn Sci 9:159–162PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bolton GE, Zwick R (1995) Anonymity versus punishment in Ultimatum Bargaining. Games Econ Behav 10:95–121CrossRef Bolton GE, Zwick R (1995) Anonymity versus punishment in Ultimatum Bargaining. Games Econ Behav 10:95–121CrossRef
go back to reference Bouscein W (1992) Electrodermal activity. Plenum, New York Bouscein W (1992) Electrodermal activity. Plenum, New York
go back to reference Critchley HD, Wiens S, Rotshtein P, Ohman A, Dolan RJ (2004) Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nat Neurosci 7:189–195PubMedCrossRef Critchley HD, Wiens S, Rotshtein P, Ohman A, Dolan RJ (2004) Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nat Neurosci 7:189–195PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Damasio AR (1994) Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. Putnam, New York Damasio AR (1994) Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. Putnam, New York
go back to reference Guth W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B (1982) An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J Econ Behav Organ 3:367–388CrossRef Guth W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B (1982) An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J Econ Behav Organ 3:367–388CrossRef
go back to reference Guth W, Huck S, Muller W (2001) The relevance of equal splits in ultimatum games. Games Econ Behav 37:161–169CrossRef Guth W, Huck S, Muller W (2001) The relevance of equal splits in ultimatum games. Games Econ Behav 37:161–169CrossRef
go back to reference Maia TV, McClelland JL (2004) A reexamination of the evidence for the somatic marker hypothesis: what participants really know in the Iowa gambling task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101:16075–16080 Maia TV, McClelland JL (2004) A reexamination of the evidence for the somatic marker hypothesis: what participants really know in the Iowa gambling task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101:16075–16080
go back to reference Nowak MA, Page KM, Sigmund K (2000) Fairness versus reason in the Ultimatum Game. Science 289:1773–1775PubMedCrossRef Nowak MA, Page KM, Sigmund K (2000) Fairness versus reason in the Ultimatum Game. Science 289:1773–1775PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Phillips ML, Young AW, Senior C, Brammer M, Andrew C, Calder AJ, Bullmore ET, Perrett DI, Rowland D, Williams SCR, Gray JA, David AS (1997) A specific neural substrate for perceiving facial expressions of disgust. Nature 389:495–498PubMedCrossRef Phillips ML, Young AW, Senior C, Brammer M, Andrew C, Calder AJ, Bullmore ET, Perrett DI, Rowland D, Williams SCR, Gray JA, David AS (1997) A specific neural substrate for perceiving facial expressions of disgust. Nature 389:495–498PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pillutla MM, Murnighan JK (1996) Unfairness, anger, and spite: emotional rejections of Ultimatum Offers. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 68:208–224CrossRef Pillutla MM, Murnighan JK (1996) Unfairness, anger, and spite: emotional rejections of Ultimatum Offers. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 68:208–224CrossRef
go back to reference Roth AE (1995) Bargaining experiments. In: Kagal J, Roth A (eds) Handbook of experimental economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 253–342 Roth AE (1995) Bargaining experiments. In: Kagal J, Roth A (eds) Handbook of experimental economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 253–342
go back to reference Sanfey AG, Rilling JK, Aronson JA, Nystrom LE, Cohen JD (2003) The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science 300:1755–1758PubMedCrossRef Sanfey AG, Rilling JK, Aronson JA, Nystrom LE, Cohen JD (2003) The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science 300:1755–1758PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Affective state and decision-making in the Ultimatum Game
Authors
Mascha van ’t Wout
René S. Kahn
Alan G. Sanfey
André Aleman
Publication date
01-03-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Experimental Brain Research / Issue 4/2006
Print ISSN: 0014-4819
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1106
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0346-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2006

Experimental Brain Research 4/2006 Go to the issue