Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Experimental Brain Research 1/2005

01-01-2005 | Research Article

Individual differences discriminate event-related potentials but not performance during response inhibition

Authors: Richard A. P. Roche, Hugh Garavan, John J. Foxe, Shane M. O’Mara

Published in: Experimental Brain Research | Issue 1/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded from 20 normal participants while they completed a Go/NoGo response inhibition task. Previous ERP studies have implicated the N2 and P3 waveforms as the main indices of processing in this task, and functional brain imaging has shown parietal, prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices to be involved in response inhibition. 32-channel ERP analysis revealed amplitude differences in the N2/P3 components when stimuli that required a button-press (Go stimuli) were compared with stimuli for which the response had to be withheld (No-Go stimuli), and in N2 and P3 latencies when successful withholds to No-Go stimuli were compared with unsuccessful attempts to inhibit. Further differences in the N2/P3 complex emerged when participants were grouped in terms of a measure of absentmindedness (the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire, CFQ); larger and earlier components were found for high CFQ respondents. We conclude that the latencies of the N2 and P3 may be the critical indicators of active inhibitory processes for this task, suggesting that a pattern of sequential activation rather than altered activity level in key structures may mediate success on the task. In addition, highly absentminded participants exhibited larger components for errors than did less absentminded participants when performing at the same level, which implies that the absentminded may require greater activity in the neural substrates of response inhibition in order to accomplish this task at a comparable level of performance to less absentminded participants.
Footnotes
1
We confine our examination of ERP components to the N2 and P3 waveforms, due to their association with voluntary/controlled processes, rather than the automatically elicited components P1, N1 and P2, though it is noted that these components may reveal other interesting aspects of inhibition.
 
2
The terms “stimulus-locked” and “response-locked” are used here to describe averaging binned by stimulus, or by response, respectively. Averages based on stimulus triggers or response triggers would be referred to as Stimulus Triggered Averages (STA), or Response Triggered Averages (RTA), respectively, if they were present in this study.
 
3
In any analyses which yielded no “clean” sweeps from a participant after artifact rejection, etc., that participant was removed from the corresponding behavioural analysis. Further subdivisions of the sweeps (into “corrects”, “errors”, etc.) and the presence of “bad” channels for some waveform components meant that the Degrees of Freedom were sometimes reduced further for the electrophysiological analyses, explaining disparity between DFs in the two analyses.
 
4
It should be noted that the task would probably require a constant stimulus duration, rather than the individual titration used here, to allow top-down changes in P1 and/or N1 to be seen.
 
Literature
go back to reference American Encephalographic Society (1994) Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J Clin Neurophysiol 11:40–73PubMed American Encephalographic Society (1994) Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J Clin Neurophysiol 11:40–73PubMed
go back to reference Bokura H, Yamaguchi S, Kobayashi S (2002) Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task. Clin Neurophysiol 112:2224–2232CrossRef Bokura H, Yamaguchi S, Kobayashi S (2002) Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task. Clin Neurophysiol 112:2224–2232CrossRef
go back to reference Brandeis D, van Leeuwen TH, Rubia K, Vitacco D, Steger J, Pascual-Marqui RD, Steinhausen H-Ch (1998) Neuroelectric mapping reveals precursor of stop failures in children with attentional deficits. Behav Brain Res 94:111–125CrossRefPubMed Brandeis D, van Leeuwen TH, Rubia K, Vitacco D, Steger J, Pascual-Marqui RD, Steinhausen H-Ch (1998) Neuroelectric mapping reveals precursor of stop failures in children with attentional deficits. Behav Brain Res 94:111–125CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Broadbent DE, Cooper PF, FitzGerald P, Parkes KR (1982) The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. Brit J Clin Psychol 21:1–16 Broadbent DE, Cooper PF, FitzGerald P, Parkes KR (1982) The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. Brit J Clin Psychol 21:1–16
go back to reference Bruin KJ, Wijers AA, van Staveren ASJ (2001) Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition? Clin Neurophysiol 112:1660–1671CrossRefPubMed Bruin KJ, Wijers AA, van Staveren ASJ (2001) Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition? Clin Neurophysiol 112:1660–1671CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Carter CS, Braver TS, Barch DM, Botvinick MM, Noll D, Cohen JD (1998) Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science 280:747–749CrossRefPubMed Carter CS, Braver TS, Barch DM, Botvinick MM, Noll D, Cohen JD (1998) Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science 280:747–749CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Dehaene S, Posner MI, Tucker DM (1994) Localisation of a neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychol Sci 5:303–305 Dehaene S, Posner MI, Tucker DM (1994) Localisation of a neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychol Sci 5:303–305
go back to reference de Zubicaray GI, Andrew C, Zelaya FO, Williams SC, Dumanoir C (2000) Motor response suppression and the prepotent tendency to respond: a parametric fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 38:1280–1291CrossRefPubMed de Zubicaray GI, Andrew C, Zelaya FO, Williams SC, Dumanoir C (2000) Motor response suppression and the prepotent tendency to respond: a parametric fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 38:1280–1291CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Duncan-Johnson CC, Donchin E (1977) On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiol 14:456–467 Duncan-Johnson CC, Donchin E (1977) On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiol 14:456–467
go back to reference Falkenstein M, Koshlykova NA, Kiroj VN, Hoormann J, Hohnsbein J (1995) Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/Nogo tasks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 96:36–43CrossRefPubMed Falkenstein M, Koshlykova NA, Kiroj VN, Hoormann J, Hohnsbein J (1995) Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/Nogo tasks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 96:36–43CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Falkenstein M, Hoormann J, Hohnsbein J (1999) ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychol 101:267–291CrossRef Falkenstein M, Hoormann J, Hohnsbein J (1999) ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychol 101:267–291CrossRef
go back to reference Filipović SR, Jahanshahi M, Rothwell JC (2000) Cortical potentials related to the nogo decision. Exp Brain Res 132:411–415CrossRefPubMed Filipović SR, Jahanshahi M, Rothwell JC (2000) Cortical potentials related to the nogo decision. Exp Brain Res 132:411–415CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Fox AM, Michie PT, Wynne CD, Maybery MT (2000) ERP correlates of response inhibition to elemental and configural stimuli in a negative patterning task. Clin Neurophysiol 111:1045–1053CrossRefPubMed Fox AM, Michie PT, Wynne CD, Maybery MT (2000) ERP correlates of response inhibition to elemental and configural stimuli in a negative patterning task. Clin Neurophysiol 111:1045–1053CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Garavan H, Ross TJ, Stein EA (1999) Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. Proc Nat Acad Sci 96:8301–8306CrossRefPubMed Garavan H, Ross TJ, Stein EA (1999) Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. Proc Nat Acad Sci 96:8301–8306CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Garavan H, Ross TJ, Murphy K, Roche RAP, Stein EA (2002) Dissociable executive functions in the behavioural control: Inhibition, error detection and correction. NeuroImage 17:1820–1829CrossRefPubMed Garavan H, Ross TJ, Murphy K, Roche RAP, Stein EA (2002) Dissociable executive functions in the behavioural control: Inhibition, error detection and correction. NeuroImage 17:1820–1829CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gehring WJ, Goss B, Coles MGH, Meyer DE, Donchin E (1993) A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychol Sci 4:385–390 Gehring WJ, Goss B, Coles MGH, Meyer DE, Donchin E (1993) A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychol Sci 4:385–390
go back to reference Hoffman JE (1990) Event-related potentials and automatic and controlled processes. In: Rohrbaugh JW, Parasuraman R, Johnson R (eds) Event-related brain potentials: basic issues and applications. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford, pp 145–157 Hoffman JE (1990) Event-related potentials and automatic and controlled processes. In: Rohrbaugh JW, Parasuraman R, Johnson R (eds) Event-related brain potentials: basic issues and applications. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford, pp 145–157
go back to reference Jackson SR, Jackson GM, Roberts M (1999) The selection and suppression of action: ERP correlates of executive control in humans. Neuroreport 10:861–865PubMed Jackson SR, Jackson GM, Roberts M (1999) The selection and suppression of action: ERP correlates of executive control in humans. Neuroreport 10:861–865PubMed
go back to reference Jodo E, Kayama Y (1992) Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 82:477–482CrossRefPubMed Jodo E, Kayama Y (1992) Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 82:477–482CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kiefer M, Marzinzik F, Weisbrod M, Scherg M, Spitzer M (1998) The time course of brain activations during response inhibition: evidence from event-related potentials in a go/no go task. NeuroReport 9:765–770PubMed Kiefer M, Marzinzik F, Weisbrod M, Scherg M, Spitzer M (1998) The time course of brain activations during response inhibition: evidence from event-related potentials in a go/no go task. NeuroReport 9:765–770PubMed
go back to reference Larson GE, Alderton DL, Neideffer M, Underhill E (1997) Further evidence on dimensionality and correlates of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire. Brit J Psychol 88:29–38 Larson GE, Alderton DL, Neideffer M, Underhill E (1997) Further evidence on dimensionality and correlates of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire. Brit J Psychol 88:29–38
go back to reference Molholm S, Ritter W, Murray MM, Javitt DC, Schroeder CE, Foxe JJ (2002) Multisensory auditory—visual interactions during early sensory processing in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study. Cog Brain Res 14:115–128CrossRef Molholm S, Ritter W, Murray MM, Javitt DC, Schroeder CE, Foxe JJ (2002) Multisensory auditory—visual interactions during early sensory processing in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study. Cog Brain Res 14:115–128CrossRef
go back to reference Pfefferbaum A, Ford JM, Weller BJ, Kopell BS (1985) ERPs to response production and inhibition. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 60:423–34CrossRefPubMed Pfefferbaum A, Ford JM, Weller BJ, Kopell BS (1985) ERPs to response production and inhibition. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 60:423–34CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Porter N, Robertson IH (2002) The highs and lows of sustained attention: an ERPs study. Int J Psychophysiol 45:129 Porter N, Robertson IH (2002) The highs and lows of sustained attention: an ERPs study. Int J Psychophysiol 45:129
go back to reference Ravden D, Polich J (1998) Habituation of P300 from visual stimuli. Int J Psychophysiol 30:359–365CrossRefPubMed Ravden D, Polich J (1998) Habituation of P300 from visual stimuli. Int J Psychophysiol 30:359–365CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rieger M, Gauggel S (2002) Inhibition of ongoing responses in patients with traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia 40:76–85CrossRefPubMed Rieger M, Gauggel S (2002) Inhibition of ongoing responses in patients with traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia 40:76–85CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Roche RAP, O’Mara SM (2003) Behavioural and electrophysiological correlates of visuomotor learning in a visual search task. Cog Brain Res 15:127–136CrossRef Roche RAP, O’Mara SM (2003) Behavioural and electrophysiological correlates of visuomotor learning in a visual search task. Cog Brain Res 15:127–136CrossRef
go back to reference Simson R, Vaughan HG Jr, Ritter W (1977) The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual Go/NoGo tasks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 43:864–875CrossRefPubMed Simson R, Vaughan HG Jr, Ritter W (1977) The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual Go/NoGo tasks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 43:864–875CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Strik WK, Fallgatter AJ, Brandeis D, Pascual-Marqui RD (1998) Three-dimensional tomography of event-related potentials during response inhibition: evidence for phasic frontal lobe activation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 108:406–413CrossRefPubMed Strik WK, Fallgatter AJ, Brandeis D, Pascual-Marqui RD (1998) Three-dimensional tomography of event-related potentials during response inhibition: evidence for phasic frontal lobe activation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 108:406–413CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Van’t Ent (2002) Perceptual and motor contributions to performance and ERP components after incorrect motor activation in a flanker reaction task. Clin Neurophysiol 113:270–283CrossRefPubMed Van’t Ent (2002) Perceptual and motor contributions to performance and ERP components after incorrect motor activation in a flanker reaction task. Clin Neurophysiol 113:270–283CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Individual differences discriminate event-related potentials but not performance during response inhibition
Authors
Richard A. P. Roche
Hugh Garavan
John J. Foxe
Shane M. O’Mara
Publication date
01-01-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Experimental Brain Research / Issue 1/2005
Print ISSN: 0014-4819
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1106
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-1985-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2005

Experimental Brain Research 1/2005 Go to the issue